Labour asks Auditor General to consider cost burden in school lunches probe
Photo:
VNP / Phil Smith
Labour wants an inquiry by the Auditor General into the school lunch programme to go further, and has written to the watchdog requesting it consider things like the cost burden on schools.
The
Auditor-General's office announced plans
earlier this month for an inquiry into the school lunch programme that has drawn criticism since its revamp.
It will cover Ministry of Education planning, procurement and contract implementation under David Seymour's alternative model.
Seymour at the time welcomed the inquiry.
"I actually would like to offer [the Auditor-General] some of the lunches so he can audit them with his mouth, and I think what he's going to find is a programme that has overcome some initial hurdles to deliver great value, very good lunches at half the price of Labour's scheme," he said.
Minister David Seymour eating lunch at the launch of the revamped school lunch programme.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Labour's education spokesperson Willow-Jean Prime said the investigation should include whether providers are meeting agreed standards, the programme's value for money and how complaints are being managed and standards enforced.
She said she's heard from schools that have forked out hundreds of dollars without being reimbursed by the government.
"I'm hearing from schools that have had to fork out hundreds of dollars without any reimbursement because of David Seymour's botch-ups, and there are many cases of food waste as poor quality lunches go uneaten."
She said it's a struggle to get straight answers out of Erica Stanford and Seymour about why the programme has been "so chaotic" and what they're "actually doing to respond."
"We welcome the Auditor-General's inquiry into the ongoing issues with the programme and look forward to seeing these issues addressed," Prime said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
26 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Mediawatch: Media milking butter battle
Big money for butter - as seen on TV on 1News on Tuesday, reporting the bitter butter battle turning political. Photo: screenshot / TVNZ 1News "How much is a block of butter?" a reporter from Stuff asked as things wrapped up the prime minister's post-Cabinet media conference on Monday. The tension was palpable. This was a high-stakes moment. "About $8.40 in New Zealand at the moment," Christopher Luxon responded. Close enough, thankfully for Luxon. Woolworths' in-house salted butter is $8.50, and you can get 500g of Rolling Meadow at PaknSave for $8.29. The consequences for getting it wrong would undoubtedly have been dire. In case you've been living under a rock inside a cave on the planet Venus during a solar storm - while wearing a blindfold and noise-cancelling headphones - our entire nation and nearly all of its media organisations have been fixated on the price of 500g of pure concentrated uncut dairy. The price has risen nearly 50 percent in a year and that's caused quite a few conniptions back home on Earth. Stuff actually ran a story on Luxon getting the price of butter right. Meanwhile journalists accosted Fonterra boss Miles Hurrell out in the open with questions about the cost of his company's yellow gold. First he had to fend off TVNZ political editor Maiki Sherman , not once but twice, ahead of a heavily-promoted meeting with finance minister Nicola Willis at Parliament. Hurrell got away, only to encounter RNZ's political reporter Giles Dexter afterwards - and by then he was pretty fed up. "I'll talk to media in the morning," he replied tersely to Dexter's enquiries. (Two more days passed before he actually did). But the media's intense interest in that meeting was understandable. It had been billed as a kind of 'please explain' and the finance minister told RNZ's Checkpoint she would grill Hurrell on the price of butter. "Sometimes we're seeing cheaper prices in British or Australian supermarkets and I'm interested to understand how much of that is about the lack of supermarket competition here - and how much is about the prices that Fonterra is passing through," she said. But that tough talk got the goat of Newstalk ZB morning host Mike Hosking during his weekly interview with the prime minister on Monday. "No she's not," he responded, after Luxon said Willis was doing a good job on food prices. "She's off to Fonterra this week to meet who? Miles. And what's she going to talk to Miles about? She's going to talk about the price of butter. I can tell you why the price of butter is the price of butter, and I don't know why we have a finance minister who doesn't know. We get the international price for butter." "Nicola has this penchant for saying stuff that might lead you to believe she could produce an uzi out of a handbag and blitz the room," he said later in a two-minute-long Mike's Minute . The following morning Willis was keen to tell RNZ's First Up her meeting with Hurrell was just a regularly scheduled catch-up. But the Fonterra boss was pursued around Parliament and the streets of Wellington nevertheless. It didn't deter our media from delivering blanket coverage of the meeting and post-butter discussion analysis - and the price of butter more generally in news bulletins, commentary and explainers . The Herald 's Liam Dann implored the media to have a little bit of perspective in his weekly column in the Herald on Sunday last weekend. He said high butter prices are actually only costing many families about $4 a week and other price rises hit harder. He told Mediawatch we might be overreacting to the incredible cost of a spreadable product. "If you're going to get worked up about a food product in New Zealand, it's going to be dairy. There's a sort of cultural connection to dairy and this feeling that we produce so much of the stuff that it's not fair that it costs so much." Dann said high dairy prices were a net positive for the country's economy, with the current spike expected to bring in an additional $10 billion in export revenue over this year and next. Politicians - including former Fonterra employee Nicola Willis - were well aware of that. But he acknowledged those gains were less tangible and visceral than the sight of a $10 block of butter in the supermarket aisle. The high price of butter was also emblematic of the wider cost of living crisis, he said. "I'm certainly not downplaying the cost of living crisis... but if you actually do the maths and crunch how much discretionary income's coming or going based on your butter consumption, we're talking cents." "Perhaps it is just that we need something to focus on, to channel that anger around what's happening to the overall supermarket sector." Dann has pleaded with politicians to " raise the quality of debate " and focus on structural economic issues rather than the price of butter. But surely that goes for the media as well? Liam Dann didn't want to blame the media, but said the wider issue of New Zealand's low wage and under-productive economy was far more important and worthy of analysis than individual commodity prices. "How do we organise the system so we've actually got a thriving domestic economy, people are paid more and can afford to eat these products that we've grown up culturally seeing as our own?" Good question. For now though, the media is firmly focused on butter. The meeting between Hurrell and Willis, in particular, would have been a friendly one rather than the adversarial encounter some stories suggested. But that reporting was driven by the intoxicating allure of thousands of clicks. "We see that the butter story is what everybody's clicking on... and it becomes a topic that gets momentum. We start asking economists about the butter, and then that gets into people's heads," he said. "We get a sort of a media spiral going where it just becomes a bit of a phenomenon in its own right." That may not be as edifying as a discussion of the economic conditions behind our lagging wages, but it's certainly a lot more clickable. In the end, just like Fonterra, the media is a business too - and it also follows the money. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
35 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Bitter butter battle tops bulletins, Saudi sports cash
sport media 22 minutes ago A bitter battle over the price of butter led news bulletins this week, prompting a 'please explain' from the finance minister to Fonterra. But did the media miss the main point? Also: pundits say Sky TV taking over Three strengthens its on-screen sport play, but the cash Saudi Arabia's suddenly splashing could end up changing the picture.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
No penalty clauses paid on stalled Waiouru army base housing project
Waiouru military training camp Photo: Google Maps The Defence Force (NZDF) says it has not paid any penalty clauses associated with its housing project at Waiouru army base . Penalty clauses can be paid when contractors or subcontractors sign up to projects that do not then go ahead. The $50 million-plus project has stalled , though both defence and Ngāti Rangi iwi consider it urgent, and the force issued a tender over a year ago for 50 new homes. No building has taken place. The NZDF once again refused to tell RNZ why it was still in negotiations with the iwi over the housing. It had appeared the talks were settled before it issued last year's tender. "Negotiations in relation to this matter remain underway. Accordingly, this information is withheld in full... to enable negotiations to be carried out without prejudice or disadvantage," it said in a response to a request under the Offiicial Information Act. "The NZDF's relationship with local iwi has not changed and remains vital to our use of the Waiouru Military Training Area," it added. It also said no penalty clauses had been paid, either related to the new builds or the retrofit upgrade of existing army rental houses. Defence housing and other facilities were very rundown, interfering with its military performance and leading to some personnel quitting, its own reports showed. It had an Estate Investment Committee that "provides performance monitoring, oversight, and direction", according to its annual report. But when RNZ asked for the latest three performance management reports by the committee, NZDF replied: "No reports are generated by the New Zealand Defence Force's Estate Investment Committee." It repeated this in relation to its Technology Governance Committee, when RNZ asked for its latest reports, too. A lot of the NZDF's information technology was old and needed replacing, or were in the middle of years-long projects. Funding was set aside in Budget 2025 for this.
