Tesla mocks American Eagle with cheeky jeans joke after Sydney Sweeney ad controversy erupts
The carmaker, headed by Elon Musk, wrote: 'Our seats robot also has great jeans' in a tongue-in-cheek X post on Wednesday.
It was posted alongside a video of a robotic arm performing automated durability testing on its car seats.
Then, the company doubled down, writing 'Seatney' in a follow-up comment.
American Eagle has not responded to FOX Business request for comment.
It was a dig at the apparel company's 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' ad, which is described as 'a return to essential denim dressing and a celebration of what the beloved brand does best: making customers look and feel good in AE Jeans.'
In the ad, which went viral, the 27-year-old actress is seen walking toward an AE billboard featuring her with a tagline: 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Genes.' In the video, Sweeney crossed out 'Genes' and replaced it with 'Jeans' before walking away.
5 Sydney Sweeney poses in American Eagle jeans and denim jacket for her spot with American Eagle.
American Eagle
5 Tesla's robot and a car set in the car company's dig at Sydney Sweeney.
Tesla/X
However, a growing number of critics slammed the 'Europhia' star's jeans ad campaign, saying it promoted racist and 'regressive' themes despite the proceeds of the jeans going towards a mental health support hotline.
Some critics have claimed the tagline of Sweeney's ad is promoting 'eugenics movements.'
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) described eugenics 'as the use of selective breeding to improve the human race.'
5 In the ad, which went viral, the 27-year-old actress is seen walking toward an AE billboard.
American Eagle
Some people on social media have said the fact that Sweeney has blue eyes and blonde hair is rubbing them the wrong way.
'It sounds like a white purity dog whistle, and that's why people are uncomfortable,' one critic posted on X.
Seatney — Tesla (@Tesla) July 30, 2025
Others have pushed back on the criticism. Piers Morgan, in a tweet said, 'The Sydney Sweeney furor perfectly epitomizes why the woke left is so bonkers.
'They call everyone a Nazi or white supremacist, even when she's obviously neither, and they hate women celebrating beauty and sex appeal. It's why woke is dead — we all just laugh at their idiocy now.'
The company's stock dropped as the backlash persisted.
5 Some people on social media have said the fact that Sweeney has blue eyes and blonde hair is rubbing them the wrong way.
American Eagle
5 Some critics have claimed the tagline of Sweeney's ad is promoting 'eugenics movements.'
American Eagle
However, AE's website also noted that a butterfly motif on the back pocket of the jeans represents domestic violence awareness.
It's a cause that Sweeney supports.
'In support of the cause, 100% of the purchase price from 'The Sydney Jean' will be donated to Crisis Text Line, a nonprofit offering free, 24/7, confidential mental health support to anyone in need—just text 741741,' the site says.
Despite the jeans promoting a good cause, online critics were fixated on the ad's alleged white supremacist undertones.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Accused of Stiffing Small Businesses for Millions of Dollars, Causing Some to File for Bankruptcy
Tesla CEO Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, has allegedly been stiffing small businesses, causing some of them to file for bankruptcy. According to an investigation by CNN, contractors have filed liens — claims of possession of property until a debt is paid off — for more than $110 million against Tesla over the last five years. The company still owes dozens of businesses more than $24 million. Worst of all, many of these firms are mom-and-pop operations, making them extremely vulnerable when a contractor like Tesla simply doesn't pay up after they've already put their limited resources into a service. The investigation highlights how Musk's firms are systematically taking advantage of their contractors — a pattern, strikingly, that's very similar to the longstanding business practices of US president and former Musk ally Donald Trump. And it's not just Tesla — the billionaire's social media platform Twitter, since renamed X, also allegedly stopped paying rent on its offices in San Francisco, and failed to pay out annual bonuses. Its "extreme belt-tightening" required "nearly everyone to whom it owes money to sue," as attorney Ethan Jacobs wrote in a 2023 court filing. Musk also oversaw brutal cost-cutting efforts as the unofficial head of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency in DC, pulling out the rug beneath entire agencies in a complete disregard for social norms and the fate of regular people. It's become so common for Tesla not to pay up, even one of its lawyers admitted that Tesla takes "some time to pay," including legal bills, during a bankruptcy proceeding against the carmaker last year, as quoted by CNN. Tesla's construction of its enormous Gigafactory in Austin, in particular, has left countless broken promises and small businesses in distress in its wake. Many businesses CNN reached out to, which filed liens and lawsuits against Musk's companies, weren't willing to go on the record for fear of retaliation, pointing to his infamous wielding of non-disclosure contracts. Some firms said they were still hoping to be paid. Others have already written off the losses. Many of them pointed to the many ways Tesla tries to wriggle out of having to pay them through convoluted language in its contracts that often only lawyers can make sense of. All of those broken contracts and unpaid labor have understandably left a sour taste in the mouths of many small-time contractors and businesspeople. "[Musk's] goal is to run through everything now — he doesn't care what or who that impacts — to save the future of the world," one entrepreneur told CNN. "Tesla was probably one of the only companies we did business with where it just felt like they absolutely did not care about putting a company out of business." Musk's systematic unwillingness to pay the firms on which his empire is built has shocked legal experts. Jacobs told CNN that he was shocked that Musk was brazen enough to have "a practice of not paying people until they sue." "They were essentially saying that they just decided not to pay until they had to," he said, referring to former Twitter executives under Musk. "It's not the way I have generally seen people doing business." More on Elon Musk: Elon Musk Publicly Kicks His AI Employee's Legs Out From Under Him Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin vs Stocks: Which $15,000 Investment Would Make You a Billionaire?
Imagine it's mid-2010, and you have $15,000 to invest. You're considering a new digital currency called bitcoin, trading at just 10 cents per coin, or putting your money into promising stocks like Nvidia, Tesla or Netflix. Read More: Discover Next: I asked ChatGPT to run the numbers on what might be the most expensive investment decision in modern history. The artificial intelligence's analysis reveals just how dramatically different asset classes can perform (and why timing really is everything when it comes to investing). The $15,000 Investment Scenario: Mid-2010 To make this comparison fair, ChatGPT set the investment date at mid-2010, when both bitcoin and several now-famous stocks were available. This timing is important because it represents a moment when ordinary investors could realistically have made any of these choices. The AI selected five investments that seemed promising in 2010: Bitcoin, trading at around $0.10 per coin Nvidia stock at about $2.50 (split-adjusted) Tesla, which had just gone public at $1.17 (split-adjusted) Broadcom at approximately $7.30 (adjusted for splits and mergers) Netflix at around $8.80 (adjusted for splits) Each represents $15,000 invested at that moment in time. Here's what ChatGPT discovered about where that money would be today. Find Out: Bitcoin: The $17.7 Billion Winner According to ChatGPT's calculations, bitcoin's results are nearly unbelievable. At $0.10 per bitcoin in mid-2010, your $15,000 would have purchased 150,000 coins. With bitcoin trading at approximately $117,700 today, those 150,000 coins would be worth $17.655 billion. 'Yes, this investment would have made you a multibillionaire,' ChatGPT confirmed, adding that bitcoin is the only asset in this comparison that achieved billionaire status. This represents a return of over 1,000,000% — turning every dollar invested into more than $1 million. Nvidia: The Stock Market's Best Performer Still Falls Short Nvidia has been the poster child for stock market success in recent years, especially with the AI boom. ChatGPT's analysis shows it was indeed the best-performing stock in our comparison. Your $15,000 would have bought 6,000 shares at $2.50 each in 2010. With Nvidia currently trading around $175.50, those shares would be worth $1.053 million today. 'Even accounting for stock splits and exact timing, Nvidia grows to around $5-6.7 million at best,' ChatGPT wrote, acknowledging that different timing within 2010 could have yielded slightly better results. Still, even the most optimistic Nvidia scenario falls dramatically short of billionaire status. Tesla: From IPO to Millions, Not Billions Tesla's initial public offering in June 2010 created early investor opportunities that ChatGPT calculated would have been impressive — just not billionaire-level impressive. At Tesla's split-adjusted IPO price of $1.17, your $15,000 would have purchased approximately 12,820 shares. With Tesla trading around $328 today, that position would be worth about $4.2 million. 'Best estimates suggest Tesla would yield around $3.6-4.2 million on $15,000,' ChatGPT concluded, noting that Tesla's volatility could have affected results depending on exact purchase timing. Netflix: The Streaming Pioneer's Solid but Not Spectacular Returns Netflix represented the streaming revolution that was just beginning in 2010. ChatGPT's analysis shows it would have been a good investment — but nowhere near life-changing money. Your $15,000 would have bought roughly 1,705 shares at $8.80 each. With Netflix currently around $1,176 per share, those shares would be worth approximately $2 million today. 'Best case scenario: around $1.3-2 million,' ChatGPT estimated, accounting for Netflix's various ups and downs over the past 15 years. Not chump change, but not billions. Broadcom: The Forgotten Semiconductor Play Broadcom, while less famous than Nvidia, was another semiconductor stock available in 2010. ChatGPT calculated it would have been the worst performer in this group. At $7.30 per share, your $15,000 would have purchased about 2,055 shares. With Broadcom trading around $293.36 today, that investment would be worth roughly $603,000. 'Realistic return: around $1.7 million max (including reinvestment/dividends),' ChatGPT wrote, suggesting that dividend reinvestment could have improved results somewhat. The Reality Check: Why Almost Nobody Became a Bitcoin Billionaire While ChatGPT confirmed that bitcoin was the only path to billionaire status, the AI also provided crucial context about why so few people actually achieved these returns. 'Bitcoin's rise was incredibly volatile, and few investors held on through multiple 80%+ crashes,' ChatGPT warned. 'Stocks, while slower, offered more stable growth.' The psychological challenge of holding bitcoin through its numerous boom-bust cycles cannot be overstated. Bitcoin crashed over 80% at least three times during this 15-year period. Most investors who bought at $0.10 probably sold long before bitcoin reached $117,700. What This Means for Today's Investors ChatGPT's analysis reveals several important lessons for modern investors: Hindsight is not an investment strategy: While bitcoin clearly won this historical comparison, trying to find the 'next bitcoin' is essentially gambling, not investing. Diversification matters: Even the best-performing traditional stocks 'only' returned millions rather than billions. But millions in returns from a $15,000 investment represents life-changing money for most people. Volatility is the price of potential: bitcoin's path to billions involved gut-wrenching volatility that would have tested any investor's resolve. Traditional investments still work: While stocks didn't create billionaires, turning $15,000 into several million dollars over 15 years represents excellent investment performance by any reasonable standard. The Broader Investment Implications ChatGPT's comparison illustrates why investment advisors typically recommend diversified portfolios rather than betting everything on single assets, even promising ones. Let's break it down. If you had split your $15,000 five ways in 2010, putting $3,000 into each investment, you'd have: $3.531 billion from Bitcoin $200,000-1.3 million from Nvidia $720,000-840,000 from Tesla $120,000-340,000 from Broadcom $260,000-400,000 from Netflix Even with 80% of your portfolio in stocks that 'underperformed,' you'd still be a billionaire thanks to that small bitcoin allocation. It (quite literally) pays to diversify. Why Timing Really Is Everything ChatGPT's analysis used mid-2010 as the investment date, but small timing differences could have dramatically affected results. Bitcoin was virtually worthless in early 2010 but had already begun rising by year-end. Similarly, Tesla's IPO timing, Nvidia's various product cycles and Netflix's streaming transition all created windows where earlier or later investments could have yielded different results. The Bottom Line on Billionaire-Making Investments According to ChatGPT's analysis, if your goal was becoming a billionaire from a $15,000 investment in 2010, bitcoin was the only known path to that outcome. Even the decade's best-performing stocks delivered 'only' multi-million dollar returns. But the AI's analysis also reveals why chasing these extreme outcomes is probably the wrong approach for most investors. The stocks in this comparison all delivered life-changing returns while offering more stability and predictability than bitcoin's wild ride. As ChatGPT wrote, bitcoin's success required not just picking the right asset, but having the psychological fortitude to hold through multiple crashes that would have tested any investor's resolve. For today's investors, the lesson isn't to search for the next bitcoin — it's to build diversified portfolios that can capture strong returns while managing the very real risks that come with chasing billionaire-level gains. Not as fun as making millions — or billions — but a worthy goal, nonetheless. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 10 Used Cars That Will Last Longer Than the Average New Vehicle 10 Cars That Outlast the Average Vehicle This article originally appeared on Bitcoin vs Stocks: Which $15,000 Investment Would Make You a Billionaire? Sign in to access your portfolio
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
BMW CEO: iX3 Electric SUV Will Be Industry ‘Benchmark'
BMW Chief Executive Officer Oliver Zipse discusses the new all-eclectic SUV called the iX3. "This will be the benchmark of the industry," he tells Bloomberg's Tom Mackenzie. The sport utility vehicle will be the first of 40 new or updated models that share software, high-performance computers and different design cues. Zipse also comments on how much market share he expects the automaker to take from competitors such as Tesla. (Source: Bloomberg)
