Birmingham bin drivers offered voluntary redundancy 'in attempt to break strike'
"They are rushing it through"
Despite talks to resolve the situation, no deal has yet been struck.Unite has since claimed that Government commissioners are "blocking" a deal from being made to end the dispute.One grade-four city driver said "Emails have been going out (within the last week) with figures."They (the council) are trying to break the strike that way by offering the VR."They are rushing it through. I just think they are trying to reduce the numbers on the picket lines."Some of these workers are long term. Some might take it (if they are near retirement), but it all depends on individual circumstances."
A City Council spokesperson said "Voluntary redundancy options have been offered to workers as part of service redesigns across the council throughout the last year."A large number of expressions of interest in voluntary redundancy have been received from within the waste service, and we are following our usual processes in progressing those expressions of interest to offers over the coming weeks.'
"The offer of redundancies is not a resolution" A Unite spokesperson said 'The Council need to prioritise the resolution of the current dispute."The offer of redundancies is not a resolution. If there is a genuine redundancy situation, it would always make sense to release the agency workers first."This would be a normal process, especially as there are significant agency numbers engaged."Any redundancy proposals must be wrapped in with a proposal from the Council to resolve the dispute, as was agreed at ACAS.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Croydon Council is not failing despite finances, says mayor
Croydon's mayor has insisted that the council is "not failing" as the prospect of a possible government takeover Perry, the south London borough's executive mayor, has vowed to oppose commissioners imposing tax hikes or service cuts, a stance critics say is undermined by his own row follows a government announcement last month that it was "minded to" send in commissioners to take control of the financially troubled government minister Jim McMahon warned that without a shift in direction, Croydon risked sliding into a deeper crisis with "no clear way out". In a video released shortly after the announcement, Perry pushed back against the proposal, stating: "The government should be helping us, not hindering us by heaping more pain on our borough."Tensions came to a head at an "extraordinary council meeting" on Wednesday, brought forward by Labour councillors in response to the looming the mayor's defiant stance won some support, many councillors expressed concern that his tone risked damaging the south London council's chances of negotiating a favourable outcome. Labour opposition leader Stuart King said he understood Perry's frustration, but criticised the combative response."Launching a full-throttle political attack on the government doesn't make it more likely we'll secure the deal we need," he said."Your reaction was ill-considered and has harmed, rather than helped, Croydon's prospects."New figures released this week show the council overspent its budget by £30m last year, requiring £136m in exceptional financial support to stay council is also burdened with £1.6bn in legacy debt, costing £70m annually to service. This debt appears to have risen by £0.2bn in the past has been under the government's Improvement and Assurance Panel (IAP) review since it issued a Section 114 bankruptcy notice in IAP was intended to provide oversight and challenge, but McMahon's recent report described a "lack of urgency" during the intervention and warned that the council was approaching a fresh financial report also called Croydon's ongoing reliance on emergency funding, now totalling £553m since 2021, as McMahon promised a "short, sharp reset", no specific details have been shared on what powers commissioners might hold or how direct their involvement would be. Despite his earlier video, the mayor later struck a more conciliatory tone during the sweltering hot council to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) after the meeting, he said he would be willing to work with commissioners, but added: "If we get to a position where they say council tax needs to go above the cap or that services need to be salami sliced, I will oppose those decisions."While there was broad agreement on the decision to work with future commissioners, opposition councillors were quick to remind the mayor that he had raised council tax to its highest ever level and brought forward cuts to services like libraries and youth engagement under his Conservative-led council says it has generated over £230m in capital receipts, including £130m from asset sales, with another £68m in sales planned this despite what Perry has called "difficult decisions", the council's budgetary shortfall continues to grow. 'Blinkered denial' Many councillors now believe only a full government bailout can break Croydon's debt cycle, though such a move would be said he holds regular meetings with government ministers, during which the need for a bailout is often Rowenna Davis, Labour's candidate for mayor, said: "To deny the need for commissioners is a blinkered denial of the financial danger we face three years into your leadership."She adding that Perry's attacks on the intervention were "insulting" to those trying to Council has officially opposed the commissioner proposal in the ongoing consultation, with several local charities also submitting consultation closes on 20 July, and further details on the government's next steps are expected later this year.
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Heath battery farm plan recommended for approval
Plans to build a battery energy storage system (BESS) close to a West Yorkshire village have been recommended for approval by council planning officers. A report said the scheme for land near Heath in Wakefield was acceptable despite more than 1,200 objections and criticism from councillors and said the development, which would see 72 containers storing lithium ion batteries installed on farmland, could pose a fire risk to residents and harm the local conservation area. However, applicant Harmony Energy said the project would contribute to net zero targets and that there were at least 130 similar sites operating safely in the UK. A spokesperson for the company said no properties within the village of Heath would be able to see the seven-hectare site and that its cultural heritage assessment had been "robust".BESS facilities take in power from renewable energy sources and then release it back to the National Grid when demand is planning application for the site was submitted in 2022 and a council report outlines reasons for the three-year delay in a decision on the scheme, which include changes to national planning policy and the area's Local officers said the site was previously designated green belt but had been reclassified as grey said there was "considered to be no technical reasons to withhold planning permission" and have recommended the scheme be approved at a meeting on 17 July, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. A total of 130 comments in support of the proposal have been received by Wakefield a spokesperson for the I Love Heath Common campaign group previously said: "Harmony Energy is showing a blatant disregard for local feeling."There is nothing renewable about a battery storage facility. It is a standalone industrial development."They added: "Its sole purpose is as a business opportunity, and it is certainly not a source of renewable energy."Campaigners said two historical buildings – the Grade II-listed Dame Mary Bolles Water Tower and the Whittling Well – are situated less than 100m from the proposed BESS Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Authority (WYFRA) also previously said the risks were "very real and are becoming more common".But Harmony Energy argued: "Schemes would not be financeable or insurable if they were deemed to be a significant risk."The company lodged an appeal with the Planning Inspectorate following the three-year delay in determining the application.A four-day public inquiry is expected to be held over the matter at a date yet to be confirmed. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Councils are for emptying bins – ban them from playing monopoly with our money
Poor, late and incomplete reporting. A culture of denial, a bias of optimism and a limited understanding of finance. These are the damning descriptions of council officials in charge of investing the hard-earned money of thousands of taxpayers in Spelthorne. A review commissioned by the Government uncovered a 'prevailing sense of insularity' in the Surrey borough, where the mountain of debt stands at more than £10,000 per resident. To put it simply, the council is a gargantuan failure. Its shambles – which have now sparked government intervention – are symbolic of problems across the UK. Too often, egotistical council officials believing they are the next Elon Musk attempt to flex their feeble muscles in the property market only to fall flat on their faces. With no risk to their personal finances, officials can blow holes in public funds with no accountability while residents are punished with increased tax bills and reduced services. It begs the question as to whether local authorities should possess the 'general competence' powers bestowed upon them in 2012. They give councils the remit to do anything an individual can do, paving the way for a scourge of risky investments. Many local leaders will say they've had little space to come up with creative money-making ventures due to continual funding cuts from central government. Yet the gung-ho decision-making is incredibly damaging. The prime example is Thurrock, where the council ignored what Essex County Council called 'multiple red flags' and poured £665m of taxpayers' money into alleged sham solar farm investments. A Serious Fraud Office investigation into the deals is ongoing. Thurrock was left with debts of £1.5bn at the time of its bankruptcy, and saddled residents with a 23pc tax rate increase in the past three years. This is what happens when councils – which people simply want to empty bins, repair roads and clean the streets – are given free reign to act like big shot financiers. It very rarely works. In 2020, the Commons Public Accounts Committee found risky council investments in commercial property had ballooned 14-fold in just three years. In total, 91pc of the £6.6bn spend was financed through borrowing. The Tory government was accused of being blind to the shenanigans occurring on its 'sleepy watch'. Councils took on large debts to invest in new sources of income, such as offices and shopping centres. The latter was a mind-boggling trend considering the death of the high street and rise of internet shopping. The pandemic hit, interest rates soared, commercial property values slumped and councils were left scrambling to pick up the pieces. Spelthorne borrowed £1.1bn against annual core spending power of £11m. That's like a mortgage-holder somehow managing to borrow 100 times their income. An inspection report released in March said 'inherent risks are beginning to materialise and could accelerate rapidly'. Such recklessness wouldn't happen in the real world, yet councils can play monopoly with public money. And it's not just risky investments in existing property. Councils also believe they can become developers. Blowing millions on building a leisure complex which then fails to attract commercial tenants or visitors due to expensive parking is all too common. The usual spiel of 'we'll regenerate this area into a thriving community hub' generally results in a very costly white elephant. Look at Brighton's i360, Woking's cluster of skyscrapers (a failed Singapore) and Crewe's £11m car park used by 80 cars a day. The list is endless. Last week, we analysed West Norfolk Council's embarrassing failure to sell a single flat at its new seafront complex in Hunstanton. As well as reportedly going £2m over its £7m budget, the council enforced a ban on selling any of its 32 flats to second home owners in an effort to prioritise locals. But 19 months after hitting the market, the council reversed the second homes restriction after facing the impending threat of its own empty homes premium triggering a self-inflicted £100,000 tax bill. You couldn't make it up. Local government has well and truly become the byword for incompetence.
