Government's new health strategy ‘no more than hiding the crisps', Tories say
Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately said setting mandatory targets for supermarkets was 'nanny state'.
'They had 14 years in opposition to think about what they wanted to do about the NHS, they've had a year in government, and the number one thing in it seems to be hide the crisps,' she told Sky News' Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips.
Mr Streeting said the Government wants to 'nudge people in the right direction' (Lucy North/PA)
'It's obviously the nanny state, but it's also not what people want for the NHS.
'People want to hear how they're going to get to see their GP.
'Telling people what to buy, I think, is not up to government. I believe in personal responsibility.'
Health Secretary Wes Streeting told the same programme the Government will work with supermarkets to help 'nudge people in the right direction'.
'By taking the approach we're taking with supermarkets, they will decide through the combination of where they put their products, how they do price promotions, the reformulation, what products they choose to put on the shelves,' he said.
'They will work with us to make sure that we nudge people in the right direction without any of us even noticing, in the same way that we've nudged the country in the other direction since the 1990s.'
Rejecting suggestions that the idea was too controlling, he said it was different to 'traditional nanny statism, where we regulate more heavily on price, on marketing, on what's sold'.
Labour's 10-year health plan is set to be published next week.
Other changes could include money for hospitals being linked to patient ratings.
According to the Times, part of the proposals will see patients contacted a few weeks after their hospital treatment for feedback.
Based on their responses, money could be diverted to a local 'improvement fund'.
Another proposal could see NHS users awarded points for upping their step count and eating healthily.
Points can then be traded for vouchers, with discounts at supermarkets and coffee shops, according to The Sun.
Hundreds of bodies responsible for overseeing and running parts of the NHS in England are likely to be scrapped as part of the changes.
Mr Streeting has said the current system is too complex and needs reform.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
12 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cervical cancer survivor concerned over screening changes
A woman who survived cervical cancer says she is concerned about changes to cervical screening that come into effect today. Cervical screening tests are currently offered to 25-to-49-year-olds every three years. That is now being extended to five-year intervals. The time between tests for those aged 50 to 64 is already five years. The NHS said research had shown screening every five years was as safe as every three years, and it wanted to spare people appointments they did not need. However, Crystal Manuel from Chandler's Ford, Hampshire, is worried it might impact on early detection of the disease. Mrs Manuel, a 42-year-old mother of two, was diagnosed in 2021. Although her previous screening test was clear, she developed symptoms between tests. An initial examination did not find anything but when her symptoms persisted, she pressed for a follow-up appointment. She was immediately referred for a biopsy, which confirmed she had cervical cancer. Mrs Manuel's mother died after she was diagnosed with cancer of the uterus. "When I first got that diagnosis I was really worried, I was really scared because I thought of my mum and I thought of how she passed away three months after her diagnosis," she said. "And the first thing that came into my mind was 'my children are too young not to have a mother and I have to fight this'… fortunately due to early detection I wasn't at such a higher stage as my mum was."Mrs Manuel underwent treatment including a hysterectomy, intensive radiotherapy and chemotherapy. It was successful - and four years on she is cancer free. She believes her persistence in pushing to have her symptoms investigated meant the cancer was caught early. However, she is worried that extending the time between screening tests could mean some people are left undiagnosed for longer."Personally I think five years is a long time... leaving it another 2 years, I think it's too long and I think it prevents early detection, which I know is crucial." The NHS said the changes were based on research showing the five-year interval was just as safe as a three-year interval. The screening test checks for the presence of the human papillomavirus or HPV. Some types of HPV can cause changes in the cervix that can develop into cancer. Nearly all cases of cervical cancer are linked to high risk HPV. The five-year interval only applies to those who test negative for HPV while those who test positive will be subject to follow up checks. Dr Charlotte Hutchings is a GP in Bramley in Hampshire and also a clinical director at NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight. 'Never a 100% guarantee' She said the change should not impact on early detection because those at highest risk would be tested more frequently."Because the test is checking for HPV, if you have that test and it's negative we know the chances of you developing cancer within the next 10 years are very, very low," she said. "If the test is positive, that puts you in a higher risk group and that's when we look at the cells to see if there are any abnormal cells and if there are you'll get treatment at a hospital very quickly. "If the cells are normal but you do have the HPV positive test... we'll be checking you even more regularly and you'll get a repeat every year until the body clears it."However, despite the screening, and the introduction in 2008 of vaccinations against HPV for school age girls, which was extended to boys in 2019, Dr Hutchings said being aware of symptoms was still vital. "It's never a 100% guarantee so even if you've had your vaccination it's still really important to come through for your screening because there are some people who won't respond to the vaccination," she said. "And, likewise, even if you've had your screening and your vaccination, if you have symptoms of pain or discharge or bleeding, particularly in between your periods at abnormal times, it's really important to get checked out at your surgery." You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Reading's urgent care centre moved to Royal Berkshire Hospital
An urgent care centre is set to open at Reading's Royal Berkshire Hospital, moving from a location in the town facility will not be a walk-in and patients should phone 101 or use to get advice from medical professionals as to whether they should previous facility in Broad Street Mall allowed people with an urgent but not life-threatening condition to get treatment with no booking, but patients could also pre-book had been hoped that it would cut the number of people turning up at the hospital for treatment but it did not have the desired effect. Figures collected in the first year of the service showed that even when more people turned up at the centre looking for help, they were matched by similar rises at the Broad Street Health Centre, which is also in the Broad Street Mall, will still be open for registered patients. You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, and X.
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
'We need more support for early-onset Alzheimer's', says Kent woman
A woman living with early-onset Alzheimer's disease says more needs to be done for people in her Wallis, 62, was diagnosed a year ago and said there was a lack of support and appropriate treatment for younger people receiving a said she had been to an Alzheimer's support group near her home in Sheerness, Kent, but was told it might not be suitable, as most people there were "in their eighties".Ms Wallis, who received the diagnosis after being offered a dementia test by her GP, said: "You feel absolutely stupid, basically, and it's quite upsetting. "You walk away and you think 'oh my goodness, what's going on now?' Because I didn't think about Alzheimer's at all."It was recently announced that two breakthrough Alzheimer's drugs capable of slowing down the disease were too expensive to become available on the Wallis said the news annoyed her, adding, "I think that the government should start helping these people." The NHS says early- or young-onset Alzheimer's disease impacts around one in every 13 people under the age of disease is most common in people over the age of 65 with the risk of Alzheimer's and other types of dementia increasing with affects an estimated one in 14 people over the age of 65 and one in every six people over the age of 80. If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this story, support and advice is available via BBC Action Line. Dr Martyna Matuszyk, research communications officer at Alzheimer's Society, said: "It can be difficult for people to hear this diagnosis, early symptoms may not always be obvious."But she said an early diagnosis was "really important to get all the support that a person might need". Looking to the future Ms Wallis added: "I'm a little bit nervous, I must say I'm not frightened because there's no point in being frightened. "You can only take one day as it comes. Tomorrow is another day."
