Federal judge halts Trump's order to end collective bargaining rights for many federal workers
Judge James Donato of the US District Court in San Francisco granted the preliminary injunction requested by a coalition of unions whose members would be stripped of their collective bargaining rights under Trump's executive order. However, Donato's decision clashes with a May ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, which lifted a different judge's block on Trump's order pertaining to another union's members.
Donato, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, said the unions that brought the case before him had 'demonstrated a serious question as to whether their First Amendment rights have been violated.' The judge said he was blocking the executive order pending a trial over the order's constitutionality.
'Plaintiffs have raised serious questions under the First Amendment that warrant further litigation,' he wrote, adding that the unions have shown they would face 'a strong likelihood of irreparable harm from the loss of their collective bargaining and allied rights.'
The Trump administration has the option of appealing Donato's ruling to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals.
At issue is Trump's unprecedented executive order from March that seeks to abolish multiple agencies' union contracts in the name of national security. It would apply to departments including State, Veterans Affairs and Justice, as well as smaller agencies such as the National Science Foundation and Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The order is aimed at stopping federal unions who have 'declared war on President Trump's agenda,' according to a White House fact sheet. It claimed the American Federation of Government Employees, the largest federal workers' union, has filed many grievances to 'block Trump policies.'
The unions, led by AFGE, argue that Trump's actions are retaliation and violate the right to engage in constitutionally protected speech. Also, the suit alleges the administration is attempting to apply the national security exemption to eliminate the rights of workers whose primary duties are not related to national security.
Donato said in his 29-page ruling that the White House fact sheet was 'solid evidence of a tie between the exercise of First Amendment rights and a government sanction.'
'The Fact Sheet called out federal unions for vocal opposition to President Trump's agenda. It condemned unions who criticized the President and expressed support only for unions who toed the line. It mandated the dissolution of long-standing collective bargaining rights and other workplace protections for federal unions deemed oppositional to the President,' he wrote.
Also, while Donato wrote he would not second guess the president's national security determinations, 'a claim of national security does not, of course, automatically negate the Constitution, particularly with respect to the First Amendment.'
The ruling by Donato follows a defeat for federal workers in a separate lawsuit filed by the National Treasury Employees Union, which argued that Trump's directive would strip union rights from about two-thirds of its members and deprive it of critical union dues that are deducted from members' paychecks.
The 2-1 order from the DC Circuit last month said that the NTEU had not shown that it would be irreparably harmed without a court order blocking the executive order. The panel's majority — made up of a President George H.W. Bush appointee and a Trump appointee — said the harms alleged by the union were 'speculative,' in part, because the Trump administration had directed agencies not to terminate collective bargaining agreements before litigation over the order concluded.
A President Joe Biden appointee who dissented from the appellate decision said that self-imposed restriction showed the Trump administration would not be harmed if the preliminary injunction issued by the district judge was left in place.
CNN's Tierney Sneed contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
25 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge blocks order barring asylum access at border, gives administration two weeks to appeal
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge said Wednesday that an order by Donald Trump suspending asylum access at the southern border was unlawful, throwing into doubt one of the key pillars of the president's plan to crack down on migration at the southern border. But he put the ruling on hold for two weeks to give the government time to appeal. In an order Jan. 20, Trump declared that the situation at the southern border constitutes an invasion of America and that he was 'suspending the physical entry' of migrants and their ability to seek asylum until he decides it is over. U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss said his order blocking Trump's policy will take effect July 16, giving the Trump administration time to appeal. Moss wrote that neither the Constitution nor immigration law gives the president 'an extra-statutory, extra-regulatory regime for repatriating or removing individuals from the United States, without an opportunity to apply for asylum' or other humanitarian protections.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News Joins MAGA Hissy Fit Over Zelensky's ‘Suit'
Volodymyr Zelensky's wardrobe continues to generate MAGA theatrics. Ukraine's wartime president has shunned suits since Russia invaded his country in 2022, opting instead for military-style fatigues as a symbol of solidarity with his troops. That seemed to irritate President Donald Trump enough that he made a comment about it when his Ukrainian counterpart visited the Oval Office in February. At the NATO summit on Tuesday, Zelensky was spotted in a slightly more formal getup, but stopped short of wearing a traditional suit. His all-black outfit included a button-up shirt, a jacket with a subtle military cut, trousers, and utilitarian sneaker-style shoes. He dressed the same way when meeting with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday. He also dressed similarly at last month's G7 summit. According to Fox News' Peter Doocy, who reported live from the Netherlands in the early hours of Wednesday local time, Zelensky's outfit qualified as a suit this time. 'If President Trump winds up seeing Zelensky tonight at the leader's dinner, he might not recognize him, because the Ukrainian leader has ditched the sweatshirt that he wore for that infamous Oval Office meeting earlier this year,' Doocy said. 'Mr. Zelensky has been spotted here in the Netherlands... wearing a suit,' he added Doocy wasn't alone in noticing Zelensky's new threads. 'LOL! Zelensky actually wore a SUIT this time,' right-wing podcaster Nick Sortor wrote on X. 'He wasn't about to make that mistake again after the Oval Office visit,' he added. 'Especially now that he's running low on cash.' Other right-wing social media figures piled on, making crude remarks and suggesting it was an attempt to impress Trump and obtain more foreign aid. 'Zelensky seeks $40bn a year in aid. He sure learned his lesson from the last time he begged for money,' conservative pundit Steve Gruber posted. Zelensky was wearing a black sweater when he met with Trump earlier this year in a meeting that devolved into a shouting match. 'Oh, you're all dressed up today,' Trump said to Zelensky when he first greeted him. Zelensky's attire has long triggered pearl-clutching in MAGA world, where the Ukrainian president is viewed with suspicion. Many on the far right resent the billions in U.S. aid sent to Ukraine to defend itself against Russia. During the fraught Oval Office meeting, conservative reporter Brian Glenn, who also happens to be the boyfriend of Marjorie Taylor Greene, scolded Zelensky. 'You're at the highest level in this country's office and you refuse to wear a suit,' said Glenn. 'Just want to see, do you own a suit? A lot of Americans have problems with you disrespecting this office.' 'I will wear a costume after this war will finish,' Zelensky replied. 'Maybe something like yours, maybe something better, we will see, maybe something cheaper.' Glenn wrote on X Tuesday: 'As the unofficial Director of Wardrobe at the White House, I personally approve President Zelenskyy's attire at the NATO summit.'
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Kills Key Weapons Shipments to Ukraine as Putin Unleashes Hell
Kyiv has been left scrambling after the Pentagon made the sudden decision to stop supplying air defenses to Ukraine, citing concerns over U.S. stockpiles. The Ukrainian government has been left blindsided by the move, a source told The Washington Post, with the country's Foreign Ministry urgently summoning the U.S. ambassador to 'check with the Americans what's really happening.' Crucial air defense systems are among the munitions being withdrawn from Ukraine, with the Kyiv Independent reporting that Patriot missiles, precision artillery rounds, Hellfire missiles, drones, and other missiles used by F-16 fighter jets are under threat. The decision to halt some shipments to Ukraine was driven by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, according to Politico, after a Defense Department review of U.S. munitions stockpiles. In a statement confirming the news, White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly told Politico the decision 'was made to put America's interests first following a DOD review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe.' 'The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned — just ask Iran,' Kelly added. Russia has drastically increased its aerial attacks on Ukraine, battering the country with an ever-increasing number of missile and drone attacks. June saw 5,337 exploding Shahed drones unleashed upon Ukraine, smashing the previous record of 4,198 in March, according to the Ukrainian Air Force and Dragon Capital. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has welcomed the suspension of arms shipments to Ukraine, stating on Wednesday that 'the less weapons are supplied to Ukraine the closer the end of the special military operation,' using Russian President Vladimir Putin's euphemism for his war on Ukraine. President Trump has yet to approve any additional arms packages to Ukraine since his inauguration in January, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth indicating in June that the U.S. plans to scale down its funding allocation to Kyiv during the next spending review. Nevertheless, Trump indicated at a NATO summit last month that he would 'see' if the U.S. could supply Ukraine with additional munitions for its Patriot missile defense systems. 'They do want to have the anti-missiles, as they call them, the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available,' Trump said following a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. 'They are very hard to get. We need them too,' he added. 'We are supplying them for Israel, and they are very effective. According to Politico, plans to redirect shipments back towards Israel or the U.S. homeland have been in place since at least March, as the Trump administration has repeatedly stated it wants to bring an end to the conflict by negotiating a peace treaty, which critics claim is overly favorable to Russia. Ukraine's Foreign Ministry said in a statement following the news that 'any delay or slowing down in supporting Ukraine's defense capabilities would only encourage the aggressor to continue war and terror, rather than seek peace.' The Daily Beast has contacted the Department of Defense for further comment.
