
Democrats stoke the flames of MAGA world's Epstein saga: From the Politics Desk
In today's edition, Ben Kamisar explores how Democrats have changed their tune on the Jeffrey Epstein files as they try to exploit a divide between President Donald Trump and his base. Plus, Alexandra Marquez and Alex Tabet preview tomorrow's special House primary in Arizona, which is serving as a test for young progressives.
— Adam Wollner
Democrats stoke the flames of MAGA world's Epstein saga
Democrats are echoing criticism from the right of how President Donald Trump and his administration have handled case files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
It's a stark reversal for a party that swiftly condemned Trump's unfounded claims about the investigation into the financier and his death nearly six years ago.
Democrats have now spent days poking the bear after an administration memo knocked down conspiracy theories related to Epstein's past activities and his suicide in 2019. Democratic lawmakers are demanding that the Trump administration release more documents related to the investigation into Epstein, accusing the president and his allies of either a cover-up or a cynical ploy to exploit conspiracy theories about Epstein for political gain.
And Democratic candidates and committees have been fanning the flames as some of Trump's most prominent right-wing supporters threaten a revolt over the issue.
With MAGA world seething, key members of his administration at odds and Trump himself on the defense, Democrats are embracing the raw politics of the situation, despite their previous scolding.
On social media: The DNC launched a new account on X that posts daily messages reminding its followers that Trump has 'not released the Epstein files.' The account has also reposted Trump-focused, Epstein-related criticism from key social media influencers.
On Capitol Hill: Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas, announced he would introduce a resolution 'demanding the Trump administration release all files related to the Epstein case.'
On the campaign trail: Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., who is running for re-election in a state that went red in last year's presidential election, criticized Trump on the issue while invoking the sexual misconduct and abuse allegations against the president and his past social relationship with Epstein. (Trump has denied allegations of sexual misconduct and has denied any impropriety related to Epstein's crimes.)
The Democratic Party's fight over generational change flares in Arizona
By Alexandra Marquez and Alex Tabet
It's hot election summer — at least according to Democrats who are organizing behind youthful and progressive candidates in a series of off-year primaries.
First was Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old state legislator who won New York's Democratic mayoral primary over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo. (More on that race below.) Now, a special election for a vacant congressional seat in southern Arizona is grabbing attention in part because of a young Democrat's campaign.
After Rep. Raúl Grijalva died in March at 77, Deja Foxx, 25, is gaining ground ahead of Tuesday's special Democratic primary in Arizona's 7th District, running on a message of generational change and hoping to leverage support from her almost 400,000 TikTok followers and 240,000 Instagram followers. But she doesn't have a clear path against former Pima County Supervisor Adelita Grijalva, the late congressman's daughter and former state Rep. Daniel Hernandez.
Grijalva, 54, with endorsements from Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., doesn't give Foxx the same ideological opening that Mamdani exploited in New York. Not only did Grijalva's father serve the district in Congress for over 20 years, but Hernandez also has siblings who serve in the state House.
Still, the race has become part of a broader nationwide conversation among Democrats about the ages of their party's elected leaders and the desire for generational change.
In a recent interview, Foxx acknowledged that her age has played a role in her campaign messaging and the support she has drawn from young people across the country.
'We have lost ground with young people as a party for the first time in decades ... and it's not enough to just put our members of Congress on TikTok, right, or brief them on the trends or put mini-mics in their face. We need to give young people real leadership,' Foxx said.
Whoever wins the Democratic primary is likely to win September's general special election to represent a stretch from Tucson to the U.S.-Mexico border.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump's two-word verdict on what will happen if Putin doesn't sign deal
Donald Trump spoke to reporters on the White House South Lawn after imposing a 50-day ultimatum on Vladimir Putin - and explained what would happen if it is not met Donald Trump has said it will be 'too bad' if Vladimir Putin does not agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine in a blasé ultimatum. The US president spoke to reporters on the White House South Lawn on Tuesday afternoon, the day after he threatened to impose "secondary tariffs" of up to 100% on Moscow if they fail to sign a deal within the next 50 days. Despite his infamous bust-up with Zelensky in the Oval Office in the first few weeks of his second term, Trump has in recent days signalled a surprising change in his position on the war, with his country now set to send a cache of"top-of-the-line" Patriot missiles to Kyiv via its allies in Europe. He's also appeared to toughen his rhetoric on the Russian president, claiming earlier this week that he was "disappointed" in Putin. On Tuesday, he repeated his threat to impose tariffs on sanctions on Russia if they fail to meet the 50-day ultimatum. Asked by one reporter what he repercussions would be for Moscow if they do not come to an agreement with Ukraine, Trump said: "Well at the end of 50 days if we don't have a deal, it's going to be too bad." "The tariffs are going to go on and other sanctions going to go on," he added when asked what the future of Russian relations looked like if Putin did not agree to end his war. He was also pressed on whether he had now switched sympathies in favour of Ukraine, after previously appearing reluctant to criticise Russia, and replied: "No, I'm on nobodies side. "You know whose side I'm on? Humanity's side, I want to stop the killing of thousands of people a week. I want to stop the killing. I want the killing to stop in the Ukraine-Russia war, that's the side I'm on." The President went on to say: 'We're going to see what happens with President Putin. So far I've been very disappointed with President Putin. I've solved a lot of wars in the last three months, but I haven't got this one yet. This is a Biden war, it's not a Trump war, I'm here to try and get us out of that mess.' But Trump appeared to downplay reports that he could soon supply Ukraine with more long-range weaponry, allowing it to strike directly on Moscow. Some in Ukraine and the US have said the move could help push Putin towards negotiations to end the fighting. Asked if he intended to supply Ukraine with weapons that could reach deeper into Russian territory, Trump replied: "We're not looking to do that." Trump made the remarks to reporters before departing the White House for an energy investment event in Pittsburgh.


Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Pete Hegseth bans Pentagon officials from ‘evil globalism' conference
Pete Hegseth has banned Pentagon officials from speaking at a security conference because it promotes 'evil globalism'. Senior figures in the US defence department were set to speak at the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado this week, following a tradition under both Democrat and Republican administrations. However, Mr Hegseth, the US defence secretary, has blocked his department from taking part in the four-day event, which is hosted by the Aspen Institute think tank. Kingsley Wilson, a Pentagon spokeswoman, told Just the News that Mr Hegseth's office believes it 'promotes the evil of globalism, disdain for our great country, and hatred for the president of the United States'. The department 'has no interest in legitimising an organisation that has invited former officials who have been the architects of chaos abroad and failure at home', she continued. 'They are antithetical to the America First values of this administration.' Figures still scheduled to appear John Phelan, the Navy secretary, Emil Michael, the defence undersecretary for research and engineering, and Doug Beck, director of the department's defence innovation unit, were among several senior Pentagon officials due to speak this week, according to Politico. Ms Wilson did not clarify her comments and the Pentagon declined to provide further details. However, attendees tend to come from a more traditional foreign policy perspective than Mr Trump's 'America First' wing of the Republican Party, which has a strong isolationist streak and is deeply critical of former administrations. Those expected to speak at the conference this week include Condoleezza Rice, George W Bush's secretary of state, David Petraeus, Barack Obama's former CIA director, and Mark Esper, defence secretary in Donald Trump's first administration. Diplomatic figures from the current administration are still scheduled to appear, including Tom Barrack, the US ambassador for Turkey, and Adam Boehler, the presidential envoy for hostages. Sean Parnell, the Pentagon's chief spokesman said: 'Senior department of defence officials will no longer be participating at the Aspen Security Forum because their values do not align with the values of the DOD [department of defence]. 'The department will remain strong in its focus to increase the lethality of our warfighters, revitalise the warrior ethos, and project peace through strength on the world stage. 'It is clear the ASF [Aspen Security Forum] is not in alignment with these goals.' The conference hosts said in a statement that it had 'welcomed senior officials – Republican and Democrat, civilian and military – as well as senior foreign officials and experts, who bring experience and diverse perspectives on matters of national security' for more than a decade. 'We will miss the participation of the Pentagon, but our invitations remain open,' they added. 'The Aspen Security Forum remains committed to providing a platform for informed, non-partisan debate about the most important security challenges facing the world.'

Reuters
43 minutes ago
- Reuters
Market Talk: Trump's pressure on Powell risks dollar's dominance
"Trump's got to be careful," warned Eric Diton, president and managing director of The Wealth Alliance, "because if he leans too hard on [U.S. Federal Reserve Chair] Jay Powell, or replaces him and brings in someone who is a Trump 'yes-man,' we are endangering the dollar as the international reserve currency." Lisa Bernhard has more.