logo
How long it will take you to save for a home deposit depending on your salary

How long it will take you to save for a home deposit depending on your salary

Scottish Sun2 days ago
Plus scroll down to see what your rights are when your flight is cancelled
LEVEL UP How long it will take you to save for a home deposit depending on your salary
SAVING up for a house deposit if you're earning an average annual salary of £37,000 could take 12 years, but there are ways to fast-track becoming a first-time buyer.
With lending rules easing, a mortgage rate summer price war and an interest rate cut looming, experts say now is a good time to get on the ­property ladder.
Lucy Andrews and Emiy Mee explain everything you need to know.
WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE PROPERTY MARKET
In March, strict lending rules about how much buyers can borrow, called the 'stress test', were eased by the city watchdog, the Financial Conduct Authority.
This made it easier for banks to lend more money to buyers.
Since then a price war has broken out among lenders, triggering a flurry of cheaper mortgage deals.
Banking giants including Barclays, Nationwide, Halifax and HSBC slashed rates this week, and there are now 65 deals offering fixed rates below four per cent.
Even better, rates could fall even further from next month with a drop to the Bank of England base rate widely anticipated.
HOW LONG IT COULD TAKE TO SAVE
This depends on how much you earn and can put aside, who you're buying with and the price of the property.
The average house price is £265,497, so a ten per cent deposit would be £26,549.
If you earn the average salary of £37,000 a year, and save five per cent of it (£1,850pa) in a three per cent savings account, it would take 12 years, according to numbers crunched by Hargreaves Lansdown for Sun Money.
That's down from 2020, when it would have taken 13 years to save when the average salary was £31k and the average house price was £228,446.
Mortgage help ends TODAY and more hot water info released
TAKE A SAVINGS SHORTCUT
There are a number of ways you can accelerate your path to becoming a homeowner.
BANK OF MUM AND DAD
If your parents are lucky enough to have savings then they might be willing to give you some cash to put towards a deposit.
The Bank of Mum and Dad handed down £9.6billion in 2024, according to estate agent Savills.
Parents can still help, even if they don't have cash to spare.
They can list their income on the mortgage to boost the amount their child can borrow on guarantor mortgages.
Their savings or home will be used as collateral against their child's mortgage application.
'These mortgages are really popular,' said Harry Arnold from the broker Anderson Harris.
Beware, parents will have to foot the monthly mortgage bill if the kids can't keep up with payments.
THE BANK ACCOUNT TO OPEN
Push your savings further by opening a Lifetime Isa.
These are generous tax-free savings accounts designed for first-time buyers or saving for retirement.
The Government boosts your savings by an extra 25 per cent.
You can put in £4,000 a year (which is a whopping 10.8 per cent of a £37,000 salary), which means a maximum bonus of £1,000 per year.
However, even if you can't put the maximum in a Lifetime ISA, and put in five per cent of a £37,000 salary (£1,850pa) you would be able to buy in ten years — two years quicker than saving without one.
If you were able to save the maximum £4,000 plus £1,000 bonus, it would take you about five years.
'The Lifetime Isa is a brilliant way to turbo boost your savings, and gets you a step closer to owning your first home,' said Sarah Coles from Hargreaves Lansdown.
The value of the house must be £450,000 or below, and you will only be able to withdraw money from your account after 12 months of opening it to qualify for the bonus.
Otherwise you pay a nasty 25 per cent penalty.
NO-DEPOSIT MORTGAGES
Some lenders offer no-deposit mortgages, also known as 100 per cent track record mortgages.
These are controversial, partly because they were seen to fuel the 2008 financial crisis, but also because they often have higher rates and there is a much higher chance of you falling into negative equity.
'These mortgages may not be a solution for everyone,' said David Hollingworth from the broker L&C Mortgages.
'Do your research carefully and get advice.'
SCHEMES TO CHECK
Keep an eye out for the reboot of the mortgage guarantee scheme.
It closed last month, but the Government has promised it will launch a new version soon.
Lenders who signed up were offering mortgages where you only need a five per cent deposit.
The First Homes scheme, which gives a discount of 30 to 50 per cent off a new-build home, is also worth considering.
Your income must be £80,000 or less.
You'll need to be able to get a mortgage for at least half the price of the home.
Shared ownership — where you own a smaller percentage of the property and rent the rest — is­ ­popular too.
But it has drawbacks, such as rising service charges and fees.
Often it's available on new-build ­properties, which suffer from lower house-price growth.
2
There are ways to fast-track becoming a first-time buyer
YOUR RIGHTS ON CANCELLED FLIGHTS
TENS of thousands of holidaymakers who have seen their getaways ruined by flight cancellations this week have been urged to check their refund rights.
As many as 36,000 passengers saw their flights cancelled this week due to strikes over working conditions and pay.
2
What are your rights if your flight is cancelled?
Credit: AP
EasyJet, Ryanair and AirFrance customers were affected.
Ryanair also warned of record flight delays this summer.
So what are your rights?
GET A REFUND: If your flight takes off or lands in the UK or EU, you are covered by rules that mean you can get a refund and compensation.
Connecting flights are covered, but you must have booked all legs of the journey at the same time. Affected passengers will be legally entitled to a full refund or a replacement flight.
Airlines don't have to give you a refund if the flight was cancelled due to reasons beyond their control, such as extreme weather.
'Passengers should also be provided free refreshments or accommodation, if appropriate to the length of the delay,' said Rory Borland from the consumer site Which?.
If you fork out for anything yourself, keep the receipts in a safe place and claim the money back from your airline. Ask your airline for details about how to make a claim for a refund.
CLAIM COMPENSATION: If the airline cancelled less than 14 days before departure, or your replacement flight means you arrive at least two hours late to your destination, you could get compensation.
How much you could receive will depend on the distance of your flight and the length of delay, but it could be worth between £110 and £520.
You'll get the maximum amount if the flight distance is more than 3,500km and you arrive at least four hours after your booked flight should have arrived.
Check the Citizens Advice website (citizensadvice.org.uk), which gives a compensation breakdown for all events.
Contact your airline and ask how to make a claim for compensation.
You have six years to make a claim, but don't delay ­– do it quickly before you forget.
Write down what happened and provide any evidence, such as receipts.
If your flight doesn't begin or end in the UK or EU, check the terms and conditions of the airline's policy. The compensation you receive will depend on the rules in the country the airline is based.
HAVING TROUBLE? If you've made a claim for compensation and your airline isn't playing ball, you can complain.
Check if the airline is a member of an alternative dispute resolution scheme. You can do this by visiting the Civil Aviation Authority website and searching your airline's name.
If it's not part of an alternative dispute resolution scheme, complain to the Civil Aviation Authority.
LUCY ANDREW
Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Malaysia central bank expected to cut rates for first time in five years: Reuters poll
Malaysia central bank expected to cut rates for first time in five years: Reuters poll

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Malaysia central bank expected to cut rates for first time in five years: Reuters poll

BENGALURU, July 7 (Reuters) - Malaysia's central bank will cut its key interest rate for the first time in five years on Wednesday according to a slim majority of economists in a Reuters poll, a sharp shift from the near-unanimous call in previous surveys for no move this month. Expectations have shortened from no cut until at least the first half of 2026 in a March poll to one cut pencilled in next quarter in a May poll and now to a move expected on July 9. The shift in outlook follows a string of soft economic data - economic growth slowed to 4.4% in the first quarter, June inflation fell to a four-year low of 1.2%, and the central bank's May statement flagged mounting downside risks to the outlook. A slim majority of economists, 17 of 31, in a June 30-July 7 Reuters poll expected Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) to cut its overnight policy rate (MYINTR=ECI), opens new tab by 25 basis points to 2.75% on Wednesday. The other 14 forecast no change. It would be the bank's first cut since July 2020. "While our base case is for a cut, this is a close call, with a high risk of delay to September or November," said Brian Tan, head of non-China EM Asia economics research at Barclays. "The risk is the central bank prefers to wait for better timing when a rate cut would be more effective in psychologically boosting economic confidence, rather than easing pre-emptively." A sizeable minority of economists expect policymakers to wait a few more months for greater clarity, particularly on the domestic impact of a sales and service tax (SST) hike that took effect on July 1. It is not yet clear how that might affect inflation since it applies mainly to selected imported and luxury goods, with essential items remaining zero-rated, so some economists said the central bank was likely to wait and watch. "BNM may want to see the impact of the recent sales and service tax hike ... and more evidence of a weakening economy before deciding to cut," said Ahmad Nazmi Idrus, head of economics at CGS International Securities. While median forecasts showed rates would then remain at 2.75% until at least the end of 2026, there was no clear consensus among economists on where rates would be. Estimates for the end of next year ranged from 2.25% to 3.00%. Malaysia's worsening export performance could also pressure the BNM to cut rates. Southeast Asian nations will be especially vulnerable to U.S. President Donald Trump's "take it or leave it" tariff offers, expected to be sent out from Monday. "Data on external demand show the growth wobble is no longer just sentiment but is bleeding into actual production," said Sunny Kim Nguyen, economist at Moody's Analytics. She said U.S. tariffs pose an immediate threat to Malaysia's electronics and machinery exports. "Taken together, these developments should satisfy the Bank's 'evidence-based' test for additional support which they highlighted in their May statement," she added. Malaysia's economy was forecast to grow 4.2% this year, slightly below BNM's 4.5%-5.5% projection, and 4.3% in 2026. Inflation was expected to average 1.9% this year and rise to 2.3% next. (Other stories from the July Reuters global economic poll)

Millions of people due £1,100 car finance compensation update this month
Millions of people due £1,100 car finance compensation update this month

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Millions of people due £1,100 car finance compensation update this month

The Supreme Court is expected to issue a final ruling on the scope of the problem this month. A new survey suggests more than 23 million people across the UK believe they could be in line for compensation of around £1,100 over mis-sold car finance loans. The poll found that 45 per cent of people believe they are likely to be eligible for some sort of payout over motor finance deals signed between 2007 and 2021. Consumer groups estimate that motorists took out more than 30 million car loan deals over those years. Regulators and courts have found that many of the car finance deals signed in that period did not properly inform consumers about hidden charges through Discretionary Commission Arrangements (DCAs). Consumer groups estimate that motorists took out more than 30 million car loan deals over those years. The Supreme Court is expected to issue a final ruling on the scope of the problem this month, after which the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) may set up a formal redress scheme for lenders to compensate consumers. The survey of 4,000 people in June was carried out by the pollsters Find Out Now, on behalf of consumer law firm Slater and Gordon, suggests that public expectations over the car finance issue are running very high. Slater and Gordon said those expectations could create challenges for the FCA in designing any redress scheme. The City Regulator has suggested it may set up the redress scheme in a way that reduces the scope for consumers to hire lawyers to make claims on their behalf. Instead, the regulator could ask the lenders who carried out the mis-selling to check their records and decide who gets compensation. However, less than a quarter (23%) of people surveyed said they would trust the lenders to do this fairly. Slater and Gordon backed the idea of a redress scheme, but warned that the FCA's plans risk widespread disappointment and a potential backlash unless it is carefully constructed to ensure consumers are protected from missing out. Some 40 per cent of poll respondents said they would consider taking legal action to challenge the redress scheme if they are unhappy with the outcomes. The polling also suggests that a redress scheme reliant on lenders to identify and trace victims of mis-selling could miss out significant numbers of people who should get compensation. Among respondents who believe they are entitled to compensation - estimated by consumer champion Martin Lewis to be around £1,100 per vehicle purchase - some 57 per cent said they had moved house at least once during the claims period, something that might make it impossible for lenders to contact them for redress. A further 13 per cent of potential claimants said they changed their legal name during the claims period, which could also make them hard to reach for redress. In addition, 36 per cent of potential claimants - 8.4 million people - said they have lost at least some of the paperwork on their previous car finance deals. Commenting on the findings, Elizabeth Comley, Chief Operating Officer of Slater and Gordon, said: 'The public have very high expectations on the car finance scandal. They rightly expect to be compensated for their losses. 'The FCA is trying to put things right but there's a risk that a redress scheme leaves many people disappointed and keen to challenge the process. That sort of backlash would be bad for everyone - the scandal would drag on for years, the courts would be inundated with challenges and the public would be denied the clear resolution they want.' Ms Comley continued: 'The FCA is trusted by the public to resolve this issue, but the public will not support putting decisions on redress in the hands of the lenders responsible for mis-selling - people just don't trust the wrongdoers to decide who gets compensation. 'An FCA redress scheme that relies on the lenders responsible for mis-selling to identify people who get compensation would mean many people miss out, perhaps because they have moved address or changed their name and the lenders can no longer find them. That would be unacceptable and fuel public cynicism.' The legal expert added: 'The best way to ensure a redress scheme works well for everyone and resolves this scandal swiftly is to allow people the choice to hire a lawyer to support their claim. 'Independent professional lawyers work to assemble documents and evidence, pursue people's rights and ensure they get what's due to them. Why shouldn't people have this option if they want it?' Alex Neill, co-founder of Consumer Voice, said: 'People are rightly concerned about the use of secret commissions in car finance. Millions of drivers feel misled and have suffered financial harm - so it's no surprise that public expectations for compensation are high. ‌ 'Our own research shows that two-thirds of consumers would have acted differently if they'd known about dealer commissions, and many remain concerned about how those commissions impact what they pay. 'Any redress scheme must tackle drivers' legitimate distrust of lenders and be built with fairness to consumers at its core. People must be given choice and clear information about their options and the compensation they can expect to receive. Resolving claims quickly is in everyone's interest, but it must not come at the expense of people being denied proper access to justice.'

More than 23million households could be due compensation over mis-sold car finance loans
More than 23million households could be due compensation over mis-sold car finance loans

The Sun

time4 hours ago

  • The Sun

More than 23million households could be due compensation over mis-sold car finance loans

MORE than 23million people believe they could be due compensation over mis-sold car finance loans, according to new research. Around 45% of people believe they are likely to be eligible for some sort of compensation over motor finance deals signed between 2007 and 2021, according to the poll by law firm Slater and Gordon. 1 Consumer groups estimate that motorists took out more than 30million car loan deals over those years. But regulators and courts have found that many of the car finance deals signed during this period did not properly inform consumers about charges and commission. This is because banks allowed car dealerships and brokers to set their own interest rates on loans. Under these now-banned discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs), dealerships and brokers had a financial incentive to charge higher interest rates, as their commission increased proportionally. But many customers were not aware of this practice. As a result, motorists who finance the purchase of cars, motorbikes or vans before January 28, 2021 - when DCA was banned - could be entitled to substantial compensation. The Supreme Court will this month issue a final decision on the scope of the problem after a landmark Court of Appeal ruling in October 2024. Once this is done industry regulator the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) may set up a formal redress scheme for lenders to compensate consumers. The FCA began working on this redress scheme in January 2024. Lenders including Barclays, Lloyds, Santander UK and Close Brothers may be liable to pay out £44billion in compensation, analysts have suggested. The FCA has said it may set up the scheme as a way that reduces the scope for consumers to hire lawyers to make claims on their behalf. Instead, the regulator could ask the lenders who carried out the mis-selling to check their records to decide who could get compensation. But less than a quarter of people surveyed said they would trust the lenders to do this fairly. A redress scheme would rely on lenders to identify and trace victims of mis-selling but could miss out significant numbers of people who should get compensation. What is the FCA investigating and who is eligible for compensation? What is being investigated? The FCA announced in January 2024 that it would investigate allegations of "widespread misconduct" related to discretionary commission agreements (DCAs) on car loans. When you buy a car on finance, you are effectively loaned the value of the car while you pay it off. These loans have interest payments charged on top of them and are often organised on behalf of lenders by brokers - usually the finance arm of a dealership. These brokers earn money in the form of commission - a percentage of the interest payments on the loan. DCAs allowed brokers to, to a certain extent, increase the interest rate on a loan, which in turn increased the amount of commission they received. The practice was banned by the FCA in 2021. Who is eligible for compensation? The FCA estimates that around 40% of car deals may have been affected before 2021. There are two criteria you must meet to have a chance at receiving compensation. First, you must be complaining in relation to a finance deal on a motor vehicle (including cars, vans, motorbikes and motorhomes) that was agreed before January 28 2021. Second, you must have bought the vehicle through a mechanism like Personal Contract Purchase (PCP) or Hire Purchase (HP), which make up the majority of finance deals and mean you own the vehicle at the end of the agreement. Drivers who leased a car through a scheme like a Personal Contract Hire, where you give the car back at the end of the lease, are not eligible. This is because they may have moved house or changed other important personal information such as their legal name. Plus, 36% of potential claimants - around 8.4million people - said they have lost some of the paperwork from their previous car finance deals. Meanwhile, 40% of people said they would consider a legal challenge if they are unhappy with the redress scheme. Elizabeth Comley, chief operating officer at Slater and Gordon, said: 'The FCA is trying to put things right but there's a risk that a redress scheme leaves many people disappointed and keen to challenge the process. 'That sort of backlash would be bad for everyone – the scandal would drag on for years, the courts would be inundated with challenges and the public would be denied the clear resolution they want.' How to claim Consumer finance website offers an email template to help you complain to your finance provider. To download this, visit Alternatively, you can complain directly to your provider without using the template. Anyone who took out car finance should file a claim, even if their previous one was denied. In your complaint, ask whether you were overcharged due to your broker receiving a commission and ask the company to rectify this if it happened. If you are not happy with the company's response then you can escalate your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service for free. You have until July 29, 2026, or up to 15 months from the date of the company's final response letter to do so, whichever is longer. Avoid using a claims management firm as they will take a portion of any successful claim. .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store