UK must push for diplomatic solution following US strikes on Iran, says Swinney
The Scottish First Minister's response to the developments in the Middle East came after Sir Keir Starmer urged Iran to return to negotiations.
UK minister Douglas Alexander said the Government 'has been putting contingencies in place' as the region braces for any potential retaliation from Iran.
US President Donald Trump said three key nuclear sites in Iran were 'completely and fully obliterated' in the military strikes.
The US is thought to have used B-2 stealth bombers to drop bunker-busting munitions on the sites – including the deeply-buried Fordo facility – as well as 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from submarines.
The US-UK base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean is not thought to have been used in the operation.
Posting on X, Mr Swinney said: 'The Middle East conflict has reached an alarmingly greater level of danger after the US attacks on Iran.
'The conflict must be stopped by a diplomatic solution delivered through the international community. And the UK Government must insist on that now.'
The Prime Minister had earlier said Iran should 'return to the negotiating table', noting the region remains 'volatile'.
He said: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security.
'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.'
Former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf was critical of the Prime Minister's response.
He posted on social media: 'An awful statement from the PM, which ignores our collective responsibility to uphold international law.
'Supporting illegal military action in Iran, and gas-lighting us about an imminent nuclear threat, is hauntingly reminiscent of the lies told in the run up to the Iraq war.'
During a protest march in London, Mr Yousaf had earlier accused the UK Government of 'abusing' anti-terror laws against the Palestine Action group, which vandalised two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton.
Trade policy minister Mr Alexander, who is the MP for Lothian East and a former international development minister, spoke to the BBC's Sunday Show.
He said: 'I understand that people have woken up this morning to the news that was breaking overnight with a real sense of concern.
'I want to assure your viewers that the British Government has been putting contingencies in place.
'There have been a whole series of meetings, I and other have been attending Cobra meetings in the course of the week.'
He said plans are being put in place to move UK nationals in affected countries to safety, stressing the UK 'took no part in this military action'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
21 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Firing of Fed Reserve chief ‘highly unlikely', says Trump
President Donald Trump has said it is 'highly unlikely' he will fire Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell 'unless he has to leave for fraud'. The statement came less than 24 hours after Mr Trump indicated in a private meeting that he is leaning in favour of dismissing the head of the US central bank. Advertisement Mr Trump confirmed that he discussed the 'concept' of dismissing Mr Powell in a meeting with about a dozen Republicans, who had gathered at the White House on Tuesday to discuss crypto legislation in the House of Representatives. Jerome Powell leads the US central bank (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) 'Almost every one of them said I should,' Mr Trump said on Wednesday during an Oval Office meeting. US stocks were shaky after the news broke, as such a move could help Wall Street get the lower interest rates that it loves but would also risk a weakened Fed unable to make the unpopular moves needed to keep inflation under control. Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson stopped short of calling for Mr Powell to be fired, saying he was not certain about the 'executive authority' involved. Advertisement But he did say 'new leadership would be helpful at the Fed'. 'I've been unhappy with the leadership there personally,' Mr Johnson told reporters on Wednesday.
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Crushing new blow for Donald Trump over his handling of Jeffrey Epstein fiasco, CNN pollster says
CNN 's resident data expert revealed that Donald Trump may be in deep trouble with voters due to his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Citing a new poll conducted by political research firm SSRS Tuesday, CNN chief data analyst Harry Enten showed that half of Americans are unhappy with the amount of information the government has released about Epstein. A full 43 percent of Republican-leaning respondents said they were dissatisfied with case, Enten said, with just 4 percent saying they're satisfied. 'My goodness gracious! When you only have 4 percent that is with Donald Trump on a particular issue, that is ridiculously low,' Enten said during a segment on CNN's News Central. 'I've never seen anything quite like it.' For left-leaning respondents, 60 percent said they were dissatisfied with the case as well and 3 percent said they were satisfied. Enten mentioned that Trump had leaned on the support of conspiracy theorists to get reelected and that he repeatedly promised to release Epstein's case file in full. Last week, the Justice Department released findings stating that Epstein never even kept a 'client list' and that he killed himself in jail. The announcement earned harsh criticism from leading MAGA figures and fringe theorists who Enten said helped Trump 'rise up from the dead' following his election loss in 2020. 'Donald Trump, from the very beginning, has been pushing conspiracy theories over and over and over again, and he has benefited from them historically,' the data expert said. 'And now, finally, it's coming back to actually bite him.' When asked by host Sara Sidner what the poll indicated overall, Enten replied: 'I would say that the word is dissatisfied. 'That is how Americans feel in terms of the releases so far in the Epstein case.' He highlighted how QAnon's support for Trump in last year's election proved crucial to his win over Kamala Harris, when the Republican repeatedly suggested there was more to the case than meets the eye. Such claims stoked the interests of many, especially on the right. Both Democrats and Republicans are now calling on Trump to make good on his promise. House Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday said that the files should be released. The Justice Department's announcement on the findings earned harsh criticism from leading MAGA figures, including Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly and Laura Loomer. Attorney General Pam Bondi had insisted in February that the Epstein list was 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' She subsequently released Epstein documents to right-wing influencers that turned out to contain no new information. Some critics have called for Bondi to be fired while pointing to the announcement as proof of a conspiracy surrounding Epstein and his associates. Epstein and Trump have were pictured together several times in the '90s and 2000s. Both carved out presences in Manhattan and Palm Beach. In a Saturday Truth Social post, Trump blamed Barack Obama, Hilly Clinton, former FBI boss James Comey and 'the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration' for the Epstein files, painting it as unreliable. He also reiterated the Justice Department's stance that a list of Epstein's old clients did not exist, angering many who voted for him in the process. Enten hit this home with data from a series of older polls, including one of registered voters who believed in conspiracy theories peddled by QAnon. The poll, conducted by nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute two months before the election, showed Trump beating Harris by a margin of +61. The same poll found registered voters who rejected such conspiracies preferred Harris over Trump by a margin of +16. Another poll showed how registered GOP voters and right-leaning independents who picked Trump in 2024 and 2016 have repeatedly sided with conspiracy theories the president has pushed for years. 'Trump swam in the conspiracy theorist waters for years, and now, finally, the sharks in those waters are coming to try and get him,' Enten said in response. On Saturday, Trump tried to wave off disgruntled voters clamoring for the full case file with a widely ridiculed post to Truth Social. 'What's going on with my "boys" and, in some cases, "gals"?' asked the president. 'We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and "selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein.' A report from Wired last week found the surveillance footage released to back up the Justice Department's claim that Epstein killed himself in a New York City prison cell in 2019 was likely edited. Further analysis from the publication revealed a full three minutes of the footage was cut out.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer's fury over Afghan data breach as he warns Tories ‘have questions to answer'
Keir Starmer has vented his fury over the cover-up of the catastrophic data breach that risked the lives of up to 100,000 Afghans, as it emerged no one had faced action over the huge blunder. The prime minister said the leak should never have happened and that Tory ministers have 'serious questions to answer', a day after an unprecedented superinjunction was lifted. Ben Wallace, who was defence secretary at the time the draconian legal order was granted, earlier said he took full responsibility for the leak, which happened when an MoD official released a spreadsheet containing the names of 18,000 Afghans "in error". But questions have been raised over why no one has been fired over the breach, which put the lives of those with links to UK forces in danger of reprisals from the Taliban, amid calls for further investigation. It comes as the chair of a powerful Commons committee has written to the Information Commissioner, applying pressure for a rethink on its decision not to investigate the breach, which cost the taxpayer billions in relocating thousands of affected Afghans to the UK. At the start of a tense Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir expressed his anger, telling MPs: "We warned in opposition about Conservative management of this policy and yesterday, the defence secretary set out the full extent of the failings that we inherited: a major data breach, a super injunction, a secret route that has already cost hundreds of millions of pounds. "Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen." He suggested the Conservatives should "welcome" scrutiny from the Commons Defence Committee, which has vowed to investigate. In a dramatic intervention just hours later, right-wing former home secretary Suella Braverman revealed that there were splits in the Tory government over how to deal with the breach and said she had opposed the superinjunction and the new secret route set up to bring those affected to the UK. In a scathing statement, Ms Braverman condemned the former Tory government, then led by Rishi Sunak, in which she played a major role before she was sacked by the former prime minister. She said: 'There is much more that needs to be said about the conduct of the MoD, both ministers and officials, and the House of Commons is the right place to do so. I hope we have the opportunity soon. 'What has happened is outrageous and must never happen again. We must therefore be very clear about what that was and how it happened. 'The cover-up was wrong, the super injunction was wrong, and the failure to stop unwanted mass immigration has been unforgivable. So, I am sorry: the Conservative government failed you and its leaders let you down. It wasn't good enough then. It's not good enough now.' Mr Sunak, ex-defence secretary Grant Shapps and former armed forces minister James Heappey, who oversaw the cover-up, have all been contacted for comment, but none have broken cover and have all remained silent on the breach. Amid calls for further investigation into the breach, Defence Secretary John Healey said that 'accountability starts now' after admitting that he was uncomfortable with the way that the information had been covered up for three years. The Commons Defence Committee confirmed it would launch its own inquiry, and Dame Chi Onwurah, chair of the Commons committee for science innovation and technology, is writing to the Information Commissioner pushing for an investigation. The Information Commissioner has so far declined to hold its own probe, despite previously issuing a fine of £305,000 for a much smaller MoD data breach. Dame Chi told The Independent: 'A leak of this magnitude is, of course, extremely worrying and the fact that it happened in the Ministry of Defence brings the additional dimension of security concerns. The Defence Select Committee Office (ICO) will be undertaking a full inquiry, in the meantime I will be writing to the Information Commissioner to ask for more details on his office's role in this case.' Jon Baines, a senior data protection specialist at Mishcon de Reya, expressed bafflement at the commissioner's attitude to the breach. He said: 'I have not seen such unanimous bafflement from the data protection commentariat at the ICO's lack of apparent interest. 'There is a potential argument that there is no point in a big fine against the MoD when it would punish the public purse. 'Enforcement is not just about fines. The information commissioner has the power to lay a report before parliament. I have been banging on for years about the issue of hidden data in spreadsheets, and if I were the commissioner, I would be thinking about how I can raise the issue. 'A report before parliament would give them publicity, raise the issue and seize parliament.' The ICO has not responded to The Independent 's request for comment. Meanwhile, a member of the defence select committee has warned against naming and shaming the individual responsible for the breach and said the committee should instead look at a failure of government. Confirming the committee would launch an inquiry, its chair, Labour MP Tan Dhesi, told BBC Radio 4's The World at One Programme: "We want to get to the bottom of what has happened on behalf of parliament, which has been sidelined for too long on this issue.' "Ultimately, I think the fact there has been no parliamentary scrutiny, that nobody's been held to account on this, is just not on at all." Leyton and Wanstead Labour MP Calvin Bailey, who was a key figure in organising flights out of Kabul when allied forces went into a chaotic retreat as the Taliban swept to power in 2021, called for 'proper scrutiny' on the matter. He said: 'We need to go back and give proper scrutiny to everything, not just the data breach, the whole culture management and oversight of the operation, of the extraction recovery, the foreign policy and the military engagement and involvement. 'We will probably find that people were working under duress and pressure, because there were too few people to deal with the crisis.' He also warned that the defence committee was 'best placed to do the necessary work' as a full public inquiry 'would take too long and be too expensive'.
