logo
Texas set to mandate Ten Commandments in classrooms as ACLU vows to sue

Texas set to mandate Ten Commandments in classrooms as ACLU vows to sue

Yahoo30-05-2025
Texas is set to become the largest state in the nation to mandate that every public school classroom display a copy of the Ten Commandments, with advocates fearing a further erosion of church and state and the legislation's sponsor making clear that's a separation she doesn't believe in.
While Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has not yet signed the measure, which comes as red states are increasingly seeking to inject Christianity into public education, he told lawmakers in early May to 'get this bill to my desk. I'll make it law.'
Under the legislation, beginning September 1, every school in Texas will be required to display a 16 inch by 20 inch poster of the Ten Commandments. While they won't be required to buy them with district funds, they will be required to display them if donated.
The legislation also effectively creates an official state version of the Ten Commandments, because only one specific iteration meets the new statute: a King James Bible-derived list of 'Thou shalt nots' that is used by many Baptists and evangelicals but not by a majority of Catholics, Jews, protestants or Eastern Orthodox Christians.
Critics argue the bill is a clear violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits the federal government from creating a state religion.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas on Wednesday announced it would sue.
'S.B. 10 is blatantly unconstitutional. We will be working with Texas public school families to prepare a lawsuit to stop this violation of students' and parents' First Amendment rights,' the ACLU wrote, calling the measure 'religiously coercive.'
Supporters of the bill, meanwhile, appeal to a letter from Thomas Jefferson which seems to leave open the possibility of state regulation of religion, though so far, courts haven't agreed: A similar bill in Louisiana was blocked in November after being ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge.
The Texas bill is one of a broad array of public policy proposals pushed by an alliance of groups that seek a broader role for evangelical Christianity in public life. A prior state measure, passed in 2021, required schools to display 'in God we Trust' placards in every classroom.
Neighboring Arkansas passed its own Ten Commandments bill in April.
In a nod to the legal risks, amendments to the Texas measure require the state attorney general, currently Republican Ken Paxton, to defend at state expense any school district sued over compliance.
This week, the Texas legislature also passed a bill permitting prayer in public schools and stripping language that forbids teachers from 'encouraging' students to participate.
That measure also obligates the office of the state attorney general to help schools set up a prayer program, and — like the Ten Commandments bill — to defend any legal challenges to it at public expense.
During debates over passage, bill sponsor state Rep. Candy Noble insisted that it was not a religious measure but meant to instruct students about the historical importance she says the Ten Commandments hold in American democracy.
'This bill is about honoring our historical educational and judicial heritage with the discipline of the Ten Commandments,' Noble said in a Sunday exchange with Rep. James Talarico (D), a self-described evangelical who opposed the bill.
Over the past two months, Talarico and Noble's verbal duels over the bill have served as an intra-evangelical debate over the role of Christianity in public life.
'We established that our founding fathers wanted a separation of church and state,' Talarico began in one April committee hearing, before Noble cut him off.
'I did not establish that,' she said. 'I absolutely did not establish that. That's a historical fact that I disagree with.'
In his opposition to the bill, Talarico repeatedly argued that displaying the Ten Commandments was itself a religious violation: a contradiction of St. Paul's dictum in Romans that all the commandments could be 'summed up in this sentence, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'
He argued it was not neighborly to signal to Jews, Muslims, Hindus or members of other Christian denominations that they didn't belong.
That's a read Noble emphatically pushed back on. If these people were Americans, she said, 'maybe it would make them curious about what made our forefathers tick. Maybe it will help them wonder 'How can I treat others better? Maybe it will help them ask their parents questions on 'Why should I be under your authority?'
'Maybe we can take that tack with it instead of the negative tack that you're taking with it,' she added.
In debates over the bill, Noble repeatedly argued that 'our classrooms are crying out for moral guidance,' though she went back and forth on whether teachers would be required to interpret the Ten Commandments for students.
In a viral moment from the debate, Talarico pressed her on why representatives were working over the weekend — the Jewish and Christian Sabbaths — in violation of the Fourth Commandment.
'Is that ironic or what?' Noble asked, before explaining the importance of God's decision to take a day of rest, and contending that Talarico's own opposition to the bill had pushed debate to the weekend.
'Do you think that members of the legislature should focus more on trying to follow the Ten Commandments rather than telling others to follow them?' Talarico asked.
'It is incumbent on all of us to follow God's law,' Noble said. 'And I think that we would be better off if we did.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Greg Abbott Issues Update on Texas Raising Property Taxes
Greg Abbott Issues Update on Texas Raising Property Taxes

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Greg Abbott Issues Update on Texas Raising Property Taxes

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has spoken out against a move by the Austin City Council that could see the maximum property tax increase by 25 percent for the next fiscal year, to 60 cents per $100 in valuation. Newsweek contacted Governor Abbott and the Austin City Council for comment on Friday via email and telephone respectively outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Austin City Council is estimated to have a $33 million shortfall for the next fiscal year, which comes against the backdrop of federal funding cuts and additional spending requirements for the police and fire department. Abbott's move to oppose potentially substantial new property taxes is likely to find a favorable audience from Texas Republicans. What To Know On Thursday the 11-strong Austin City Council voted unanimously to set the maximum property tax for the next fiscal year at 60 cents per $100 in valuation, a substantial increase on the current 47.76 cents. This doesn't necessarily mean the council will end up proposing an increase to 60 cents and any such move would have to be approved by voters due to a 2019 state law which requires such a move for any tax increase of more than 3.5 percent over a year. However the move sparked a hostile reaction from Governor Abbott who shared an article from The Austin American-Statesman about Thursday's vote. Hey #txlege- This. Right here. Austin eyes major property tax increase to close growing budget gap. We must stop them from raising property taxes & stop spending increases. via @statesman — Greg Abbott (@GregAbbott_TX) August 1, 2025 The governor added: "Hey #txlege [Texas Legislature]—This. Right here … We must stop them from raising property taxes & stop spending increases." In 2024 the Austin Firefighters Association was awarded an eight percent pay rise by an arbiter, with negotiations over a new four-year contract having begun this week. Texas Governor Greg Abbott speaking during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025 in Austin, Texas. Texas Governor Greg Abbott speaking during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025 in Austin, Texas. Brandon Bell/GETTY In addition, a draft budget drawn up by City Manager T.C. Broadnax predicts the Austin Police Department's budget will rise by around $92 million between 2024 to 2027, including a six percent pay award to officers as stipulated by their labor contract. Property tax bills in Texas have increased dramatically in recent years, rising by 26 percent between 2019 and 2023 according to Cotality, a property data company. In June Governor Abbott signed two bills that, if approved by Texan voters in November, would grant property tax cuts to many Texans. The measures would raise the existing homestead exemption from $100,000 to $140,000 for all homeowners while also increasing it to $200,000 for those with disabilities or those aged 65 and above. What People Are Saying Speaking to The Austin American-Statesman Austin Mayor Kirk Watson welcomed Thursday's council vote which he said would provide "flexibility." He added: "We want to avoid being in a situation where we're precluding consideration of where [Council] might want to end up." In a joint statement Mike Siegel and Zohaib Qadri, two progressives on the Austin City Council, wrote: "We knew this time would come. We can no longer rely on an unstable framework of one-time funding and unpredictable revenue streams to fix and sustain core services." What Happens Next According to Mayor Watson the Austin City Council will begin discussions next week on proposed changes to Broadnax's draft budget, before a final vote on a new budget which is expected in mid-August.

The value of Barbie ad-free media: Indiana public TV, radio are far from woke, leaders say
The value of Barbie ad-free media: Indiana public TV, radio are far from woke, leaders say

Indianapolis Star

time4 hours ago

  • Indianapolis Star

The value of Barbie ad-free media: Indiana public TV, radio are far from woke, leaders say

Travis Pope remembers his dad was flipping through channels on the family radio in 1997 when he found the NPR affiliate in Richmond, Virginia. He has listened ever since. Pope didn't grow up with a lot of money or access to resources, but through public media, he learned about classical music, mortgage-backed derivatives and church burnings in the South. "Public media is a thing that I have listened to, consumed, watched or read since I was roughly 7, 8 years old," said Pope, who is now the leader of Fort Wayne's WBOI. "And the idea that it might not be around for another 7- or 8-year-old is the thing that I take very seriously." Indiana public media leaders told IndyStar they are concerned that the mission of public radio and television is being misunderstood amid Republicans' intense attacks on NPR and PBS nationally. And, following crippling government spending cuts, they said, these misunderstandings could debilitate access by rural communities that rely on public broadcasting the most. Since taking office, President Donald Trump has sought to defund public media, asserting it has a liberal bias that thwarts fair coverage. NPR and PBS have repeatedly refuted these claims, and NPR is suing his administration on First Amendment grounds. Over the next two years, Hoosier stations combined will lose nearly $9.4 million in federal dollars and $7.4 million in state funding. At least four stations will lose over 50% of their revenue. Public media leaders said their noncommercial funding structure was a feature, not a detriment, to their mission. However, as critics demand that public media outlets support themselves without tax dollars, that structure means that budgets are harder to balance. "It is just putting the news out there without a monetary gain," said Amanda Miller Kelley, president and general manager of WNIT - PBS Michiana. "It has served so many people to have a place where they're not worried about who's funding it, who's benefiting from it." NPR and PBS have long acted as noncommercial news gatherers and educational outlets, stemming back to the reason the federal government started funding public media as an impartial information source. When Congress passed the Public Broadcasting Act in 1967, it injected local and national news, educational programming, and emergency alerts into areas that often went without, usually due to cost. "We are sometimes the only ones in the county to get out the information," Harmon-Baker said. "If something happens to rural stations like us, people aren't going to get the information they need and they're not going to get it in a timely manner." At the time, President Lyndon B. Johnson and lawmakers agreed that this new swath of local radio and television access would serve 'instructional, educational and cultural purposes.' In the half century since, over 1,500 National Public Radio and Public Broadcasting Service affiliates grew to reach 99% of Americans. Indiana is home to 17 stations, including in Indianapolis, Bloomington, Fort Wayne, Evansville, Vincennes, Muncie, West Lafayette, South Bend, Merrillville and Elkhart. Many of those stations cover and reach about two dozen counties each. That's why the federal government saw the value in funding public media, Miller Kelley said. Their reach extends into the corners of the country where commercial and nonprofit news is not financially feasible. A Muck Rack analysis found local journalism is declining across the country, and news deserts in Indiana and elsewhere are expanding. "It is an equalizer," she said. "That has been the intent of public media since the beginning. It was to make the content that you can find on PBS and NPR available to everyone." Public media leaders interviewed by IndyStar said the funding structure of public media meant stations don't need to worry about clickbait headlines or selling advertisements. That means, they said, that viewers are able to obtain information free of any commercial motives or sway. They can cover stories solely due to their importance to residents, Pope said, rather than for their commercial value. "We have the ability to not ask ourselves how many clicks this gets," he said. "We get the ability to first ask ourselves: 'Is this the right thing? Is there a story here?'" A 2025 study published in the Journal of Communication found that viewers, regardless of their political leanings, largely consume public broadcasting because they feel it's unbiased and they trust it because it's publicly funded. The study also found 47.4% of respondents thought it was an "excellent" use of tax dollars. Prior to this month's rescissions bill, the federal government allocated about $545 million annually, amounting to about 0.0073% of federal spending. In line with their FCC license, public broadcasting stations cannot run traditional commercials that seek to sell a product or are overly promotional. Instead, these stations have corporate sponsorships that vary in message and delivery. Part of what makes NPR and PBS special is the complete divorce from commercial interests, said Shelli Harmon-Baker, WVPE news director and local host. She said she doesn't have to worry about angering sponsors, like she did in commercial radio, for reporting out sensitive stories. "That's not something we think about here," she said. "You do the story for the sake of the story so that people know what's happening in their community." The lack of advertising is also critical for PBS's vast number of children's programs, Miller Kelley said. All of the shows are educator-vetted and based on curricula, she said. That programming is not sustained by ad buys, she said. "When your kid is watching PBS Kids, they're not going to come to you and say, 'I want that new Barbie,'" she said. "They are focused on learning, which is a gift to a parent in the moment because your kid isn't coming to you and making a laundry list of demands." Opponents cite a departure from public media's impartial mission as their reason for defunding public media. In May, the White House published a list of stories it said were "trash that has passed for 'news' at NPR and PBS." Trump and his conservative base argue NPR and PBS should not receive tax dollars to "spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as 'news.'" When asked about concerns that public media is too liberal, station leaders said that national narrative is one they largely don't hear from their patrons and that they believe is a misrepresentation of local news. "I don't think that woke narrative applies to us at all," Harmon-Baker said. "In fact, I think we go out of our way to make sure that we're just covering things that people are interested in and of local importance." Miller Kelley, Harmon-Baker and Pope told IndyStar about how their small staffs cover their local communities. Harmon-Baker spoke about her staff's coverage of an animal cruelty case involving a major local business. Miller Kelley said her station airs six weekly shows covering news, local talent, food, arts and culture. Pope said local artists have an outlet through his station. "It is hard for me as a GM to see the incredible work that the staff here does to lift up voices and bring attention to stories that might otherwise go unheard," Miller Kelley said. "It's very difficult as a general manager to hear all of that brushed aside under the politicization of media." When Pope encounters people with the opinion that public media is biased, he said, he tries to understand how a person came to their opinion and see how he can do better to address any local concerns. He doesn't buy that people like himself in public media are trying to push a political narrative. Instead, he said they are covering city council meetings, organizing volunteer DJs and covering high school sports. "We are always trying to make sure that we are being a voice for everyone's perspectives," he said, "because what we want to create is a broadcast that gives you the information you need and then allows you, respects you enough, to think about that, to marinate about what we've talked about and make a conclusion." The USA TODAY Network - Indiana's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners.

Oklahoma requires 'America First' certification test for teachers fleeing blue states
Oklahoma requires 'America First' certification test for teachers fleeing blue states

Fox News

time4 hours ago

  • Fox News

Oklahoma requires 'America First' certification test for teachers fleeing blue states

Oklahoma will be the first state to require teachers from liberal-leaning states to take a test to show they align with Oklahoma's curriculum standards. The state's Superintendent, Ryan Walters, told Fox News Digital that next week he plans to release a new certification test for teachers moving into the state from blue states. "We offered the largest signing bonuses for teachers in the country. If you're in the top 10 percent of teachers in the country, we give you $50,000 in Oklahoma. So we've seen teachers come from blue states, red states all over to come to Oklahoma. They especially are fleeing the teachers unions, the grip that they've had on them in these blue states," Walters said. Walters added that the state is working with conservative think tank PragerU on developing the test for teachers. The "America First" test will include basic questions about American history, civics, and "common sense." Oklahoma is thus far the only state that has worked with PragerU on this kind of project. Walters said that Oklahoma education officials have partnered with PragerU in the past, helping them develop standards for teaching history and putting an emphasis on American exceptionalism. "We put the Bible back in our history standards," Walters said. The superintendent mentioned Maine, California, and New York adopting standards and requirements that were antithetical to Oklahoma. "One of the things that we wanted to do is, first of all, make sure that they're great teachers, right? And No. 2, make sure we're not getting these woke, indoctrinating social justice warriors in the classroom," Walters said. He name-dropped California Gov. Gavin Newsom as one of the "impetuses" of the change, regarding the state's policy on gender ideology. The California Department of Education requires instruction "about gender, gender expression, gender identity and explore the harm of negative gender stereotypes." Schools must also "teach about all sexual orientations and what being LGBTQ means." "We're going to make sure that this isn't creeping into our schools. When we see Maine take the extraordinary steps to fight President Trump… Every county in Oklahoma voted for President Trump," Walters said. Maine has pushed back against President Donald Trump's executive orders requiring that schools teach that there are only two genders and that biological boys are prohibited from participating in female sports. "We have been closely following the implementation of teacher training and testing programs — such as the PRISM test imposed on educators in states like California — and we fully understand why superintendents of education, like Ryan Walters, feel compelled to protect their students from the extreme left-wing ideologies being promoted in schools through teachers who often do not even realize the damage caused," a spokesperson for PragerU told Fox News Digital. "It is our honor to help reverse the damage caused by these trends by equipping educators with higher-quality resources and holding them accountable to do what is right for their students. While we do not mandate the use of any of our materials, we strongly encourage the adoption of our wholesome, patriotic content as a constructive alternative," the spokesperson added. Walters' colleagues have previously challenged the legal merit of his idea. When Walters said the test would not need the board's approval, his colleague Ryan Deatherage asked for legal documentation to prove it. Board member Chris Van Denhende asked whether the tests were necessary, citing teaching contracts requiring educators to teach to Oklahoma standards anyway. "He's been a puppet for the teachers union," Walters told Fox News Digital, referring to Van Denhende. "I've had to deal with people in our state that are just continuing to parrot the lies of the NEA [National Education Association]. And here's the reality. What do you mean? We're seeing it all over the place. We are seeing indoctrination on kids like never before," he added. Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom and Van Denhende for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store