logo
Private sector DEI programs still legal despite Trump's executive order, Maryland AG says

Private sector DEI programs still legal despite Trump's executive order, Maryland AG says

CBS News14-02-2025
Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown is one of 16 state attorneys general joining together to issue guidance on how organizations should approach Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) programs in the workplace.
In the letter, the AGs emphasize that DEI programs are still legal, despite an executive order issued by President Trump halting federal DEI programs nationwide.
Following the order, Maryland leaders shared their support for DEI programs, and the City of Baltimore responded with a lawsuit alleging that the order would stifle programs the city relies on for essential functions.
What is DEI and DEIA?
DEI and DEIA refer to principles of diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility.
While the push gained momentum after the 2020 murder of George Floyd, DEI has much earlier roots.
The concept dates back to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned employment discrimination based on race, color, sex, religion, and other criteria. Since then, other policies seeking to eliminate hiring bias, promote fairness in the workplace, and provide equal opportunities to people of color, women, and individuals with disabilities have arisen. DEI has also expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity.
Are workplace DEI and DEIA programs legal?
Mr. Trump's executive order calls for an end to "discriminatory programs," including "'diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility' (DEIA) mandates, policies, programs, preferences, and activities in the Federal Government, under whatever name they appear."
It also instructs the U.S. attorney general to create a plan that would deter the private sector from continuing DEI programs.
According to the Bureau of Justice Assistance, "Executive Orders (EOs) are official documents … through which the President of the United States manages the operations of the Federal Government."
But the memo from the 16 state attorneys general says Mr. Trump's executive action does not have the authority to mandate an end to DEI and DEIA programs within the private sector.
"Diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility best practices are not illegal, and the federal government does not have the legal authority to issue an executive order that prohibits otherwise lawful activities in the private sector or mandates the wholesale removal of these policies and practices within private organizations, including those that receive federal contracts and grants," the memo reads.
AGs say DEI prevents workplace discrimination
The attorneys general argue that DEI employment practices are not only lawful but exist to prevent workplace discrimination — protecting companies from the risk of lawsuits.
"Employment policies incorporating diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility best practices are not only compliant with state and federal civil rights laws, but they also help to reduce litigation risk by affirmatively protecting against discriminatory conduct that violates the law."
According to the 16 attorneys general, more than 285,000 discrimination complaints have been filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by employees in their states alone.
In the letter, the attorneys general said Mr. Trump's executive order is misleading and suggests that DEI policies are discriminatory practices.
"The Executive Order states what is already the law—that discrimination is illegal—but then conflates unlawful preferences in hiring and promotion with sound and lawful best practices for promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in the workforce," the coalition of attorneys general wrote. "This conflation is inaccurate and misleading. Policies and practices that promote diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility are not the same as preferences in individual hiring and promotion decisions that have been found to be unlawful. The Executive Order cannot and does not prohibit these otherwise lawful practices and policies."
How should organizations implement DEI policies?
The attorneys general encouraged organizations to prioritize wide-scale recruitment efforts to attract diverse applicant pools, while using panel interviews to ensure multiple perspectives in hiring and promotion decisions.
The AGs said companies should also establish standardized evaluation criteria focused on skills and experience to maintain objective, merit-based hiring processes.
Companies are also encouraged to maintain accessible recruitment practices and provide reasonable accommodations throughout the hiring process.
In the letter, the attorneys general also told companies to ensure that employees have equal access to professional development, training, and mentorship programs to minimize turnover rates and strengthen organizational culture.
They also recommended employee resource groups, or ERGs, which are spaces where employees of common backgrounds can feel recognized and supported.
In addition, the AGs encouraged organizations to conduct training on unconscious bias, inclusive leadership, and disability awareness.
How do DEI programs impact the workplace?
DEI experts told CBS News that DEI is often misperceived as being solely focused on race. Policies giving working parents flexible work hours or establishing professional groups based on shared identities, such as sexual orientation, could also be classified as DEI programs.
Proponents of DEI argue that it improves the quality of the workforce and its employees, while opponents argue DEI programs work against the principle of merit-based hiring and promotions or even promote discrimination themselves.
According to Mr. Trump's executive order, DEI policies have led to "illegal, pernicious discrimination that has prioritized how people were born instead of what they were capable of doing."
In a statement Thursday, Attorney General Brown said companies in the top quartile for diversity are 35% more likely to have financial gains above their respective industry counterparts, citing a study by the consulting firm McKinsey & Company.
"Diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility initiatives are not only legal, they are essential for creating fair, thriving workplaces. They help businesses comply with the law, prevent discrimination, and ensure equal opportunities for all employees," Brown said. "DEIA policies are critical for expanding talent pools, addressing bias, and fostering employee success. Far from being illegal, they are vital for business growth, retention, and engagement."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thai-Cambodia Clashes Enter Second Day as US Calls for Ceasefire
Thai-Cambodia Clashes Enter Second Day as US Calls for Ceasefire

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Thai-Cambodia Clashes Enter Second Day as US Calls for Ceasefire

(Bloomberg) -- The armed military conflict between Thailand and Cambodia entered a second day, with troops using rockets and artillery to shell targets along their contested border as the US joined other nations in calling for an immediate ceasefire. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom Thailand's government put the death toll from the deadliest clashes in more than a decade at 14, including a soldier. Thai authorities have also said more than two dozen people were injured, some seriously, while Cambodia is yet to report on casualties. The Thai army said Cambodian 'forces conducted sustained bombardment' using heavy weapons, field artillery and rockets through Friday morning, and that it responded appropriately and advised civilians to avoid the conflict zones. Cambodia's defense ministry confirmed shelling overnight and claimed to control the site of three disputed temples, the Khmer Times reported. Read: What's Behind Deadly Thailand-Cambodia Border Clash?: QuickTake The flareup in clashes on Thursday, which included Thai airstrikes on Cambodian military bases using F-16 fighter jets and Phnom Penh's attack on civilian areas in Thailand, followed a months-long border standoff that also pushed Thailand's ruling coalition to the brink of collapse. Thai stocks and baht declined a second day. The baht fell 0.2% to 32.33 per dollar, in line with regional peers, while the benchmark stock index fell as much as 0.6%. The fighting has drawn condemnation from world leaders, with the US saying it was gravely concerned. Read: Cambodia Clash Heaps Pressure on Embattled Thai PM, Boosts Army 'The United States urges an immediate cessation of hostilities, protection of civilians, and a peaceful resolution of the conflict,' State Department deputy spokesman Tommy Pigott told reporters in Washington on Thursday. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump admin appeals to Supreme Court to allow $783M research-funding cuts over DEI
Trump admin appeals to Supreme Court to allow $783M research-funding cuts over DEI

New York Post

time13 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump admin appeals to Supreme Court to allow $783M research-funding cuts over DEI

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to allow it to cut hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of research funding in its push to roll back federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. The Justice Department argued a federal judge in Massachusetts was wrong to block the National Institutes of Health from making $783 million worth of cuts to align with President Donald Trump's priorities. US District Judge William Young found that the abrupt cancellations ignored long-held government rules and standards. Advertisement The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to cut $783 million of research funding in an effort to roll back diversity, equity and inclusion policies. AP Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, also said the cuts amounted to 'racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community.' 'I've never seen government racial discrimination like this,' Young said at a hearing last month. Advertisement An appeals court left the ruling in place. The ruling came in lawsuits filed by 16 attorneys general, public-health advocacy groups and some affected scientists. US District Judge William Young argued against the Trump administration that the proposed cuts amounted to 'racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community.' AP His decision addressed only a fraction of the hundreds of NIH research projects that have been cut. Advertisement The Trump administration's appeal also takes aim at nearly two dozen cases over funding. Solicitor General D. John Sauer pointed to a 5-4 decision on the Supreme Court's emergency docket from April that allowed cuts to teacher training programs to go forward, one of multiple recent victories for the president at the nation's highest court. The order shows that district judges shouldn't be hearing those cases at all, but rather sending them to federal claims court, he argued. 'Those decisions reflect quintessential policy judgments on hotly contested issues that should not be subject to judicial second-guessing. It is hardly irrational for agencies to recognize—as members of this Court have done—that paeans to 'diversity' often conceal invidious racial discrimination,' he wrote.

FCC approves Skydance-Paramount $8B merger
FCC approves Skydance-Paramount $8B merger

UPI

time14 minutes ago

  • UPI

FCC approves Skydance-Paramount $8B merger

1 of 3 | The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday announced it had approved Skydance's acquisition of Paramount Global. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo July 24 (UPI) -- The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday announced its approval of Skydance's $8 billion acquisition of Paramount Global, ending months of uncertainty surrounding the deal but inflaming allegations of corruption directed at the Trump administration. The FCC voted 2-1 in favor of Skydance's acquisition of Paramount and all of its subsidiaries, including Paramount Pictures, CBS television, Comedy Central and Nickelodeon. Among the commitments Skydance made to the Trump administration was ensuring it will include news and entertainment programming that "will embody a diversity of viewpoints across the political and ideological spectrum" and that CBS News' reporting "will be fair, unbiased and fact-based," according to the FCC. Skydance has also pledged that it will not establish any diversity, equity and inclusion policies -- ideology that seeks to create inclusive environments that the Trump administration has been seeking to remove from both public and private sectors on allegations of discrimination. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr described the merger as a change that will instill public trust in media. "It is time for a change," he said in a statement. "That is why I welcome Skydance's commitment to make significant changes at the once storied CBS broadcast network." Though the FCC said Skydance does not have any DEI programs, Carr said the agreement "marks another step forward in the FCC's efforts to eliminate invidious forms of DEI discrimination." Skydance announced the deal in July of last year, but the merger has stalled amid frictions with the Trump administration, as President Donald Trump has sparred with CBS News. Trump sued CBS News while campaigning for re-election in October for $10 billion in a lawsuit many saw as one he wouldn't win over editing of a 60 Minutes interview with his political opponent, Democrat Kamala Harris. He then upped the amount in damages to $20 billion after winning re-election. Earlier this month, Paramount Global reached a $16 million settlement with Trump that Democrats and critics of the Trump administration are calling a bribe and an affront to free speech -- accusations that only intensified after Trump earlier this week said Skydance has pledged $20 million more in advertising, PSAs and "other Similar Programming, for a total $36 MillIon Dollars." Paramount Global told UPI that the $16 million, minus fees and costs, will be allocated to Trump's future presidential library. FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, the only Democrat of the three commissioners and the only one not appointed by Trump, dissented to the merger, and described Paramount's settlement as "cowardly capitulation" and accused the FCC of losing its independence. In her strongly worded dissent, Gomez warned that this merger will not be the last time the Trump administration threatens the First Amendment. "The Paramount payout and this reckless approval have emboldened those who believe the government can -- and should -- abuse its power to extract financial and ideological concessions, demand favored treatment and secure positive media coverage," she said. "It is a dark chapter in a long and growing record of abuse that threatens press freedom in this country." Democrats were quick to lament their concerns online. "Trump filed a sham lawsuit against CBS, but instead of fighting it CBS' parent company, Paramount, paid Trump $16 million to his future library. So, you got to ask, why did Paramount do that if the suit was quote 'meritless'?" Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said in a video statement published online. "Well, maybe because they needed Trump to approve their multibillion-dollar merger, which Trump just did. The appearance of this wink-wink deal basically let's every other company and every other billionaire know that Trump is open for business, apparently happy to accept offers in exchange for favors." Warren has called for a full investigation into the deal. Sens. Ed Markey, D-Mass, and Ben Ray Lujan, D-N.M., described Thursday as "a dark day for independent journalism" and called the approval of the merger "a stain on the storied history of the Federal Communications Commission. "The FCC's approval of the Paramount-Skydance merger reeks of the worst form of corruption. The timing speaks for itself: Paramount settled with Trump for $36 million on Tuesday and the FCC approved the merger on Wednesday," they said in a joint statement. "The stench of this transaction will linger over the commission for years."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store