Double Wimbledon champion Petra Kvitova prepares for her last dance in SW19
Petra Kvitova needed to say the words out loud to ensure she could relax and enjoy her final Wimbledon.
The two-time women's singles champion only returned to the sport in February following the birth of son Petr a year ago but announced last week that she plans to call it a day after the US Open later this summer.
Kvitova is a former world number two and winner of 31 titles but her name will always be associated most with Wimbledon.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Wimbledon (@wimbledon)
She was a shy 21-year-old from small-town Czech Republic when she stunned Maria Sharapova in 2011, while she produced one of the most dominant final performances in Wimbledon history three years later, thumping Eugenie Bouchard 6-3 6-0.
'I wasn't really planning anything when I came back,' said Kvitova of her decision.
'I was just thinking I go how it goes. I do this year, maybe maximum next year. That's when I knew that I will not carry on for a long time because I was already tired before and tennis is a very difficult sport, and of course with a baby it's not that easy, and I'm not that young any more as well.
'My body, it's struggling a little bit, it's just too much probably. I had the time when I said, 'OK, I'm done, I don't want to put myself in this situation'.
'I wanted to enjoy Wimbledon. I wanted to know, even for myself, that it will be my last Wimby because it's so many great memories I have – even the bad ones.
'Most important are the two great ones. It's always been my special tournament and that's why I wanted to say it out loud before it starts.'
Asked for her favourite All England Club memory, the 35-year-old cites the moments before she clinched the trophy for the first time.
'I think it was the first one, when I had 5-4 and I was going to serve for the match,' she said.
'I do remember I was sitting on the bench and I was telling myself it's maybe just one chance in my life so I should try to do it.
'Those wins were the most I could wish for and it was very special to win it for a second time as well. Since then I always wanted to have the feeling again. Probably that's why I was sometimes struggling as well in the first rounds. I put too much pressure on me. Sometimes it was very sad.'
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Petra Kvitova (@petra.kvitova)
Kvitova said she will not miss the travel or the pre-match nerves – 'sometimes I was white as a wall' – but she has never grown tired of tennis.
'I will miss tennis itself,' she said ahead of a first-round match against 10th seed Emma Navarro on Tuesday.
'It's a beautiful sport, it's something which you need everything – hands, legs, mind – to be really ready and you are alone on the court.
'I'm not sure how I'm going to feel but every time stepping here in Wimbledon it's very, very special. This time will be a different special for sure but definitely I will enjoy it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
30 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Wimbledon briefing: Day one preview, order of play and must-see match
Women's world number one Aryna Sabalenka and defending men's champion Carlos Alcaraz start their campaigns on Monday while 14 British players take to the court hoping to thrill the home crowd. Here, the PA news agency breaks down what to expect on day one of the Championships. Brit watch Jacob Fearnley is eyeing a good run at Wimbledon (Walton/PA) British tennis fans are spoiled for choice on Monday as 14 of the 23 home players in the singles draws take to the court. Emma Raducanu faces Welsh 17-year-old Mimi Xu in the day's 'battle of Britain' while British number two Katie Boulter and number three Sonay Kartal have their work cut out against seeds Paula Badosa and Jelena Ostapenko respectively. Sixteen-year-olds Hannah Klugman and Mika Stojsavljevic are also against seeds – former US Open finalist Leylah Fernandez and Ashlyn Krueger respectively – while Harriet Dart plays Hungary's Dalma Galfi. In the men's draw British number two Jacob Fearnley takes on hot Brazilian prospect Joao Fonseca while Cameron Norrie faces Roberto Bautista Agut. Debutant Oliver Tarvet, former boys' champion Henry Searle, Billy Harris, Arthur Fery and Oliver Crawford also take to the court on Monday. Raducanu plays down expectations View this post on Instagram A post shared by @emmaraducanu Emma Raducanu made the fourth round last year in her biggest moment since winning the US Open in 2021 but this time is dealing with some difficult personal news, a niggling back problem and a very tough section of the draw. But the 22-year-old is determined to enjoy her time in SW19. 'Truthfully I don't expect much from myself this year (at Wimbledon),' she said. 'I know I've just been dealing with certain things. I just want to go out there and embrace the moment. I want to embrace the occasion. 'Right now I'm just happy to be at Wimbledon. I think that is a great motivation to just keep going and deal with everything else afterwards.' King Carlos eyes hat-trick Carlos Alcaraz has won the last two men's singles finals (Aaron Chown/PA) Carlos Alcaraz is full of confidence as he starts his bid for a third successive Wimbledon men's singles title – a feat managed only by Bjorn Borg, Pete Sampras, Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic in the Open era. The Spaniard comes into the tournament in superb form, with his 18th-straight victory securing the title at Queen's to follow up successes in Rome and, memorably, at the French Open. The 22-year-old, who opens play on Centre Court against veteran Italian Fabio Fognini, said: 'Obviously I feel a lot of confidence. But right now I'm not thinking about who I could join if I win three Wimbledons in a row.' Match of the day Katie Boulter is confident she can cause problems for Paula Badosa (John Walton/PA) Katie Boulter's hopes of a long Wimbledon run were handed a major early obstacle when she was drawn against Spanish ninth seed Paula Badosa. But the 28-year-old is confident she can give anyone a match on Wimbledon's lawns. 'I do feel like I can play very well on these courts and I don't think that a seed is going to want to see me in their part of the draw either for a first round,' Boulter said. 'I'm very, very excited. I feel like it's a totally different situation for me coming in this year. I'm not seeded. I'm kind of like a dark horse and I like that feeling. I do like the fact that I can go out and swing free and I've got nothing to lose.' Order of play The Order of Play for Day One at #Wimbledon has been confirmed… Tap the card below to view the full schedule 👇 — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) June 28, 2025 Centre Court (from 1.30pm) Carlos Alcaraz (2) v Fabio Fognini Katie Boulter v Paula Badosa (9) Alexander Zverev (3) v Arthur Rinderknech Court One (from 1pm) Aryna Sabalenka (1) v Carson Branstine Jacob Fearnley v Joao Fonseca Emma Raducanu v Mimi Xu Weather A fan sunbathes in the queue (Mike Egerton/PA) Hot and sunny, with highs of 33 degrees Celsius, according to Accuweather.
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
BBC could lose Wimbledon if they are not careful
It's upon us, the time all tennis fans anticipate – Wimbledon. Some people even take a fortnight's holiday so they don't miss any of the action, although I suspect working from home has taken care of that. For the BBC, the quality of broadcasting takes on a special meaning. The relationship between the Corporation and Wimbledon has been going on for almost 100 years but so many major live sports have been lost in recent years that there is always an element of concern that Wimbledon, which for the time being remains the jewel in the crown, might go the same way. The bad news for any potential competitor is that the BBC has a contract with Wimbledon until 2027, which interestingly will be the centenary of the first radio broadcast from the All England Club. If you took in the recent French championships at Roland Garros, you might have been highly impressed by TNT's coverage. They threw all their resources at it, which their American parent company allowed them to do. Their team included stars such as John McEnroe, Chris Evert, Mats Wilander and Jim Courier, not to mention a much-improved Tim Henman, who seems to have added a lightness of touch to his undoubted knowledge of the game. Interesting to note that Henman will be part of the BBC commentary team as usual. The men's singles final in Paris between Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner has been described as the best ever. The commentary by Nick Mullins, another who doubles up at the BBC, aided and abetted by Wilander and Courier, both former winners of grand-slam tournaments, was superb. Meanwhile Sky, with their own dedicated tennis channel, seems to be waiting in the wings to grab any chance they have of expanding their coverage. A few years ago, the French Open was broadcast on ITV4 and some years previously ITV had a share of Wimbledon coverage but it did not last long. It will be vitally important for the BBC to keep up their very high standards, otherwise in a couple of years the sport could fade away to the highest bidder as most of the other major sports seem to have done. One added complication is the BBC charter is also due for renewal in 2027. Meanwhile, we have two weeks of wonderful tennis to look forward to. Young Jack Draper leading the British challenge and those fantastic players Alcaraz and Sinner potentially doing battle again. Oh – and do not forget the old master Novak Djokovic is waiting in the wings, still hungry at 38 to collect his 25th grand-slam title.
New Statesman
40 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Why do right-wing 'transvestigators' believe Michelle Obama is a man?
Photo by Charly Triballeau/AFP A new fetish has evolved. For a long time, it was easy to predict the archetypal sexist vitriol spewed by anonymous, vaguely Nordic X accounts whenever a woman came close to the highest seats of political power. But lately, their fascination with female authority has deepened – and twisted. Welcome to the world of the transvestigators: the West is falling, family values are under attack, and Michelle Obama is secretly a man. The objective of this conspiracy among far-right internet sleuths is to use phrenology to 'prove' that cisgender celebrities – namely the wives of political figures – are secretly transgender (or 'inverted,' as they are typically referred to). These detectives scrutinise the physical features of these women – from their height and voices to their jaws or 'energy'– in search of supposed deviations from arbitrary beauty standards. While it began with posts about the former First Lady and Angela Merkel, transvestigation has now proliferated throughout the online far-right ecosystem, where each new day brings another avalanche of outlandish claims and AI transvestigation sludge. The most recent swell came when Meghan Markle shared footage – in her uber-cheery, classically cringey Instagram mode – of herself and Prince Harry dancing in a hospital. The choreography in the video was allegedly a labour-inducing ritual and, also allegedly, a successful one: Rachel from Suits and the Spare made the post to celebrate four years since Lilibet's birth. The far-right saw through all that: 'At first, I didn't buy into the rumours', an X post began. But 'there's no denying this: Meghan Markle is a fraud'. Markle's great swindle? Trying to convince the world that she gave birth to her children. Anyone with two eyes and a lot of free time could see the truth. That was no baby bump – that's a scrunched-up 'puffer jacket,' a balled-up 'blanket,' or, as one user astutely proposed, a rumpled 'hotel sheet.' The ruse confirmed what they had always known: Prince Harry had married a woman who was unwilling to carry her own child, so insisted on having Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet via surrogate. Transvestigation is part of a broader 'emasculation fetish' within the online right. That sense of emasculation was formed by the twin pressures of two perceived threats: the woke left's crusade against traditional masculine values and an influx of 'fast-breeding alien immigrants'. The persecuted and surrounded envisioned a new image of virtue – then stuck it in the White House. This new model was the fertile patriarch: Donald Trump. He was Christian (sort of), nationalist, strong, with a perfect (mute) Mar-a-Lago-faced wife and a legion of grinning, preferably white, children. J.D. Vance said, 'I want more babies in the United States of America'. In an essay explaining his conversion to Catholicism, Vance remembered 'the achievement that mattered most to me for so much of my life: a happy, thriving family.' With the new pride came a new fall. The most disgraceful shame, now, was to lose control over your woman and her womb. And with the emergence of transgenderism, 'cuck' (from cuckold), the old insult, metastasised into a still more fearful peril for dominated husbands. Your wife could secretly be a man. Thus a new ignominy was mapped out, where the children weren't children, the wives weren't wives and, above all, the men weren't men. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe It was only a week before the Markle video that the world had stopped to watch Emmanuel Macron pushed in the face by his wife, Brigitte, as they deplaned during a state visit to Vietnam. Here was a head of state reduced to a trembling 'man-child' – emasculated and humiliated by a wife who groomed him as his teacher. X and Reddit filled with AI memes of a black-eyed, arm-slung Macron cowering beside his wife. But in 2025, scenes that we once might have called 'unfortunate' now supply more complex implications. Right-wing talking-head Candace Owens was willing to stake her considerable professional reputation on this one. Owens told listeners of her multi-part series Becoming Brigitte to 'stop everything': she had unravelled 'likely the biggest scandal that has ever happened in politics in human history'. The French president's wife was a man. This she was a he, the femme was a homme, and there were prehistoric, grainy zoom-ins on Brigitte's crotch to prove it. In this world, few passions are more dearly cherished than the transvestigation. Even while interviewing Renaud Camus, the originator of the 'Great Replacement' theory, the key online right guru Curtis Yarvin could not resist questions about Brigitte's sex. A baffled Camus protested, 'We are dealing with the most important thing in the history of the Continent,' referring to the rise of nonwhite immigration to Europe. 'What does it matter if Mrs. Macron is a man or a woman?' But to some, it very much does matter. And the 'Brigitte = Jean-Michel' hypothesis has but a fraction of the traction of 'Michelle = Michael'. This is the idea that Michelle Obama, whose husband has long been a hate figure for the American right, is Michael LaVaughn Robinson. It's absurd, sometimes even laughable. But emasculating non-compliant figures like Prince Harry, Macron and Obama – while deploying the triumvirate of far-right insults: racism, sexism, and transphobia against their wives – has generated an almost guaranteed formula for viral outrage, meme fodder, and reinforcement of reactionary gender norms. It's a wider endorsement of traditional general roles that promote the restriction of women to domestic roles, while offline, a broad backlash against feminism has led to legislative changes that reduce women's bodily autonomy. Most irritating, if not most serious, is the unavoidable suspicion that all this noise has rather more to do with the accusers than the accused. Seeing anonymous crotch-zoomers lamenting the downfall of Western civilisation on X, I remember Christopher Hitchens: 'Whenever I hear some bigmouth in Washington or the Christian heartland banging on about the evils of sodomy or whatever, I mentally enter his name in my notebook and contentedly set my watch. Sooner, rather than later, he will be discovered down on his weary and well-worn knees in some dreary motel or latrine, with an expired Visa card, having tried to pay well over the odds to be peed on.' As it happens, a 2022 lawsuit unearthed a Republican enthusiasm for transgender porn. Texas, Georgia, Kentucky, Missouri, and Kansas – five valiant defenders of Bible, bullet and boot – came out on top of the charts. The new beau idéal of the right-wing family is a familiar one. In fact, the idea beneath it is very nearly a cliché: that behind every successful man is, well, another man. [See also: Is Thomas Skinner the future of the right?] Related
