School mobile phone ban call rejected after Senedd inquiry
The Senedd's Petitions Committee held an inquiry in response to a petition signed by more than 3,000 people calling for smartphones to be banned in schools, except in exceptional circumstances.The committee spoke to teachers, pupils and parents as part of its inquiry.It considered the different rules currently adopted by schools in Wales and, what it described as, "the complex relationship" between young people and their smartphones.The committee concluded that an outright "ban" on smartphones in all schools was not "a clear cut call" and that instead it wanted to see more support for schools to set their own restrictions.Kayla Lovell, 25, from Cribyn, Ceredigion, said she did not think phones needed to be banned in schools and argued that banning them only led to pupils hiding phones.
"I think for people like maybe in sixth form, it would be a good idea, and a part of safety," she said.For Sam Herbert, 50, mother to 13-year-old Stephanie, safety is also a valid reason to question a ban."Maybe they should hold them in the school when they attend school, and then give them back to the end of the day, so that they have them for going home or when they need them," she said.But Stephanie, who is diabetic, uses her phone to manage her condition, meaning a ban would be a real cause for concern for her.
Lewis Jarvis-Blower, 23, from Llanwnnen, Ceredigion, said a ban was "probably for the best" but admitted he liked using his phone during breaks and at lunchtime."I would be fuming, really angry," he said, if he were a student now and a ban was introduced. "It already feels like sometimes there's not the freedom there," he added."The schools struggling with it... it's probably best if they have their own rules to cater uniquely to their students."In its report, the committee calls on the Welsh government to establish "clear guidance, alongside a robust decision-making framework, which will give teachers the confidence to set rules that work best for their young people".
It also wants the Welsh government to keep following the evidence of studies into the impact of smartphone restrictions during the school day.Tracey Boothby, 44, from Lampeter, Ceredigion, said a ban would be "tricky" but added that while children were in school, social media was "obviously a no-no"."You're in a place of education, and I do feel, as parents that... we should help with whatever the schools decide," she said.
'Compelling and concerning'
Laura Doel, national secretary of school leaders' union NAHT Cymru, said an outright ban would not work."School leaders need the flexibility and support to develop a policy that works for them to keep the children and staff in their schools and communities safe," she said in a statement."The fact is we live in a society where phone use is prevalent. "But it is important that we educate children and young people, to help them understand and navigate this online world, and make sure they know how to seek help when it becomes unsafe or unhealthy, as well as clamping down on those who do not obey the rules."Carolyn Thomas, the Labour chairwoman of the committee, said it was "a complex" topic."The growing body of evidence about the harms of smartphones outweighing the benefits for children is both compelling and concerning," she said."However, on balance we do not believe that it supports a move to a uniform ban on smartphones in all Welsh schools."The more evidence we heard, the clearer it became that the relationship between young people and their phones is not simple."There are children who experience distraction, cyber-bullying, addiction and anxiety delivered through their phones. "There are others who are liberated by being able to manage health conditions or feel emboldened to walk to school, knowing they can always contact a parent."In England, smartphones are not banned from schools but the UK government has issued guidance encouraging headteachers to prohibit their use.Some Welsh schools already ban smartphones.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
17 hours ago
- Wales Online
Private schools hike fees in Wales as pupils leave amid VAT changes
Private schools hike fees in Wales as pupils leave amid VAT changes Private schools in Wales are being hit hard by Labour reforms in Westminster Howell's School (Image: Western Mail and Echo Copyright ) Independent schools in Wales are increasing fees by thousands of pounds from September as a direct result of new VAT charges and admit that some pupils have left as a result. As the academic year ends headteachers say they have taken action to absorb costs but some are hiking fees by as much as 12%. It comes as reforms brought in by Keir Starmer's government in Westminster mean that from January this year private school fees in the UK have been made subject to a 20% VAT charge. Howell's in the leafy Llandaff suburb of Cardiff confirmed its fees will rise by 12% next term. The school lists fees for 2025-2026 as £15,279 a year with lunch and VAT for children aged three to six and £19,809 for senior students. School management said they have taken some measures to cushion the other 8% of the 20% VAT costs and realise the economic pressure on its families. Read the biggest stories in Wales first by signing up to our daily newsletter here Westbourne School in Penarth says VAT is "an imposition". (Image: Westbourne School, Penarth ) A spokesperson said: "At Howell's, we are not immune to the impact of VAT on school fees and rising operational costs, but as a member of the Girls' Day School Trust (GDST) – a family of 26 schools – we benefit from the scale, resources, and efficiencies of a larger network. Article continues below "We have managed to mitigate the full financial impact of the tax change and have increased fees, inclusive of VAT, by 12%, while absorbing the remaining 8%. "We are very well aware of the financial sacrifices Welsh families make to provide their children with a Howell's education, and the additional, incremental costs that add up over time. "With that in mind, we have taken meaningful steps to support our community and since January, breakfast club and after-school care has been included in fees for pupils in nursery to year six, and we have also reduced the cost of our holiday club by 30 percent." Westbourne School in Penarth will also be charging more from next turn to cover the higher VAT bill. The school lists fees as just over £4,300 a term for reception age children rising to just over £7,600 a term in sixth form. Mark Peters, chairman of Westbourne said fees there will "rise slightly" and that a "small number" of parents had made the choice to take their children away as a result. Realising the impact the school had spoken individually to parents, he said.. Describing VAT on private fees as "an imposition" he said the school, which takes day and boarder pupils, is in a strong position with international satellite schools and more than one in four pupils from overseas. "VAT is quite an imposition on families who work hard to send their children to independent school," Mr Peters said, "our approach is that it is very unfortunate. "We spoke to parents one to one. Working parents want to do their best for their children and value the education we offer". Ruthin School is raising fees from September as a result of VAT (Image: Ruthin School ) Ruthin School in north Wales, which traces its roots back to 1284, described the current climate as "challenging" and the market for new pupils as "slow" thanks to VAT. It has also hiked fees for its day pupils by between 8 and 12%. It lists its full boarding fees for 2024/2025 as £45,690 a year and full boarding fees for 2025-26 as £54,828 including VAT. Day fees are rising by thousands too. For day sixth form students next year's fees will be £18,500 compared to £17,698 in the 2024-25 academic year. A spokesperson said: "Ruthin School recognises that these are challenging times for all. Anyone considering enrolling their children to independent schools will now be having to think hard about the financial viability of this following the government introduction of VAT onto school fees. "With regard to the impact of VAT on the school over the last few months, whilst we have retained our existing students, we have seen a slower response to sign up from the local market as potential parents review their financial situation. "To support enrolment from the day market, we have launched the Gabriel Goodman Award, which provides financial support for local families who can demonstrate strong local connections but who don't feel they have the funds to afford full fees at our school. "We are very proud of our Welsh roots and are keen to keep the school attractive and relevant to the local market whom we have served for the last 740 years." Ruthin says it is "strong and stable" as it is part of the Global Galaxy Group, "a group of four high achieving schools" working together to best manage their educational offer and costs to parents". It will continue to offer both day and boarding places and, like many independent schools, recruits pupils from around the world beyond Wales' borders. But it warned: "With regard to the impact of VAT on the school over the last few months, whilst we have retained our existing students, we have seen a slower response to sign up from the local market as potential parents review their financial situation." Critics said the VAT bill would lead to school closures and greater burden on already overstretched state schools as families moved their children to the local mainstream system. Supporters said it was right that those who can afford it pay more tax. In the spring St Clare's School in Porthcawl announced plans to close at the end of the Christmas term. Education firm Cognita, which owns and runs the school announced soon after that it also plans to shut Oakleigh House School in Swansea. Announcing the closure of St Clare's after 85 years and Oakleigh House after nearly a century Cognita did not reference VAT directly but cited forces beyond its control. In a letters to parents the company also blamed the falling local birth rate saying projected pupil numbers for next academic year made the schools "unsustainable". Read the biggest stories in Wales first by signing up to our daily newsletter here Westbourne School in Penarth (Image: Westbourne School, Penarth ) In Porthcawl parents hoping to keep St Clare's running have raised funds to buy the school, which they believe is viable. It's actions like this which heads say shows how much parents want the choice independent schools offer. Making the case for Wales' independent schools Paul Norton, director of the Welsh Independent Schools Council, said they often deliver life changing help and education to children who have not been able to get what they need in mainstream schools. "As someone who has dedicated years to running a school that provides specialist support for pupils with different learning needs and abilities, I believe it's time we spoke more openly about the vital role these schools play—not as alternatives to the state system, but as valued partners in a diverse educational ecosystem," he write recently on a WISC blog. St Clare's School, Porthcawl is facing potential closure by the end of this year Article continues below Mr Norton said independent schools in Wales come in all shapes and sizes, from large institutions with centuries of history to small, "nurturing environments". "Many families want and need something different for the education of their children, whether this has a grounding in additional learning needs, religious or cultural beliefs, mental wellbeing or small classes and a more nurturing environment, and our schools offer something irreplaceable: expertise, agility, and above all, hope," he said.
South Wales Guardian
17 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Former Conservative MP who harassed ex-wife handed community order
Katie Wallis, 41, of Butetown, Cardiff, the MP for Bridgend in South Wales from 2019 to 2024, became the first openly transgender MP in the House of Commons in 2022. Appearing before Cardiff Magistrates' Court on Monday, Wallis, who was previously known as Jamie, was sentenced for harassing her ex-wife, Rebecca Wallis, now known as Rebecca Lovell. The court heard the former MP sent messages accusing Ms Lovell of being 'mean' to them, demanding to know about her new partner, saying she was 'cock hunting,' and calling her a 'c***' and a 'f****** bitch'. On February 25, using an unknown number, the former MP demanded £350,000 be put into their bank account within 15 minutes. In a separate message, Wallis referred to her ex-wife and father as 'prejudiced f******' adding they hope they 'never have a happy moment again'. In total, the former MP sent four messages and left one voice note. The couple split in 2020, with the divorce finalised in 2024. In a victim impact statement, which was read to the court, Ms Lovell said: 'This is the hardest thing I have written, for so long I have had to fight against the tide of Jamie's behaviour, publicly and privately.' She added: 'The woman I used to be is destroyed. I will never understand what I have done to deserve the hurt I have endured.' Ms Lovell described the last six months as 'utterly devastating' and said she was living her life as an 'overstimulated adult constantly in fight or flight'. She said she feared Wallis turning up at her home, leading her to have CCTV installed. Wallis, who was wearing a black dress, looked down as the statement was read to the court. Narita Bahra KC, appearing for the defence, said Wallis uses female pronouns, referring to Jamie as her 'deadname'. She argued it was 'disappointing' the case had come to court, criticising South Wales Police and the Crown Prosecution Service for not dealing with the issue outside the court. Ms Bahra argued it was 'unequivocal' that Wallis had been suffering from mental health difficulties at the time of the offending, partly brought on by their transitioning. She also said Wallis was suffering from PTSD, a depressive disorder and an adjustment disorder. Ms Bahra said Wallis was remorseful and did not seek to excuse her actions. In Wallis's final message to Ms Lovell she asked for help, claimed she was experiencing pain in her temples and said she wanted her father to pay for someone to hold her hand. Wallis was then found by police and sectioned under the Mental Health Act before being arrested and later charged. District Judge Rhys Williams handed Wallis a 12-month community order to be carried out over 12 days and a fine worth £1,264. He also imposed a restraining order for 12 months to prevent Wallis from contacting Ms Lovell. Wallis, who pleaded guilty to leaving the messages at a hearing in June, initially denied the charges, but changed her plea when allegations of having driven by her ex-wife's home were removed from the charge.
The National
17 hours ago
- The National
Scottish Government agrees to meet with Sex Matters
The Government also said its trans and non-binary inclusion policy, which applies to staff, is under 'active review'. Campaign group Sex Matters has called on ministers to make a statement on its policy around access to toilets in Government properties. Sex Matters wrote to Nicola Richards, the Scottish Government's director of people, at the start of July to raise concerns about single-sex spaces. READ MORE: Russell Findlay under fire for £150k taxpayer cash given to ex-spin doctor's firms The letter followed the issue of a formal 'letter before action' in June warning of potential legal action, saying ministers are failing to implement the recent Supreme Court judgment on biological sex in equalities legislation. The campaign group was offered a meeting with Dr Richards, with the Government saying the policy on trans and non-binary equality had been put under 'active review' in light of the Supreme Court judgment. But the Government said the policy has not been amended. Dr Richards wrote that the Scottish Government does not agree with Sex Matters that it is 'appropriate or straightforward to take immediate steps' to bring its toilets policy into line with the Supreme Court's ruling on the meaning of 'man' and 'woman'. She cited the Good Law Project's legal challenge to the Health and Safety Executive's interpretation of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 as a reason for a lack of action on the policy. Dr Richards wrote: 'Given these complexities, the Scottish Government does not agree that it is appropriate or straightforward to take immediate steps to either withdraw or amend the current policy. 'It is my understanding that the approach of the Scottish Government in this regard, of reviewing policies and, where appropriate, seeking guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), is consistent with the position of the UK and Welsh Governments. 'Appropriate changes will be made to the policy referred to in your letter, and others impacted by the ruling, as soon as the Scottish Government has further clarity. This will follow any required and appropriate consultation and engagement.' Later this week, the employment tribunal involving nurse Sandie Peggie and NHS Fife will resume. Veteran nurse Peggie brought the case against the health board after her complaint about sharing a changing room with transgender medic Dr Beth Upton led to her being suspended. Peggie lodged a complaint of sexual harassment or harassment related to a protected belief under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. A 10-day hearing was adjourned in February, shortly before the Supreme Court judgment was returned. The tribunal hearings are due to recommence in Dundee on July 16. Maya Forstater (above, right), founder of Sex Matters, said: 'We have accepted the offer of a meeting in the hope of gaining clarity about how the Scottish Government is currently managing its workplace facilities, and when it intends to bring them into line with the law. 'Tomorrow would be a good answer. It is now three months since the Supreme Court ruling and, this week, the Sandie Peggie tribunal resumes. 'It is atrocious that public bodies are still dragging their feet and describing the question of whether female staff deserve privacy and dignity as complex. 'Parliament makes the law and the highest court in the land has now clarified its meaning.' She added: 'Whether or not we pursue legal action depends entirely on what the Scottish Government does next.' The Scottish Government has been contacted for further comment.
