US did not play any role in halting India's military action during Operation Sindoor : Jaishankar
Speaking in Rajya Sabha while resuming the discussion on Operation Sindoor he said there was no conversation between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump to halt the military action. 'There was no telephonic conversation between the two leaders from April 22 to June 16,''.'
Rejecting opposition allegations of diplomatic failure during Operation Sindoor, the External Affairs Minister said Indian diplomacy was perfectly on track given that the BRICS summit condemned the Pahalgam terrorist attack.
'BRICS countries condemned the conspirators behind the Pahalgam attack and cross-border terrorism, whereas in the BRICS summit statement after the Mumbai attacks, cross-border terrorism was not mentioned,' he said. He also highlighted that Germany, France, Russia and the European Union had condemned the Pahalgam attack.
The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) had also issued a statement on April 25 condemning the Pahalgam terrorist attack when Pakistan was a member of the Council and India was not.
Praising the valour of Indian armed forces during Operation Sindoor, he said the military struck terrorist hideouts in Bahawalpur and Muridke with precision. 'These were strongholds of terrorism in Pakistan. Several Pakistani airports were also targeted. This was a major success of Operation Sindoor.'
For those demanding proof of the Operation's success, he suggested watching videos on YouTube showing terrorists' funerals after they were killed, which would reveal the nature of the Indian Army's action.
He acknowledged the closeness between Pakistan and China and said both countries have come closer over time, not overnight. Referring to incidents during Congress governments, he pointed out that Pakistan-China relations have had moments of proximity in the past as well.
He said that by suspending the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) Prime Minister Modi had corrected the wrongs committed by former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. "Blood and water will not flow together," he said, providing reasons for India's decision to suspend the IWT.
Dr Jaishankar recalled that during the Indus Waters Treaty, Nehru was more concerned about Pakistani farmers than Indian farmers. Nehru had stated in Lok Sabha that the water agreement would benefit farmers in West Punjab which was then part of Pakistan.
Jaishankar also appreciated the role of Members of Parliament who were part of the all-party delegations sent to different countries to clarify India's position on Operation Sindoor.
India's delegation visited 33 countries with MPs like Shashi Tharoor, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Sanjay Jha, Supriya Sule and Srikant Shinde effectively presenting India's viewpoint to the world.
UNI AJ RB
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
13 minutes ago
- Business Standard
RS adjourned till 2 pm as Opposition parties press for discussion on SIR
Proceedings of the Rajya Sabha were adjourned till 2 pm on Thursday after Opposition MPs created uproar over the issue of Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls. The House was adjourned twice during the pre-lunch session over the SIR issue. Soon after the House met at 12 noon after one adjournment in the morning, Opposition MPs were on their feet raising slogans in support of their demand for a discussion on SIR of Bihar's electoral rolls. The MPs demanded that the special revision of electoral rolls should be discussed in the House. The Opposition has been demanding a roll back of the SIR in Bihar till the after the Assembly polls, which are due later this year. Ghanshyam Tiwari who was in the Chair urged the potesting MPs to maintain decorum in the House and allow the Question Hour to function. Unrelenting Opposition members, however, continued to raise slogans. Some of the TMC members also trooped into the Well and continued with their sloganeering. Amid the din the Chair adjourned the House till 2 pm. Earlier when the House met, Deputy Chairman Harivansh cited loss of time in disruptions since the start of the monsoon session and asked MPs to allow listed business to be taken up. But the Opposition parties continued to press for a time and date for holding a discussion on SIR. Harivansh said the Opposition and Treasury benches must sit together and decide on the issue. But this did not cut much ice as Opposition MPs started raising slogans against SIR. The Deputy Chairman called for taking up of the listed Zero Hour mentions but adjourned the proceedings till 12 noon as the Opposition MPs refused to relent. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Asaduddin Owaisi's first reaction to 2008 Malegaon blast case verdict by NIA court: ‘Shoddy investigation'
Asaduddin Owaisi of the AIMIM on Thursday expressed disappointment over the acquittal of all accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, calling it a result of a 'deliberately shoddy investigation and prosecution'. AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi speaks to media.(ANI file) 'The Malegaon blast case verdict is disappointing. Six namazis were killed in the blast and nearly 100 were injured. They were targeted for their religion. A deliberately shoddy investigation/prosecution is responsible for the acquittal,' the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief posted on X. Asaduddin Owaisi questioned whether the Centre and Maharashtra governments would challenge the verdict. 'Seventeen years after the blast, the Court has acquitted all of the accused for lack of evidence. Will the Modi & Fadnavis governments appeal the judgement the way they swiftly demanded stay in the Mumbai train blasts acquittals? Will Maharashtra's 'secular' political parties demand accountability? Who killed the 6 people?' Also Follow | Malegaon Blast Case Verdict LIVE Updates Owaisi also recalled former special public prosecutor Rohini Salian's allegation that she was asked to "go soft" on the accused. 'Remember, in 2016 the then prosecutor in the case Rohini Salian went on record to say that NIA had asked her to 'go soft' on the accused. Remember, in 2017, NIA had tried to get Sadhvi Pragya acquitted. The same person would go on to be a BJP MP in 2019.' Also Read | What is Malegaon blast case? Verdict today: What we know about 17-year-long probe He further mentioned slain ATS chief Hemant Karkare, who had initially probed the blast case before being killed in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. 'Karkare had uncovered the conspiracy in Malegaon & was unfortunately killed by Pakistani terrorists in the 26/11 attacks. The BJP MP went on record saying that she had cursed him and his death was a consequence of his curse.' Taking aim at the current government, Owaisi asked, 'Will NIA/ATS officers be held accountable for their faulty investigation? I think we know the answer. This is the 'tough on terror' Modi government. The world will remember that it made a terror accused a Member of Parliament.' 2008 Malegaon blast case: Court acquits all 7 accused Nearly 17 years after the Malegaon blast claimed six lives, the special court acquitted all seven accused, including former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, noting there was "no reliable and cogent evidence" against them. No religion teaches violence, the court said. Terrorism has no religion, but the court cannot convict on mere perception, it added. Special Judge AK Lahoti, assigned to hear cases of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) here, flagged several loopholes in the prosecution's case and the investigation carried out, and said the accused persons deserved the benefit of doubt. An explosive device strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in the town, located about 200 km from Mumbai, on September 29, 2008 killing six persons and injuring 101 others. Besides Thakur and Purohit, the accused comprised Major Ramesh Upadhyay (retired), Ajay Rahirkar, Sudhakar Dwivedi, Sudhakar Chaturvedi and Sameer Kulkarni. Once the court acquitted the seven accused, they looked relieved with smiles on their faces. They thanked the judge and their lawyers. The court while reading out the judgment said there was no "reliable and cogent" evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. "Mere suspicion cannot take the place of real proof," the court said, adding that in the absence of any evidence, the accused persons deserve the benefit of doubt. "The overall evidence does not inspire confidence in the court to convict the accused. There is no reliable and cogent evidence to warrant conviction," the judge said while reading out the judgment. The court also said provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) were not applicable to the case.
The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Raichur MP alleges stagnation in Institutions of Eminence scheme
Raichur Lok Sabha member G. Kumar Naik has criticised the Union Government's handling of the Institutions of Eminence (IoE) scheme, saying the Centre has failed to deliver on its core promise of building globally competitive universities even eight years after its launch. On July 28, the MP had raised the issue in the Lok Sabha. Following up, on July 31, Mr. Naik released a statement in which the MP stated: 'Bureaucratic inertia, underfunding, and lack of institutional autonomy' have derailed the Central Government's flagship programme for higher education excellence. 'The state of higher education in India speaks volumes in the silence that has followed. The ambition was to put Indian universities on the global map. But as the numbers show, the reality is far from this goal,' he said. According to the reply by the Union Ministry of Education to his query, only 114 institutions have applied under the IoE scheme since its launch in 2017. Of these, just 11 are greenfield institutions that are yet to commence operations. The MP termed the figures 'abysmally low', noting with concern that prominent institutions such as Jawaharlal Nehru University, known for its work in the social sciences and development studies, are excluded from public funding under the scheme. Mr. Naik pointed out that while 12 universities have been granted the 'eminence' tag, no new Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) has been signed since 2022. 'This is because the Empowered Expert Committee, which was supposed to process new applications, has not been reconstituted after its term expired in 2021,' he said. Highlighting the 2026 QS World University Rankings, Mr. Naik said only six Indian institutions have made it to the top 500 list – five of which have consistently figured in the rankings since 2012. 'The scheme aimed to elevate Indian institutions into the top 500 globally. However, according to the 2026 QS World University Rankings, only six Indian universities have made it to that list so far. Five of these had already entered the top 500 by 2012, during the tenure of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. Since then, only one additional institution, the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, has made it to the list under the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government. Even that has seen a steep fall in its global standing, slipping from 147 in 2016 to 219 in 2026,' he said. Pointing to ₹10,000 crore earmarked for 10 public institutions under this scheme, Mr. Naik claimed that almost 40% of the amount remains unallocated, and even Delhi University had received only ₹481 crore. 'Worse, this year's budget estimates have been slashed by nearly 68% compared to 2023-24, to just ₹475.12 crore,' Mr. Naik said. Mr. Naik flagged a broader decline in public investment in education, pointing out that the share of education in the Union Budget has fallen from over 4% in 2013-14 to 2.5% in 2025-26 whereas the number of students in higher education has grown from 3.2 crore (32 million) in 2013-14 to 4.3 crore (43 million) in 2021-22. He added that one-third of faculty posts in Central universities remain vacant as of March 2023. 'The 2017 policy shift from grants to loans has only added pressure on our universities. It is making higher education more expensive for students, and financially unsustainable for institutions.' he claimed. Quoting a 2023 report by the Ministry of Science & Technology, Mr. Naik noted that India's expenditure on research and development (R&D) had declined to just 0.64% of GDP as of 2020-21, continuing a downward trend since 2009-10. 'Our researcher base is also shrinking, with the number of researchers per capita five times lower than the global average. While China is producing frontier AI models like DeepSeek, we are struggling to fill teaching vacancies,' he said. 'The quest for 'eminence' will no doubt continue, but whether it is driven by meaningful action, or left to wither in quiet neglect is for the Indian political class to decide,' he stated.
