Diocese of Galloway ordered to pay man £473,000 over priest abuse
A Roman Catholic diocese has been ordered to pay a man more than £470,000 after he suffered "horrific" sexual abuse at the hands of a priest almost 50 years ago.The man, who has not been identified, was targeted by the priest when he was five years old while at school in Irvine in Ayrshire and again while he was a boarding school pupil in the Highlands aged 14 to 16.The Court of Session said the Diocese of Galloway was "vicariously liable" for the abuse, which has left the man unable to work since 2012.It ordered the diocese to pay a total of £473,250 for the impact it has had on his life.
The priest, who has not been identified, died in 2021 and had been convicted of sexual abuse.Lawyers for the man, also unidentified for legal reasons, raised an action against the church after the man was diagnosed with complex post traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) stemming from his experiences in childhood.In a written judgement, Lord Clark said the abuse had a "profound effect" on his life.
The diocese was the subject of the action because the priest was within its area at the time of the offending.The diocese covers Dumfries and Galloway, East and South Ayrshire, and parts of North Ayrshire.The man was first targeted by the priest aged five or six while a pupil at St Mark's Primary in Irvine.The same priest targeted the boy again in the late 1970s whilst he was a boarding school student at Fort Augustus Abbey Secondary School in the Highlands.The man had several jobs throughout his life, but felt unable to continue in employment from 2012 onwards.He developed CPTSD, originally diagnosed as severe PSTD, at around that time.Archbishop William Nolan, who was once Bishop of Galloway but is now Archbishop of Glasgow, gave evidence to proceedings.The court heard how he wrote a letter to the man shortly after the conviction of the priest - Lord Clark wrote about how this letter sought to "assist the pursuer".In his evidence, the archbishop referred to the now revamped safeguarding guidelines adopted by the Catholic Church.The diocese had argued the causes of the man's psychiatric injuries were attributable to other "adverse" life events.
'Horrific sexual abuse'
But Lord Clark wrote that his experiences while a primary school pupil were "serious and damaging".In his judgement, he said: "This is a complex case in which there was serious and damaging sexual abuse of the pursuer when he was very young at primary school."He then suffered further abuse at secondary school, with sexual elements, and of a physical and emotional nature."That later abuse lasted longer than the first and may well, based on the medical literature, have had a profound effect on his life."He added: "But the devastating nature of the horrific sexual abuse at St Mark's when he was a young child was the more prominent cause."Lord Clark originally awarded the man a total of £627,000 for the abuse carried out on him while he was a pupil at St Mark's.However, Lord Clark wrote that the man had already received £50,000 compensation for the abuse he had suffered from another church organisation and a representative of a person who had abused him whilst he was at Fort Augustus Abbey.Lord Clark wrote that the man had also received £153,749.67 in respect of the abuse perpetrated at St Mark's.Lord Clark said that £78,749.67 of came from the priest's estate which was paid in February 2024 and interim payments of £75,000 which had already been paid by the diocese.He concluded these payments meant that the final sum which was due to be handed over was £473,250.Lord Clark wrote: "The impact on the pursuer and the harm from which he continues to suffer cannot adequately be addressed merely by an award of damages but it is hoped that, this matter now having been dealt with, the pursuer can move on with his life."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
2 days ago
- Glasgow Times
Court issues decision in Tommy Sheridan's case against Glasgow council
Mr Sheridan instructed lawyers to go to the Court of Session in a bid to judicially review the actions of Glasgow City Health and Social Care Partnership bosses. The organisation wrote to Mr Sheridan to tell him that to employ him as a social worker in Glasgow would create an 'unacceptable level of risk' for the local authority. The move came after Mr Sheridan had applied to become a criminal justice social worker with the council. In his job application, he disclosed how he had been given a three year prison sentence in 2011 for perjury - a jury at the High Court in Glasgow concluded that he had lied on oath during his successful defamation action against the News of the World newspaper. The court heard that social work bosses then sent him a letter in August 2024 telling him the conviction presented an 'unacceptable level of risk' to Glasgow City Health and Social Care Partnership. More communications to Mr Sheridan told him that future applications for jobs with the organisation would not be 'progressed'. This has prompted Mr Sheridan to instruct lawyers to go to Scotland's highest civil court in a bid to get Glasgow City Council to overturn its decision. Earlier this year, Mr Sheridan' s lawyer Mike Dailly told Lord Young that the council had acted unlawfully in its decision. However, in a written judgement issued by Lord Young on Thursday, the court acted social work bosses acted lawfully. Lord Young said he agreed with submissions made by lawyers acting for the local authority that the decision made by social work bosses couldn't be judicially reviewed. He wrote: 'I agree with the submission for the respondent that it makes no difference that, in this case, the petitioner's complaint relates to a refusal by the respondent to consider entering into a contract of employment. 'The context in which the respondent sent these letters to the petitioner was whether the petitioner was viewed as a suitable candidate for employment as a social worker. 'This was an employment situation where parties are free to decide whether to enter into a contract or not. 'He enjoys no private law right to be considered for employment by the respondent, so he is seeking to fashion a right to be considered for social work jobs through the application of broad public law concepts. 'If the petitioner's argument was accepted, then it would follow that every applicant for a public sector job in Scotland could potentially challenge the job application process using the judicial review procedure. 'I find that the petition is incompetent for the reasons advanced by the respondent and it falls to be dismissed. (Image: Mike Dailly) READ NEXT: Tommy Sheridan says he is 'victimised' by Glasgow council READ NEXT: Tommy Sheridan in court over case against Glasgow City Council READ NEXT: Tommy Sheridan to pursue legal action against Scottish council At earlier proceedings, Mr Dailly said the body which regulates social work in Scotland - the Scottish Social Services Council - had assessed Mr Sheridan as being a suitable candidate for working in the profession. He added : 'It's a simple matter - the petitioner has been assessed as being a fit person for the profession by the statutory social work body. 'He has also been assessed as being suitable to work with children and younger people under the PVG scheme. 'The petitioner has been told he cannot be a social worker. However, the Scottish Parliament has allowed the SSSC the role and responsibility to determine who is a fit and proper person to be a social worker. 'The SSSC says the petitioner is a fit and proper person. I say the decision made by the council is irrational - it cannot say the petitioner cannot be a social worker.' (Image: Tommy Sheridan with wife Gail, right.) Mr Dailly was speaking during a judicial review brought by Mr Sheridan used to lead the Scottish Socialist Party which won a number of seats at Holyrood in 1999 and 2003. Mr Sheridan served as an MSP for Glasgow between 1999 and 2007. He took the News of the World to court in 2006, alleging it defamed him after reporting he was an adulterer who visited swingers' clubs. He netted £200,000 but he was later convicted of lying in court during this civil action, and was sentenced to three years in jail. On social media last summer he revealed his future plans in response to a suggestion that he should stand again as an MSP in 2026. He posted: "I just graduated as a professional social worker from Glasgow Caledonian University after a two-year masters degree so I am applying for jobs in that profession just now but who knows what will come to pass by 2026.' Lord Young also dismissed concerns that the council acted irrationally in the light of the SSSC allowing Mr Sheridan to be registered with the organisation. He added: 'I do not consider that the respondent's concern about employing the petitioner comes close to being viewed as irrational. 'His registration with the SSSC simply confirms that he meets the minimum statutory requirement for employment. 'It does not prevent an employer from applying its own additional criteria before interviewing or offering employment. 'The existence of a conviction for perjury is likely to be of some relevance to some employers considering whether to employ an individual as a social worker.'
The Herald Scotland
4 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Police probe into evidence to Salmond inquiry 'ongoing'
He said the investigation was looking into claims that a 'very, very senior civil servant - Mr James Hynd - gave a false statement on oath at the inquiry'. When the former First Minister died suddenly, aged 69, in North Macedonia in October last year it was not clear if and for how long the police investigation into the matter would continue. READ MORE: But today the force said its inquiries into the evidence provided to the Holyrood committee are still continuing. "We are investigating a complaint in relation to evidence provided to a Scottish Parliament committee. These inquiries are ongoing and we are unable to comment further," a spokesman for Police Scotland told The Herald. The Court of Session was told in August 2024 that detectives were probing evidence given to the inquiry in 2020 by Mr Hynd, who was the Scottish Government's head of cabinet, parliament and governance at the time. The parliamentary inquiry was examining the handling of sexual harassment complaints made against the former First Minister, who was later cleared of all of the charges against him in a separate criminal trial. The probe by a committee of MSPs - formally called the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints - concluded in March 2021 that the government investigation into Mr Salmond was 'seriously flawed". During his evidence to the parliamentary inquiry Mr Salmond alleged that there was a conspiracy among senior SNP figures, including his successor as First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, to imprison him. Ms Sturgeon has strongly denied the claim. The Court of Session action was launched by Mr Salmond in November 2023 to seek "significant damages" and compensation for loss of earnings reportedly worth £3 million. The sum would be in addition to the £500,000 that Mr Salmond was awarded in legal costs after a judge said in 2019 that the government investigation into the allegations against him had been 'unlawful in respect that they were procedurally unfair" and also "tainted with apparent bias". Mr Salmond's lawyer Gordon Dangerfield told the Court of Session last August that the Police Scotland investigation into Mr Hynd was called Operation Broadcroft and was being headed by a senior detective. Mr Dangerfield told the court hearing at the time: 'I can advise that the ongoing Police Scotland investigation is named Operation Broadcroft. It is led by senior investigating officer Detective Superintendent Graham Lannigan." Mr Hynd was responsible for drawing up the government's policy on the handling of complaints involving former and current ministers - the policy under which Mr Salmond was investigated. Mr Dangerfield asked last August for the civil case to be 'sisted' - a legal expression for it to be paused – while the police investigation was ongoing. Judge Lord Fairley refused the request after Scottish Government lawyer Lesley Shand KC said the case had already been sisted three times since it was first raised in November 2023. A spokesman for the Scottish Courts and Tribunal Service told The Herald last night that the case has now been sisted until September 19 this year. The Scottish Government was asked for a response to the development that the Police Scotland Operation Broadcroft inquiry is still ongoing. 'It would not be appropriate for the Scottish Government to comment on a live police investigation," a spokeswoman said. The Scottish Government does not comment on individual staffing matters.
North Wales Chronicle
19-06-2025
- North Wales Chronicle
Monk who brought shame on Catholic boarding school jailed for abusing pupils
Michael James Callaghan, known as Father James, has been jailed for seven years for preying on the vulnerable teenage boys at Ampleforth College in North Yorkshire. Judge Richard Clews, sentencing at Durham Crown Court, told the 71-year-old: 'It cannot go unsaid that your actions have brought the Catholic church and the school into serious disrepute by their nature and number.' Following a trial last month at Teesside Crown Court, Callaghan was convicted of 12 counts of indecent assault on one pupil in the 1990s and one count of sexual assault on another teenager in the 2010s. The older victim, neither of whom can be identified, faced the priest in court as he read out a statement in which he said 'Father James was manipulative and controlling'. He said: 'My life was hijacked when I was just 14 and I have been dealing with the fallout ever since.' The court heard how the house master groomed the boy and engineered ways to be alone with him, took him out of school for meals and gave him cigarettes. The complainant said in his police interview that Callaghan would 'take on the role of a boy I had a crush on' and they would kiss and simulate sex, telling officers he 'hated the sexual bit of it' and realised as an adult it 'wasn't right'. The second victim, who had his bottom fondled by Callaghan, said it was 'weird and quite frightening' that his abuser was a priest. In a victim statement which was read out for him, he said he hoped Callaghan could be rehabilitated, and 'that he may in time examine his conscience, practice repentance and change his ways'. David Lamb KC, defending, said Callaghan had sought medical help to address his attraction to boys even before he joined Ampleforth, that he had no previous convictions and that he had expressed remorse after his conviction. The judge said Callaghan, of Moortown, Leeds, would be subject to an indefinite sexual harm prevention order and will be on the sex offender register for life. Judge Clews said right-thinking people would 'recoil in horror' at the idea of a Roman Catholic priest having a sexual relationship with a boy. The school, described in court as 'the Catholic Eton', said after the sentencing that it had 'overhauled' it safeguarding systems. In a statement, it said: 'Ampleforth College deplores abuse and offers a heartfelt apology to the victims and their families for the profound suffering and pain that Michael James Callaghan has inflicted upon them. 'We acknowledge past failings and feel great sorrow at the terrible betrayal of trust.' It said the monk left the school in 2018 and it fully supported the police inquiries which began in 2022. The statement added: 'We are committed to reporting any safeguarding concerns to the relevant authorities and supporting the police and relevant authorities in any investigation. 'We actively offer any help we can give to survivors of abuse and we commend their courage in speaking out.' After the sentencing, Detective Constable Alison Morris, of North Yorkshire Police, said: 'Not only did Callaghan abuse his position of trust in the most appalling way, taking advantage of vulnerable boys he should have been caring for and protecting, he denied his offences throughout and showed no remorse for the pain and suffering he caused.'
