10x Returns Lost: Redditors Reveal Which Stocks They Sold Way Too Early
Investing in stocks isn't easy. You have to stay on top of multiple companies and predict how the future will unfold. While investors confidently hold on to stocks during bullish cycles, many of these same investors fold during bearish markets.
Many Redditors discussed stocks they sold too early in a recent post that is gaining momentum. Some Redditors lost out on massive, life-changing returns just by exiting reliable companies during corrections.
"If I waited a year, I would be 10x," one Redditor stated when talking about buying Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) in 2020 and selling at breakeven in 2022.
Don't Miss:
GoSun's breakthrough rooftop EV charger already has 2,000+ units reserved — become an investor in this $41.3M clean energy brand today.
Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Back a bold new approach to cancer treatment with high-growth potential.
One investor regretted selling Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) shares eight years ago. Another investor sympathized and said they also sold Tesla eight years ago, citing 10% daily swings as the main reason for exiting.
Tesla was one of the biggest winners during the pandemic and has gone up by more than 1,000% over the past eight years. While some posts contained nothing more than people talking about their losses, this one contains a valuable lesson.
If you invest in a company for the long run, you have to endure volatility. Sharp price swings are especially common for growth stocks that have tremendous long-term potential. Ignore the price swings and consider where the company will be in the next decade.
Another Redditor mentioned that they owned 1,000 shares of Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) about 18 years ago. Netflix doesn't receive as much attention since the FAANG acronym is out of style, but it's still a top-performing stock, especially for early investors.
Trending: This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to become a landlord in just 10 minutes, with minimum investments as low as $100.
Netflix shares have gained anywhere from 30,000% to 50,000% since 2007, depending on when investors bought their shares. That's a massive gain to lose out on, but 2007 was right before the Great Recession, so it was common for people to exit the markets frantically.
One commenter offered an interesting perspective on Netflix stock that highlights how some investors were thinking at the time.
"There were a lot of experts over the years, especially in the beginning, saying how other media companies were going to make [Netflix] irrelevant or basically put them out of business."
Those concerns were unfounded, and it goes to show that some people forecast the absolute worst-case scenario. These overblown narratives may have caused some investors to abandon ship, especially during the Great Recession.
Some people posted impressive gains in the comments section that don't feel so good knowing how the assets performed in the long run. One investor bought a bunch of Bitcoin at $0.50 apiece and sold them for $250 to buy a house. It's the type of gain you rarely get, but it still feels like the Redditor missed out on a great opportunity with Bitcoin now above $100,000 a coin.
Another Redditor thought they did well when they bought Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) shares for $2-$3 dollars and sold at $9.50. It's a 3x profit, but AMD stock now goes for more than $100 per share.
It's easy to beat yourself up about missing out on 10x returns, but most investors should love a 3x return. While it makes for entertaining content, dwelling on missed opportunities isn't the right approach for building long-term wealth. You can learn from your mistakes and commit to long-term investments instead of selling amid volatility.
See Next:
$100k in assets? Maximize your retirement and cut down on taxes: Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation.
Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's how you can earn passive income with just $100.
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article 10x Returns Lost: Redditors Reveal Which Stocks They Sold Way Too Early originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hesai Group (HSAI) Soars 19.26% as New Lidar Secures Safety Certification
Hesai Group (NASDAQ:HSAI) is one of the . Hesai Group soared by 19.26 percent on Thursday to end at $23.10 apiece after achieving a new milestone for its ATX Lidar and safety certification portfolio. In a statement, Hesai Group (NASDAQ:HSAI) said that its ATX, a compact, high-resolution, long-range lidar, officially obtained ISO 26262 ASIL B functional safety certification from SGS-TÜV, the world's leading testing, inspection, and certification institution. ATX marked its fourth ISO 26262 accreditation after after Pandar128, QT128, and AT128. With the new certification, Hesai Group (NASDAQ:HSAI) said it now holds the highest number of ISO 26262 certified products in the world. ISO 26262 is a key standard for the functional safety of electrical and electronic (E/E) systems in vehicles. It calls for carefully planned safety measures at every step of the development process—from safety management and concept design, to system, hardware, and software development. Logistics robots filling packages in a warehouse, preparing for delivery. As vehicles become more dependent on E/E systems, ISO plays an important role in ensuring vehicle components adhere to the most stringent safety standards to reduce costly recalls and prevent passenger injuries. While we acknowledge the potential of HSAI as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why The Washington Post Is Drowning In Bad Headlines
The Washington Post Building at One Franklin Square Building in Washington, DC. (Photo by Andrew ...) I didn't think I'd be back writing about the troubles at The Washington Post so soon, following my last piece from just a few days ago, but here we are. That earlier piece, which you can read here, focused on the Post having lost tens of thousands of subscribers over the last several years, with the paper's current average daily paid subscriptions now at a new low. Despite the financial backing of owner Jeff Bezos, the reality is that Post hasn't been able to convert fleeting interest from readers into long-term loyalty; worse still, internal dysfunction and shifting editorial strategies continue to cloud the Post's identity and future. And, unfortunately, two new developments suggest the challenges aren't letting up anytime soon. Another misstep at The Washington Post Let's start with a newsroom experiment that executive editor Matt Murray detailed in a company memo. It's a new initiative that will allow individuals mentioned in the Post's stories to annotate those articles directly on the site. The movie is being framed as a way to 'deepen the conversation' and keep reader engagement on the Post's platform, rather than that discussion migrating away to X, Reddit, or elsewhere. But, come on: It's an absolute certainty that this is going to end up backfiring in spectacular fashion. This initiative is the kind of idea that looks fantastic on a whiteboard: Start letting some of the sources who are quoted in articles add annotations to the articles they're mentioned in. More engagement = everybody wins. Or something like that. In reality, the idea of real-time rebuttals next to reported journalism opens up an unnecessary Pandora's box. What happens when a powerful figure – or anyone, really – uses the feature in bad faith to undermine verified facts? Or tries to insert spin into the conversation? Will readers trust the original reporting, or will the very presence of a sidebar reply create the illusion of 'two sides' to a matter of fact? Reporters will technically be able to respond, but as I see it this risks adding 'debate monitor' to their job description. That the paper's management decided to embark on such an initiative at all, meanwhile, should also put this next bit of negative news into context. A rebuke of The Washington Post's Bezos era Pamela Alma Weymouth, granddaughter of the late Post publisher Katharine Graham, has written a personal and extremely scathing commentary in The Nation about the situation at the Post — among other things, accusing Bezos of systematically dismantling the institution her grandmother once protected. She lays the blame for much of the Post's woes at the feet of the Amazon founder. 'In the face of a more tyrannical Trump,' she writes, 'Bezos has retreated. He's muzzled his editorial page. Exceptional writers, editors, cartoonists have fled. Eight days before the election, the Post canceled a scheduled endorsement of Kamala Harris — breaking with decades of precedent. Four hundred Post journalists signed a protest letter. Two hundred and fifty thousand readers canceled their subscriptions.' Things got worse earlier this year, she continued, when Bezos dictated that Opinion writers would be expected to align with 'personal liberties and free markets,' leaving little or even no room for dissenting views. Editor David Shipley and others resigned, and another wave of subscription cancellations followed. Weymouth continues: 'If the free press can be manipulated by politicians, if truth is viewed as optional, if The Washington Post goes dark under Bezos, then we lose more than a legend. We lose the very thing that makes America a democracy.' Weymouth's commentary is particularly damning in light of recent revelations about Bezos' companies engaging with Trumpworld while the Post, at the same time, shifted its own editorial voice. It's the kind of rebuke that ought to cut deep, given that it's rooted in the legacy of the family that once owned The Washington Post — their ownership now relegated to a bygone era of journalism. To be sure, none of this means the Post is finished. There are still plenty of talented reporters who fill its newsroom, but decisions from the leadership have nonetheless put the paper in a precarious spot. Legacy isn't a business model. Without a clear editorial mission and a bold plan to rebuild reader loyalty, the fact of the matter is that even a paper as storied as The Washington Post won't be able to successfully right the ship — and avoid the inevitable.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla fires longtime insider as Europe slump deepens
Tesla fires longtime insider as Europe slump deepens originally appeared on TheStreet. It's safe to say all the chatter about robots, AI, and Musk's President Trump drama has masked Tesla's () core: an electric vehicle company that's now stumbling big time. Over the past few years, most earnings calls have hyped AI, robotaxis, and what Tesla could be. 💵💰💰💵 What it actually is, though, is a lagging AI player that continues to see a steep drop in vehicle sales. Mr. Market hasn't taken those declining sales reports kindly, either, with Tesla stock down more than 20% year to date. Moreover, the drama's now spilled over, with recent C-suite shakeups hinting that things are blowing up behind the scenes. Tesla and its unpredictable CEO, Elon Musk, have always landed in hot water, but the past few months have been uniquely messy. Early in 2025, Musk found himself in an unlikely alliance with the Trump administration as a special advisor. The move prompted backlash from progressive shoppers and lawmakers in no time, with massive 'Tesla Takedown' protests hitting showrooms in major U.S. cities and media chatter had buyers holding off vehicle purchases, and some states even started looking into unfair labor claims. With Tesla taking the hits, Musk told Reuters in April that he'd cut his Trump gig to just a day or two a week. Then in late May, after an ugly fallout with President Trump, he ditched the role entirely, promising to get back to Tesla's core business. The PR mess bruised Tesla's equity and precipitated some of its worst sales drops ever. Particularly in Europe, Tesla's foothold has been visibly slipping. Registrations have tanked by more than 40% early in the year and then by nearly 30% in the spring. In contrast, the broader European EV market expanded at an encouraging pace. By mid-2025, Tesla's share there had fallen to under 1% — a steep drop from the 1.6% it held a year earlier. More Tech Stock News: Circle's stock price surges after stunning CEO comment Robotaxi rivalry heats up as new cities come online Analyst reboots AMD stock price target on chip update Amid this decline, Chinese EV brands like BYD and SAIC's MG charged ahead with aggressive pricing and wider model options. In North America, Tesla's deliveries held up better, but Musk's public profile cooled off a lot of that enthusiasm. Meanwhile, the Tesla robotaxi trials started last week in Austin, attracting mixed reviews so far. Early influencer videos showed jerky braking and lane slip-ups, catching the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's eye. On the flip side, longtime Tesla bull Dan Ives still isn't rattled and remains bullish. Tesla has reportedly fired Omead Afshar, its head of North American and European operations, following a massive drop in European EV deliveries, according to Forbes. Afshar is a veteran Tesla engineer and has climbed the ranks since joining in 2011. Putting things in perspective, in May, Tesla sold just 8,729 EVs in Europe, down 40.5% from the prior-year period, with its market share shrinking to 0.9% from 1.6% year-over-year. Similarly, YTD registrations were at 46,312 units, a sharp 45% drop from 84,215 a year ago, while European EV demand climbed 12% in the first five months of 2025. In contrast, from January through May 2025, BYD's European registrations jumped fivefold from about 8,500 in Q1 2024 to over 37,000 in Q1 went up a notch in April, when BYD beat Tesla for the first time with 7,231 BEVs sold versus Tesla's 7,165. European BYD customers seem to be enjoying the company's aggressive pricing strategy, fresh hybrid models, and bigger dealer network. Meanwhile, Tesla's North American performance looks a lot better, but not bulletproof. In Q1 2025, Tesla delivered 128,100 EVs in the U.S, an 8.6% drop from a year ago, but it maintained the lion's share at 44%. The contrast reflects its home turf advantage, backed by a massive Supercharger network and loyal Model Y and Model 3 buyers. Nevertheless, automotive titans like GM, Ford, and Volkswagen are all gaining ground fast. All eyes are on Q2 as Tesla reports earnings on July 16, 2025. Wall Street's looking for GAAP EPS of 35 cents, down from 40 cents a year ago. In the last four quarters, Tesla's only topped EPS once in Q3 2024 and beat sales estimates just once, too. Analysts have also slashed EPS estimates 20 times in the past 90 days. On the deliveries front, the street's betting Tesla moved about 393,000 vehicles globally in Q2, down 11% year-over-year but up 17% from fires longtime insider as Europe slump deepens first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 27, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 27, 2025, where it first appeared.
