Joy Reid makes humiliating admission about her firing from MSNBC
Reid made the startling admission during a Tuesday appearance on The Breakfast Club radio show, where she also talked about how disillusioned she is with the Democratic party.
Reid claimed that her shock firing had nothing to do with ratings and speculated her outspoken views on Donald Trump and the situation in Gaza may have played a role.
She explained that executives reassured her two weeks before her firing that her numbers were acceptable.
'They were like, "You guys lost less than your competitors, and you're actually doing fine,"' Reid said. 'So ratings were fine. We were doing fine. And you know, the ratings have not gotten better since I left.'
Instead, Reid speculated that a February 22 story in Puck News was what sealed the fate of The Reid Out, the show she had been hosting since July 2020.
'We had seen that there was this Puck story that Friday,' she said. 'My executive producer called me and said, "Look, all of our producers are freaking out over this Puck story, so you should see it."'
The story, written by Dylan Byers, claimed that Reid's show was, 'vulnerable in light of recent ratings struggles'.
'Then I get a text message early the next morning [on Saturday] saying, "Can you talk at noon?" And I was fired immediately. There was no warning. So, I asked, "Well, what's the issue?"' Reid said.
She added that she was told management wanted to, 'make some changes', claiming that was all the specificity she was given at the time.
A representative for Puck declined to comment on the outlet's reporting on Reid's firing.
Reid went on to say that 'two topics' she frequently talked about on her show made MSNBC higher-ups uncomfortable.
One of them was President Donald Trump, she said, largely because he has sued multiple media outlets for negative coverage of him.
'He's literally threatening people to the point where '60 Minutes' is shook, where ABC News is shook. He's verbally threatened Comcast by name, named [Comcast CEO] Brian Roberts by name, and all of these are businesses that if want to do business they need the FCC's approval,' Reid said.
MSNBC President Rebecca Kutler has previously said that Reid's coverage of Trump was not a factor in her being fired.
The other topic she thought made her toxic to management was her discussing Gaza, a small strip of land that Israel has been bombing since the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023.
'You just can't get away from the fact that talking about Gaza in a way that humanizes Palestinians is not the usual way that cable news operates, or that any news in this country operates for whatever reason, that topic makes people uncomfortable,' Reid said.
Reid first addressed what happened a day after her firing on February 24, with a tearful appearance on the Win With Black Women podcast.
'I've been through every emotion... anger, rage, disappointment, hurt... guilt. You know, [ a feeling] that I let my team lose their jobs,' she said at the time.
'But in the end, where I really land... is just gratitude. Just pure gratitude and gratitude. Not just because people would take the time to get on a call like this or to take care of me. But also that my show had value.'
Reid broke down as she explained that she's not sorry for having gone, 'hard on so many' progressive issues like Black Lives Matter or immigrant rights on her primetime slot.
'Whether it's talking about any of these issues and, yes, whether it's talking about Gaza and the fact that we as the American people have a right to object, to have a right to object to little babies being bombed,' Reid went on.
'And and where I come down on that is I'm not sorry. I am not sorry that I stood up for those those things because those things are of God.'
Reid was fired in a brutal round of cuts at the network which also included anchors Jonathan Capehart, Katie Phang, and Ayman Mohyeldin.
She has since launched her own podcast, The Joy Reid Show which debuted on June 9 and places her in direct competition with her former employer.
Daily Mail approached MSNBC for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Record-breaking Bitcoin soars above $120k - up by more than double from a year ago
Bitcoin climbed above $120,000 to a record high yesterday as investors piled into the world's biggest cryptocurrency. The digital coin rose as high as $123,200 –more than double the $60,000 it was valued at a year ago. The latest rally came as so-called 'crypto week' got underway in the US. This refers to a series of debates taking place in Washington DC that could lay the foundations for a regulatory framework for digital assets. Tim Chen, global head of strategy at financial services firm Mantle, said the discussions should provide investors with 'some semblance of clarity' over the future of crypto – making it more attractive. Bitcoin has rallied strongly since crashing to around $16,000 following the collapse of crypto exchange FTX three years ago. The rally accelerated following the election of Donald Trump as investors and speculators welcomed his pledge to make the US the crypto capital of the world. Josh Fraser, co-founder of decentralised platform Origin Protocol, said: 'Gold has been a primary store of value for hundreds of years, and bitcoin now competes as a better version of gold.' Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at broker AJ Bell, said: 'Traders are expecting something significant during crypto week. 'Bitcoin has now risen by nearly 10 per cent in just five days. This implies some FOMO – fear of missing out – a trend we've seen plenty of times in the past when bitcoin hit the headlines. Crypto believers are convinced digital assets are the future of finance. While there is certainly momentum in terms of investor, government and corporate interest, it is not a slam dunk. There are still more questions than answers.' Nigel Green, chief executive of financial advisory deVere Group, said he expects bitcoin to hit $125,000 'in the coming days' before moving up to $150,000. 'It's being powered by deep political backing, new regulatory clarity and sustained institutional inflows. This is a powerful combination we haven't seen at this scale before,' he said. 'This is not crypto on the fringe anymore. This is front and centre of US financial policy. Trump is championing it, lawmakers are acting on it and Wall Street is all-in.'
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How the Jeffrey Epstein row plunged Maga world into turmoil
The Department of Justice's announcement that it did not have a list of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged clients, and that the convicted sex offender was not murdered, has plunged the rightwing world into turmoil. Conservative commentators and media figures, some of whom spent years pushing conspiracy theories about Epstein's death, have accused the government of covering up the hedge fund manager's crimes, with calls growing for Pam Bondi, the attorney general, to resign. The saga has pitted Trump, who was friends with Epstein for many years before later disowning the financier, against his base, with the president pleading over the weekend for his supporters to 'not waste time and energy on Jeffrey Epstein'. This is how we got here. Epstein is charged with federal sex-trafficking crimes in a Manhattan court. Prosecutors allege that Epstein, who was taken into custody, 'sexually exploited and abused dozens of minor girls' from 2002 to 2005 at homes in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida. Epstein pleads not guilty. The charges come more than a decade after Epstein and the Miami US attorney's office reached a deal that ended a federal investigation involving at least 40 teenage girls. Epstein pleaded guilty in 2008 to state charges, served 13 months in jail and registered as a sex offender. Guards find Epstein dead in his cell at Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan. On 16 August New York's chief medical examiner rules that the cause of death was suicide by hanging, but lawyers for Epstein say they are dissatisfied with the medical examiner's conclusions. Trump shares a tweet from rightwing comedian Terrence Williams, which claims Bill and Hillary Clinton were involved in Epstein's death. After criticism, Trump doubles down, telling reporters: 'The question you have to ask is, did Bill Clinton go to the island? Because Epstein had an island. That was not a good place, as I understand it, and I was never there.' Trump adds: 'So you have to ask, did Bill Clinton go to the island? That's the question. If you find that out, you're going to know a lot.' A spokesman for the Clintons says the family knows nothing about the crimes committed by Epstein, who was known to have a number of famous and powerful associates, including Prince Andrew. Trump himself was friends with Epstein, and in 2002 said he had known Epstein for 15 years, describing him as a 'terrific guy'. The pair later fell out following a bidding war on a Florida property. The official ruling that Epstein committed suicide does little to quell conspiracy theorists. Much of the commentary, particularly from the rightwing, focuses on Epstein's relationship with liberal figures, including Clinton. The phrase 'Epstein didn't kill himself' begins to spread online, with Joe Rogan and even Republican members of Congress posting it on social media. Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's ex-partner and longtime confidante, is convicted of sex trafficking. The judge says Maxwell is 'guilty of one of the worst crimes imaginable: facilitating and participating in the sexual abuse of children. Crimes that she committed with her longtime partner and co-conspirator, Jeffrey Epstein.' A trove of court documents identifying associates of Epstein are unsealed. The documents, which had been filed as part of a lawsuit against against Maxwell in 2015 by one of Epstein's victims, Virginia Giuffre. Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, David Copperfield and Donald Trump were among those named in the documents – although none of the men were accused of wrongdoing. Giuffre claimed that Epstein and Maxwell forced her into a sexual encounter with Prince Andrew at age 17, and Giuffre sued Prince Andrew over the alleged sexual abuse. The suit settled in early 2022. Andrew has denied any wrongdoing. Trump, running for president, is asked in an interview if he would declassify 'the 9/11 files' and 'the JFK files'. He says yes. Trump is then asked if he would declassify 'the Epstein files', and initially says yes, but adds: 'I think that [declassifying the Epstein files], less so, because you don't know – you don't want to affect people's lives if there's phony stuff in there, because there's a lot of phony stuff with that whole world.' In an interview with Fox News, Pam Bondi is asked: 'The DoJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients, will that really happen?' Bondi replies: 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review.' Bondi will later suggest she was referring to Epstein case files, not a client list. After Trump and JD Vance pledged during the 2024 election campaign that they would release files relating to Epstein's crimes and contacts, the Department of Justice [DoJ] gives a group of conservative commentators binders labeled 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1'. The files contain little new information, leaving conspiracy theorists disappointed. Bondi describes the documents as the 'first phase of files', and in a statement the DoJ says it 'remains committed to transparency and intends to release the remaining documents upon review and redaction to protect the identities of Epstein's victims'. Amid a row over Trump's proposed tax bill, Elon Musk posts on X: 'Time to drop the really big bomb. @realdonaldtrump is in the Epstein files. That is why they have not been made public.' Musk later deletes the tweet. The DoJ announces that Epstein did not keep a client list, and said no more files related to his sex-trafficking investigation would be made public. The department releases an 11-hour video of the scene outside Epstein's cell during hours before and after his death, showing that no one entered or left the room. But a minute of footage is missing, prompting further speculation. Bondi says the missing minute is due to the Bureau of Prisons resetting the video. Rightwing media and commentators begin to lash out at the DoJ. Laura Loomer, the 32-year-old conspiracy theorist whose influence over Trump has come under scrutiny, accuses Bondi of 'covering up child sex crimes'. 'NO ONE IS BUYING THIS!! Next the DOJ will say 'Actually, Jeffrey Epstein never even existed.' This is over the top sickening,' Alex Jones, the rightwing commentator and conspiracy theorist, writes on social media. On Truth Social, the rightwing, Trump-owned platform where people are usually united in their praise for the president and his administration, numerous users criticize the government over Epstein. Dan Bongino, the deputy director of the FBI who spent years pushing conspiracy theories about Epstein's death, reportedly clashes with Bondi at the White House. Bondi accused Bongino of leaking to news outlets, after NewsNation reported that the FBI had wanted to release more information on Epstein 'months ago', but was prevented from doing so. NBC News reports that Bongino is considering stepping down from his post at the FBI amid the Bondi row. 'Bongino is out-of-control furious,' a source told NBC News said. 'This destroyed his career. He's threatening to quit and torch Pam unless she's fired.' Trump writes a lengthy Truth Social post pleading with his supporters. 'What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?' They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening. We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein.' Trump adds: 'One year ago our Country was DEAD, now it's the 'HOTTEST' Country anywhere in the World. Let's keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.' The post is the first time Trump has been 'ratioed' on Truth Social: more people comment on the post than like it, which typically suggests disagreement.
Sky News
15 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trump is clearly fed up with Putin - but will his shift in tone force Russia to the negotiating table?
As ever, there is confusion and key questions are left unanswered, but Donald Trump's announcement on Ukraine and Russia today remains hugely significant. His shift in tone and policy on Ukraine is stark. And his shift in tone (and perhaps policy) on Russia is huge. Ever since Mr Trump returned to the White House he has flatly refused to side with Ukraine over the Russian invasion. He has blamed Ukraine and Joe Biden for the incursion but has never been willing to accept that Russia is the aggressor and that Kyiv has a legitimate right to defend itself. Today, all that changed. In a clear signal that he is fed up with Vladimir Putin and now fully recognises the need to help Ukraine defend itself, he announced the US will dramatically increase weapons supplies to Kyiv. But, in keeping with his transactional nature and in a reflection of the need to keep his isolationist "America-First" base on side, he has framed this policy shift as a multi-billion dollar "deal" in which America gains financially. American weapons are to be "sold" to NATO partners in Europe who will then either transfer them to Ukraine or use them to bolster their own stockpiles as they transfer their own existing stocks to Kyiv. "We've made a deal today," the president said in the Oval Office. "We are going to be sending them weapons, and they are paying for them. We are manufacturing, they are going to be paying for it. Our meeting last month was very successful... these are wealthy nations." 2:27 This appears to be a clever framing of the "deal". Firstly, America has always benefited financially by supplying weapons to Ukraine because much of the investment has been in American factories, American jobs and American supply chains. While the details are not entirely clear, the difference now appears to be that the weapons would be bought by the Europeans or by NATO as an alliance. The Americans are the biggest contributor to NATO, and so if the alliance is buying the weapons, America too will be paying, in part, for the weapons it is selling. However, if the weapons are being bought by individual NATO members to replenish their own stocks, then it may be the case that the US is not paying. NATO officials referred all questions on this issue to the White House, which has not yet provided clarity to Sky News. It is also not yet clear what type of weapons will be made available and whether it will include offensive, as well defensive, munitions. 1:49 A key element of the package will likely be Patriot missile batteries, 10 to 15 of which are believed to be currently in Europe. Under this deal, it is understood that some of them will be added to the six or so batteries believed to be presently in Ukraine. New ones would then be purchased from US manufacturers to backfill European stocks. A similar arrangement may be used for other weapons. The president also issued the Russian leader with an ultimatum, saying that Putin had 50 days to make a peace deal or else face 100% "secondary tariffs". It's thought this refers to a plan to tariff, or sanction, third countries that supply Russia with weapons and buy Russian oil. This, the Americans hope, will force those countries to apply pressure on Russia. But the 50-day kicking of the can down the road also gives Russia space to prevaricate. So, a few words of caution: first, the Russians are masters of prevarication. Second, Trump tends to let deadlines slip. And third, we all know Trump can flip-flop on his position repeatedly. 2:00 Maybe the most revealing aspect of all this came when a reporter asked Mr Trump: "How far are you willing to go if Putin sends more bombs in the coming days?" "Don't ask me questions like that..." Mr Trump doesn't really know what to do if Mr Putin continues to take him for a ride. Mr Biden, before him, supplied Ukraine with the weapons to continue fighting. If Mr Trump wants to end this, he may need to provide Ukraine with enough weapons to win. But that would prolong, or even escalate, a war he wants to end now.
