logo
Trump envoy warns of ‘short-term pain' as administration cracks down on Cuba, Venezuela

Trump envoy warns of ‘short-term pain' as administration cracks down on Cuba, Venezuela

Miami Herald03-04-2025
A senior Trump administration official warned Cubans and Venezuelans on Thursday to brace for 'short-term pain' from measures aimed at increasing pressure on the authoritarian regimes in Havana and Caracas.
Speaking at an event at Miami-Dade College, Mauricio Claver-Carone, special envoy for Latin America, defended President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, in particular its emphasis on deporting Tren de Aragua gang members, as part of a larger strategy to put pressure on Venezuela's strongman Nicolás Maduro.
Claver-Carone suggested the Maduro regime is following the playbook used by Fidel Castro when he freed criminals from Cuban prisons and sent them as part of the about 125,000 Cubans who came to Florida during the Mariel boatlift in 1980. Unlike other presidents, who were not 'resolute enough' to send the criminals back, he said, 'President Trump is, so we're calling bullshit.'
'We understand there are challenges, and it's painful. There's short-term pain,' he added, speaking of emotions running high because of generalizations from administration officials depicting Venezuelans as criminals. 'But the other thing all of these regimes and dictators have also learned, starting with Cuba, is that the easiest thing to do is export your problem,' he said. 'So the way you have totalitarian control is, you don't like it, you leave. And that's what happened in Venezuela. That's what's happening in Nicaragua.'
'I can tell you this as a member of the Cuban American community, and it's been now 60 years. If you don't want to be 60 years in exile, then cut it off now, do the short-term sacrifices now, because if not, they're not going anywhere,' he said.
Claver-Carone declined to comment on plans for a potential travel ban that would bar Cubans and Venezuelans from traveling to the United States, adding that the plans are still under discussion.
The special envoy also said the administration is planning to ramp up pressure on the Cuban military as part of a more 'surgical approach' to sanctions and spoke of using more effective tools than those already written into the decades-old U.S. embargo.
'The Cuban government needs to understand that our tools and President Trump's will in this regard are different from what they have seen in the past,' he said, underscoring that leaders at the State Department, the Treasury Department and the Pentagon are aligned with Trump on Latin American foreign policy.
The comment came after Miami Republican U.S. Rep. Carlos Gimenez sent a letter Thursday to the Treasury Secretary asking him to halt 'all travel to and from communist Cuba and eliminating remittances to the island.'
When asked about the letter at the event organized by the World Affairs Council of Miami, Claver-Carone said he had not seen it.
'It's something that's always been talked about, and it's about the old tools,' he said. ' I think we can be more creative, but obviously, I understand. And it comes from a good place,' he said in reference to Giménez, the only Cuban American in Congress born on the island.
However, throughout his remarks, Claver-Carone made clear that the administration is pursuing the 'maximum pressure' approach advocated by Giménez in dealing with Cuba and Venezuela.
Speaking of lessons learn during the first Trump administration, in which he was involved in crafting U.S. policy toward Cuba and Venezuela at the National Security Council, Claver-Carone said officials in the second Trump administration will try to avoid 'plaguing whatever policies we do with loopholes.
'There's still going to be disagreements. There's always commercial interests,' he added. 'But it's either short-term pain for long-term gain, or you'll have long-term pain and no gain. In the short term, there are things that may seem upsetting or disruptive. But honestly, if you don't do it, it doesn't work. So we have to be all in, go big, or go home.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House breaks record for longest-ever vote — again
House breaks record for longest-ever vote — again

Axios

time16 minutes ago

  • Axios

House breaks record for longest-ever vote — again

House Republicans broke the record Wednesday for the lower chamber's longest vote in history — for the second time in as many weeks. Why it matters: It's the latest example of Johnson's strategy for dealing with his razor-thin majority — holding votes open for hours as he tries to sway opponents in his own party. Wednesday's record-setting vote was on a resolution setting the terms of debate on several measures, including the GENIUS Act, which would establishing a regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers. That broke the previous record, set two weeks ago to the day amid grueling negotiations over President Trump's " big, beautiful bill." The big picture; Before two weeks ago, the previous record was set in 2021, when the House took seven hours and six minutes on a procedural vote related to then-President Biden's Build Back Better legislation. This was Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-La) second attempt after the House floor ground to a halt Tuesday when the chamber rejected the procedural vote on the first try. Johnson is facing demands from hardliners to combine the GENIUS Act with two other crypto bills the chamber is considering this week. That would force the Senate to reconsider the legislation, likely leading to significant delays. Between the lines: Wednesday's revote follows a meeting Trump said he held late Tuesday in the Oval Office with opponents — after which he declared victory, apparently prematurely.

Gov. Newsom criticizes Trump's use of National Guard after removal of some troops
Gov. Newsom criticizes Trump's use of National Guard after removal of some troops

Los Angeles Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Gov. Newsom criticizes Trump's use of National Guard after removal of some troops

A day after the Pentagon ordered the withdrawal of half of the National Guard troops deployed in Los Angeles, Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized President Trump for wasting hundreds of millions of dollars to appear 'tough' by punishing immigrants. Newsom also accused the president of trying to preserve Republican power in Washington by pressuring Texas to redraw congressional districts to elect GOP representatives. The governor repeated a threat to launch a similar effort in California to favor Democrats. 'Everything has changed, and it's changing in real time,' Newsom told reporters Wednesday. 'I'm not going to be the guy that said I could have, would have, should have. I'm not going to be passive at this moment. I'm not going to look at my kids in the eyes and say I was a little timid.' The comments came at a news conference outside Downey Memorial Christian Church, where Newsom met with the Rev. Tanya Lopez, the senior pastor, to discuss an incident in June where she watched as plainclothes federal agents swarmed and detained a constituent in the parking lot of her church. Newsom criticized the administration's immigration crackdown, saying its only goal was to terrorize families and communities — not to pursue violent criminals, which Newsom said he would support. Newsom said the crackdown was also harming family-owned businesses as immigrants who work and shop at stores stay home out of fear. The governor called the president's decision to deploy about 4,000 National Guardsmen part of Trump's 'rule of cruelty' and said the decision to remove half the troops came after the Pentagon realized the absurdity of its deployment. The government wasted of hundreds of millions of dollars on the deployment, Newsom said. He added that the 'utilization rate' of the National Guard troops was only about 5%, meaning only that percentage was actively engaged with duties while the rest were held in reserve. 'They're a solution right now in search of a problem,' he said of the National Guard. The move to send home some of the troops comes after a legal battle over whether the administration could deploy the troops. A federal appeals court ruled that the president had broad — though not 'unreviewable' — authority to deploy the military in American cities. State and local leaders said the National Guard was not needed to deal with protests over immigration raids that have led to around 3,000 arrests. On a separate issue, Newsom repeated the threat that California could redraw its electoral maps to help Democrats pick up more congressional seats in response to Trump's call for Texas and other states to redistrict to benefit Republicans in the 2026 midterm elections. Republicans currently hold power in both the Senate and House of Representatives, which have been instrumental in enacting the president's policy agenda, including cuts to healthcare and food assistance for Americans in need. 'They can't win by the traditional games, so they want to change the game,' Newsom said. 'We can act holier-than-thou. We can sit on the sidelines, talk about the way the world should be, or we can recognize the existential nature that is this moment.' California voters in 2010 gave an independent Citizens Redistricting Commission the power to determine the boundaries of state voting districts for the U.S. House of Representatives instead of leaving that authority with the state Legislature. Newsom said the California Legislature could pass a bill in the regular session or in a special session that places a proposed constitutional amendment before voters to change state redistricting laws through a special election held in a tight window before the 2026 primaries. The governor said he's also exploring a potential legal loophole that could allow the California Legislature to redraw the congressional maps themselves now with a two-thirds vote and avoid going to the ballot. 'That is an option that is also being considered and both of those are being advanced in real time, not only with members of the Legislature, but others that are interested, because they feel the same pressures I do about the existential threat of what Donald Trump and some of these Republican states are trying to do,' Newsom said.

Here are the 3rd-countries where the Trump admin is deporting migrants
Here are the 3rd-countries where the Trump admin is deporting migrants

Axios

time16 minutes ago

  • Axios

Here are the 3rd-countries where the Trump admin is deporting migrants

Expelling migrants to third-countries that are not their place of origin is becoming a cornerstone of President Trump's deportation strategy. The big picture: The administration's increasing number of third-country deportation agreements showcases a dogged desire to pursue every possible avenue to fulfill Trump's promise to deport record numbers of noncitizens. Catch up quick: The Trump administration restarted deportation flights after the Supreme Court ruled last month that the Department of Homeland Security could resume sending migrants to countries that were not their place of origin. The decision put a lower court order that required the government to give immigrants adequate time to challenge their deportations on hold. State of play: Border czar Tom Homan said the U.S. aims to sign third-country deportation agreements with "many countries" to support the administration's deportation plans. The administration has either approached or plans to approach roughly 51 countries to accept non-citizen deportations from the U.S., per a June report New York Times report. At least two of those countries, Eswatini and South Sudan in Africa, have accepted flights from the U.S. since the report came out. The DHS did not immediately respond to Axios' Wednesday evening request for comment on how many of the countries have been approached. Thought bubble via Axios' Dave Lawler: The administration has reportedly discussed safe third-country agreements with many countries for which the "safe" description is very much in question. Take Libya or South Sudan, both of which have been wracked by instability and violence for years. Several other countries involved in these deals are among the poorest in the world. The prospect of deporting migrants thousands of miles away to unfamiliar and often unstable countries has raised alarm among human rights groups, but the idea has strong support within the administration. Here are the countries that have already accepted deportees who are not their citizens: Eswatini Five migrants from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Vietnam and Yemen were deported to the tiny African nation of Eswatini on Tuesday, the DHS announced. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin wrote on X that the flight was carrying individuals who had been convicted of a range of crimes that included murder, homicide, and child rape. El Salvador The Trump administration sent at least 238 Venezuelan migrants to a notorious El Salvadorian maximum security prison under the Alien Enemies Act in March, claiming that they were terrorists and members of a violent gang. By the numbers: An April CBS News report found 75% of the migrants sent to the prison had no criminal record. Mexico Mexico has received roughly 6,000 non-Mexicans from the U.S. as of late April, per Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Sheinbaum said the non-Mexicans her country was accepting for "humanitarian reasons" comprise a small number of the nearly 39,000 migrants the U.S. has deported to Mexico since Jan. 20. Guatemala Guatemalan President Bernardo Arevalo announced in February that his country had agreed to accept third-country nationals from the United States and would be ramping up deportation flights from the U.S. by 40%. Arevalo told NBC News that the agreement was not supposed to provide a pathway for people to seek asylum in Guatemala. Rather, the country would serve as a pit stop in the process of sending people back to their home countries. Costa Rica Costa Rica accepted roughly 200 third-country nationals from two different U.S. flights through the end of February, per a May Human Rights Watch report. On the planes were at least 81 children and two pregnant women. What they're saying: After announcing the expulsion agreement, Costa Rican President Rodrigo Chaves said his country was helping its "economically powerful brother to the north." Costa Rican officials have said the U.S. will cover the costs of the deported people's stay in the country, and that the arrangement was expected to be a temporary stop in the repatriation process. Panama The U.S. has deported hundreds of people to Panama since February as part of a deal for the country serve as a "bridge" while the U.S. bears the financial costs, per AP. The migrants are from countries including Iran, India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Afghanistan and China. Rwanda The U.S. paid the Rwandan government $100,000 to accept an Iraqi citizen in April and agreed to take 10 more deportees, the New York Times reported. Negotiations reached over the Iraqi citizen "proved the concept for a new removal program, according to the report. South Sudan The U.S. deported eight men to South Sudan in July, after a legal battle diverted their deportation flight to Djibouti for several weeks. Some of the men deported were from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar and Vietnam. Kosovo This landlocked Balkan nation in Europe agreed to host 50 noncitizen deportees from the U.S. in June. The deal would allow noncitizens to be "temporarily relocated" before being sent back to their home country. The intrigue: Kosovo reportedly agreed to accept the noncitizens from the U.S. in the hope that the administration will continue to lobby other nations to recognize the small country's independence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store