
Houston government softens language in transportation bill
The original language in the proposed changes to the Joint Regional Transportation Agency Act suggested the province could unilaterally undertake projects to build or remove infrastructure, or "do anything necessary" to ensure the smooth movement of people and goods.
According to Bill 24, the provincial government could simply pass on the cost of the work to a municipality once the project was completed.
The Federation of Nova Scotia Municipalities, the organization that speaks for the province's municipal governments, called that original language "tremendously concerning."
Amendments introduced Tuesday during debate on the bill noted the province would try to consult and negotiate with municipalities on projects it felt were necessary.
"The cost of any work undertaken … shall be apportioned between the municipality and the Crown in right of the Province in the manner agreed upon by them," said one amendment.
But the next amendment made it clear the province would keep its power to pass along the costs, if there was no agreement between the parties.
Thrust of bill still 'a huge concern'
Pam Mood, president of the Nova Scotia Federation of Municipalities, said the thrust of the bill remains "a huge concern."
"What it said before is we are going to come in, we're going to tell you this is what needs to be done, we're going to tell you to do it and if you don't do it in a reasonable amount of time, we're going to come in and do it and bill you," said Mood, the mayor of Yarmouth.
"But now it … basically says apportioning costs of work in a manner agreed upon. We'll have to sit down and figure out how that [will] work."
The proposed legislation now says the municipal affairs minister will "make reasonable efforts" to consult the federation and municipalities "impacted by ministerial action taken pursuant to this Act."
Mood wasn't impressed with that change either.
"That doesn't equal doing so," she said. "When you say I'll make an effort to do something, you're saying if it happens, it happens, if it doesn't, it doesn't. That's simply not enough."
During an exchange with reporters intended to explain the changes, Public Works Minister Fred Tilley downplayed how upset some municipal leaders had been with the original version of the bill.
"Well, it was just discussion that we had around the way the language read," said Tilley. "So we agreed with our partners and adjusted the language accordingly to make the bill more about what we were attempting to do."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
a day ago
- Vancouver Sun
Union vote on Canada Post contract offer set to wrap up Friday afternoon
OTTAWA — Unionized workers at Canada Post are entering their final day to vote on the Crown corporation's latest contract offer. Voting is set to wrap up today at 5 p.m., with results expected to be shared shortly after. The offer includes wage hikes of about 13 per cent over four years but also adds part-time workers that Canada Post has said are necessary to keep the postal service afloat. The Canadian Union of Postal Workers has urged the roughly 55,000 postal service workers it represents to reject the proposal. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. If workers reject the offer, the union says it will immediately contact management and invite them to return to the bargaining table, but it says further strike or lockout actions could risk the government intervening with back-to-work legislation or a binding arbitration order. The vote, which opened July 21, is being administered by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, which stepped in after federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu intervened in the labour dispute. The union has said a strong no vote would not only reject the offer, but also protect the integrity of the bargaining process. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .


CBC
2 days ago
- CBC
What impact could an Ontario court decision have on Alberta bike lane plans?
On Wednesday, an Ontario court deemed a provincial plan to remove 19 kilometres of bike lanes to be unconstitutional. As Travis McEwan reports, it's unclear what impact that might have in Alberta, where the province is mulling similar legislation.


Edmonton Journal
3 days ago
- Edmonton Journal
Crown attorneys' group denounces 'attacks' on justice system during Freedom Convoy, Hockey Canada trials
OTTAWA — The president of the Ontario Crown Attorneys' Association says 'attacks' launched by 'politicians, media and members of the public' in response to two high-profile criminal cases amount to 'affronts to the rule of law.' Article content 'Be they attacks on prosecutorial independence or sexist attacks on principles of fundamental justice, these actions are affronts to the rule of law,' Donna Kellway wrote in an open letter. Article content Article content 'Personal attacks on Crowns seeking a significant sentence are nothing less than attacks on prosecutorial independence. These attacks do not — nor will they ever — drive the decisions made by our prosecutors.' Article content Article content Kellway said in an email to The Canadian Press that the letter refers to reaction to Crown sentencing proposals in the cases of two people associated with the 'Freedom Convoy' protest and criticism of counsel in the recent Hockey Canada trial based on their gender. Article content Several Conservative MPs, along with party leader Pierre Poilievre, have criticized the Crown's approach to sentencing two key organizers of the Freedom Convoy. Article content Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, who have yet to be sentenced, were convicted of mischief in April for their roles in organizing the protest, which blockaded streets around Parliament Hill for more than three weeks in early 2022. Article content Article content 'Let's get this straight: while rampant violent offenders are released hours after their most recent charges and antisemitic rioters vandalize businesses, terrorize daycares and block traffic without consequences, the Crown wants seven years prison time for the charge of mischief for Lich and Barber,' Poilievre wrote on social media last week. Article content Article content In her own social media post, deputy Conservative leader Melissa Lantsman said that if 'the Crown suddenly wants to apply the law – equal application of law would be a good start – but this is political vengeance not actual justice and it's why trust in our institutions is dwindling.' Article content Lich's lawyer Lawrence Greenspon said that while he 'liked' what Poilievre had to say, he shouldn't have said it. Article content 'The separation of church and state, in this case legislature from judiciary, is something that is highly valued in our country,' Greenspon said outside an Ottawa courthouse last week.