Retailleau ruined relations with Algeria, and the French colonization was brutal.
The French Press Agency (AFP) acted suspiciously in the interview it conducted with the French historian, Benjamin Stora, last Wednesday, focusing on a small aspect of the dialogue related to the role of memory in reviving relations between Algeria and France, while ignoring more important points concerning the heinous crimes of French colonialism in Algeria and the role of the far-right, represented by the Minister of the Interior, Bruno Retailleau, in destroying the bridges of communication between the two countries.
The French Press Agency summarized the interview in a brief dispatch that various French media outlets covered last Wednesday, while the full interview was only disseminated through the agency's YouTube channel on Saturday, May 24. The full interview was rich in details of great importance that the dispatch did not mention.
It was striking in following the 'video dialogue,' which lasted for 35 minutes, the disappearance of many points that the French historian discussed regarding Algerian-French relations from the past and present, especially concerning the description of the occupation crimes during the initial period of colonization that lasted for eighty years, as well as the crisis instigated by the far-right to destroy the relations between Algeria and Paris.
What Benjamin Stora said: 'The French colonization of Algeria cannot be considered a trivial matter, because it was a colonization unlike any other.
There was a colonial invasion that lasted for eighty years. It was truly horrific; there were atrocious massacres that the French only discovered recently. Entire villages and cities were destroyed, and this cannot be ignored. There were burnings (the caves), forced relocations of Algerians from their land, and their confinement in camps.'
He adds: 'These are painful memories in the history of Algerians that cannot be underestimated. Algeria was part of France, not just a protectorate like Morocco and Indochina. France's borders, until the 1960s, extended south to Mali, Niger, Libya, and Mauritania… The French believed it was impossible to abandon Algeria, which is rich in oil, gas, phosphate, and gold, which led some of the French people to consider Algeria's independence a betrayal.' General Charles de Gaulle was accused of committing this betrayal, and he was the target of assassination attempts several times until his death in 1970.
As for the telegram reported by the French Press Agency last Wednesday (France Press), it focused on the role of memory in bridging the gap between the two countries. It quoted Stora: 'We need strong initiatives, especially regarding the issue of French colonization of Algeria in the 19th century.
But today, in my opinion, considering the possibility of launching memory initiatives could serve as an alternative to resuming political relations,' which is 'necessary to resolve issues of immigration or visas.'
The agency also overlooked an important aspect of the dialogue, which is the role of Algeria in driving rapprochement through memory. Benjamin Stora pointed out that the idea of creating a joint committee of Algerian and French historians originated in Algeria, and it was an initiative that should have been capitalized on.
The historian emphasized that the committee cannot write a shared history because each side has its own perspective. The French consider colonialism as bringing civilization to Algeria, while the Algerians view it as the main reason for the killing of millions, the theft of their wealth, and their illiteracy.
In the opinion of the French historian, progress on the memory front could have alleviated tensions through initiatives from the French president, which were embodied in Macron's acknowledgment that the French state is responsible for the assassination of Maurice Audin, Ali Boumendjel, and the martyr Arab Ben Mhidi.
However, the controversial shift in the French stance on the Sahrawi issue led to the stifling of that initiative, which was proposed after its crystallization during the visit of French President Emmanuel Macron to Algeria in the summer of 2022.
He also accused France of making decisions that intensified the crisis, as it 'reduced the number of visas granted to Algerians without announcing it, from 400 to 200 or 250 thousand, and Algerians are aware of this.
Requesting a visa from a holder of a diplomatic passport is considered reaching the brink of a break, which I don't think will happen because there are millions of people from both sides and shared ties of land and lineage.'
Stora was asked if he would play the role of mediator to resolve the crisis between the two countries, to which he replied: 'The mediator must be accepted by both parties of the crisis. There is no search for a mediator. The crisis has reduced communication channels. I was indeed received by the two presidents in 2020 and 2021, but many things have changed today; we are in 2025.' He hinted that the French Minister of the Interior is responsible for the deterioration of these bilateral relations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
El Chorouk
17 hours ago
- El Chorouk
Parliament's International Work Conditional Upon Competence and Specialisation
The missions of the Council of the Nation abroad will be subject to strict regulatory control, as proposed in a new clause included in the draft bylaws of the council, currently under discussion. This control aims to better convey Algeria's voice and the state's positions, within the framework of what is called 'parliamentary foreign diplomacy,' and to counter attempts to distort them and mislead international public opinion. The clause stipulates the adoption of competency and specialisation criteria in selecting Council members participating in diplomatic missions and international parliamentary conferences, to improve the quality of representation and strengthen the presence of Algerian parliamentary diplomacy abroad. This proposal, which is expected to be included in the draft internal regulations of the upper house of parliament, falls within the framework of adopting more precise and rigorous criteria for selecting members of the Council of the Nation who participate in diplomatic missions and international parliamentary activities. It is also based on the principle of linking the MPs' specialisation with the nature of the task to which they are assigned, whether political, economic, legal, or technical, to ensure qualitative representation that reflects the competence of the parliamentary institution and its ability to interact constructively with issues raised in international forums. This approach is also expected to contribute to reducing previous imbalances in the composition of delegations and enhance the presence of the Algerian Council of the Nation as an effective and influential legislative body internationally. This draft, if officially adopted in the final version of the Council of the Nation's bylaws, aims to enhance the effectiveness of Algerian parliamentary diplomacy and direct it toward more professional performance that is integrated with the state's foreign policy. It is expected to contribute to unifying Algeria's discourse within international forums, ensuring that the positions of the representatives of the upper house are consistent with Algeria's official orientations, particularly concerning defending the country's sovereignty, protecting its strategic interests, and affirming its principles and positions on various regional and international issues under discussion on the global stage. In his speech following his election as Speaker of the Council of the Nation, Azouz Nasri, chairman of the Upper House of Parliament, replacing Saleh Goudjil, emphasised the growing importance of parliamentary diplomacy in the current regional and international context. He emphasised that the Council's representatives abroad are required to play a critical role that keeps pace with developments in the international scene and reflects the Algerian state's principles and sovereign positions. In his address, Nasri called for the need to enhance the level of participation of parliament members in international forums, not only in terms of attendance, but also in terms of influence and effective advocacy for the country's supreme interests. This directly intersects with the content of the proposed article to be included in the council's bylaws. It should be noted that the senators had recently reopened the file on the internal regulations of the upper house of parliament, seeking to finalise its provisions after the document had made significant progress during the term of the previous council's speaker. According to information previously published by Echorouk, the heads of parliamentary blocs in the lower chamber of parliament have re-raised this issue and made it a top priority, given its importance in organising and regulating parliamentary work, alongside the compensation issue, which is also receiving considerable attention within the council.
El Chorouk
18 hours ago
- El Chorouk
Appeals Pour In From Paris Before The Verdict In Sansal's Case
French authorities are exercising great caution in dealing with the case of the Franco-Algerian writer, Boualem Sansal, to avoid any potential escalation just days before the judicial decision on appeal is pronounced. Paris has leaned towards de-escalation for weeks, and the Minister of Interior, Bruno Retailleau, has completely disappeared from involvement in the crisis with Algeria, unlike before. He has been replaced by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jean-Noël Barrot, with his diplomatic and calm remarks. Jean-Noël Barrot completely ignored the case of the Franco-Algerian writer, Boualem Sansal, during his appearance as a guest on the French news channel 'LCI' in what appears to be a calculated decision. This provoked the journalist who was interviewing him, as she directed a question to him about it, expressing her surprise that the French authorities had not addressed Sansal's case during its crucial days. The journalist embarrassed her country's foreign minister, saying: 'You addressed the issue of hostages in Iran, and the fleet breaking the siege on Gaza, but you did not utter a single word about the case of the writer Sansal, for whom the Public Prosecutor (at the Algiers Judicial Council) requested a ten-year prison sentence. Why this silence in the last hours?' Here, Jean-Noël Barrot responded in a language full of pleading and appeal: 'We look forward to a humanitarian gesture from the Algerian authorities towards the writer Sansal, taking into account his age and health condition, and we hope that this is what will happen,' this was said before the session for pronouncing the final decision at the Algiers Judicial Council, which is expected on Tuesday, July 1st. The French hope that the Algerian authorities will respond to the repeated appeals from French President Emmanuel Macron on more than one occasion, as well as from his foreign minister Jean-Noël Barrot, before this dialogue. Meanwhile, President Abdelmadjid Tebboune had settled the matter when he affirmed on more than one occasion that the file is in the hands of justice, which is sovereign and independent. In contrast, the French Foreign Minister revealed that the Algerian authorities allowed Sansal's lawyer to travel to Algeria to attend the verdict session, saying: 'His lawyer has arrived in Algeria to attend the trial session next Tuesday, and I hope there will be a humanitarian gesture.' Although the Parisian Foreign Minister defended the innocence of the Franco-Algerian writer: 'We have always said that there is no justification for keeping our citizen in prison.' The French official did not mention the name of Sansal's lawyer who traveled to Algeria, nor whether it was the former French ambassador to Denmark, François Zimeray, knowing that the Algerian authorities had reservations about his travel to Algeria and did not grant him a visa for that purpose. Therefore, he did not attend the preliminary session at the Dar El Beida court in the capital, nor did he attend the appeal session at the Algiers Judicial Council. François Zimeray presents himself as being in charge of defending Boualem Sansal, despite the accused having dismissed all his lawyers and decided to defend himself alone, according to what the head of the Bar Association, Mohamed Baghdadi, said earlier. Nevertheless, the lawyer insists that he is part of Sansal's defense team, commissioned by Gallimard publishing house, while Algerian law stipulates that the defense must be commissioned by the accused's family. This is the justification that the Algerian authorities may have relied on in not granting a visa to the French lawyer, in addition to Zimeray's stances on the Palestinian issue, which Algeria considers a red line. Algerian-French relations are showing a remarkable tendency towards de-escalation after nearly a year of severe political and diplomatic crisis not witnessed by the two capitals since independence. Economic visits between the two countries have resumed, and here we refer to the visit of Rodolphe Saadé, owner of the largest French shipping company (CMA CGM), to Algeria, and his reception by President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, after the cancellation of the first visit that was scheduled for the first week of last April.
El Chorouk
2 days ago
- El Chorouk
President Boumediene's Widow Combating Hate Speech in France
Anissa Boumediene, the widow of the late President Houari Boumediene, is being subjected to a racist smear campaign in France for expressing her position on the imprisonment of Franco-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal, who is accused of targeting Algeria's territorial integrity. This was stated in press releases made to a far-right platform. The widow of the late President Boumediene was asked if she supported those calling for the release of writer Boualem Sansal, including Yasmina Khadra. She expressed her categorical refusal to release him, responding firmly, 'No, not at all.' Although the media outlet that interviewed her, Africa Radio, is unknown, this statement sparked a fierce campaign against the former first lady of Algeria. Anissa Boumediene justified her firm stance by saying, 'For me, Boualem Sansal doesn't like Algeria.' She added, denouncingly, 'Boualem Sansal said that Tlemcen and other cities are not Algerian… For me, that's very serious,' before addressing her interviewer, 'Imagine if the people of Nice (a city in southeastern France) or the Corsicans (named after the island of Corsica) said they would have preferred to remain with the Italians rather than the French.' The former first lady's stance came less than a week before the Algiers Judicial Council issued its ruling in the appeals hearing in the case of the Franco-Algerian writer. This decision caused panic among those who supported and demanded Sansal's release in France. This is because the position of a figure working in the field of law (Anissa holds a law degree from the Sorbonne University in Paris), as well as being an icon in the Algerian society as the widow of a national president beloved by Algerians, the late Houari Boumediene, could impact the case of the imprisoned writer in the eyes of those who attack her. Therefore, these French circles quickly emerged from their dens, harshly criticising Anissa. What's striking is that those launching this attack claim to defend freedom of expression, led by the Goncourt Prize winner and fugitive from Algerian justice, Kamel Daoud, who posted on X, 'I was asked if I supported the release of Boualem Sansal. She replied: 'Absolutely not. She lives in France, the country where she enjoys freedom.' Kamel Daoud followed this with a series of tweets supporting the Franco-Algerian writer, one of which read: 'If you want to help yourself, defend your freedoms, believe without kneeling, dream without sleeping, listen without prejudice, and travel with the mere movement of your index finger across the page, read Sansal.' Despite the undeclared truce in the French media toward Algeria, hoping to de-escalate tensions and pave the way for a pardon for the Franco-Algerian writer, media outlets known for their right-wing leanings have not failed to target the widow of the late president, such as Le Journal du Dimanche and Valeurs Actuelles. The Journal du Dimanche headlined its article on Anissa Boumediene as follows: 'She lives in France and is free: Algeria's former first lady's opinion on Boualem Sansal sparks controversy.' In it, it paused on what Anissa Boumediene had said, writing: 'The former first lady of Algeria and lawyer does not call for the release of the writer Boualem Sansal, who has been detained in Algerian prisons since November. She believes that his dangerous statements threaten the country's unity and justify his fate'. Meanwhile, the other newspaper, Valeurs Actuelles, titled its provocative article against Anissa Boumediene: 'His statements are very serious: Algeria's former first lady does not want the release of Boualem Sansal.' The article commented: 'After several months without mentioning the case of Boualem Sansal, the Franco-Algerian writer imprisoned since November 2024 in Algeria, Anissa Boumediene confirmed that she does not want the release of the writer, whose case is a symbol of tensions between Paris and Algiers.' In contrast, Anissa Boumediene found her defender in France, represented by the locally elected Salim Djellab, of Algerian origins, who responded to Kamel Daoud in a tweet: 'Mentioning that Anissa Boumediene 'lives in France' amounts to publicly exposing her, while also insinuating a dissident who must be punished. However, under international law, each state is sovereign in the exercise of its justice. If Boualem Sansal was convicted under Algerian criminal law, one can appeal for a measure of clemency (presidential pardon), but certainly not challenge the jurisdiction of a third state.
