Treasury chief predicts 10 more tariff deals by Labor Day — as EU reportedly nears new pact, too
WASHINGTON — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent predicted Friday that the US could secure 10 more tariff deals with other countries before Labor Day — as the European Union is reportedly edging toward a new trade pact, too.
Bessent said the trade deals would give the US economy a major boost, as would the proposed tax cuts and deregulatory provisions in President Trump's 'big beautiful bill.'
3 'If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18″ [proposed tariff deals], I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo in an interview Friday.
FOX Business
Advertisement
'If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18 [tentative tariff deals], I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day,' the Treasury chief told Fox Business' Maria Bartiromo in an interview.
'We will have taxes and trade, which I think will provide great stimulus from the economy, and then there's the deregulatory impact,' he said.
It's not clear which countries Bessent was talking about, but a pre-existing trade agreement with Canada and Mexico from Trump's first term has expedited tariff discussions between those nations. Meanwhile, other talks involving Japan, South Korea and Vietnam are making progress, Wall Street sources told The Post.
Advertisement
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also recently told officials she expected the EU could reach an agreement before mid-July, according to Bloomberg News.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick hinted at the extra trade deals Thursday as the Trump administration recently secured tariff agreements with the UK and China — while the July 8 deadline looms for so-called 'reciprocal' duties on products imported to the US.
The US-UK agreement aligns with Trump's 10% global baseline tariff rate on all products including up to 100,000 imported cars annually. As part of the pact, Downing Street will scrap its 19% ethanol fuel tariff and the US is nixing all duties on British-made airplane parts.
3 Bessent (second from left) and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer (left) meet with Chinese officials over trade last month.
via REUTERS
Advertisement
The US will place 55% duties on goods from Beijing, too, while China will keep 10% tariffs on American products, Trump previously announced.
'Now our tariffs are 30[%] on them. We're at 10[%]. We're collecting a substantial tariff income,' Bessent noted Friday.
There are still details to be worked out regarding Chinese magnets and rare-earth minerals, while the US has pledged to walk back visa revocations for students coming from China to learn at US universities and colleges.
Trump first announced new 10% US 'Liberation Day' tariffs April 2 and promised much higher 'reciprocal' rates to reduce trade imbalances with the US that have consistently been postponed to allow for negotiations such as those conducted with the UK and China.
Advertisement
As some of his planned higher rates have fallen through, Wall Street traders coined the term 'TACO' — for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.'
3 Bessent's positive statements preceded the S&P 500 hitting a record high and stock futures surging Friday.
AFP via Getty Images
Lower courts had initially blocked some of the new tariffs, but a federal appellate court paused that decision until a July 31 hearing.
Trump had previously set a goal for his administration to broker 90 trade deals in 90 days between April 9 and July 8.
The president has also set a July 4 deadline for Republicans in Congress to pass a massive tax-and-spending bill that makes items from Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent while also eliminating taxes on tips and overtime.
Bessent's positive statements preceded the S&P 500 hitting a record high and stock futures surging Friday.
'In the first 100 days, we set the table for the peace deals, the trade deals and the tax deals,' the Treasury secretary said. 'And now, in these 100 days, we're bringing them all home.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Supreme Court Curbs Judges in Birthright Case as Trump Touts Win
A divided SCOTUS left unresolved a fight over President Trump's restrictions on automatic birthright citizenship. The 6-3 ruling said Trump's restrictions on birthright citizenship at a minimum won't take effect for 30 days. Erik Larson explains. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signals full steam ahead after momentous Supreme Court decision
President Trump said Friday the Supreme Court's decision knocking down nationwide injunctions in a birthright citizenship case would give him full range to proceed with his agenda, particularly on immigration. The court in a 6-3 ruling said district judges in three separate cases when too far in issuing nationwide injunctions. 'Thanks to this decision, we can now properly file to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis, including birthright citizenship, ending sanctuary city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding, stopping federal taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries and numerous other priorities of the American people,' Trump said at a press conference. He added, 'We have so many of them. I have a whole list.' Trump also railed against 'radical left judges' who he said had used nationwide injunctions to 'overrule the rightful powers of the president' to stop illegal immigration. 'It was a grave threat to democracy, frankly, and instead of merely ruling on the immediate cases before them, these judges have attempted to dictate the law for the entire nation,' Trump said. Trump also argued nationwide injunctions were 'a colossal abuse of power' that allowed a federal judge to 'dictate the law for the entire nation.' 'In practice, this meant that if any one of the nearly 700 federal judges disagree with the policy of the duly elected president of the United States, he or she could block that policy from going into effect, or at least delay it for many years tied up in the court system,' Trump said. Friday's ruling does not resolve whether Trump's restrictions on birthright citizenship are constitutional, but the justices narrowed the lower court rulings to only block Trump's order as applied to the 22 Democratic-led states, expectant mothers and immigration organizations that are suing. Attorney General Pam Bondi said the administration is going to 'follow the law' when it comes to implementing the birthright order when asked whether there were any plans to try to make it effective immediately. 'We're going to follow the law, we're going to make those decisions, and we're going to do what's right in the bounds of the law,' she said. The Trump administration can now resume developing guidance to implement the order, though it must wait 30 days before attempting to deny citizenship. Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson forcefully butted heads in dueling opinions on the decision, with Jackson and two other liberal judges dissenting. Jackson wrote that the decision 'gives the Executive the go-ahead to sometimes wield the kind of unchecked, arbitrary power the Founders crafted our Constitution to eradicate.' Barrett sharply rebuked Jackson's rhetoric as a 'startling line of attack' and claimed her argument was at odds with centuries of precedent and the Constitution. 'These injunctions — known as 'universal injunctions' — likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts,' Barrett wrote for the court's six Republican-appointed justices. Trump thanked Barrett, as well as the other Republican-appointed justices, in the press conference Friday. Trump appointed Barrett and two other members of the six-justice majority. 'I'm grateful to the Supreme Court for stepping in and solving this very big and complex problem,' he said. When asked about backlash toward Barrett from some of Trump's most fervent supporters over an immigration case in April, the president said he wasn't aware of the ire. 'I don't know about that. I just have great respect for her,' he said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 takeaways from the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling
The Supreme Court handed President Trump a clear victory Friday, stopping judges from issuing nationwide injunctions that block his executive order narrowing birthright citizenship. But the cases aren't over yet, as a new phase of the battle commences in the lower courts. Here are five takeaways from the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling. Friday's opinion came from Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Trump's third appointee to the court who has recently faced a barrage of criticism from the president's supporters. The heat grew as Barrett this spring ruled against the administration in several emergency cases, including Trump's bid to freeze foreign aid payments and efforts to swiftly deport alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act. By tradition, the most senior member of the majority decides who authors the opinion. So Chief Justice John Roberts would've assigned Barrett as the author soon after the May 15 oral arguments. On Friday, Barrett ultimately wrote for all five of her fellow Republican-appointed justices, being the face of the Trump administration's major win. Barrett rejected the challengers' notion that nationwide injunctions were needed as a powerful tool to check the executive branch. 'Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch; they resolve cases and controversies consistent with the authority Congress has given them. When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too,' she wrote. Though the court curtailed nationwide injunctions, the decision leaves the door open for plaintiffs to try to seek broad relief by pursuing class action lawsuits. Within hours, one group of plaintiffs quickly took the hint. A coalition of expectant mothers and immigration organizations suing asked a district judge in Maryland to issue a new ruling that applies to anyone designated as ineligible for birthright citizenship under Trump's order — the same practical effect as a nationwide injunction. The Democratic-led states suing are also vowing to press ahead. 'We remain hopeful that the courts will see that a patchwork of injunctions is unworkable, creating administrative chaos for California and others and harm to countless families across our country. The fight is far from over,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) said in a statement. And the American Civil Liberties Union brought an entirely new lawsuit Friday seeking to do the same. The efforts could quickly bring the birthright citizenship battle back to the Supreme Court. 'In cases where classwide or set-aside relief has been awarded, the losing side in the lower courts will likewise regularly come to this Court if the matter is sufficiently important,' Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a solo concurring opinion. 'When a stay or injunction application arrives here, this Court should not and cannot hide in the tall grass.' Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, two of the court's leading conservatives, cautioned lower courts against creating a 'significant loophole' to Friday's decision by stretching when plaintiffs can file class action lawsuits. 'Federal courts should thus be vigilant against such potential abuses of these tools,' Alito wrote, joined by Thomas. Justice Sonia Sotomayor penned the chief dissent, arguing the rule of law is 'not a given' in America and the high court gave up its 'vital role' in preserving it with Friday's opinion. Joined by fellow liberal Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, she claimed the Trump administration sought to tear down nationwide injunctions because it can't prove the president's order narrowing birthright citizenship is likely constitutional. Trump's order made a 'solemn mockery' of the Constitution, she said, and his request to instead curtail nationwide injunctions is obvious 'gamesmanship.' 'Rather than stand firm, the Court gives way,' Sotomayor wrote. 'Because such complicity should know no place in our system of law, I dissent.' Going further than her liberal peers, Jackson wrote in a solo dissent that the court's decision was an 'existential threat to the rule of law' — drawing a harsh rebuke from Barrett, a dramatic exchange between the two most junior justices. Jackson argued that the majority uses legalese to obscure a more basic question at the heart of the case: 'May a federal court in the United States of America order the Executive to follow the law?' 'It is not difficult to predict how this all ends,' Jackson wrote. 'Eventually, executive power will become completely uncontainable, and our beloved constitutional Republic will be no more.' At another point, she said that 'everyone, from the President on down, is bound by law,' suggesting the Trump administration's efforts to 'vanquish' universal injunctions amounts to a request for permission to 'engage in unlawful behavior' — and that the majority gave the president just that. The rhetoric in Jackson's opinion amounts to a 'startling line of attack,' Barrett said, condemning her argument as 'extreme.' 'We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary,' Barrett wrote. 'No one disputes that the Executive has a duty to follow the law. But the Judiciary does not have unbridled authority to enforce this obligation — in fact, sometimes the law prohibits the Judiciary from doing so.' She urged Jackson to 'heed her own admonition' that everyone, from the president down, is bound by law. 'That goes for judges too,' Barrett said. Trump and his allies hailed the ruling as a decisive victory for his administration, promising to move his sweeping second term agenda forward with judges' power significantly curtailed. 'It was a grave threat to democracy, frankly, and instead of merely ruling on the immediate cases before them, these judges have attempted to dictate the law for the entire nation,' Trump said at a press conference Friday afternoon. He specifically slammed 'radical left judges' he said used nationwide injunctions as a tool to 'overrule the rightful powers of the president' to stop illegal immigration. The decision means his administration can now move forward on a 'whole list' of policy priorities that were frozen nationwide by federal judges, he argued, from birthright citizenship to freezing federal funding. 'We have so many of them,' Trump said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
