X sues to block New York social media transparency law
Elon Musk's X Corp. has filed a lawsuit challenging a New York state law that requires social media companies to report how they moderate hate speech and disinformation.
The complaint, filed in a federal court in Manhattan, seeks to halt the law, which X argues violates the First Amendment by forcing platforms to disclose sensitive information about their content moderation practices.
'Today, @X filed a First Amendment lawsuit against a New York law, NY S895B,' X's Global Government Affairs team posted Tuesday, adding that it had successfully challenged a similar law in California.'X is the only platform fighting for its users by challenging the law, and we are confident we will prevail in this case as well,' the company said.
The New York law requires social media companies with over $100 million in annual revenue to submit semiannual reports detailing how they define and moderate hate speech, racism, extremism, disinformation and harassment.
Companies face fines of $15,000 per day for violations, which can be sought by the attorney general's office.
X says the law is 'an impermissible attempt by the State to inject itself into the content-moderation editorial process' and seeks to pressure platforms into restricting constitutionally protected speech.
Reporters Without Borders said in a statement that asking X 'account for their actions against misinformation is by no means an infringement of freedom of expression, but the bare minimum to clean up the digital space.' 'Freedom of expression does not come without responsibilities,' it added.
The lawsuit comes after X successfully challenged a nearly identical California law last year, according to the filing. New York's law is 'a carbon copy' of the California provisions that were struck down, the filing adds.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
3 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Amazon teams up with Elon Musk's SpaceX in rare satellite launch deal
Agencies In a surprising move, Amazon is teaming up with Elon Musk's SpaceX to send its next group of internet satellites into space. The rare partnership comes as part of Amazon's effort to build Project Kuiper—its satellite-based internet system meant to compete with SpaceX's Starlink. On Wednesday, July 16, 2025, weather permitting, 24 new Kuiper satellites will launch aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. According to CNBC, the mission, named KF-01, will be Amazon's first time using a SpaceX rocket. The launch is scheduled for 2:18 am ET, with a backup window the next morning. Even though SpaceX and Amazon are fierce competitors in the race to deliver internet from space, the collaboration is simple business. Amazon is paying SpaceX for the launch, just as it has with other companies like United Launch Alliance (ULA), which carried the first 54 Kuiper satellites earlier this year. Amazon needs to move fast. The company must have at least 1,600 satellites in orbit by July 2026 to meet a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) deadline. So far, Amazon has 54 satellites in space, and this launch will bring the total to 78, Yahoo said. The Kuiper project could eventually include more than 3,200 satellites. Project Kuiper is one of Amazon's biggest bets. The company has already invested more than $10 billion and may spend over $20 billion more to complete the network. Analysts at Bank of America estimate Amazon could generate over $7 billion a year in revenue from the service by 2032 if it grabs a big share of the market. 'Amazon is working hard to meet its goals and bring internet access to people who need it,' said the company, pointing to plans to serve rural and underserved communities. Elon Musk's SpaceX, on the other hand, has a head start. Starlink already has about 8,000 satellites in orbit and nearly 5 million users worldwide. But that hasn't stopped Amazon from pushing forward. While Amazon's founder Jeff Bezos also owns the rocket company Blue Origin, it's not yet ready to handle most Kuiper launches.
Al Jazeera
3 days ago
- Al Jazeera
Tesla finally parks in India. But can it survive the tariff war?
New Delhi, India – Tesla is finally cruising in India, the world's third-largest car market, with the launch of its Model Y. The rollout marks the culmination of a decade-long, topsy-turvy journey. Showcased at its new showroom in Mumbai, India's financial capital, on Tuesday, Tesla's Model Y is now on sale for about $70,000, a price comparatively higher than in any other major market. Elon Musk's electric vehicle (EV) company is braving high tariffs and stiff competition in India's nascent but rapidly expanding EV market. As New Delhi negotiates a trade deal with the United States, India's car sector tariffs, arguably among the highest in the world, are a central topic. 'Tesla's entry into India marks a significant expansion of the company's global footprint,' said Kwan Wongwetsawat, a senior auto analyst at the research firm GlobalData. 'Before this decision, Tesla faced several market challenges,' he said, ranging from geopolitical concerns, a decline in global sales, and an uncertain launch schedule for a new compact model. So, what's the buzz about Tesla coming to India? Can it leverage the developing Indian market? And can India give a shoulder to Musk's EV giant as its global sales plummet? What is Tesla offering in India? To start with, in India, Tesla has chosen to offer its Model Y in the mid-range luxury segment, combining its hallmark features: minimalist design, high performance, and long-range driving distance. The driver-assistance technology is available as an add-on for 600,000 Indian rupees, or $7,000. Tesla is offering two variants of Model Y in India: the rear-wheel drive (RWD) and the long-range RWD edition. While the RWD has a range of up to 500 kilometres (310 miles) on a single charge, the long-range variant has a range of 622km (386 miles). In the Indian market, the Model Y will go head-to-head with other premium electric SUVs, such as the Mercedes-Benz EQB, BMW iX1, Volvo EC40, and Kia EV6. Tesla offers a four-year, or 80,000km, vehicle warranty for the battery and drive unit, whichever comes first. 'Tesla is the biggest EV company in the world, and its entry in India is a big milestone for the national EV industry,' said Puneet Gupta, who leads the India and Southeast Asia teams at automotive intelligence firm S&P Global Mobility. 'It's not just about selling cars in India. But Tesla's entry can help India to build the EV ecosystem,' Gupta told Al Jazeera. 'And the biggest impact of a company like Tesla is that it boosts people's confidence in EVs as a category.' The Model Y reaches a top speed of 201km/h (125mph), with six coloured exterior finishes. It is equipped with standard features such as automatic emergency braking, forward collision alerts, blind spot monitoring, and lane departure warnings. Tesla's signature Dashcam and Sentry Mode provide real-time recording and alerts for suspicious activity, even when the vehicle is parked. Why is Tesla so expensive in India? Tesla's Model Y rear-wheel drive is priced at 6 million Indian rupees, or $70,000, while the long-range RWD edition is priced at about 6.8 million Indian rupees, or just below $80,000. Tesla's website does not provide the price breakdown, including delineating the additional import tariff costs and levies imposed by a state. These prices for Model Y are higher than in any other major car market. They start at $44,990 in the United States, $36,700 in China, and $53,700 in Germany. India currently imposes one of the highest import duty tariffs on fully built cars in the world, significantly shooting up prices of foreign vehicles, including EVs like those from Tesla. Until recently, India imposed a 110 percent import duty on all fully built vehicles. The Indian government revised this policy, lowering the import duty to 15 percent for carmakers committing to invest and set up local manufacturing facilities within a three-year timeframe. This steep tariff structure has been a point of contention for global carmakers like Tesla, which has long lobbied for a reduction in duties to test market viability before committing to local manufacturing. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticised and called out India as a 'tariff king'. Both countries continue to negotiate a trade agreement, where the auto sector reportedly remains a central focus. Musk, Tesla's CEO, has also noted that 'import duties [in India] are the highest in the world by far of any large country!' What is India's EV sector like? India has set a national goal of achieving 30 percent EV adoption by 2030. While electric car sales in India increased by 20 percent in 2024 from the year before, EVs still represented just 2.5 percent of the total 4.3 million passenger vehicles sold. Despite its relatively small base, the EV sector in India is projected to grow rapidly, from its current market value of $54.41bn to $111bn by 2029. Currently, local manufacturers dominate the space, offering competitively priced EVs tailored to India's cost-conscious consumers. Tata leads with approximately 60 percent of the market share in the electric car segment, followed by JSW MG Motor India – a collaboration between India's JSW Group and China's SAIC Motor – and then Mahindra & Mahindra. High-end electric cars, priced above $20,000, made up a minuscule 6.6 percent of total EV sales last year. This is where Tesla will have to compete with the likes of Mercedes-Benz, BMW, KIA and Audi. How are Tesla sales faring in other markets? Tesla is coming to India as its EV sales plunge in global markets, and as the company bets on its revised Model Y to turn its fortunes around. In its home market, the US, sales continued to fall in the second quarter of 2025 by 6.3 percent, marking Tesla's third straight quarterly drop in year-over-year domestic sales. Facing protests against Musk's politics and earlier involvement with the Trump administration, sales have fallen for five straight months in Europe. With some consumers switching to cheaper Chinese EVs, Tesla's market share has dropped to just 1.2 percent in May from 1.8 percent a year ago. In China, Tesla's second-biggest market, the Q2 deliveries fell by nearly 12 percent. 'Tesla has been facing tough times globally, so the company also desperately wants new markets, and India, being the world's third-largest market, is a great opportunity for them to make up for some loss,' said Gupta of S&P Global Mobility. In several countries, Tesla's Chinese competitors are outselling Musk's EVs. And that's where the vast Indian market comes into the equation for Tesla, noted experts. Due to geopolitical tensions between India and China, rival Asian neighbours, only a few Chinese EVs are pitching to the Indian market. In 2023, the Indian government rejected BYD's proposal to establish a $1bn factory locally. While SAIC Motor operates in India in collaboration with India's JSW Group, BYD relies on importing multiple models. 'BYD is a direct competitor to Tesla, but the brand is also facing challenges in India and has yet to establish local production in the country,' said Wongwetsat. As a result, he added that both Tesla's prices in India and those of BYD are higher than in other markets. 'However, there is a clear price distinction between Tesla and local competitors like Tata, MG, and Mahindra,' placing Musk's company in the luxury segment. Unlike other Chinese-dominated EV markets in Asia, India offers a rather open market for Tesla to introduce high-end features and build an ecosystem from the ground up. 'The Chinese companies are not comfortable investing in India, and even Indian consumers are not comfortable buying Chinese due to the uncertain geopolitical situation,' said Gupta. 'For now, the Indian market's positioning is a very good advantage for Tesla, where you really don't get competition from Chinese, which is really killing Tesla both in terms of price and features,' Gupta told Al Jazeera. What challenges does Tesla face in India? For starters, India, which has the world's biggest population, is a starkly unequal country, where 90 percent of the population does not have discretionary spending capacity. Tesla's base offering is priced at $70,000, where, on a national average, per capita income is $2,880. Another concern is that India's infrastructure, including the condition of its roads and poor traffic discipline, could pose challenges for Tesla vehicles' lower ground clearance. India has only one charging station for every 235 EVs, with a total of 26,367 public charging stations nationwide for its 1.46 billion people. In contrast, the US has more than 61,000 charging stations for its 330 million people. At its media-only launch in Mumbai on Tuesday, Isabel Fan, Tesla's regional director, said, 'We are here to create the ecosystem, to invest in the necessary infrastructure, including the charging infrastructure.' Tesla announced that it will set up four charging stations in Mumbai. More will come to Delhi soon. 'We are building from 0 to 100. It will take time to cover the whole country,' Fan said. Reading into the Indian EV market, Wongwetsat of GlobalData said that 'Tesla's arrival may not significantly impact overall battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales in India, but it could attract demand from consumers interested in luxury brands like BMW and Audi.' Additionally, the launch of Tesla cars in India may be just one aspect of Tesla's broader ecosystem, Wongwetsat said, which includes sectors such as solar energy, energy storage systems, and even the space industry, all of which could enhance Tesla's appeal. Will Tesla lose subsidies in the US? Musk and the US president's apparent public fallout took a sharp turn earlier this month as Trump threatened to cut off billions in federal environmental subsidies that have benefitted Tesla and Musk's other companies. The clash follows Musk's renewed criticism of Trump's tax and spending bill, which includes provisions to eliminate key clean energy incentives – specifically, the $7,500 consumer tax credit for electric vehicles that has long supported Tesla's market growth. Trump, responding to Musk's criticism, warned that the Tesla CEO could 'lose a lot more' than just EV incentives. The dispute has broader implications. Musk has threatened to fund campaigns against lawmakers who back the bill and even floated the idea of launching a new political party.
Al Jazeera
4 days ago
- Al Jazeera
US Senate approves cutting billions in foreign aid as Trump demands
United States senators have passed a package of sweeping cuts that would slash Washington's foreign aid expenditures by about $8bn as part of President Donald Trump's pledge to drastically shrink federal spending. The package, which passed in a 51-48 vote early on Thursday, cancels $9bn in spending already approved by Congress, including more than $1bn to be stripped from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Two of the Senate's 53 Republicans voted with Democrats against the legislation. The vote was seen as a test of how easily senators would approve spending cuts recommended by Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The president, who has made slashing federal spending a domestic priority, established the department and had put billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk at the helm to identify areas for government cost-cutting before the SpaceX and Tesla CEO left in May. A public spat between Musk and Trump over deficit spending erupted a short time later. Food for starving children in Afghanistan, Pakistan to be burned Much of the $8bn in foreign aid cuts under the 'rescissions' package, which now returns to the House of Representatives for final approval, had been allocated to the now-defunct US Agency for International Development (USAID), a prime target for DOGE. The agency, which was established during the Cold War to run aid programmes and project US soft power internationally, closed its doors this month after the Trump administration's announcement in January that it was shutting down USAID. Within the funding that was cut was $4.15bn to boost economies and strengthen democratic institutions in developing countries, The Associated Press news agency reported. The package also cancelled $800m for a programme that assists with emergency shelter, water, sanitation and family reunification for people fleeing their homelands as well as $496m for food, water and healthcare in countries affected by natural disasters or conflicts. A senior US official said on Wednesday that nearly 500 tonnes of high-energy biscuits intended to feed 27,000 starving children in Afghanistan and Pakistan would soon be incinerated due to the Trump administration's decision to shut down USAID. 'A bunch of junk' Democrats argued that weakening foreign aid efforts would diminish the US's global status and leave a vacuum that would be filled by rivals like China. Senator Brian Schatz said cutting food aid and disease prevention measures was having life-and-death consequences, AP reported. 'People are dying right now, not in spite of us but because of us,' he said. But Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican, told the AFP news agency that while he was a 'big fan' of foreign aid and the soft power it brought, he believed money was being wasted. 'When you start spending money on a bunch of junk and liberal programmes disconnected from the purpose of the aid package, it makes it difficult on a guy like me,' he said. Republican leaders had removed a $400m cut to an HIV prevention programme from the package after requests from its own lawmakers. The programme is credited with saving millions of lives. US Constitution's ideals 'undermined' The cuts to public broadcasting, which Republicans have accused of having a left-wing bias, also met with fierce objections. Democrats said they would remove a key public service that performs a vital role, particularly during emergencies like natural disasters. The package cancels $1.1bn that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was due to receive over the next two years. It would help fund National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) as well as more than 1,500 local radio and television stations. Democrats said the rescissions package, by cutting $9bn from a $6.8 trillion federal budget, would do little to meaningfully tackle the deficit but would harm important public institutions. 'It is yet another example of the spirit and ideals of our constitution being undermined in a terrible way,' New Jersey Senator Cory Booker told AFP. Others, including Senator Mitch McConnell, the former Republican Senate leader, expressed concerns about ceding congressional spending powers to the president, saying he was worried about handing the White House a 'blank cheque' on spending issues, AP reported. But he ultimately voted to approve the package.
