Trump sued by US states over withholding $6.8 billion for schools
Attorneys general or governors from 24 states and the District of Columbia sued in federal court in Providence, Rhode Island, arguing that the U.S. Department of Education and the Office of Management and Budget threw schools nationwide into chaos by unconstitutionally freezing funding for six programs approved by Congress.
The freeze extended to funding used to support the education of migrant farm workers and their children; recruitment and training of teachers; English proficiency learning; academic enrichment; and after-school and summer programs.
The administration also froze funding used to support adult literacy and job-readiness skills.
The government was legally required to release the money to the states by July 1, the lawsuit said. Instead, the Education Department notified states on June 30 that it would not be issuing grant awards under those programs by that deadline. It cited the change in administration as its reason.
An OMB spokesperson at the time cited an "ongoing programmatic review" of education funding and said initial findings showed what he termed as a misuse of grant funds to "subsidize a radical leftwing agenda."
OMB also raised objections to the use of the grant money to support scholarships for immigrant students and lessons that involved LGBTQ themes.
The Democratic-led states said the sweeping funding freeze has disrupted school systems, resulting in summer school and after-school programs being canceled or put at risk and the halting of other initiatives with little time for school districts to fill in the holes left in their budgets.
The states say the administration violated the U.S. Constitution by disregarding Congress' sole authority over spending and ran afoul of federal administrative law by freezing the funds without any reasoned explanation.
The states also say the administration failed to abide by procedures of the Impoundment Control Act, which bars the executive branch from unilaterally refusing to spend funds appropriated by Congress unless certain steps are followed.
The lawsuit follows a series of other cases Democratic-led states and others have filed challenging the administration's sweeping efforts to freeze or terminate federal funding for programs out of line with Trump's agenda.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
Law firm Milbank defends NJ cities in Trump immigration lawsuit
July 15 (Reuters) - U.S. law firm Milbank has signed on to defend two New Jersey cities that were sued by President Donald Trump's administration over their immigration policies, putting the firm at odds with the White House after it struck a deal in April to avert the president's crackdown on prominent firms. A team of Milbank lawyers is representing Newark and Hoboken in the case in federal court, new court papers showed this week. They include former Obama-era acting U.S. Solicitor General Neal Katyal and Gurbir Grewal, a former New Jersey attorney general and enforcement head at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Trump administration in May sued Newark, Hoboken and other New Jersey cities, accusing them of being so-called sanctuary jurisdictions and obstructing federal immigration agents. The lawsuit, filed in Newark, was part of the White House's broader hardline campaign against immigration. Milbank, Katyal, Grewal and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. New York-headquartered Milbank is one of nine firms that reached deals with Trump in March and April, after he began issuing executive orders against law firms that restricted their access to government officials and federal contracting work. Four other law firms successfully sued to block Trump's orders against them. Trump in his orders alleged major firms had "weaponized" the legal system through politicized cases and hires, and accused them of illegal employment practices focused on racial diversity. To rescind or head off such orders, the settling firms pledged nearly $1 billion in free legal services to mutually agreed-upon initiatives with the White House, among other concessions. Milbank, which had not been hit with an executive order, said it earmarked $100 million. Milbank Chairman Scott Edelman in a letter to the firm in April said the administration had approached it with concerns about its pro bono and diversity initiatives, suggesting it make a deal. The New Jersey case is one of at least three in which Milbank now represents Trump's legal opponents. Katyal represents a former federal official suing over what she said was her wrongful termination from a board overseeing employment complaints by government workers. He is also representing a group of five small businesses that sued to challenge Trump's across-the-board taxes on imports from nations that sell more to the United States than they buy. The administration has appealed a ruling the plaintiffs won in May. Milbank hired Grewal last year from the SEC, where he had led enforcement efforts since 2021. Katyal joined the firm in February from rival law firm Hogan Lovells, and now leads Milbank's appellate team. He has argued more than 50 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. The case is United States v. City of Newark et al, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 2:25-cv-05081-EP-AME. Read more: Small businesses sign up prominent appellate attorney Neal Katyal in tariff case From Harvard to Musk, law firm Quinn Emanuel juggles Trump's friends and foes Law firms hire former Tesla lawyer and top conservative litigator for Trump fight Obama's top Supreme Court lawyer files lawsuit over Trump funding freeze
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump: Bessent an option to replace Fed chair, 'but I like the job he's doing'
WASHINGTON, July 15 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent could be a candidate to replace Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, but suggested that might not happen. After landing at Joint Base Andrews following a trip to Pittsburgh, Trump was asked if Bessent was his top choice to replace Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. "He's an option, and he's very good. Well, he's not, because I like the job he's doing, right?" Trump told reporters. Trump has railed against Powell for months for not lowering U.S. interest rates and has repeatedly urged him to resign. On Tuesday, Trump said cost overruns on a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's historic Washington headquarters could amount to a firing offense. "I think it sort of is," Trump said, when asked if he could fire the Fed chair over the renovation cost overruns, which have been sharply criticized by Trump administration officials. The president cannot fire Powell over a monetary policy dispute. Trump had originally appointed Powell, a fellow Republican, during his first time in office, and he was reappointed to a second term as Fed chief by Democratic President Joe Biden, With the unemployment rate low and inflation above the Fed's 2% target, U.S. central bank officials have been reluctant to cut interest rates from the current 4.25% to 4.5% range until it is clear that Trump's tariff policies won't lead to a fresh surge in prices. U.S. data on Tuesday showed that consumer prices rose across an array of goods from coffee to audio equipment to home furnishings in what economists say is evidence that the increasing import duties are being passed through to consumers. Overall consumer prices rose 0.3% in June, a roughly 3.5% annual rate, after a 0.1% increase in May. Other people under consideration to replace Powell include former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh and Trump's top economic adviser, Kevin Hassett. Bessent, who has also played a key role in Trump's trade negotiations with a host of countries, told Bloomberg Surveillance on Tuesday that a "formal process" was already starting to identify a potential successor to Powell. "There are a lot of great candidates, and we'll see how rapidly it progresses," Bessent said. He said it would be confusing for Powell to remain at the Fed after his term as chair ends in May 2026. Powell's term as Fed governor extends until January 31, 2028. Trump administration officials argue that a tax bill nearing passage in Congress will boost private sector investment and strengthen the U.S. economy, and insist that while tariff increases could result in a one-time bump in prices, they should not drive up inflation over the longer term.
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Republicans grill university leaders in latest House antisemitism hearing
July 15 (Reuters) - The leaders of three U.S. universities testified before a House of Representatives panel on Tuesday about what they have done to combat antisemitism on campus, saying they were committed to stamping out hatred while protecting academic freedom. At Tuesday's three-hour hearing, Georgetown University interim President Robert Groves, City University of New York Chancellor Felix Matos Rodriguez, and University of California, Berkeley Chancellor Richard Lyons came under sharp fire from Republicans. Many of them echoed President Donald Trump's recent attacks on universities, which he has described as "infested with radicalism," and questioned whether the presidents were doing enough to protect Jewish students and faculty. "The genesis of this antisemitism, this hatred that we're seeing across our country, is coming from our universities," said Representative Burgess Owens, a Utah Republican. It was the latest in a series of hearings about antisemitism on campus in which university leaders testified before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, which is tasked with higher education oversight. Democrats on the panel used the session to question the Trump administration's gutting of the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights, which probes incidents of antisemitism and other forms of discrimination. That has led to a backlog in investigations at a time when Republicans say universities are not doing enough to combat antisemitism. The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for the administration to resume dismantling the entire department, part of Trump's bid to shrink the federal role in education and give more control to the states. Representative Mark Takano, a California Democrat, called the hearing a "kangaroo court." "This scorched earth warfare against higher education will endanger academic freedom, innovative research and international cooperation for generations to come," Takano said, referring to the administration's efforts to cut off funding to some schools, including Harvard and Columbia, and impose other sanctions. University leaders have come under fire from both pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian communities for their handling of protests that broke out after the 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas militants and conflict that emerged from it. On some campuses, clashes erupted between pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel demonstrators, spawning antisemitic and Islamophobic rhetoric and assaults in some cases. During the hearing, the university leaders were repeatedly asked about their responses to antisemitic actions by faculty or affiliated scholars. Representative Mary Miller, an Illinois Republican, asked Berkeley's Lyons about a February event in which speakers "repeatedly denied that Israeli women were gang-raped by Hamas terrorists on October 7, 2023, and argued that Israel was weaponizing feminism." Lyons said the online event in question was organized by a faculty member but the comments that Miller cited did not come from the Berkeley faculty member. He said the school anticipated that some of the ideas discussed at the event would prove controversial. "I did not prevent it from happening because I felt that keeping the marketplace for ideas open was really important in this instance," he said. Previous hearings held by the panel have led to significant consequences for university presidents. In December 2023, Representative Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican, raised her own political profile by grilling the presidents of Harvard, University of Pennsylvania and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She asked them whether "calling for the genocide of Jews" would violate their schools' codes of conduct related to bullying and harassment. Each president declined to give a simple "yes" or "no" answer, noting that a wide range of hateful speech is protected under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment and under university policies. Their testimony, which many viewed as insensitive and detached, triggered an outcry. More than 70 U.S. lawmakers later signed a letter demanding that the governing boards of the three universities remove the presidents. Soon afterwards, Harvard's Claudine Gay and Penn's Liz Magill resigned. Columbia President Minouche Shafik resigned in August, following her April testimony before the committee.
