Top 5 Countries For Studying Abroad Compared: Visas, Job Opportunities
Study Abroad 2025: Choosing the right country to study is as important as selecting the right course or university. With many options available, students opt to study abroad because of the perceived quality of the international degrees, global living experience or some other reason. Countries like the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada are popular choices among students, offering a high quality education, multicultural society, and a low cost of tuition. However, knowing the advantages and disadvantages of a country are essential as studying abroad typically means living there for at least a year or more.
Here are some of the most sought-after countries for international students and why they would be the right fit for them.
1. United States (US)
US is home to many top ranking universities like the MIT, Stanford and Harvard. A F-1 visa is typically required for students looking to study here and the cost of tuition and living costs might be higher as compared to other countries. Optional Practical Training (OPT) allows one to three years of work after graduation (STEM advantage)
United States is best for students :
Who want to study in top-tier universities with well experienced professors,
Looking for a course in STEM programs.
Who want long term career opportunities.
2. United Kingdom (UK)
Graduate Route Visas allows two years (three years for PhDs) of post study work. Being cheaper than US, but more expensive than Canada and Germany makes it suitable for students seeking a prestigious degree in a shorter duration with historical institutions. UK provides top quality education through its well known universities like the Oxford, the Cambridge, the Imperial College and London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
3. Canada
Canada, being more affordable than USA and UK has various globally recognized universities like the UBC, University of Toronto and McGill. Students with Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP) can stay up to three years for work after graduation.
Canada is best for students who are:
Looking for quality education.
Looking for immigration opportunities in a multicultural society.
4. Australia
Australia is known for providing best courses in Engineering, Medicine, and Environmental Studies. Proof of funds and GTE (Genuine Temporary Entrant) are required to study here. Germany provides two to four year post study work visa depending on the course. It is best for students looking for work-life balance, nature-rich living, and Permanent Residency (PR) options.
5. Germany
Germany is highly known for providing tuition free education at their public universities to all students irrespective of their nationality. Germany offers courses with strong foundation in Engineering, Robotics, and Applied Sciences. It is best suitable for budget-conscious students and those pursuing technical fields like engineering or automotive.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Relationships will never be free of issues': Jaishankar on India-US ties
Washington: India and America will have to keep growing their relationship despite disagreements and frictions, said external affairs minister S Jaishankar on Monday, during his ongoing visit to America. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar,(Dr. S. Jaishankar-X) 'Relationships will never be free of issues and even differences. What matters is the ability to deal with it and keep trends moving in a positive direction,' said Jaishankar in New York at an event hosted by Newsweek, an American news magazine. 'I remember when I was Ambassador, I literally came in a few days after we had a problem related to one of our diplomats in New York City. And then, I had to deal with (Section) 301 issues, compulsory licensing controversies and with plans to sell F-16 aircraft to Pakistan. We dealt with it,' said India's top diplomat while pointing out that India had seen tensions with US administrations in the past as well. Despite this, Jaishankar argued, India and the United States are brought together by fundamental convergences on economic and strategic issues. India and the United States have disagreed publicly on the exact role played by Washington in mediating a ceasefire between New Delhi and Islamabad after military clashes in early May. US President Donald Trump - who announced the ceasefire before the Indian and Pakistani governments - claimed credit for brokering an end to hostilities. The Trump administration has also attempted to mediate between India and Pakistan on the Kashmir issue and claimed that trade-related inducements were offered to help ease tensions. India has publicly contested these claims by Washington. According to foreign secretary Vikram Misri, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made India's position clear during a phone conversation with President Trump after the G7 summit earlier in June. "Prime Minister Modi stated that the ceasefire was agreed to only at the request of Pakistan and that India does not want mediation. He made it clear that at no point during this episode were India-US trade talks or third-party mediation discussed," Misri said in a statement. "The halt to military action was discussed directly between the two countries through existing military channels," he added. A scheduled meeting between Trump and Modi on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada was reportedly cancelled after the former left the summit early. The Indian PM subsequently declined Trump's invitation to stop over in America on the way back from Canada. The Trump administration's overtures to Pakistan have also been in focus after Trump hosted Pakistan's Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir for a lunch at the White House. Top US military and diplomatic officials have outlined plans for a closer economic and defence relationship with Pakistan, including cooperation on security, counter-terrorism, investment and critical minerals. New Delhi has refrained from commenting publicly on these overtures to Pakistan but has noted these developments with some concern, according to persons aware of the matter. Despite these concerns, Jaishankar outlined plans for a closer partnership with America, including through a trade deal with Washington. The two countries are engaged in active negotiations with the deal expected to be finalised soon, according to White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt. 'Obviously, my hope would be that we can get to a successful conclusion to the trade deal,' said Jaishankar while stating that there would have to be 'give and take' on both sides to secure the agreement. Jaishankar will also meet with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday. The latter is hosting the Quad Foreign Minister's Meeting, which will also feature Japan's Takeshi Iwaya and Australia's Penny Wong. 'There are a lot of issues we need to discuss in the Indo-Pacific. These are issues of maritime safety and security, connectivity, technology, pandemic preparedness and even of education,' said Jaishankar about the Quad's agenda.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Turkey Eyes F-35 Comeback, Dumps Russia's S-400 – Will India Buy The Abandoned Missiles?
New Delhi: Turkey President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and U.S. President Donald Trump met briefly on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague. That meeting has now turned into a flashpoint in Washington's shifting military ties with Ankara. Flying home after the summit, the Turkish president said his country had not closed the door on the F-35 fighter jet. His comments came days after Turkey announced an upgrade to its domestic air defense network, the so-called 'Steel Dome'. Trump later confirmed what Erdogan hinted at. The U.S. president told a small group of Republican donors that Turkey's return to the F-35 fold was 'being worked out'. He did not give a timeline but said conversations had moved into the technical phase. The F-35 story has been a sensitive one for both sides. In 2019, Turkey took delivery of a Russian S-400 air defense system. That $2.5 billion deal led to U.S. sanctions. The Pentagon froze Turkey out of the F-35 consortium. Diplomats on both ends called it a low point. Now, the mood is shifting. Trump believes the impasse can be resolved. Speaking off the record with aides after the summit, he reportedly said Turkey's 'signals are encouraging' and that 'we have got momentum'. Turkey has not activated the S-400s. They remain locked up in a military base, with their future uncertain. That may be the olive branch Washington needs. A former U.S. official familiar with the talks called the change in tone 'a huge reversal'. The official said Turkey may be willing to cut its losses on the S-400s to re-enter the Western tech ecosystem. On June 29, U.S. envoy Tom Barrack said sanctions on Turkey's defense sector might be lifted by the end of the year. He told Anadolu that both Erdogan and Trump were 'pushing for resolution'. Insiders now say Ankara could be back in the F-35 loop within months. That path would require Turkey to mothball its S-400s permanently or sell them to a third country. Names being floated? Pakistan. Even India. There is no confirmation yet. But Erdogan's remarks suggest the S-400 deal may have run its course. For his part, Trump sees the F-35 not as a sale but as a strategic bridge. One that can still link Ankara back to Washington.
Hindustan Times
8 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC slaps ₹2 lakh fine on eight tenants, says they can't oppose redevelopment of building
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Friday dismissed a petition filed by eight tenants who tried to stall the redevelopment of a dangerously dilapidated building in Malad West. The court fined them ₹ 2 lakh each and reiterated that the property owner has the right to get his building redeveloped and tenants cannot oppose such a demolition. The Krishna Baug building near Malad Railway station was demolished two years ago. (Raju Shinde / HT Photo) The eight tenants had opposed their eviction and the demolition of the 100-year-old Krishna Baug Building No.1 which had been classified by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) as a C1 category building, extremely dangerous and unfit for habitation. In 2020 the BMC had issued a notice for the building's immediate demolition. A division-bench of justices Ajey Gadkari and Kamal Khata heard two separate pleas, one by the tenants of commercial premises filed in 2023, challenging the BMC's demolition notice and questioning the C1 category, and another by building owners asking for the demolitions to be enforced, instead of being stalled by tenants. Tenants wanted the building to be reclassified from the C1 category to the C2-B category which suggests repairs and renovations. They said that repair work had already been completed, the ground floor of the building was no longer dangerous, and there was no need for evicting them anymore. The court called this as an 'obstructionist approach intended to hinder the landlord's efforts toward redevelopment' and made it illegal for tenants to obstruct demolitions. The court added that the rights of tenants are safeguarded by the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and the BMC Act. The court said that as per section 17 (tenants rights in matters of redevelopment) of the Rent Control Act, and section 499 (regarding repair work) and 354 (removal of structures) of the BMC Act, tenants had the right to oppose the 'reconstruction' of the building, but not the 'redevelopment' of it. In real estate, reconstruction refers to rebuilding a structure without any change, and redevelopment involves demolishing the structure and building a new one with a different design and layout. While asking the tenants to pay the fine, the court said that they had been focused only on extending their stay in the building without taking into consideration other residents of the building.
