logo
Impact of AI on entry-level campus jobs: How the roles of engineers are being redefined

Impact of AI on entry-level campus jobs: How the roles of engineers are being redefined

Time of Indiaa day ago
As the landscape evolves, specific skills in AI are becoming increasingly valuable, commanding higher premiums. (AI image)
By Dr Neelesh Gupta and Dhruv Dudeja
Per our Campus Workforce Trends Study 2025, entry-level management roles post-MBA typically pay 1.5 times more than entry-level technical roles.
However, for graduates from the top 10 and tier-1 institutions, this salary gap has consistently narrowed over the past five years, decreasing from 2x to 1.5x and from 1.8x to 1.4x, respectively.
Despite this trend, the technology talent landscape faces a growing replacement threat, as AI and GenAI increasingly take over tasks once performed by human talent.
The AI tsunami: Threat or transformation?
Ongoing discussions highlight that leaders increasingly view entry-level roles in technology (such as coding), content creation, customer support, technical helpdesk and translation and localisation as tasks that AI or GenAI can perform more quickly and accurately.
The real-world implications of this perception remain uncertain; it may signal either a replacement of human roles or a simple augmentation of workforce capabilities.
Conversely, the demand for on-site staff to maintain AI data centres or associated facilities may give rise to new job categories, ranging from basic to complex.
The fear factor: Automation anxiety a catalyst for career realignment
As the debate continues, it is clear that GenAI is rapidly becoming part of everyday work.
According to Deloitte's Campus Workforce Trends: Placement Cycle 2025 study, 69 percent of engineering students believe their jobs are at risk due to AI. This apprehension reshapes their learning preferences and redefines their career entry strategies and long-term trajectories.
Roles once considered stable and future-proof, such as QA testing, data processing, level 1 support and documentation, are now being swiftly automated.
Technologies such as chatbots, Robotic Process Automation (RPA) engines and auto-coding assistants perform these tasks with remarkable speed and efficiency. This results in twofold problems for entry-level talent: (a) fear of job loss and (b) missing out on formative critical experiences that define and shape one's career trajectory.
As automation continues to take over routine tasks, the nature of human-led functions in the workplace is undergoing a significant shift.
This change is evident in entry-level campus jobs, where individuals typically begin as 'makers', those who produce content, write code and deliver outcomes as individual contributors.
Traditionally, their work is overseen by slightly more experienced professionals or first-line managers, known as 'checkers', who review and validate what the makers produce. However, this maker-checker model is evolving in two key ways:
• Checkers hold tightly to their roles, often viewing makers as increasingly replaceable due to automation.
• Makers increasingly take on checker responsibilities, diminishing the traditional work hierarchy.
As a result, organisations grapple with either an inflated middle management layer or redundant managerial roles, with each organisation's situation telling its unique story.
Reimagining careers: The emergence of the hybrid engineer-manager
Instead of shunning technical learning, students increasingly gravitate towards hybrid roles integrating technical expertise with business acumen and leadership capabilities.
This evolution is reflected in current skilling trends. While many continue to focus on AI and Data Science, they are increasingly pairing these subjects with leadership, project management and strategic thinking courses.
This shift creates new opportunities in emerging roles, such as prompt engineers, AI support engineers, data annotation specialists, cybersecurity analysts and AI ethics assistants, which require a blend of critical thinking, domain expertise and ethical reasoning.
As the landscape evolves, specific skills in AI are becoming increasingly valuable, commanding higher premiums. Notable in-demand skills include:
AI development and prompt engineering: About 15–20 percent premium
ML engineering: Approximately 15–20 percent premium
Cloud AI and infrastructure: Nearly 5–10 percent premium
Real-time and specialised data analytics: About 10–15 percent premium
These high-demand skills are compelling entry-level professionals to pivot towards them for better compensation and career prospects.
Our report shows that 83 percent of engineering students are now pursuing training in leadership and management. This marks a significant shift, as these were once considered separate career paths.
This trend is driven not only by apprehension but also by ambition. Management positions are perceived as gateways to faster career advancement, broader strategic influence and higher compensation.
Organisations are embracing AI in their campus hiring and cadre management processes
As student aspirations shift, campus recruiters are adjusting their strategies accordingly. Companies are increasingly using AI in their recruitment processes, with clear evidence apparent at three levels:
Smart resume parsing
Automated screening
Skill-based matching
Organisations are also revamping their hiring models to attract tech-plus-business talent.
Fast-track management programmes, rotational leadership roles and digital transformation fellowships are gaining popularity. Recruiters now prioritise applied skills, hands-on project experience and cross-functional adaptability over traditional academic metrics.
Preparing for an AI-augmented workforce
The mantra 'AI for all and all for AI' is becoming essential for students and organisations. Its adoption spans various levels:
Academic institutions: Approximately 20 percent of institutions are integrating AI into their curricula and administrative processes, using tools for personalised learning and automated admissions. For example, MIT employs AI for real-time feedback, enhancing student engagement.
Individual students: Students use AI-powered platforms for personalised tutoring and writing assistance, enhancing academic outcomes. Notably, about 83 percent of tier-1 students now use AI-generated mock interviews, job-specific simulations and automated profile audits.
Organisations: Companies are adopting AI to optimise operations by employing data analytics for customer insights and using AI tools in HR to enhance recruitment while personalising employee training. This adoption showcases AI's transformative impact on decision-making across various sectors.
Conclusion: Redefining the role of engineers
India Inc.'s
graduating class of 2025, along with those of the coming years, will continue to experience the impact of AI-driven disruption. The surge in AI solutions and their ability to deliver precise results will shape the future paths of engineers, prompting many to reskill or shift towards management roles.
At the same time, India Inc. stands at a pivotal juncture where jobs are being redefined. As roles evolve, campus curricula will adapt and the mindset of future generations will shift accordingly.
This transformation necessitates a re-evaluation of traditional talent models. Employers and educators must invest in developing multidimensional capabilities that bridge the divide between code and commerce.
In the GenAI era, success hinges less on static knowledge and more on the ability to adapt and grow with emerging technologies. Engineering students are already responding to this shift by actively seeking out cross-disciplinary skills, blending technical expertise with leadership, strategy and innovation. Engineering students are already demonstrating a deep understanding of this imperative.
(Dr Neelesh Gupta is Partner, Deloitte India and Dhruv Dudeja is Director, Deloitte India)
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Samsung share price dips: Earnings miss to Trump tariffs — key reasons behind the fall explained
Samsung share price dips: Earnings miss to Trump tariffs — key reasons behind the fall explained

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Samsung share price dips: Earnings miss to Trump tariffs — key reasons behind the fall explained

Samsung share price: Samsung Electronics' share price declined in trade on Tuesday after the company delivered an earnings shock, projecting a 56% drop in its second-quarter operating profit, dented by US curbs on China and delays in supplying high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips to key US customer Nvidia. Additionally, US President Donald Trump levied a 25% tariff on South Korea, further clouding the outlook for the stock. Samsung, one of the world's largest makers of memory chips, reported a preliminary operating profit of 4.6 trillion won in the June quarter — the company's lowest since 2023 and short of analysts' projections, as per a Bloomberg report. The revenue was flat at 74 trillion won. The company will provide a full financial statement with net income and divisional breakdowns later this month. Samsung reported a drop in profit after its foundry division, partly dependent on Chinese demand, incurred a one-time inventory charge for unsold AI chips. The company also noted a decline in utilisation rates, explaining the weaker-than-expected performance in an unusual statement. However, Samsung expects operating losses in its contract chipmaking business to narrow in the second half of the year, citing a gradual recovery in demand. Samsung lost its leadership in the AI market to rival SK Hynix Inc. Its longstanding rival — along with Micron Technology Inc. — now sells more of the cutting-edge high-bandwidth memory chips paired with Nvidia Corp.'s AI accelerators, the Bloomberg report said. What's worse, the problem for Samsung has been compounded by the US restrictions on tech exports to China, thus slowing a turnaround in its chipmaking operation. "Samsung's operating profit dropped by a sharper-than-expected 56% due to inventory write-downs triggered by US export restrictions on AI chips destined for China. Trump's tariff policy had a significant impact on the company's performance," said capital market expert Anuj Gupta. He said that given growing macroeconomic uncertainties due to recent global trade tensions and slowing global economic growth, it is difficult to predict future performance. Due to the festival season in India, we expect its performance to improve in the second half of the year and expect an increase in demand growth, Gupta added. Samsung share price declined over 1% to 61,000 KRW from its last closing price of 61,700 KRW. "Last year, prices corrected by 32.23%. Currently, it has strong resistance at 65000krw and support at 57300krw. We are expecting the price to go down. Traders can use buy-on dips as prices are traded in an oversold zone," Gupta advised. Meanwhile, Anshul Jain, Head of Research at Lakshmishree Investments said that Samsung Electronics' share price has been trading in a wide 240-week range between 85,000 and 49,000 South Korean Won (KRW), recently rejecting the lower end of this range and forming a promising double bottom setup. This, he said, signals a potential preemptive reversal with a solid base. "A sustained move above 62,000 KRW per share will likely propel the stock towards 71,000 KRW apiece, and if momentum persists, a test of 85,000 KRW per share could be in sight. The substantial accumulation at the range lows suggests buyers are defending this zone aggressively. Only a close below 48,000 KRW per share can damage this structure, which currently looks unlikely given the price," Jain opined. (With inputs from agencies) Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

Samsung to buy US healthcare services company Xealth
Samsung to buy US healthcare services company Xealth

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Samsung to buy US healthcare services company Xealth

Samsung Electronics said on Tuesday it had signed an agreement to acquire Xealth, a U.S.-based healthcare platform, as part of its efforts to expand its mobile healthcare services business. The South Korean company did not disclose the value of the transaction. Samsung said the two companies hoped to create "synergy between Samsung's advanced wearable technology and Xealth's digital health platform " which runs digital health programs and manages data linking care providers, including more than 500 U.S. hospitals, with their patients. The acquisition comes as Samsung steps up efforts to diversify beyond its core semiconductor and smartphone businesses. Samsung has been betting on the medical sector as one of its new growth engines, along with consumer audio, cooling and heating systems, and robotics. In May, Samsung Electronics agreed to buy Germany's FlaktGroup for 1.5 billion euros ($1.68 billion) as it looks to meet growing demand for cooling of data centres used for artificial intelligence projects. Live Events Samsung, led by Chairman Jay Y. Lee, said at a shareholder meeting in March that it was looking for "meaningful" deals this year to drive growth after having lagged rivals in tapping the AI chip boom led by Nvidia. Samsung earlier on Tuesday projected a far worse-than- expected 56% plunge in second-quarter operating profit due to weak AI chip sales, deepening investor concerns over the tech giant's ability to revive its struggling semiconductor business .

Beware the market risk of AI-guided investment gaining mass popularity
Beware the market risk of AI-guided investment gaining mass popularity

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

Beware the market risk of AI-guided investment gaining mass popularity

As artificial intelligence (AI) expands its role in the financial world, regulators are confronted by the rise of new risks. It is a sign of a growing AI appetite among retail investors in India's stock market that the popular online trading platform Zerodha offers its users access to AI advice. It has deployed an open-source framework that can be used to obtain the counsel of Anthropic's Claude AI on how one could rejig one's stock portfolio, for example, to meet specified aims. Once set up, this AI tool can scan and study the user's holdings before responding to 'prompts' on the basis of its analysis. Something as general as 'How can I make my portfolio less risky?" will make it crunch risk metrics and spout suggestions far quicker than a human advisor would. One could even ask for specific stocks to buy that would maximize returns over a given time horizon. It may not be long before such tools gain sufficient popularity for them to play investment whisperers of the AI age. A recent consultation paper by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi)—which requires AI advisors to abide by Indian rules of investment advice and protect investor privacy—outlines a clear set of principles for the use of AI. Also Read: Siddharth Pai: India's IT firms have a unique opportunity in AI's trust deficit The legitimacy of such AI tools is not in doubt. Since the technology exists, we are at liberty to use it. And how useful they prove is for users to determine. In that context, Zerodha's move to arm its users with AI is clearly innovative. As for the competition posed by AI to human advisors, that too comes with the turf. Machines can do complex calculations much faster than we can and that's that. Of course, the standard caveat of investing applies: users take the advice of any chatbot at their own risk. Yet, it would serve us well to dwell on this aspect. While we could assume that AI models have absorbed most of what there is to know about financial markets, given how they are reputed to have devoured the internet, it is also clear that they are not infallible. For all their claims to accuracy, chatbots are found to 'hallucinate' (or make up 'facts') and misread queries without making an effort to get clarity. Even more unsettling is their inherent amorality. Tests have found that some AI models can behave in ways that would be scandalous if they were human; unless they are explicitly told to operate within a given set of rules, they may potentially overlook them to achieve their prompted goals. Asked to 'maximize profit," an AI bot might propose a path that runs rings around ethical precepts. Also Read: AI privacy paradox: Is India's Digital Personal Data Protection law ready for the chatbot revolution? Sebi's paper speaks of tests and audits, but are we really in a position to detect if an AI tool has begun to play fast and loose with market rules? Should AI advisors gain influence over millions of retail investors, they could conceivably combine it with their market overview to reach positions of power that would need tight regulatory oversight. If their analysis breaches privacy norms to draw upon the personal data of users, collusive strategies could plausibly be crafted that venture into market manipulation. AI toolmakers may claim to have made rule-compliant tools, but they must demonstrably minimize risks at their very source. Also Read: AI didn't take the job. It changed what the job is. For one, their bots should be fully up-to-date on the rulebooks of major markets like ours. For another, since we cannot expect retail users to include rule adherence in their prompts, AI tools should verifiably be preset to comply with the rules no matter what they're asked. Vitally, advisory tools must keep all user data confidential. AI holds promise as an aid, no doubt, but it mustn't blow it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store