Labour vows to tackle 'corridor care' and long waits with almost £450m NHS investment in England
Wes Streeting says his NHS reforms aim to deliver around 40 new centres to fast-track treatment for patients, up to 15 mental health crisis assessment units and almost 500 new ambulances.
It is part of an attempt to shift patients away from A&E and avoid unnecessary hospital admissions.
Analysis:
"No patient should ever be left waiting for hours in hospital corridors or for an ambulance which ought to arrive in minutes," said Mr Streeting.
"The package of investment and reforms we are announcing today will help the NHS treat more patients in the community, so they don't end up stuck on trolleys in A&E," he added.
1:39
In an example of the challenge facing the health secretary, Sky News on Wednesday revealed the scale of England's mental health crisis, exacerbated by a shortage of specialist beds and an overwhelmed social care network.
The new Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for England says more needs to be done to drive down long waits, cut delayed discharges and improve care for patients.
The document requires Trusts to reduce the number of patients waiting over 12 hours and make progress on "eliminating corridor care". It is estimated "over 800,000 people a month will receive more timely care".
A&E league tables published
A&E "league tables" will be published to drive up performance, including driving down delayed discharges from hospital. This can often impact elderly people when they are fit to leave but have additional care needs which require the involvement of social care teams.
The plan also sets out aims to cut ambulance waiting times for category 2 patients - like those suffering stroke, heart attack, sepsis or major trauma - from 35 to 30 minutes. A previous target of 18 minutes has been repeatedly missed.
Trusts have also been told to tackle lengthy ambulance handover delays by meeting a maximum 45-minute target for patients to enter A&E.
The aim is to avoid a repeat of a crisis last winter when patients were waiting hours for beds and regularly being treated in corridors - so-called corridor care.
Among the other plans revealed by NHS England are: virtual wards, where patients are monitored by hospital staff from their home, and a greater role for paramedics and urgent community response teams to treat people in the community to avoid hospital admission.
4:01
Some reforms 'lack ambition'
Royal College of Emergency Medicine president Dr Adrian Boyle accepted the plan had "some good and some bad" points but also that NHS England had acknowledged "the shameful situation being experienced by patients and clinicians across the country's emergency departments".
In a statement, Mr Boyle said: "Some parts lack ambition - for example accepting that 10% of people will face A&E waits of more than 12 hours, when no patient should.
"Also maintaining the four-hour standard at 78% when the stated aim is that 95% of patients should move through the emergency department within this time - something which hasn't happened for a decade."
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives managing director Anna Parry said: "Handover delays have the greatest detrimental impact on ambulance resources and create unnecessary delays and additional harm for thousands of patients each year.
"The elimination of corridor care and the focus on reducing 12-hour waits at emergency departments is also welcomed."
The Liberal Democrats broadly welcomed the plans but called on ministers to follow through on their promises.
"Patients have heard these kinds of promises before only to be led up the garden path," said Lib Dem health spokesperson Helen Morgan MP.
"The misery in our A&Es will only be prolonged if they continue to move at a snail's pace on social care," she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Superbugs could kill millions more and cost $2tn a year by 2050, models show
Superbugs could cause millions more people to die worldwide and cost the global economy just under $2tn a year by 2050, modelling shows. A UK government-funded study shows that without concerted action, increased rates of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) could lead to global annual GDP losses of $1.7tn over the next quarter of a century. The research, by the Center for Global Development thinktank, found the US, UK and EU economies would be among the hardest hit, prompting accusations that recent swingeing aid cuts are self-defeating. On Thursday, the UK government announced it was axing funding for the Fleming fund, which combats AMR in low- and middle-income countries, as part of wider aid cuts. The Trump administration has confirmed $9bn in cuts to its foreign aid budget, while a number of European countries have also reduced spending on overseas aid. Anthony McDonnell, the lead author and the research and a policy fellow at the Center for Global Development, said: 'When we conducted our research on the economic impacts of antimicrobial resistance, it was anticipated that resistance rates would continue to follow historical trends. 'However, the sudden cuts to Official Development Assistance by the US, which has cut its aid spend by roughly 80%; the UK, which has announced aid cuts from 0.5% to 0.3% of gross national income; and substantial reductions by France, Germany, and others, could drive up resistance rates in line with the most pessimistic scenario in our research. 'Even countries that have been successful in keeping AMR rates under control cannot afford to be complacent. Unless AMR programmes are protected from aid cuts, resistance rates across the world will likely increase at a rate in line with the worst-affected countries. 'This would result in millions more people dying worldwide, including across G7 nations. Investing in treatment for bacterial infections now will save lives and deliver billions in long-term economic returns.' The research calculated the economic and health burden of antibiotic resistance for 122 countries and forecast that in that in this most pessimistic scenario, by 2050, GDP losses in China could reach just under $722bn a year, the US $295.7bn, the EU $187bn, Japan $65.7bn and the UK $58.6bn. According to the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), deaths from AMR are expected to increase 60% by 2050, with 1.34 million people in the US and 184,000 in the UK alone predicted to die each year from antibiotic resistant bugs, while numbers of those becoming seriously ill from drug-resistant bacteria are also expected to jump. Superbugs increase the number of hospital admissions and lead to longer and more intensive hospital stays, costlier second-line treatments and more complex care, meaning resistant infections are roughly twice as expensive to treat as those for which antibiotics are effective. The study estimates global health costs of treating AMR could increase by just under $176bn a year, while in the UK, they would rise from $900m to $3.7bn and in the US from $15.5bn to just under $57bn. Higher rates of resistant bugs would also shrink the UK, EU and US workforces by 0.8%, 0.6% and 0.4% respectively, the study found. But if countries invest more in tackling superbugs – increasing access to new antibiotics and high-quality treatment of these infections – the US economy would grow $156.2bn a year and the UK $12bn (£9.3bn) by 2050. Responding to the findings, Dr Mohsen Naghavi, a professor of health metrics at IHME, said: 'Today the threat of AMR is increasing, and without immediate action from all stakeholders the medicines we have access to now could stop working, potentially causing a simple infection to become deadly.' That would involve policy changes from the US, European and UK governments, the development of new drugs and ensuring everyone understood that antibiotics were ineffective against viruses, he added. A UK government spokesperson said: 'Our 10-year health plan recognises antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as a major threat and commits to urgently tackle its spread, including through new vaccines. 'We have made important progress - reducing antibiotic use in meat and pioneering a world-first subscription model to incentivise the development of new treatments. We also continue to work closely with international partners to influence global efforts to limit the spread of AMR.'
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Weight-loss jabs linked to five deaths in Scotland
Weight-loss injections have been linked to the deaths of five people in Scotland, while hundreds more report having become ill after using them. The jabs were developed to suppress appetite among obese patients with type 2 diabetes but have become more commonly used as a quick-fix diet aid. Last year a Scottish nurse, Susan McGowan, was the first person in the UK whose death was directly linked to the prescription-only medication. Now, however, the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has said it has received five reports of fatalities linked to weight-loss jabs north of the border. The watchdog said in March that it had been notified 361 times since January last year of patients in Scotland who have suffered illness after taking the drugs.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
BMA members could triple their pay covering doctors' strikes
Doctors who are members of the British Medical Association will be able to triple their salary by covering for junior colleagues during industrial action, NHS leaders have said. Up to 50,000 resident doctors, who were previously known as junior doctors, are poised to begin a five-day walkout from 7am on Friday, which is expected to lead to the cancellation of 100,000 appointments. If the walkout goes ahead, senior colleagues will fill in for them and be able to request premium rates of pay. In previous strikes consultants have been paid as much as £3,000 to cover a single 12-and-a-half-hour night shift. Matthew Taylor, the head of the NHS Confederation, which represents hospitals, said that the strikes would increase the risk of 'severe harm' to patients. He said: 'It is hard for the public to understand when, in terms of the BMA, some members are going on strike, while others — consultants — are asking for three times more than their usual salary in order to cover for that strike action. 'I do worry that public sympathy will be stretched. NHS trade unions have tended to have high levels of support when they take action. I think the indications are that the public do not feel the same level of sympathy. Particular elements of this, like those providing cover, being able to ask for a lot more money, have an impact on trust.' Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is expected to hold talks with the BMA on Tuesday, and there are hopes in the government of a breakthrough. They last met on Thursday with both sides describing the discussions as constructive. • Five deaths linked to disruption from last junior doctors' strikes Streeting has made clear that he 'cannot move' on headline pay for resident doctors, who are pushing for a 29 per cent pay rise. However, several other issues are up for negotiation, including the possibility of writing off student loans if medical graduates keep working in the NHS for a certain number of years. Younger doctors can graduate from five years of medical school with £100,000 in debt, which could be reduced over time under a 'loan forgiveness' scheme. Other possible reforms include cutting doctors' pensions to give them 'higher pay today', subsidising fees for exams and speeding up career progression so they earn more at a younger age. Taylor said that the strikes could mean 100,000 operations being cancelled. 'Some people who have been waiting many months in pain are going to have to wait longer because consultants who would have been holding clinics or doing operations will instead need to be on wards or in A&E,' he said. • NHS put up with harm of last strikes, says boss — but not any more He said that the increased pressure on hospitals meant increased risk for patients. 'When appointments don't take place, when there is more pressure on hospitals, there is a risk of severe harm to people because services are overstretched.' He also said that there were financial consequences. 'If already hard-pressed [hospital] trusts are not able to undertake activity they don't get the money for that activity,' he said. The Centre for Economics and Business Research, an economic think tank, has suggested that the industrial action could cost Britain £64 million. Dr Tom Dolphin, chairman of the BMA council, said: 'Senior doctors keep urgent services running safely during strikes by resident doctors, but this is work over and above their regular contracted work. The rates of pay for all extra-contractual work are not unique to covering strike days, and year-round trusts are having to pay overtime rates and expensive agency fees to cover rota gaps, not just on strike days. 'This is due to repeated failures by governments to fix the staffing crisis in the NHS.' Dolphin added: 'The BMA firmly believes that any harm arising from failure to plan appropriately for reduced staffing levels on strike days is the responsibility of senior directors at a hospital.' The industrial action poses a significant threat to Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to cut NHS waiting lists. Internal NHS modelling already suggests that the government is unlikely to hit the target by the end of this parliament. A YouGov survey for The Times has found that 36 per cent of the public supported further industrial action by junior doctors, while 49 per cent opposed it. When doctors last went on strike, just before last year's general election, YouGov found it was supported by 59 per cent of the public and opposed by 36 per cent.
