
Brit F1 fans all did same cruel thing at British Grand Prix and it reveals a stark truth
There is a peculiar, almost uniquely British tradition once a year in the UK in that thousands of us head off to cheer the heroes and boo the villains at the pantomime.
We love to show our disdain for the baddies almost as much as we like to applaud and shout encouragement to the goodies.
It's all tongue in cheek of course - and the villains normally get their comeuppance and turn out to be not quite as bad as made out.
But the tradition and others in the UK, like cheering on the underdog, does not just end at the theatre, it's found in sport as well.
There are of course the traditional rivalries and partisanship in sport - a lot of which is far from tongue in cheek. People want their team to win and get quite annoyed when they don't.
However, there is one thing fans will always unite behind strongly and that's perceived injustice against their man, woman, or team, and/or adjudged cheating on the part of the opposition. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here
At the British Grand Prix at Silverstone on the weekend of July 4/5/6, a good chunk of the 500,000 fans who gathered over the course of the weekend were there to support Lewis Hamilton, Lando Norris or George Russell - the three Brits with a chance or victory or at least a podium.
(Image: Anadolu via Getty Images)
Norris drives for McLaren and there was a fair dosage of papaya orange among the supporters, the colours of the McLaren F1 team, and also plenty of Ferrari red and banners backing Hamilton in his first season with the Italian team.
As well as their nationality, both drivers, and Mercedes man Russell to an extent, all have one other thing in common - they have all clashed multiple times with a certain Dutch-Belgian Red Bull driver and four-times world champion Max Verstappen.
It's fair to say that Verstappen has thoroughly annoyed fans of Hamilton and Norris in the past. He fought a long and bitter season against Hamilton in 2021 in which the pair clashed repeatedly on track.
(Image: Getty Images)
Verstappen's race tactics were frequently called into question, by fans and race stewards, the latter of whom penalised him on a number of occasions for allegedly breaking the rules of fair racing.
Hamilton also received penalties during the season as their fight became ever more contentious.
The British driver looked to have overcome his rival to claim a record-breaking eighth world championship and deny Verstappen his first when a controversial decision by the race director at the time at the end of the final race of the season in Abu Dhabi, allowed Verstappen one final lap on fresh tyres to overtake Hamilton on his ageing set and see the Dutchman claim the title.
It was far from just Hamilton fans who saw this as a huge injustice. The race director's decision and interpretation of the rules which led to it was the subject of long debate and all but the most ardent of Verstappen fans probably knew in their hearts that Hamilton had been the victim of a serious wrongdoing.
(Image: Formula 1 via Getty Images)
That decision may have been nothing to do with Verstappen, but the cards had been dealt and, combined with what had happened during the rest of the season and incidents in those prior, the role of villain had been cast, at least in the eyes of many British fans and probably every fan of Hamilton.
Verstappen had already faced boos at some circuits prior to that, a shame considering his immense talents, but the driver did little to warm hearts to him when his questionable race tactics emerged on more occasions following.
Chief among these were his clashes with another Brit and emerging championship challenger, Lando Norris, in the 2024 season.
The two, friends off track, clashed on a number of occasions on it, with Verstappen often perceived to have stretched and sometimes broken the rules of fair racing once more.
(Image: Getty Images)
I'm sure many see Verstappen's tactics in a different light and will defend his driving to the hilt. Often these things are far from clear cut in the heat of the moment when you are braking from 200mph to make a corner.
Verstappen is certainly one of his own strongest advocates and rarely admits any fault.
But that's what probably angers people more than anything. They can more easily accept mistakes when the person perceived to have made them throws up their arms and admits them.
It is Verstappen's dogged refusal to do so, rightly or wrongly, that grates on people.
Hand on heart, few would question Verstappen's talents. His ability to get the absolute best out of himself and his car is probably second to none. He's already rightly considered one of the best drivers of all time, and not just because of those four world titles.
But everything I have explained is the reason why, at the British Grand Prix, and you may not always hear this on the TV, when he makes a mistake or gets overtaken, a cheer will go up.
There was a roar from the crowd at Silverstone this year - 2025 -when Verstappen spun his Red Bull at the end of one of the safety car periods . People cheered and clapped gleeful at his misfortune.
It seems cruel and it is - it's hardly the sportsmanlike behaviour we'd like to see from the fans.
But it's just the way of it. No-one wants to see Verstappen get hurt. But a large number of those fans at Silverstone would struggle to conceal a smile at seeing him suffer a few misfortunes along the way - especially if it's to the gain of a Norris, or a Hamilton, or a Russell.
(Image: Formula 1 via Getty Images)
When Nico Hülkenberg steered his Sauber home in third at the British Grand Prix in 2025 it denied home favourite Hamilton his first Ferrari podium (other than his sprint race win in China).
While many Hamilton fans may have been disappointed not to see the British driver claim third, it's unlikely they begrudged German driver Hülkenberg his first ever, much deserved podium in F1.
And that's the difference - Hülkenberg has never worn the villain's clothes in the same way Verstappen has, so people can be happy for him even when he denies their favourite a better result.
For years Sebastian Vettel earnt similar ire from some F1 fans for various reasons, including controversial moments at the height of his career - but he eventually shook that off and you'll struggle to find anyone having a bad word to say about him these days.
Verstappen may well end up in the same position one day. But for now, in the minds of many British fans particularly, he wears a villain's hat, cloak and shoes and that's why they'll continue to cheer his misfortune, little and often as it is. Oh yes they will.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
10 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Wimbledon chiefs issued warning after British star suffered horrible abuse
Britain's Sonay Kartal was subjected to online abuse following her last-16 defeat to Russian opponent Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova on Centre Court at Wimbledon on Sunday Wimbledon is 'damaging its image' by allowing a torrent of abuse aimed at new British tennis sensation Sonay Kartal on its own social media channels. Kartal, 23, was the subject of hundreds of messages of abuse on two of Wimbledon's own Facebook posts after her loss in the last 16 against Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova on Sunday. Kartal, who became an immediate fan favourite with her laid back attitude and love of tattoos, was the target of cruel messages about her appearance. Only after being alerted to the abuse did Wimbledon chiefs delete around 1,000 messages, some 24 hours after they had been posted. That is despite there being obvious engagement from those monitoring the channel with other fans commenting. Marcel Knobil, founder of superbrands, said Wimbledon is damaging its image by allowing such remarks on its own channels. He said: "Wimbledon is a brand icon in the tennis world and one where its brand values are based around fairness, elegance and doing the right thing, not just in terms of style of play and dress, but in terms of behaviour and behaving in the correct manner. "So to appear to be hosting such vitriol and toxicity would be at odds from what we would expect from that brand. It's such a prestigious and historic brand that it therefore requires all the more to be responsible guardians on its platforms, and it appears that's not been the case here. "You cannot, on the one hand, be vociferous with what attire tennis players can wear, with severe reprimands if one has a little splash of colour on a sock, and on the other hand allow for such vile insults to appear on your own platforms. "They should be focusing on encouraging great volleys from players, not volleys of abuse. This also impacts on the tennis brand in general. " Football has really suffered as a result of hooliganism and there are many brands that refuse to be involved in that world because of that. Brand image in tennis has traditionally had an image of quality and decency and hosting such toxicity on its own channel really impacts the image of the sport in general." What should Wimbledon do about the online abuse? Have your say in the comments section. A spokesperson for the All England Club said: "Wimbledon's social analytics tool automatically rates comments by sentiment and flags posts with a high proportion of negativity. "Our digital team also does a significant amount of manual moderation of comments across all of Wimbledon's official social channels with the aim of removing inappropriate content as soon as possible."


Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Anyone who believes in clean sport will hope Novak Djokovic sinks Jannik Sinner, writes OLIVER HOLT
Jannik Sinner beat Ben Shelton in straight sets here on No 1 Court on Wednesday and progressed serenely to the Wimbledon men's singles semi-finals. He took the applause, gave an anodyne interview and autographed giant tennis balls for eager kids. Shelton played some thunderous, brilliant tennis but Sinner swatted him aside. It turned out his injured elbow was not a problem. Nor was his awkward acquaintance with anabolic steroids. Nobody mentioned the doping because that would have been impolite. So here is a quick refresher: on February 15, Sinner 'accepted' a three-month ban in a 'settlement' with the World Anti-Doping Agency after the world No 1 twice tested positive for the anabolic steroid clostebol in 2024. The language used suggested the Italian had made a particularly magnanimous gesture and that we ought to be terribly grateful to him for giving his consent to his ban. Remember that term 'strict liability'? No, I thought not. Falling foul of it used to be a serious thing. How quaint that idea seems now. Many had urged that Sinner, 23, be banned for much longer but instead, tennis listened to a pocketful of mumbles from expensive lawyers that centred on an interesting story about a physio, a masseur, a wash bag, a scalpel, a cut finger and a spray purchased from a Rome chemist. It put one in mind of Tyson Fury and his penchant for wild boar testicles that was his explanation for a positive test for nandrolone. Tennis accepted it, though, and now we are all agreed there could not possibly have been any intent to gain an unfair advantage. Sinner did not miss a single Grand Slam, which was nice. He was welcomed back to the sport like a returning, and wronged, hero. From that moment onwards, barely anyone mentioned the anabolic steroids. Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz are the future of men's tennis, you see, and no one wants to sully that any more than they have to. In May, Sinner had an audience with the Pope and made a gift to him of a tennis racquet. In June, he released a duet with Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli. It was called Dust and Glory, which sounds better than Doping and Glory. When he lost a close match against Alcaraz in the final of the French Open last month, it was hailed as 'a match for the ages'. The swooning over him was enough to make one feel somewhat queasy. The rush to absolution was complete. Rarely can the beatification of a Sinner have been conducted so smoothly. Let us get one thing straight: Sinner should not have been playing at the French Open and he should not be here playing Novak Djokovic, who squeezed past Flavio Cobolli in four sets, in the semi-finals of Wimbledon on Friday, either. Whatever one's view of his intentions, the brevity of Sinner's ban was an insult to clean athletes everywhere. Three-time Grand Slam winner Stanislas Wawrinka spoke for many when he posted at the time: 'I don't believe in a clean sport anymore'. Nick Kyrgios called it a 'sad day for tennis' and former British No 1 Tim Henman said 'it leaves a pretty sour taste for the sport'. They are all correct, of course. Sinner's success since the expiry of his ban and the way he has been welcomed back with open arms, cheered to the rafters wherever he goes, asks all manner of questions about whether there is any deterrent in tennis to mitigate against doping any more. A three-month ban for twice testing positive for an anabolic steroid? Maybe others will consider that that bargain is well worth the risk if they are considering doping deliberately, which Sinner was not, clearly. Tennis looks like a sport, frankly, that has given up in the battle against performance-enhancing drugs. Part of the equation is that the game is terrified of the commercial effect of the loss of the three greatest men's players of all time. Roger Federer and Rafa Nadal are gone already and Djokovic, still chasing that record 25th singles Grand Slam title, is deep into the autumn of his magnificent career. The game is betting the farm on an Alcaraz-Sinner rivalry but what a horrible irony it would be if Djokovic's tilt at that 25th slam, that would lift him above Margaret Court as the player with the most singles titles in history, were to be ended by an opponent who, if his punishment were in line with others meted out to transgressors, should still be banned. 'A majority of the players don't feel that it's fair,' Djokovic had said when the terms of Sinner's suspension were announced. 'A majority of the players feel like there is favouritism happening. It appears that you can almost affect the outcome if you are a top player, if you have access to the top lawyers and whatnot.' It should be the hope of all those who believe in clean sport that Sinner loses on Centre Court on Friday. If he wins and progresses to the Wimbledon final against Alcaraz or Taylor Fritz, it will be an embarrassment for a tournament that deserves better.


Daily Record
44 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Kate Middleton's right hand woman makes bombshell move after 15 years of loyal service
Kate Middleton's right hand woman, Natasha Archer, has been her personal assistant since 2010. Kate Middleton's right hand woman has reportedly left her service after 15 years. Natasha Archer is set to depart Kensington Palace after 15 years of dedicated service to the Princess of Wales, according to People. Known by those close to her as "Tash," Archer, 37, joined the Royal Family's staff in 2010 as a personal assistant to Prince William and Kate Middleton, who got engaged that same year. After taking on the role, Archer became a key part of Kate's most trusted team and was known as her unofficial stylist. She was recently the senior private executive assistant to the Prince and Princess of Wales. With a sharp eye for British fashion, Archer took on a leading role in curating the future Queen's wardrobe ahead of several royal engagements and tours, including Australia and New Zealand where Kate wore 24 outfits in 19 days, the Mirror reports. Archer helped Kate emerge as a prominent wearer of popular designers including Alexander McQueen and Kenny Packham. Kate's style influenced many others, with the princess becoming a fashion phenomenon and the apparent "Kate Middleton Effect" resulting in any item she wore selling out shortly afterwards. In a bold first for a royal, Archie ended up convincing William to wear a traditional sherwani to a 2019 reception in Pakistan. She also worked alongside Kate to upscale several of her dresses in an effort to become more environmentally conscious, which led to her renting a dress for the Earthshot Prize Awards in Boston, Massachusetts, in 2022. Archer also joined the Princess of Wales during a difficult five-hour hike in the mountainous country of Bhutan in 2016, in case the princess needed an outfit change. Not only has Archer been by Kate's side for trips and tours, she was also on hand at St Mary's Hospital in 2013 when Kate and William welcomed their first child, Prince George. Natasha had been there to assist Kate by handing over an outfit and baby seat shortly after the Wales' eldest child was born. The 37-year-old then went on to have some baby joy of her own and is now a mum of two after she married Getty royal photographer Chris Jackson in 2017. She was then promoted in 2022 and led a senior private executive assistant role. While William and Kate remain focused on their royal duties, Archer is now moving onto her next chapter after fifteen years. Meanwhile, the Princess of Wales is slowly easing her way back into public life after being diagnosed with cancer last year. The future Queen is understood to be trying to find the right balance as she fully returns to public-facing engagements.