Education Minister urges compliance on Supreme Court gender ruling
Ahead of that publication, Givan said he did not believe that a boy who identifies as a girl should be participating in girls' sports or using girls' changing rooms and toilets.He said his officials were now looking at the implications of the court ruling to ensure the Department of Education and all its arms-length bodies are in compliance "with the legal definition of sex"."It is important that I follow the law, and all departments and schools in the education system follow the law," he said on Monday.He is expected to set out the policy for the education sector in the "coming weeks".It would then be a matter for the Education Authority how that policy is implemented in schools under its remit.
'Common sense'
Other Stormont ministers have said they will wait for advice from the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland (ECNI) before taking a position on what their department should do.The Equality Commission said it would "advise all employers and service providers, including councils, to review any policies that the Supreme Court judgment may impact on".Earlier, Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly described the Supreme Court ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex as "common sense"."We must protect women in women-only spaces and ensure fairness when it comes to sport," she said in the assembly."Bodies and departments must make sure they are complying legally and factually with what the ruling said."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour's decision to close the Fleming Fund is a false economy that puts our national security at risk
Health emergencies rarely respect borders or budgets. As I write, the world is facing an antibiotic emergency, with bacteria rapidly evolving resistance to the treatments we depend on to counter infectious diseases. Without effective antibiotic treatments, global health and the global economy are defenceless against the likes of pneumonia and sepsis. Antibiotics are the infrastructure of modern medicine, making chemotherapy, caesarean sections and hip replacements possible. More than 1.1million people die across the world every year because of antibiotic resistance, including 35,000 in the UK alone. These trends are increasing and inter-generational, with deaths in children tripling in the last three years. For the last decade, the UK has been at the forefront of global efforts to tackle the wider threat posed by antimicrobial resistance (AMR). While antibiotic resistance poses the single biggest threat to modern medicine, AMR points to a serious problem for all types of antimicrobial agents – antifungals, antivirals, and antiparasitics – threatening to reverse all the significant gains we've made against HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis. The UK's Fleming Fund has been a bulwark against such threats: building laboratory capacity in 25 low- and-middle-countries to detect emerging AMR outbreaks, allowing for proactive, data-driven responses before they escalate into global crises. Among many other things, the Fleming Fund has tripled the genomic sequencing capacity across the entire African continent – which even pivoted to detect Covid-19 variants. The UK government's decision to shut down the Fleming Fund is a false economy and directly puts our national security at risk. It will cost lives, as well as precious GDP that could be spent on frontline NHS services. If we are to learn any lessons at all from Covid-19, it should be that we cannot afford to cut corners when it comes to preventing and preparing for inevitable pathogenic threats. Bold investment to protect against AMR Decisions made today will directly impact our ability to counter and contain AMR pandemics in the very near future. When I was Chancellor in 2023, the Treasury recognised the economic health ramifications of AMR, and the UK government commissioned economic studies to better understand the risks and opportunities. The Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation found that if AMR resistance accelerates in line with poorer-performing countries, the world faces an additional seven million deaths globally by 2050. The Center for Global Development then estimated that economically, this would wipe $1.7 trillion annually off global GDP by 2050 and it will cost $175 billion extra a year for health systems to treat people. Country-level estimates released recently estimate that the British economy would be $59 billion smaller in this scenario and the UK would spend an additional $2.8 billion a year treating superbugs. $296 billion and $188 billion would be wiped off the US and EU economies respectively. In contrast, this research shows that there would be large economic benefits to the UK and elsewhere if we invest in improving the treatment of infections. With the UK economy facing significant challenges and the NHS workforce facing rising pressures, now is the time to act boldly and invest proactively to protect against AMR. Whilst the UK alone cannot solve AMR, the UK can and should leverage its world-leading technical expertise and diplomatic leadership through the Fleming Fund, its Special Envoy on AMR, Dame Sally Davies, and other global investments in AMR. Even in a world where only 0.3 per cent of gross national income (GNI) is earmarked for international aid funding, there must be a budget line for AMR. If we are to drive economic growth and build resilience against health threats at home and abroad, we need decisive action with investments that put health security first. With an evolved Fleming Fund, we can mitigate against the worst effects of AMR by supporting research and development of new antibiotics, increasing access to treatments in countries where lack of access accelerates resistance, embedding large-scale education and training programmes to ensure the sustainable and responsible use of existing antibiotics, and harnessing AI for diagnostic tests and surveillance for the UK and the countries most severely impacted by AMR. A world without the Fleming Fund puts even greater pressure on UK government and the life sciences sector to find new ways to prepare for the pandemics we already detect and those we are yet to detect, to safeguard UK health and economic security. Now is the time for the government to step up.
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
MPs write to Yorkshire Water over £1.3m payments
A group of Yorkshire Labour MPs have written to the chair of their region's water company to demand answers over "disgraceful" payments made to its chief executive. The MPs, which include Rother Valley's Jake Richards and Bradford West MP Naz Shah, are addressing the £1.3m in previously undisclosed payments paid to Yorkshire Water boss Nicola Shaw. The company has previously defended the payments, saying they were from the firm's parent company Kelda Holdings, which is based offshore. MPs have now written to the company's chair Vanda Murray calling for full transparency over the payments. Richards said: "At a time when constituents are facing a 41% increase in water bills, sewage is polluting our rivers, and pipes are bursting, the CEO is accepting payments that completely contradict her public statements. "Nicola Shaw promised she would decline bonuses out of respect for public anger, while in private she accepts even more money."He said this was the reason why public confidence in water companies was at "rock bottom". Yorkshire Water, which announced a hosepipe ban for millions of users in July, was one of six firms banned from paying "unfair" bonuses to their executives this year.A report in The Guardian said Ms Shaw had received £1.3m in previously undisclosed extra pay since 2023 from Yorkshire Water's parent company, Kelda company said this was for work including "investor engagement, financial oversight, and management of the Kelda Group", and the money came from said the payments were made in addition to her £660,000 salary, and came from Kelda Holdings, which is registered in Jersey. In the letter to Ms Murray, the MPs said: "It is disgraceful that Ms Shaw has publicly refused bonuses and yet discreetly accepted large payments."The also pose a series of detailed questions, including why she was paid £1.3m in addition to her salary, why Yorkshire Water's parent company is based offshore and if Ms Shaw's payments were an indirect substitute for bonuses she had publicly declined? MPs to sign the letter include: Abtisam Mohamed, Sheffield CentralClive Betts, Sheffield South EastRichard Burgon, Leeds EastAnna Dixon, ShipleyJosh Fenton-Glynn, Calder ValleyGill Furniss, Sheffield Brightside and HillsboroughFabian Hamilton, Leeds North EastAlison Hume, Scarborough and WhitbyJake Richards, Rother ValleyNaz Shah, Bradford WestAlex Sobel, Leeds Central and HeadingleyMarie Tidball, Penistone and Stocksbridge Yorkshire Water has been fined several times recently for failures over wastewater and sewage, including in March when it had to pay £40m to the regulator company was ordered to pay more than £900,000 last month after polluting a watercourse with millions of litres of chlorinated water, causing the death of hundreds of in May, the company was ordered to pay £350,000 after a watercourse in North Yorkshire was polluted with hosepipe ban was also introduced on 11 July after a period of very hot and dry weather across the country left reservoir stocks low. Yorkshire Water said it had no additional comment to make regarding the the firm previously said regarding the payments to Ms Shaw from Kelda Holdings, that as part of her role she also does "some work for the benefit of Yorkshire Water's parent company, Kelda Group".This work included "investor engagement, financial oversight, and management of the Kelda Group, which is recognised by a fee of £660k paid by shareholders".It said it did not believe work done on investor-related activities should be paid for by Yorkshire Water company added that the fee "reflects the critical importance of the work during this period that was led by Nicola in securing long-term investment for Yorkshire Water".It said: "We are determined to make improvements to our performance so we can deliver our part in creating a thriving Yorkshire, doing right for our customers and the environment." Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour's tax raid on private schools is swerved by super-rich parents who avoid £100 million by paying early
Parents at top private schools like Eton escaped £100 million of Labour's tax raid by paying fees early, new analysis suggests. Families have paid up to five years in advance to avoid the new 20 per cent VAT on fees, which came into force on January 1. It means super-rich families, who can afford to pay upfront, were able to avoid the tax while less well-off people still had to pay. Annual accounts reveal the top 50 independent schools held £515 million last year in fees-in-advance schemes, which are used to pay school costs one or more years before they are due. This is up from just £121 million in 2023, according to the investigation by the Daily Telegraph. It suggests parents made the downpayments once Labour committed to the VAT in the run-up to the 2024 election. Parents at these top schools – typically the most expensive – may have avoided up to £103 million in VAT. There are more than 2,600 private schools across the UK, meaning the total figure is expected to be significantly higher. It means the Treasury may have overestimated how much money will eventually be raised by the tax. Mairéad Warren de Búrca, managing director at Alvarez & Marsal Tax, told the Daily Telegraph: 'It's not surprising that schools would have done this type of thing with parents and maybe encouraged parents to jump on the prepayment bandwagon. 'Only the very rich can afford to make those advance payments, so I'm not entirely sure [the Government] have managed to do what they intended.' Labour has repeatedly stated that its VAT raid on private schools will target the wealthiest families, to raise £1.8 billion a year for public services. However, sector leaders have highlighted that it is the smaller, cheaper schools which are being impacted the most. Brighton College, the most expensive private school in the UK, recorded total prepaid fees of £50.1 million in last year's accounts – up from £4.1 million in 2023. The number of pupils covered by the school's fees-in-advance scheme jumped from 86 in 2023 to 819 last year. At Eton College, where fees will reach more than £63,000 next year, the total money in its prepayment scheme rose from £16.6 million in 2023 to £52.7 million last year. Winchester College's fees-in-advance scheme leapt from £4.4 million in 2023 to £19 million in 2024, according to its latest accounts. Such advance payment systems have been commonplace at many of these schools for decades, but the figures indicate a rise in parents using them. The sums cover parents paying in advance for both one year of school fees and for multiple years. According to Labour's rules, all pre-payments have been subject to VAT unless they were made before July 29 2024. However, sources suggested that the Chancellor Rachel Reeves would consider ways to claw back the lost VAT. And a Government spokesman said: 'The OBR has already factored in the increased use of prepayment schemes.'
