&w=3840&q=100)
Joining UK and France, Carney says Canada will recognise Palestine at UN meet if 'key criteria are met'
Mark Carney has spoken repeatedly of how he wants to improve ties with 'like-minded nations' like India. AP
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has announced his country's intent to formally recognise the State of Palestine during the UN General Assembly in September, aligning Ottawa with a rising international push for Palestinian statehood recognition led by France and backed by several Western democracies.
The announcement comes in the wake of The New York Call, a joint declaration co-signed by 15 countries including France, the UK, New Zealand, and Australia. Released by French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot on Wednesday, the statement said signatories 'have already recognised, have expressed or express the willingness or the positive consideration of our countries to recognise the State of Palestine'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While countries like Iceland, Ireland, Malta, Norway, Slovenia, and Spain have already extended recognition to Palestine, others, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Finland, Andorra, Portugal, Luxembourg, and San Marino, are now considering formal steps.
French President Emmanuel Macron recently said France would recognise Palestinian statehood 'in the near future', further amplifying the diplomatic push.
Canada's conditional recognition: Elections and reforms
Prime Minister Carney later clarified that Canada's recognition is conditional. Speaking after a virtual cabinet meeting focused on the Middle East, he said Canada would formally recognise Palestine if key criteria were met.
'We will recognise the State of Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September if certain conditions are fulfilled,' Carney stated, adding that the Palestinian Authority must hold democratic elections in 2026, without the participation of Hamas, and commit to governance reforms.
He also demanded that Hamas release all hostages, disarm, and play no role in any future Palestinian government.
Israel rejects pressure campaign
In response, Israel's ambassador to Canada, Iddo Moed, rejected Ottawa's stance, calling it part of a 'distorted campaign of international pressure'.
'We will not sacrifice our very existence by permitting the imposition of a jihadist state on our ancestral homeland that seeks our annihilation,' Moed said, referring to Hamas, which took control of Gaza in 2007.
Carney's comments come as pressure builds on Israel to end its military operations in Gaza, which began in October 2023 following a Hamas-led attack that killed around 1,200 people in Israel and resulted in more than 250 hostages. The Hamas-run health ministry claims over 60,000 people have since been killed in Gaza during the Israeli offensive.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
UK, US, and Australia weigh in
Earlier, on Tuesday, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Britain would also move to recognise Palestine in September, unless Israel takes 'substantive steps' to end the crisis in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire, and revive the two-state solution framework.
US President Donald Trump initially adopted a neutral tone, saying, 'I don't mind [Starmer] taking a position. I'm looking for getting people fed right now.' But later, while aboard Air Force One, he criticised the decision: 'You could make the case that you're rewarding Hamas if you do that… And I'm not about to do that.'
Meanwhile, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his government was considering the timing of recognition to ensure it could be used as a diplomatic lever to revive negotiations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
‘Embassy of Khalistan' board in Surrey gurdwara: Did Canada fund extremism despite spy agency alerts?
Local residents reportedly said that the building hosting this so-called 'Embassy of Khalistan' was constructed with funds provided by the Government of British Columbia, Canada's westernmost province read more In a baffling move, the Khalistani organisation Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), in collaboration with the Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara Temple, has established what it calls an 'Embassy of Khalistan' in Surrey, Canada. The so-called embassy, marked by a sign reading 'Republic of Khalistan,' is housed in a building on the gurdwara's premises, which serves as a community hub for the local Sikh population. Local residents were quoted by CNN-News18 as saying that the building hosting this controversial embassy was constructed with funds provided by the Government of British Columbia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD They further revealed that the provincial government recently allocated $150,000 to install an elevator in the same building, raising questions about the use of public funds for the site's new purpose. The establishment of the 'embassy' comes amid heightened concerns about Khalistani extremism in Canada. In June, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), Canada's top intelligence agency, issued a rare public statement acknowledging that 'Khalistani extremists continue to use Canada as a base for the promotion, fundraising or planning of violence primarily in India.' This statement, part of CSIS's latest annual report, has reignited debates about foreign interference and extremist activities within Canada, particularly in light of the country's delicate diplomatic ties with India. For years, India has voiced concerns about Khalistani extremists operating from Canadian soil. The issue traces back to the mid-1980s when politically motivated violent extremism (PMVE) began to take root in Canada, primarily through Canada-based Khalistani extremists (CBKEs). These groups have sought to establish an independent nation-state called Khalistan, largely within India's Punjab region, often through violent means. PMVE, as described by the CSIS, involves actors who plan, finance, and facilitate attacks globally to create new political systems or reshape existing ones. The opening of the 'Embassy of Khalistan' has intensified scrutiny of Canada's role as a hub for such activities, with India repeatedly urging Canadian authorities to address the issue. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Amid Trump tariff threats, Indian Army's 1971 newspaper post takes dig at US over support to Pakistan
Amid escalating tensions between the US and India over Donald Trump's tariff threats, the Indian Army on Tuesday shared a clip of an old newspaper from 1971 showing how the United States has supported Pakistan for decades. The post by the Eastern Command of the Indian Army comes a day after President Donald Trump threatened India over its purchase of Russian oil, saying he will substantially raise tariffs on goods from India. The Indian Army shared a clip of an old newspaper from 1971 showing how the United States has supported Pakistan for decades. The clip dated back to August 5, 1971. It showed how the US was supplying arms to Pakistan for decades in the buildup for the 1971 war. "This day, that year build up of war - August 5, 1971," the Indian Army captioned the post. What's written in the clip? The newspaper clip features a headline in bold, capital letters: 'US ARMS WORTH $2 BILLION SHIPPED TO PAKISTAN SINCE '54'. The news clip mentions the developments during a Rajya Sabha session in 1971, months before India went to war with Pakistan. The war eventually led to the creation of Bangladesh in December of that year. It also mentions the then defence production minister VC Shukla telling the Rajya Sabha about how the NATO powers and the Soviet Union had been contacted over the arms supply to Pakistan in the backdrop of Islamabad's armed aggression in Bangladesh. While the Soviet Union and the French government had denied supplying arms to Pakistan, the US continued its support, the report says. The adds that both the US and China sold arms to Pakistan at 'throwaway prices', indicating that Pakistan may have fought the 1971 war with India with weapons provided by the two countries. How India reacted to Donald Trump's tariff threat Earlier, US President Trump said his administration would substantially raise tariffs on India. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil, they are then, for much of the oil purchased, selling it on the open market for big profits," he said in a social media post. "They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine," he said. India mounted an unusually sharp counterattack on the US and the European Union for their "unjustified and unreasonable" targeting of New Delhi for its procurement of Russian crude oil. Firmly rejecting the criticism, India pointed out the double standards in targeting it on the issue and said both the US and the EU are continuing their trade relations with Russia. "Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion," the ministry of external affairs (MEA) said. The Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel, and machinery and transport equipment, the MEA said in a late-evening statement. "Where the US is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals," it added. "In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security," the MEA said. It said India has been "targeted" by the US and the EU for importing oil from Russia after the commencement of the Ukraine conflict. In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict, it said. "The US at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability," the MEA said, adding India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumers. "They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia," it said. (With inputs from PTI)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Bangladesh under Yunus: Mob rule and mayhem see over 600 lynching deaths in year since Hasina's fall
In the one year since the ouster of Sheikh Hasina and the appointment of Muhammad Yunus as the country's interim ruler, Bangladesh has descended into a state of lawlessness helmed by Islamists, with mob justice becoming the norm. A report has said that more than 600 lynchings have taken place over the past year. read more Men run past a shopping center which was set on fire by protesters during a rally against then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her government in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on Sunday, August 4, 2024. (Photo: Rajib Dhar/AP) Over the past one year since the ouster of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, Bangladesh has slipped into a state of lawlessness under the interim government of Muhammad Yunus, the octogenarian propped by the agitators and the military as the country's unelected ruler. Amid cyclic attacks on the country's religious minorities, particularly Hindus, mob violence has increasingly become the norm in Bangladesh that has not even spared the country's police personnel. Since August 5, 2024, at least 637 people, including 41 police personnel, have been lynched in Bangladesh, according to Canada-based Global Centre for Democratic Governance's (GCDG) data carried by The Economic Times. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For comparison, there were just 51 cases of lynchings in 2023 when Hasina was in power. ALSO READ: With Sheikh Hasina out of Bangladesh, anti-India forces rise in Bangladesh & pose major challenges Pakistan-backed groups, many of whom pursue outright Islamist extremism, have run amok in Bangladesh since the ouster of Hasina. They have waged a campaign of retribution against political opponents, particularly the workers, activists, and leaders of Hasina's Bangladesh Awami League (BAL). They have also attacked the country's minorities, particularly Hindus, whom they accused of siding with Hasina. In the past year, Hindus have been attacked in their houses, their houses have been burnt, and their temples have been attacked. Instead of making the protection of minorities' protection a priority, Yunus has presided over the state patronage of extremists, which has included acts like the release of jihadist leaders from jail. Most lynching victims were from Hasina's party Of those lynched, around 70 per cent of victims were from Hasina's BAL, local human rights bodies have said. These victims have largely been from Hindu and Ahmadiya Muslim communities, which have been a favourite target of Islamists in the country. Even though agitating groups said they were fighting for democracy, they have propped an unelected regime of Yunus with little accountability. The regime has not yet announced a date for elections and continues to run the country without any mandate from the people. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Moreover, in yet another case of democratic backsliding, Yunus has banned BAL and has presided over a campaign to remove BAL, BAL's leader Sheikh Mujibur Rehman —the father of the nation— from public consciousness.
