logo
The top 5 mistakes people make in a divorce that cost them thousands

The top 5 mistakes people make in a divorce that cost them thousands

Daily Mail​07-06-2025
Getting divorced can be an expensive experience, but experts warn that many don't realize the hidden traps that can rack up the bills.
The average cost of a divorce in the US is a staggering $11,300, with lawyers' fees making up the bulk, according to personal finance site The Motley Fool.
However, a marriage split is not just a one-off expense; there are often long-term implications too.
Many women in particular are at risk of ending up worse off after divorce – especially if they have taken time off work to raise a family.
Yet both men and women can end up regretting financial mistakes made during the sound and fury of splitting up.
'People making such mistakes often regret it long term, because they can be irreversible,' divorce lawyer Bari Weinberger told the Wall Street Journal.
Experts argue it is important to be prepared and ensure you are completely informed about your financial situation.
These are the top five mistakes they urge those embarking on a divorce to avoid.
1. Heavy spending
One of the most common mistakes new divorcees make is splurging right after the papers are signed.
Some take their settlements and throw a 'divorce party', or indulge in retail therapy after months or even years of acrimonious legal wrangling.
Common post-divorce purchases include new cars that become unaffordable on finance plans.
Another mistake is rushing to buy a new home too quickly, according to divorce coach Liza Caldwell.
Caldwell tells her clients to wait for their lives and especially their finances to stabilize before buying a new property.
Caldwell told the Journal that those rushing a fresh start can end up overpaying, or tie up too much of their money in their home while reducing flexibility elsewhere.
However, costly spending mistakes can also occur just before a marriage fails.
Weinberger warns that committing to expensive vacations or new joint debts such as a mortgage on a new home can complicate their process of dividing marital assets during divorce.
2. Hidden assets
Some spouses will hide assets before they ask for a divorce in order to gain more from the overall settlement.
A common tactic is giving money to friends and family on the understanding that it will be returned after the divorce is settled.
Florida accountant Mirtha Valdes Martin told the Journal that she has frequently seen small business owners use this tactic to avoid a fair settlement.
Martin said that one way to avoid becoming the losing party is to file for divorce first.
Those who suspect their partner may be hiding assets can also seek a settlement that includes even division of assets discovered after the divorce is complete.
There is also the option to hire a private investigator or a forensic accountant to get to the bottom of any suspicions.
Many women in particular are at risk of ending up worse off after divorce
New Jersey divorce lawyer Bari Weinberger says divorcees can regret their financial mistakes
3. Emotion bills
Divorce can be a painful time but experts warn that allowing your emotions to prolong proceedings can rack up ever larger bills.
Maggie Kim, author of the 'Divorce or Die' newsletter, told the Journal that she spent $500,000 on legal fees over a seven-year divorce process.
'Emotions were the biggest reason that my divorce and custody fight took seven years,' she explained.
Now Kim tells her readers to draw on support from their friends and family rather than treating divorce lawyers like therapists.
You won't feel better 'when you get a five-figure bill later because you spent two hours sobbing in their office — again,' Kim said.
4. Illiquid assets
Illiquid assets such as stock options, individual retirement accounts and real estate, can be among the hardest parts of a divorce to settle.
This is because by their very nature they cannot easily be turned into cash and split evenly.
Selling stocks can stop an investment from growing over time and incur heavy transaction fees.
Retirement accounts can also incur heavy penalties if withdrawn before retirement age.
Financial advisor Stacy Francis told the Journal she asks divorcing couples to take all of these constraints into account when deciding how to divide their marital assets.
For example, if illiquid assets are too big of a sum to be able to give up a claim to them completely, then 'it may indeed be worth waiting until they vest, mature or are able to be sold,' Francis explained.
'Negotiating for structured payouts or even a co-ownership agreement can be a creative workaround.'
Maggie Kim spent $500,000 on legal fees over a seven-year divorce process
5. Underestimating expenses
Couples who have been together decades can often forget a time before two incomes.
Individuals going through a divorce may therefore underestimate how much it will cost to run a household alone again.
Major expenses can include housing and health insurance, as well as discretionary spending such as restaurant meals and subscriptions.
Rick Jones, a divorce lawyer from Seattle, told the Journal that his male clients can often misjudge the cost of both child support and running their own home.
'Fathers paying full or partial child support don't anticipate the additional cost of having a home big enough for their kids' visits,' he said.
To avoid financial pitfalls later on, Jones urges divorcing couples to make realistic budgets setting out what cash-flow they will need to cover their expenses.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Warren Buffett's quiet moves send shockwaves through Wall Street: 'Canary in the coal mine'
Warren Buffett's quiet moves send shockwaves through Wall Street: 'Canary in the coal mine'

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Warren Buffett's quiet moves send shockwaves through Wall Street: 'Canary in the coal mine'

Famed investor Warren Buffett has quietly executed a series of multi-billion-dollar exits from major US banks. It appears to be a strategic shift that analysts say signals a sharp turn in sentiment from the world's most closely watched investor - and a growing belief that America's booming financial sector is headed for turbulence. During the first half of 2025, Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold more than $3.2 billion in shares tied to the banking industry, including a $1 billion exit from Citigroup, a $2 billion reduction in Bank of America, while also trimming holdings in Capital One. The moves were disclosed through SEC filings and confirmed by analysts monitoring Berkshire's quarterly portfolio updates. 'Berkshire has clearly been reducing its exposure to U.S. bank stocks,' said Larry Cunningham, director of the John L. Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware to The Telegraph. 'That activity signals a cautious or even bearish outlook on banking.' The divestments come at a moment of strong profitability in the sector. Goldman Sachs this week reported a 22% jump in quarterly earnings, while Citigroup profits surged 25%, both beating Wall Street expectations. The KBW Nasdaq Bank Index is nearing record highs. Yet despite these short-term gains, Buffett is building a historically large cash position - now exceeding $350 billion - and repositioning Berkshire's portfolio toward energy and consumer staples, including fresh investments in Occidental Petroleum and Constellation Brands. Buffet famously warned about derivatives as 'financial weapons of mass destruction' years before the 2008 collapse. He quietly accumulated cash before the COVID crash in 2020. Markets may be known for their irrational behavior but Buffett's moves are usually based on numbers, patterns, and a gut instinct honed over seven decades. His legacy is built not just on the billions he made, but the crashes he avoided. His cooling on banks is the classic contrarian signal the Oracle of Omaha is famous for. The rapid repositioning has not gone unnoticed by investors already rattled by political volatility, surging inflation, and uncertainty surrounding US monetary policy. 'Part of this could be driven by expectations that these current equity valuations are not sustainable,' said Gennadiy Goldberg, head of US rates strategy at TD Securities. Buffett's moves align with a broader pullback among major industry leaders. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, sold $31.5 million in company stock in April, following a $125 million sale in 2024. It was his first personal sell-off since becoming CEO in 2005. Such exits come as Wall Street deals with rising inflation and uncertainty over Trump's economic policy. The Trump administration's revived trade wars have injected volatility into the markets and uncertainty into long-term growth projections. US inflation hit 2.7% in June, and the Federal Reserve has twice slashed its 2025 GDP forecast, from 2.1% to 1.4%. The central bank's projections signal weakening consumer demand and a potential slowdown in growth during the second half of the year. Higher inflation could force long-term Treasury yields up - triggering a domino effect of rising loan defaults, declining merger activity, and stress on bond portfolios. 'The big, big red flag is going to be consumption,' said Kambiz Kazemi, chief investment officer at Validus Risk Management. 'If unemployment goes up and consumer spending drops, it triggers a feedback loop through the entire borrowing ecosystem.' Concerns are also rising over the Trump administration's confrontational stance toward the Federal Reserve. Meanwhile, Trump's escalating threats to remove Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell have rattled investors and bank CEOs alike. JPMorgan's Dimon, Goldman Sachs' David Solomon, Citigroup's Jane Fraser, and Bank of America's Brian Moynihan have all warned the White House against destabilizing monetary policy. 'Uncertainty around tariffs, and more generally, uncertainty about most subjects — the way the administration is running things - is going to be slowly eroding the trust in the system,' Kazemi added. 'The reality has to catch up.' A shake-up at the Fed could lead to artificially lowered short-term interest rates, further distorting inflation expectations. While trading revenues have remained strong amid tariff-driven market volatility, other banking segments, particularly corporate lending and dealmaking are already showing signs of strain. The bond market has begun to reflect broader investor skepticism. Bill Gross, co-founder of Pimco and widely regarded as the 'Bond King,' issued a warning on X earlier this week: 'Investors wake up! I for one am moving defensively - more cash, buying value with 4-5% dividend yields. And an emphasis on non-US.' Gross's comments underscore growing unease in global markets, with inflation, rate uncertainty, and trade policy reshaping the investment landscape faster than Wall Street earnings can keep up. Although Berkshire Hathaway maintains significant exposure to the financial sector - 16.4% in American Express and 10.1% in Bank of America, its trajectory seems clear. The firm is reallocating toward sectors traditionally seen as more resilient in downturns. 'It's always hard to know how much of Berkshire's selling reflects macroeconomic pessimism versus firm-specific or internal considerations,' Cunningham said. 'But the concentration in energy and staples suggests a shift toward stability and defensiveness.'

These are the cities where college graduates are actually landing jobs
These are the cities where college graduates are actually landing jobs

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

These are the cities where college graduates are actually landing jobs

Landing a job after graduating college can be daunting — knowing where to look for one can help. Amid a volatile economy, a tough job market and a trend of AI eliminating some entry-level jobs, New York City and Chicago may not be the best places to job hunt. Smaller cities and their surrounding areas can serve as a great place to find a new gig, new research from payroll services company ADP suggests. The job market in Raleigh, North Carolina's metro area ranked at the top of the list in terms of annual wages, hiring rates, and affordability, the study found. To rank each place, the study analyzed the annual wages of 140,000 people in their 20s, the cost of living in 55 U.S. metro areas with at least 1 million residents, and how often people in their 20s with a bachelors degree were hired within the last 12 months compared to the number of people employed in those jobs. The metro areas of Raleigh, Milwaukee, Baltimore, Austin, and Birmingham, Alabama claimed the top five spots. Raleigh, Baltimore and Austin, for example, are saturated with technology, health and financial firms, Ben Hanowell, ADP Research's director of people analytics, told the Wall Street Journal. Each of these five regions boast hiring rates of 2.8 percent or greater; Raleigh has a hiring rate of 4.2 percent, the highest of all locations analyzed. The so-called Research Triangle has been providing an influx of new jobs at nearby universities. 'We've seen this stream of office projects over the last 18 months, and North Carolina State University and some of our private colleges are all supplying this great pipeline of workers,' Kyle Touchstone, director of Raleigh Economic Development, told the Journal. Jordin Young, who graduated in 2024 from Bowdoin College, told the outlet that he took a job in Raleigh despite just knowing one person who lived there. 'I knew I wanted to explore a new city,' Young told the Journal, noting he appreciates the city's social scene, affordability, and accessibility to parks. The promising finds come as the nation's unemployment rate lingers at 4.1 percent, but jobless rates for recent grads hovers at 7.3 percent. 'There's a lot more great people than there are great jobs,' Susan De La Vega, a senior vice president at global consulting firm Korn Ferry, told the outlet. The study also looked at locations that were affordable with robust hiring but offered lower wages. These included the metro areas of Tucson, Arizona, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Cleveland, Ohio. Then there are the more expensive cities that offer high wages, but work is harder to find. Places around Boston, San Francisco and Newark, New Jersey offer high-paying jobs, but have low hiring rates.

Clark calls for more pay as WNBA labor talks intensify
Clark calls for more pay as WNBA labor talks intensify

Reuters

time4 hours ago

  • Reuters

Clark calls for more pay as WNBA labor talks intensify

INDIANAPOLIS, July 19 (Reuters) - Indiana Fever sensation Caitlin Clark called for better pay in the WNBA on Saturday as labor negotiations between the league and players intensify, while Commissioner Cathy Engelbert said she was optimistic about their latest talks. Thousands of fans wearing "Clark" jerseys packed the Gainbridge Fieldhouse for the sold-out All-Star Game on Saturday, while the wildly popular Rookie of the Year was forced to sit out after sustaining a groin injury earlier in the week. Clark was an omnipresent figure in Indianapolis in the lead-up, despite not being able to play, as her face graced ads for Nike, Wilson and Gatorade that were plastered across the city center. Asked how those brand deals stacked against her league salary, Clark responded: "That's a good question." "That's where we're really fortunate is that we have those other deals. I think that's one of the things that we're in the room fighting for," Clark told reporters. "We should be paid more. Hopefully that's the case moving forward as the league continues to grow. I think it's something that's probably the most important thing that we are in the room advocating about." The Women's National Basketball Players Association and the league met on Thursday in Indianapolis to negotiate a new collective bargaining agreement after the players voted to opt out of their current deal at the end of the season. The union said after the meeting that the two sides were far apart on several issues and players were seen warming up for Saturday's game wearing shirts that read "Pay Us What You Owe Us." Commissioner Cathy Engelbert struck a different tone with reporters, saying she felt the meeting with players had been productive. "(I'm) really optimistic that we'll get something done, that it'll be transformational, and that next year at All-Star, we'll be talking about how great everything is. But obviously, there's a lot of hard work to be done on both sides," she said. Engelbert, who also oversaw the league when the last deal was struck in January 2020, has been at the helm during a period of rapid growth for the WNBA, with TV ratings and attendance climbing rapidly. "We want the same things as the players," she told reporters. "We want to significantly increase their salary and benefits while balancing with our owners their ability to have a path of profitability."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store