
Chi Chi Wu: Recent credit score drops come from Donald Trump's bad policy
Previously, President Joe Biden's Department of Education had put negative credit reporting on hold to provide economic breathing room to millions of student loan borrowers in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as spiking inflation, skyrocketing rents and other economic stress. The Biden administration had signaled that it would resume credit reporting. However, the Trump administration made the situation exponentially worse with disastrous disruptions to student loan repayment options starting in February, its error-ridden administration of the repayment system and lack of communication with borrowers.
In fact, the 2.4 million borrowers being reported as behind on their loans closely mirrors the 2 million borrowers with languishing applications to enter more affordable repayment plans, which the department abruptly stopped processing in February.
Student loan borrowers aren't the only ones who've seen their financial profiles devastated by the Trump administration. Tens of thousands of federal workers across the country, who have been unjustly fired by the administration and the Department of Government Efficiency, are struggling to pay bills. Farmers are being buffeted by on-again-off-again tariffs, cuts to the United States Agency for International Development and the decimation of other federally funded programs. And the financial pain could spread if we head into a recession triggered by the economic instability caused by the administration.
We've seen this play out before, back in 2008 with the Great Recession triggered by the foreclosure crisis. Millions of Americans lost their homes, their jobs and their good credit reputations. Many never recovered from a cataclysmic event such as a foreclosure that left them in a vicious cycle where bad credit scores (among many factors) kept them from accessing the economic necessities needed to rebuild. Contrast this with the COVID-19 pandemic, when large amounts of stimulus and other economic supports kept credit scores high despite staggering job losses and other economic travails.
There's a myth in the United States that bad credit scores are due to being a bad person — that folks with checkered credit histories are irresponsible, undisciplined, overspending wastrels. But that's far from the truth. Student loan borrowers, fired federal workers, financially stressed farmers and many others did nothing wrong or nothing different when their credit scores plunged. Instead, what changed were the policies set by those in power, who showed no concern about the impact of their decisions on the credit health of millions.
Oftentimes the only sins of folks with poor credit are bad luck and difficult circumstances. People get sick, lose their jobs or just plain run into bad luck. And it primarily harms those folks without family wealth — it's a lot easier to stay on top of the bills despite adversity if you have generational assets to keep you afloat. This is most starkly reflected in the racial gap in credit scores, where Black and Latino consumers have lower credit scores as a group, which is a direct consequence of historical discrimination, current racism and the racial wealth gap.
Now, the credit industry would point out that credit scores are designed to predict who will repay a loan, and it's probably not a great idea to lend money to a struggling student loan borrower, an unemployed federal worker or a farmer who can't sell their crops, who have already failed to pay their bills. Fair enough, for now. But that federal worker may find a new job, and the market for those farmers' crops may recover. And those student loan borrowers were encouraged by society to borrow to get an education and better their lives; they were promised programs to help manage their loans that were subsequently blocked, that the Trump administration has failed to provide access to and that bills in Congress are seeking to diminish even further. Barely 1 in 3 student loan borrowers are making regular monthly payments. That's a sign of a systemic and societal problem, not individual irresponsible behavior by 7 million people.
Americans should not be shut out from future economic opportunities because of policy changes by the economic wrecking ball of the current administration. And their damaged credit records should not be used to decide whether they should get a job, be able to rent an apartment, and get insurance and utilities.
Inequality in the United States and globally is at record highs and contributes to societal unrest. Systems such as credit scoring entrench and exacerbate economic inequality and penalize lack of family and generational wealth instead of rewarding hard work and merit.
If we are to have any hope of a fairer, more stable society that provides opportunity to everyone, we need better systems that do not entrench inequality under a veneer of mathematical objectivity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
A Real New Middle East Is Emerging
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. With the White House leading the charge to bring about a long-term ceasefire in Gaza, the return of the hostages, and following the cessation of open and direct conflict between Israel and Iran, there is hope for optimism in a region where pessimism is the default setting. Despite the heavy toll of the recent conflicts, a new geopolitical landscape is taking shape in the Middle East—one that holds the promise of lasting transformation. Call it cautious optimism, or even premature—but the signs are difficult to ignore. In many ways, Israel's confrontation with Iran, along with the war that began on October 7, marks a tectonic shift in Middle Eastern dynamics. It began with a fateful decision by Yahya Sinwar, Hamas' leader in Gaza—a decision that set off a cascade across the so-called axis of resistance. What seemed like an isolated, if brutal, escalation now looks more like the first domino in the unraveling of an entire regional alignment. President Donald Trump meets with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 4, 2025. President Donald Trump meets with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 4, 2025. ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images Even if the Islamic Republic of Iran remains intact, the aftermath of these conflicts will likely leave it severely weakened. Iran may emerge stripped of the vast arsenal it has invested in for decades—its nuclear program, its long-range missile capabilities, and its sprawling proxy networks in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Gaza, and Yemen. Trillions of dollars in regional influence may now be lost. For Israel, the immediate imperative is to bring the Gaza war to a close and secure the return of the hostages. But even that task is now shaped by a dramatically altered regional risk landscape. The deterrence equation has changed, as has Israel's room for strategic maneuvering. Far more significant, however, is the opportunity this moment presents for long-term realignment. The tectonic plates of the Middle East are shifting. The weakening of Iran and its allies creates space for an expanded circle of normalization. The Abraham Accords may soon include Saudi Arabia—and potentially even states long considered out of reach, like Syria and Lebanon. Deprived of Iranian sponsorship, Hezbollah may find itself facing a reckoning. Once a dominant destabilizing force, it will now have to recalibrate its role within Lebanon's fractured political system—perhaps even face pressure to disarm or integrate politically in ways it has long resisted. Should the ultimate turning point occur—if the Iranian regime were to collapse and be replaced by a fundamentally different leadership—Iran itself could reenter the regional stage, not as a spoiler, but as a potential partner in a new, post-theocratic era. In such a scenario, Israel would find itself in a position never before imagined: fully integrated into the region, not only diplomatically but economically. Trade, infrastructure, and innovation partnerships could stretch from the mountains of Afghanistan to the beaches of Tel Aviv. One need only imagine the economic potential of such a corridor. And what of the Palestinians? The hardline factions, stripped of external backing, would be isolated. For the rest, a long-term interim arrangement offering full political autonomy and semi-sovereignty, and guaranteed civil rights could become the most realistic path forward. In such a regional climate, the possibility of Palestinian prosperity—alongside Israeli, Saudi, Emirati, and even Iranian growth—would no longer be a fantasy. This is not naïve utopianism. It is a recognition that sometimes, out of protracted conflict, new possibilities arise. The Middle East has been here before and squandered such moments. But this time, perhaps, the pieces are falling into place for something more durable. Dr. Shuki Friedman is the director-general of the Jewish People Policy Institute and a senior lecturer in law at the Peres Academic Center. He is former chairman of the Israeli government committee on the Iran sanctions, and headed the international and foreign law department of the Israeli Prime Minister's Office. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada Exports to US Keep Falling as Tariffs Curb Shipments
(Bloomberg) -- Canada's share of exports destined for the US shrank to the smallest proportion since at least 1997, excluding the Covid pandemic. Shipments to other countries reached a new high, led by gold exports. NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees What Gothenburg Got Out of Congestion Pricing Foreign Buyers Swoop on Cape Town Homes, Pricing Out Locals With President Donald Trump's tariffs crushing exports and imports between Canada and its biggest trading partner, the country's share of exports destined for the US shrank to 68.3% in May, from last year's monthly average of 75.9%, according to Statistics Canada data Thursday. Exports to the US were down for a fourth straight month, declining 0.9% in May. Canadian businesses and consumers were also buying fewer cars and other products from the US, with imports falling 1.2%, a third straight monthly drop. Canada exports most of the cars it makes to the US. While the country's shipments of cars and parts rose 0.9% in May from a month earlier, shipments plunged 8.4% from a year ago. Prime Minister Mark Carney met Wednesday with auto industry representatives to discuss trade negotiations with the US. Canada's goods trade surplus with the US widened slightly to C$3.2 billion ($2.4 billion) in May, from C$3.1 billion in April. 'Canada-US trade is stuck in a lull and it is unlikely to improve for a while. Activity in both directions has slowed, and the drop in imports, especially for integrated trade like energy and manufacturing, is a warning sign that exports could be impacted in the coming months,' Andrew DiCapua, principal economist at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said in an email. Exports to countries other than the US, however, surged to a record high, led by higher shipments of gold to the UK, crude oil to Singapore and unwrought aluminum and pharmaceutical products to Italy. Canada's trade deficit with countries excluding the US narrowed to C$9.1 billion in May, from C$10.7 billion in April. Higher shipments elsewhere helped narrow Canada's trade deficit to C$5.9 billion in May, from a record C$7.6 billion in April. May's smaller trade gap was in line with the median projection in a Bloomberg survey of economists. Alexandra Brown, economist at Capital Economics Ltd., called the increased shipments to non-US destinations 'a small consolation,' saying in a report to investors that 'the outlook for exports continues to be weak.' Total exports rose 1.1% in May, the first increase since January, led by higher gold shipments. However, excluding metal and non-metallic mineral products, exports were down 1.2%. Exports of consumer goods rose 2.6% due to higher pork exports to Japan. A 5.6% decrease in energy exports partially offset some of the gains. Total imports were down 1.6% in May, the third consecutive monthly decline, led by lower inbound shipments of unwrought gold, which saw a strong increase in April when imports from US surged. Imports of cars and parts fell 5.3%, with passenger cars and light trucks dropping 9.7% to the lowest level in more than two years. In volume terms, total exports were up 0.7%, and imports fell 0.6%. --With assistance from Mario Baker Ramirez. (Recasts with new headline and details starting from the second paragraph.) SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too How to Steal a House America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Europe's Billionaires Are Bending to Trump--Here's Why Investors Should Pay Attention
With Donald Trump's July 9 tariff deadline approaching, pressure is mountingnot just in Brussels, but in boardrooms across Europe. Automakers like Mercedes-Benz (MBGAF), BMW (BMWKY), and Volkswagen (VWAGY) have been quietly flying executives to Washington, lobbying U.S. officials directly and proposing their own peace terms to head off a potential 50% tariff on European exports. Luxury powerhouses like LVMH (LVMUY) and pharmaceutical giants like Sanofi have joined in, signaling a clear shift: many of Europe's biggest companies are no longer aligned with the EU's hardline approach. Behind the scenes, they're urging Brussels to cut a quick deal and scale back retaliatory measures, including removing high-profile U.S. products like bourbon from any counter-tariff list. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with MBGAF. What's driving this sudden corporate detente? Profitsand survival. European companies generate wide margins in the U.S. and rely heavily on American technology, suppliers, and research partnerships. A retaliatory tariff packageinitially floated at 95 billionhas already been softened by member state requests that could slash it by nearly 70 billion. Lobby groups representing sectors from medical devices to spirits warn that hitting back at the U.S. would hurt European firms just as much, if not more. If the EU retaliates, the sector is hit twice, said MedTech Europe CEO Oliver Bisazza. That fear has flipped the script, with industries now pressing Brussels to de-escalate, even if it means swallowing a flat 10% tariff and lobbying for carve-outs in key sectors like pharma, semiconductors, and aerospace. But this fractured front comes at a delicate time for the EU. With domestic demand weakening, China gaining ground, and energy costs still elevated post-Ukraine, the U.S. market is more important than ever. Brussels wants to preserve unity, but member states are growing impatient. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has openly criticized the Commission's slow, complex process and called for speed over perfection. LVMH Chairman Bernard Arnault has gone furtheractivating long-standing ties with Trump and making personal trips to Washington to promote a calmer path. His message? In this geopolitical chess match, compromise could be the smartest move Europe has left. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data