Are the traditional parties in Wales underestimating Reform UK?
REFORM UK is no longer a fringe force in Welsh politics. With polling surges, a local by-election victory, and a favourable new voting system set to reshape the Senedd in 2026, the party is rapidly gaining traction—and some believe traditional parties are failing to grasp the scale of its momentum.
On the rise: Reform in Wales
A May 2025 YouGov/ITV Wales poll placed Reform UK second in Wales with 25% of the projected vote—just behind Plaid Cymru on 30%, and well ahead of Labour on 18%. That number is a stark decline: Labour won a 36% regional vote in 2021, making its current standing half of its previous share.
Disillusionment among Labour voters is evident. Only 40% of those who backed Labour in the 2024 UK general election currently intend to do so for the next Senedd election, with substantial numbers shifting to Plaid Cymru (24%), Liberal Democrats (8%), Reform UK (5%), and Greens (4%).
Local Shifts and Breakthroughs
Michelle Beer has been elected as Carmarthenshire's first Reform councillor (Image: Reform)
On May 29, Reform achieved a breakthrough when Michelle Beer won the Lliedi ward by-election in Llanelli—becoming the party's first elected councillor in Carmarthenshire. In a ward long seen as Labour territory, the win signalled a dramatic shift.
Reform volunteers preparing election materials in Carmarthenshire (Image: Facebook)
That momentum continued days earlier in Pembrokeshire, when Scott Thorley, a former Reform candidate, was co-opted onto Haverfordwest Town Council. His appointment ignited local opposition from campaigners concerned about Reform's stance on the Anti-racist Wales Action Plan (AWAP).
The AWAP Dispute and Political Fallout
Scott Thorley's co-option onto Haverfordwest Town Council has sparked a petition (Image: Supplied)
Reform UK has openly opposed the AWAP, criticising its focus on identity-based policies, such as increased grants for ethnic minority student teachers and cultural accommodation in public spaces. Critics say these measures undermine meritocracy and divide communities.
After Thorley's co-option, political graffiti at Withybush Retail Park—featuring slogans like 'VOTE REFORM' and 'GOD SAVE US'—only intensified debate. Thorley swiftly condemned the graffiti, calling it 'vandalism, plain and simple,' and defended the party's intentions.
'As I have been invited to help on the anti‑racist action plan … I'm really confused by their comments. … Politics is about talking and helping people. … stop acting like stroppy teenagers.'
— Scott Thorley, Town Councillor, speaking to The Pembrokeshire Herald
Leadership turbulence and image strategy
Reform has also faced internal turbulence. Chairman Zia Yusuf, a practising Muslim, resigned on June 5, citing exhaustion and policy disagreements—particularly over a proposed burka ban—but reversed that decision just two days later. He returned to lead a new strategy unit focused on governance, fundraising, and outreach. His continued presence is seen as key to diversifying Reform's image and countering claims of intolerance.
Farage, culture wars, and language policy
Nigel Farage: Wants to scrap Welsh Language targets and identity-based policymaking
At the helm, Nigel Farage has declared Wales a top priority, urging voters to back 'real change'. He promised to scrap policies such as the 20mph default speed limit, the 'Nation of Sanctuary' scheme, and the Welsh Government's goal of one million Welsh speakers by 2050—labelled by Reform as cultural overreach.
While Farage offered limited detail on his opposition to the Welsh-language target, his position aligns with a broader opposition to identity-based policymaking.
Even Plaid warns: 'Reform could win'
The growing momentum behind Reform UK has not gone unnoticed by its political opponents. Speaking at the party's Spring conference in Llandudno, Plaid Cymru's Westminster leader Liz Saville Roberts warned party members that Reform could become the largest party in the Senedd if they are not taken seriously.
'If we—Plaid Cymru—do not provide solutions to Labour's failings, there is something worse waiting in the wings to take their place,' she said.
'If we do not take this threat seriously, they could become the biggest party in the Senedd—our national parliament. If that happens, it would be a disaster for Wales. This must galvanise us.'
Saville Roberts accused Reform of thriving on division and warned that the party would seek to privatise the NHS, strip away workers' rights, and undermine Welsh identity and the language.
Pushback from Welsh leaders
Welsh Labour's First Minister Mark Drakeford condemned the proposal to remove the language goal, asserting that the Welsh language 'belongs to us all' and should be defended from external political interference. Plaid Cymru MS Llŷr Gruffydd dismissed Farage's claims as 'empty soundbites' and accused him of 'railing against Welsh culture and identity' to advance his own agenda.
Labour's collapse in its historical heartlands is resonating at the grassroots. The Barn Cymru poll confirms their support is now the lowest since devolution began, under 20%. Meanwhile, local expressions of discontent are growing, with public services—especially in rural and post-industrial areas—seen as deteriorating, boosting calls for change.
A once-unshakeable Labour dominance is cracking. With Plaid Cymru and Reform UK capitalising on voter fatigue, policy stumbles, and identity politics backlash, Wales is entering a new era of volatility. As the Senedd moves to proportional representation, the question isn't whether Reform will take seats, but whether Labour has already ceded too much ground.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
3 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Will Keir Starmer recognise Palestine?
Photo byThe image stays with you: this week it has covered the front pages of the world's newspapers. A mother, herself worn down and bruised by 21 months of conflict, cradles her child, who is swaddled in a bin bag. The child has lost a third of its body weight, it now weighs 6kg. Such images are not unique in Gaza, where starvation is general to a community after the blockade of humanitarian aid. The international community is looking on in horror, pleading with Israel to reconsider. On Sunday, the Israeli government issued a temporary reprieve allowing deliveries of aid into parts of Gaza. In the UK, there is pressure on the government to officially recognise the state of Palestine. This pressure originally mounted from the backbenches, but now, even members of the cabinet (Shabana Mahmood, Wes Streeting and Hilary Benn) are ramping up their private calls for Starmer to recognise Palestinian statehood. Over the weekend, 220 MPs from nine political parties – including 131 Labour MPs – signed a letter calling for the immediate recognition of Palestine. In the run up to the 2024 general election, the party's manifesto included a pledge to recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution towards a renewed peace process which results in a two-state solution, but a year on, and both Starmer and his Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, are yet to make good on this promise. The government's current position is that the UK will acknowledge Palestinian statehood as part of a peace process, but only at the point of 'maximum impact'. On Saturday, Starmer doubled down, rejecting renewed calls for the UK to reconsider and immediately recognise a Palestinian state, reasserting the UK's alignment with the US on this issue (a move which one cabinet minister told The Times was 'deeply inadequate'). The opportunity for Starmer to recognise the Palestinian state has presented itself more than once. Most recently, it was thought that Starmer might wait to go ahead with recognition alongside the French President, Emmanuel Macron. The UK and France argue a historical responsibility for the continuation of a Palestinian community in the Middle East, and so plenty suspected the countries would make a dual statement. But the opportunity for joint Franco-UK recognition has now passed. On Thursday 24 July, Macron announced France's intention to recognise Palestine at the upcoming UN general assembly. (Starmer, on the other hand, almost simultaneously released a statement sticking to the government line). Backbench MPs are losing their patience. Rachael Maskell, who lost the Labour whip last week following her involvement in the welfare rebellion, believes 'time is running out' for any governmental recognition of Palestine to have its desired effect. 'We should have recognised Palestine many, many years ago,' she said, 'it's been Labour party policy since 2014'. Maskell was one of 60 MPs to sign a letter to the Foreign Secretary in July calling for Palestine's immediate recognition. Ian Byrne, the Labour MP for Liverpool West Derby agreed: 'We had a vote over a decade ago about Palestine. [Recognition] was in the manifesto. What we're seeing now with the genocide, there's the political will now from all sides of the house to do something.' Byrne said now is the time for the UK to step up and take international responsibility. 'The UK has the opportunity to do the right thing. We are one of the world leaders and sometimes you need a leader to take the lead.' He criticised the government for acting 'extremely slowly' on Gaza. Even more moderate back-bench Labour MPs are ramping up the pressure on the government. One member of the 2024 intake told me, 'It's beyond horrific, we have to seriously consider our relationship with Israel.' Israel has now offered a brief cessation of its full scale aid blockade, and Lammy has said the channelling of aid into the Gaza strip must be 'urgently accelerated'. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe No country is likely to get involved in this conflict militarily (unless a UN peacekeeping force is assembled), instead, more substantial diplomatic levers could be pulled such as suspending the UK-Israel trade agreement and imposing sanctions not only on the most outspoken ministers (as the UK has already done with Smotrich and Ben Gvir) but all Israeli political and military leaders involved in the conflict. Many Labour MPs would agree with this. Byrne called for an 'arms embargo, military cooperation to be ended, and comprehensive sanctions'. And it is not just Labour. Kit Malthouse, the Conservative MP for North West Hertfordshire said Lammy could end up in the Hague over his inaction on Gaza as he called on the government to press for an immediate ceasefire. This week the Daily Express carried a front page bearing the face of an emaciated Palestinian child crying 'enough is enough': concern over the plight of Palestinians now transcends party politics. This is unlikely to be an electoral downfall for Keir Starmer. But, with the pro-Gaza independent MPs taking seats last summer otherwise ordained for Labour, it is obvious that this is damaging to the party on its left flank. The Prime Minister may continue to prevaricate. But were we at the polls tomorrow, votes would be shed because of it. [See more: The abomination of Obama's nation] Related
The Herald Scotland
29 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scotland needs more workers - here's how we attract them
But there must be a radical shift in the narrative around immigration that stops demonising those fleeing famine, persecution and war – those seeking to settle and build a better live for themselves and their families. We need to face up to the fact that many of the conditions causing people to migrate – war, climate change, trade agreements that favour rich countries – are sustained by the very same politicians that bemoan migration. If we want to cut migration, then we must cut global inequality. In the meantime, we'll continue to support the right of people to move and not to move. Contrary to what political actors across the spectrum want you to believe, our public services aren't being drained by those from abroad; they're being decimated by those from within – austerity seeking, spending prudent politicians of both Holyrood and Westminster. Last week alone, the Prime Minister is targeting those working in hospitality and fast food – the drivers and cyclists of your favourite takeaway delivery services. Yet again, the Prime Minister misses the wider picture. In his continued attempt to reclaim the ground seized by Reform, the tough on immigration chatter highlights how migrants are forced into insecure, pitiful paid labour, exploited by companies who give them zero working rights whilst extracting sheer profit from their work. Last week serves to highlight further that, whenever politicians want to pin the blame for their own economic failings on imported labour, we need to hit reset and examine the basic facts. The reality is that Scotland has specific challenges, meaning that it needs more migrants, not fewer. The number of people in Scotland aged 75 and over is projected to increase by around a third of a million people over the 25 years to mid-2047. Over the same period, the number of children and young adults is projected to fall. We will only maintain modest population increases if migration continues at its current rate. It just about balances out the fall in birth rates in the UK. But even this will not solve the pending demographic crisis. Over the past fortnight, the spotlight has fallen on the Triple Lock with Nigel Farage arguing for yet another increase in the pension age. Hints from Government suggest that it's not off the cards. The Office for Budget Responsibility recently said that the triple lock has already cost three times more than initially expected and suggested it was unaffordable in the long term. The triple lock, which was introduced in 2011 by the coalition government, means the state pension increases every year in line with either inflation, wage increases or 2.5% – whichever is the highest. Of course, affordability is as much about the money you are prepared to raise as it is to spend. But we all need to recognise that rates of economic activity and economic growth are a key factor. Put simply, if there aren't enough younger people working in an economy, there is too little tax being paid to sustain our folk who are retired. Let me lay it out simply for all those who support policies like the triple lock but also want to cut migration: the two of these are not compatible. Nigel gets this. The fact the average worker in the poorer parts of Scotland won't even live to pension age as it is now, is neither here nor there for Farage. He is happy to sacrifice the living standards of our pensioners who have already worked their ticket to fulfil his desire to appeal to the feral instincts of the misguided minority. Now let me be clear: inward migration should never just be about sheer economics. It's about the provision of safe havens for those fleeing persecution from global conflicts - which are very often the result of our own foreign policy - or simply the enrichment and development of our culture through the contribution of other cultures. But when Scottish businesses themselves are calling for greater devolution of immigration powers to the Scottish Government, with almost 70% believing that encouraging migration is 'vital' in filling skills shortages across the country, then we should all take note. We first advocated this position a decade ago in our submission to the Smith Commission into further devolution. Scotland has unique skills shortages that can be addressed through a tailored Scottish visa programme. What I'm talking about here is finding a solution to the care crisis in Scotland, with overworked, mostly female social care workers being stretched to the limit due to record vacancies in the sector. This is most acutely felt in our highlands and islands regions who already struggle to retain their staff never mind recruit more. It also means retaining the students and staff who come to work and study at our world-leading institutions – the colleges and universities of our country. They're more than keen to build a life in Scotland, to settle and put down roots and to give back to the institutions and communities who have welcomed them. It would be folly to decry them of this opportunity. It's important therefore that Whitehall doesn't just dismiss the need for a Scottish VISA on the presumption they think the SNP are scheming and politicking. The need is great but there are important caveats. The last thing I am advocating for is the simple importation of cheap labour. Whether it is migrant care workers on special visas, or settled migrant workers, there is an over representation in lower paid, insecure jobs that must be addressed. Fortunately, we have a solution. That's why we argue for a double lock. A Scottish Visa and devolution of employment law. Working hand in hand to ensure that Scotland can plug the skills gap within its labour market and ensure workers don't find themselves ruthlessly exploited. If businesses need to fill skills gaps and labour shortages, they must do so on decent terms and conditions. It's not the Deliveroo drivers that are delivering economic stagnation; it's debilitating political inaction on migration that should be the main takeaway for ministers to examine. Roz Foyer is General Secretary of the Scottish Trades Union Congress
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Independent MP Nicolette Boele calls out parliament's lack of ambition in her first speech
Nicolette Boele, who sensationally beat Liberal candidate Gisele Kapterian by just 26 votes in the seat of Bradfield, gave her maiden speech to parliament on Monday, saying Australia is moving towards a decentralised and more people-centred rather than party-centred democracy. She said there was 'widespread conviction' that politicians were 'incapable of dealing with systemic longstanding issues' such as regulating online media platforms, climate change, gambling and housing affordability, adding that unlike previous reform to gun laws, or the introduction of medicare, the parliament was not ambitious enough
