Breast cancer survivors may have lower risk of developing Alzheimer's disease, study finds
A study led by the Seoul National University College of Medicine suggests that breast cancer survivors could have a slightly lower chance of developing Alzheimer's disease compared to those who had not undergone treatment.
In the study, which was published in JAMA Network Open, data from more than 70,000 breast cancer survivors were compared to a cancer-free control group for an average of 7.3 years.
Fda Approves First Ai Tool To Predict Breast Cancer Risk
Overall, the breast cancer survivors — particularly those who were 65 and older — showed an 8% lower risk of dementia within the five years following treatment.
Those who received radiation showed the most risk reduction, the researchers found.
Read On The Fox News App
The study was adjusted for other factors that could have contributed to Alzheimer's risk, including age, income levels, geographic location, body mass index, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol and chronic kidney disease) and health-related behaviors (smoking, alcohol consumption and physical activity), the study stated.
This outcome conflicts with previous concerns about breast cancer patients experiencing cognitive decline after treatment.
Bill Gates Reveals 'Next Phase Of Alzheimer's Fight' As He Shares Dad's Personal Battle
Chemotherapy has previously been linked to a condition called "chemo brain," where patients experience cognitive decline.
"Chemo brain refers to cognitive dysfunction, including thinking and memory problems, that occur in patients with cancer during and after chemotherapy," the researchers wrote.
Rates Of Dementia Are Lower In People Who Eat This Specific Diet, Research Shows
This is different from Alzheimer's, however — with "chemo brain," the cognitive impairment is described as "subtle" and doesn't keep the patient from retrieving remote memories.
"Concerns about chemo brain and the long-term adverse effects of breast cancer treatment on cognition are common, but our findings suggest that this treatment does not directly lead to AD," the researchers noted.
In fact, they stated, some studies have shown that certain drugs given to breast cancer patients can help to reduce the formation of amyloid-beta and tau proteins in the brain, which is one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer's.
Based on the findings, the researchers recommend that breast cancer patients take steps to reduce modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's, such as smoking and diabetes, along with receiving standard cancer treatment.
The study did have some limitations, the team acknowledged.
Information about patients' breast cancer stage and radiation dose was not available. It is also possible that the number of Alzheimer's diagnoses was underestimated.
Also, because the study focused on patients with "operable" breast cancer, it may not represent the risk of Alzheimer's among elderly patients, those with "critical comorbidities" or patients with advanced-stage disease, the researchers noted.
"We could not evaluate the long-term increase in AD risk because our follow-up period was relatively short (maximum, 11 years)," they wrote.
"Additional studies with long-term observation periods are warranted to examine long-term associations between AD risk and breast cancer survival duration."
Maria C. Carrillo, Ph.D., Alzheimer's Association chief science officer and medical affairs lead in Chicago, pointed out that this topic of research has been explored in previous studies.
"There have been many published reports from observational studies of cancer survivors with decreased risk of Alzheimer's disease, but also some that found increased risk," Carrillo, who was not involved in this most recent study, told Fox News Digital.
Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter
The expert cautions against drawing "abrupt conclusions" based on this study.
"Previous research on cancer survival and treatment and Alzheimer's risk, much of it cited by the authors of this article, has produced mixed — even contradictory — results," Carrollio said. "More research is needed — especially longer studies in more representative study populations."
The most interesting aspect of this study, Carrillo said, is the finding that radiation therapy was associated with 23% Alzheimer's risk reduction, while other cancer treatments showed no risk reduction.
This could be due to radiation's capability to lower inflammation levels, the expert suggested.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
"Lowering inflammation in the body and brain can reduce amyloid beta or slow amyloid beta production, delaying the onset of symptomatic Alzheimer's," she said. "More research is needed to see if this is, in fact, the case."
Approximately 7.2 million Americans aged 65 and older are currently living with Alzheimer's, according to the Alzheimer's Association.
Fox News Digital reached out to the study researchers for comment.Original article source: Breast cancer survivors may have lower risk of developing Alzheimer's disease, study finds
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
How sensationalized headlines about 'brain plastic' are undermining trust in safe, sustainable materials
Earlier this year, a terrifying claim swept headlines and social media: "You have a spoon's worth of plastic in your brain." The warning, based on a study published in Nature Medicine, set off a cultural firestorm, dominating news cycles, TikToks and dinner table conversations. It was the kind of phrase designed to go viral, and it did. But here's what didn't go viral: the follow-up. Experts later flagged the study for a critical flaw: To quantify microplastics in samples, the study relied on equipment with limitations in distinguishing plastics from other materials, leading to potential false positives. An independent expert noted: "The method is lauded for its ability to detect smaller micro- and nanoplastics than other methods can, but it will give you a lot of false positives if you do not adequately remove biological material from the sample. Most of the presumed plastic they found is polyethylene, which to me really indicates that they didn't really clean up their samples properly." The nuance, though important, didn't make the headlines. This highlights a broader issue: there's no globally standardized methods for the collection, detection and quantification of microplastics. Some microplastics studies may fail to identify whether the particle is a mineral, an organic material or something else, yet still misidentify them and claim they are microplastics. And without standardized methodologies for identifying and quantifying the different types of particles, it is difficult to generate reliable data and assess their true impact. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states, "While there are many studies on microplastics in food, the current state of science is limited in its ability to inform regulatory risk assessment… due to several factors, including a continued lack of standardized definitions, reference materials, sample collection and preparation procedures, and appropriate quality controls, to name a few." Yet recent coverage has prioritized drama over scientific nuance, creating confusion rather than clarity. Let's be clear: microplastics are real. Everyday life, from tire dust to synthetic fibers, produces these particles. They're in the environment and potentially our bodies. But presence alone doesn't constitute a crisis. The real question is what this means for human health and how to respond responsibly. The FDA has made clear that "current scientific evidence does not demonstrate that levels of microplastics or nanoplastics detected in foods pose a risk to human health." When we treat preliminary research as settled science – or worse, viral clickbait – we lose the ability to make smart decisions. This is particularly true in the case of materials like PET, the plastic used in food packaging, water bottles and medical supplies. PET is among the safest, most rigorously tested plastics, approved globally by regulators including the FDA and EFSA. Why is this misinformation dangerous? Because it undermines trust in safe and sustainable materials like PET, which is both lightweight and recyclable. According to life cycle assessments (LCA), a PET bottle produces significantly lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than alternative containers like glass bottles or aluminum cans, and requires less energy to produce. It enables safe hydration, reduces food waste and makes modern healthcare possible. Yet consumers increasingly question PET, not because science changed, but because headlines did. That disconnect carries real-world consequences. This is exactly why it is so important for our regulatory agencies to step up and address the lack of standardization in microplastics research and to develop methods and standards that allow for consistent and comparable results in research. Only then will we be able to have a more disciplined public conversation around microplastics that we can be confident is based on dependable evidence, and which stops the confusion of comparing apples to oranges. None of this is to dismiss the broader challenge of plastic pollution. Our industry – and society – must invest in better systems: smarter product design, stronger recycling infrastructure and more rigorous scientific research. But meaningful progress starts with clarity, not confusion. The public deserves facts. Not just headlines.
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
The Hard and Hopeful Realities of Dementia
To the Editor: Re 'A Less Bleak Story About Dementia Is Emerging,' by Lynn Casteel Harper (Opinion guest essay, June 18): I was raised in the shadow of dementia, with many in the family developing the disease. For years Mom warned us to 'walk away' when her time came. When I became her very unwilling caregiver, I saw only loss, not the person, heard only confusion, not the thought. My life as her care partner was a journey of discovery, from dread to acceptance to joy. It is the most rewarding thing I have ever done. We are on the cusp of a changing narrative about Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, from despair to hope — a recognition that those who live with dementia are valuable people with gifts to give and lives to live. They and their families and care partners need and deserve our support to thrive and live with happiness. Marilyn RaichleSeattleThe writer is the executive director of Maude's Awards for Innovation in Alzheimer's Care and the author of 'Don't Walk Away: A Care Partner's Journey.' To the Editor: This guest essay makes sense if you factor in that the author is a Baptist minister and a chaplain. However, apart from a select few, most people do not have the time or the energy to seek out the 'glorious' opportunities that one writer she quotes associates with dementia. Yes, in an ideal world, it would be nice to find some 'magic and beauty' in a relative who is mostly angry, miserable and out of touch with reality, who is unable to make any decisions or to take care of himself or herself. But for those of us already in our own senior years, taking care of an elderly parent with dementia is simply one more responsibility. Rather than hint at fault in people who are trying desperately to deal with the consequences of a loved one's decline, the author should acknowledge that this is not a beautiful moment for the majority of us. For her to focus on the exceptions is unfair. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Watch mud volcano erupt beneath a crown of flames in Taiwan
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A mud volcano has roared to life in front of a temple in Taiwan, with mesmerizing videos capturing the moments mud shot out of the ground beneath a crown of fire. The Wandan mud volcano, located in the Wandan Township of southern Taiwan, spat bubbling mud out of four separate vents on Thursday (June 26) as ejected material reached a height of 6.6 feet (2 meters), Formosa Television (FTV) News reported. Footage from the roughly 10-hour-long eruption shows flames igniting above the bubbling mud. However, while mud volcanoes can ignite naturally, the Wandan flames were deliberately set by local people to burn off ejected methane, a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change, according to Reddit posts by Mark Tingay, an adjunct associate professor of geology and geophysics at the University of Adelaide in Australia. "Local folks ignite these vents by throwing burning rags into them," Tingay wrote in response to one Reddit user asking about the flames. "They do it mostly to flare off the gases, but partly because it looks awesome!" Related: Underwater robot in Siberia's Lake Baikal reveals hidden mud volcanoes — and an active fault Mud volcanoes usually don't have anything to do with regular volcanoes, which eject molten rock and hot gases. Some mud volcanoes are linked to hot geothermal activity, like those in Yellowstone National Park. However, Wandan's mud volcano is the more common type of this geological feature. "These mud volcanoes in Taiwan are driven by high fluid pressures that can form deep underground, rather than by magmatic influence," Tingay wrote in another Reddit comment. Tingay studies mud volcanoes and regularly shares information about eruptions on social media. In his latest posts, he described the Wandan event alongside a video taken by 張寶惠, the mud volcano temple's caretaker. 張寶惠 also shared videos on Facebook, showing the mud volcano violently erupting from different angles. The latest eruption began at around 5 a.m. local time and continued until around 3.40 p.m. This is the 10th time the Wandan mud volcano has erupted within the last three years, according to Tingay's posts. RELATED STORIES —Rare mud volcano explodes into towering inferno in Caspian Sea —Indonesia's Lewotobi Laki-laki volcano erupts twice in 2 days, unleashing 6-mile-high ash cloud —Hidden layer beneath Italy's Campi Flegrei caldera may explain why it's so restless Wandan's mud volcano isn't in a single fixed location, but can erupt over a 0.6-mile-wide (1 kilometer) area, according to Tingay. In previous years, the volcano has erupted underneath the temple, with mud shooting up the outside wall and flowing inside, covering the floor. Mud volcanoes vary in size and shape, and in some cases, form massive cone-like structures very similar in appearance to regular volcanoes. They can naturally produce flames when erupting rocks strike against each other, creating a spark that ignites ejected flammable gases. Researchers believe this is what produced a towering inferno above a mud volcano in the Caspian Sea in 2021, Live Science previously reported.
