logo
Credit rating firms seek govt intervention over regulatory void on ₹1 L cr unlisted debt

Credit rating firms seek govt intervention over regulatory void on ₹1 L cr unlisted debt

Time of India22-06-2025
Mumbai: Credit rating companies have sought the intervention of ministries of corporate affairs and finance amid an uncertainty over the future ratings of more ₹1 lakh crore of
unlisted securities
.
The rating of these instruments, like
corporate bonds
and securitised papers, which comprise an integral part of the financial market for debts, has fallen between the cracks of two regulatory authorities.
The ambiguity stems from the fact that the
Securities and Exchange Board of India
(Sebi), the primary regulator for the credit
rating agencies
(CRAs), has jurisdiction over only listed securities while unlisted debts raised by corporates, including company fixed deposits, are outside the domain of the
Reserve Bank of India
(RBI).
SEBI had last year told rating firms to get a non-objection certificate from RBI for rating the unlisted papers. Since then, the central bank has allowed CRAs to rate certificates of deposits (CDs) - instruments floated by banks to raise short-term funds. But, there is no clarity on ratings of securitised papers like
pass through certificates
(PTCs) and
unlisted corporate bonds
. This is where CRAs want the ministries to step in.
Issued against a basket of loans and the interest flows from them, PTCs enable lenders like non-bank finance companies as well as banks to convert relatively illiquid loans into marketable papers and create headroom to lend more while letting investors - like corporate treasuries, financial institutions, and fund houses - hold a diversified pool of assets and sometimes generate a higher return. A predominant portion of the outstanding PTCs are unlisted.
Under the circumstances, the CRAs are awaiting a signal from the
corporate affairs ministry
that they can follow the SEBI guidelines on listed securities while carrying out the rating of unlisted securities. Thus, CRAs want to know whether they can continue to use the same rules of default recognition, application of grading scale, disclosures, and issue of press release for unlisted papers as well. The ministry is yet to respond to the letter from the rating industry body.
With New Delhi is yet to give the go-ahead, some of the CRAs, in the course of various meetings, have sensitised issuers of unlisted securities as well as some of the investors that ratings of these instruments may have to be withdrawn in the absence of any clarity from the government or regulators.
"More so, with SEBI reminding CRAs a few months ago that the issue needs to be sorted out. This could well be a nudge from SEBI to list more securities and thereby promote transparency. However, many issuers refrain from listing either to avoid the compliance and reporting that come with it or strike bilateral deals with investors and do not feel the urgency to list," said an industry official.
Many institutional investors may keep away from unrated securities, including banks who save on capital as unrated loans and investments carry higher risk weights. But while there are takers for unrated instruments, rating helps in investment decision making by capturing the risk and pricing of an instrument.
"Some are expecting RBI to clear the air for PTCs which are mostly issued by NBFCs (entities regulated by RBI). If RBI gives a green signal for PTCs, then the issue related to rating of unlisted corporate bonds has to be resolved. Company FDs are a small market," said another official.
Earnings from ratings of unlisted papers, said an analyst, is a small slice of CRAs' earnings, but a lack of rating can have some implications for the wholesale debt market. For instance, CRAs' periodic reports on the PTC market are closely tracked by investors.
"There are adequate regulations on investments in these unlisted securities but there is not enough regulation about their rating. SEBI understandably wants rating of any instrument to be cleared by some authority. It doesn't want to be blamed for a big loss or default which inevitably raises questions on ratings," said the person. "The market too is evolving. The assets of Alternative investment funds have surged in the last 5 to 6 years and many of these funds put money in unlisted papers," she said.
Earlier, CRAs could choose on what it would rate, but those days are long over with the role and rules agencies coming under scrutiny since the IL&FS default in 2018.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sebi resolves nearly 4,500 complaints via SCORES portal in Jun
Sebi resolves nearly 4,500 complaints via SCORES portal in Jun

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Sebi resolves nearly 4,500 complaints via SCORES portal in Jun

New Delhi, Jul 20 (PTI) Capital markets regulator Sebi has disposed of 4,415 complaints in June through its online grievance redressal platform SCORES. The regulator received 4,959 fresh complaints in the month, and a total of 5,107 grievances remained unresolved at the end of June, slightly higher than the 4,563 charges that were pending as of May 31, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) said in a public notice on Friday. The regulator also highlighted that the average resolution time taken by the entities to submit the Action Taken Reports (ATRs) in June was eight days, while the average time taken for complaints under First Level Review was four days. SCORES, or Sebi Complaint Redressal System, is an online platform which facilitates investors in lodging and tracking complaints against listed companies and registered intermediaries. Under the SCORES 2.0 mechanism, complaints are automatically forwarded to the respective entities, which are required to respond within 21 days. If an investor is not satisfied, they have 15 days to seek a First Level Review. A similar review opportunity is available at the Second Level with the designated body and subsequently with Sebi, each within a 15-day window. Complaints are also treated as resolved if the investor chooses the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) mechanism.

What should investors do as subdued Q1 results, tariff tensions extend stock market losses? Explains Geojit's Vinod Nair
What should investors do as subdued Q1 results, tariff tensions extend stock market losses? Explains Geojit's Vinod Nair

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

What should investors do as subdued Q1 results, tariff tensions extend stock market losses? Explains Geojit's Vinod Nair

The Indian equity market initiated the month of July on a selling note, driven by persistent global trade tensions and a subdued start to the Q1FY26 earnings season. Investor sentiment was further weighed down by delays in the India–US trade pact and the US extension of tariff deadlines. News like the imposition of a 35% levy on Canadian, 50% on copper, 25% on Japan, and sending a tariff threat letter to 20 countries intensified the concerns. Despite the broader indices slipping into negative territory, selective buying emerged in consumption-oriented sectors such as FMCG and discretionary stocks. This was supported by signs of urban & rural demand revival, easing inflation, declining interest rates, and a favourable monsoon—all of which contributed to margin improvement and a positive undertone on volume growth. Key underperformers were in the IT sector, weighed down by weak results from key bellwethers and expectations of deferred orders and investments. This raised concerns over FY26 earnings estimates and added to valuation pressures. Investors are now closely watching corporate guidance on margins and sector dynamics as the earnings season unfolds. However, after the initial setback, the prices of IT stocks are stabilising with a reduction in volatility due to deep value trading near 5years -1SD (standard deviation) forward P/E valuation and hope of a rebound in business in CY26 as the Nasdaq100 index has breached to an all-time high. Banking stocks have a muted trend, which is expected to continue in the short term, facing headwinds from NIM contraction and sluggish growth in advances, which could impact its profit performance in the short-term. Also, the valuation appears somewhat stretched at current levels, suggesting that the upside may be limited in the near future. However, with regulatory support such as liquidity infusions and other revival measures, the banking sector is expected to recover over the medium to long term. We continue to maintain a positive outlook on the industry, and back stocks with a moderate credit-to-deposit ratio and improvement in asset quality, which provide a cushion against short-term volatility. Markets attempted a partial rebound this week, driven by optimism over a potential interim trade deal with the U.S. and multi-year low domestic inflation, which boosted hopes of RBI rate cuts and economic acceleration. However, the continuation of subdued quarterly results, the clamp in the global market, and the premium valuations of India led to further losses in the market. Investors are adopting a selective approach, focusing on earnings visibility and sector resilience. Mid & Small cap were able to perform marginally better. The key intake of the month is that India's macroeconomic outlook remains strong, supported by easing inflation, lower interest rates, a healthy monsoon, and softer oil prices. A drop in inflation in eight straight months has provided an optimism to the market. However, investors are showing a mix of optimism and caution to assess the Q1FY26 corporate earnings, as an upgrade in earnings is the most essential fact in the premium-valued stock market. The author, Vinod Nair, is Head of Research at Geojit Financial Services. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making investment decisions.

Sebi resolves 4,415 investor complaints in June via SCORES platform
Sebi resolves 4,415 investor complaints in June via SCORES platform

Business Standard

time3 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Sebi resolves 4,415 investor complaints in June via SCORES platform

Stock market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) resolved 4,415 complaints through its online grievance redressal platform, SCORES, in the month of June. The regulator received 4,959 fresh complaints in June, and a total of 5,107 grievances remained unresolved at the end of the month, slightly higher than the 4,563 cases that were pending as of May 31, Sebi said in a public notice on Friday. SCORES, or Sebi Complaint Redress System, is an online platform that facilitates investors in lodging and tracking complaints against listed companies and registered intermediaries. The regulator highlighted that the average resolution time taken by entities to submit the Action Taken Reports (ATRs) in June was eight days, while the average time taken for complaints under First Level Review was four days. Under the SCORES 2.0 mechanism, complaints are automatically forwarded to the respective entities, which are required to respond within 21 days. If an investor is not satisfied, they have 15 days to seek a First Level Review. A similar review opportunity is available at the Second Level with the designated body and subsequently with Sebi, each within a 15-day window. Complaints are also treated as resolved if the investor chooses the Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) mechanism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store