logo
Sharon Gaffka: "I had an abortion and a miscarriage – and our current laws left me terrified during both"

Sharon Gaffka: "I had an abortion and a miscarriage – and our current laws left me terrified during both"

Cosmopolitan16-06-2025
Little-known fact: abortion is technically a criminal offence in England and Wales, governed by a law from 1861, before women got the right to vote.
As powerful anti-choice groups seek to roll back reproductive rights in the UK - as we've seen in the US and Europe - Cosmopolitan has joined forces with BPAS, the UK's leading abortion care service, on a new campaign: End 1861. It hopes to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales.
Head here to take action to raise your voice for choice and fight for bodily autonomy.Growing up, I saw people on the internet call abortion 'the easy way out.' Women were accused of being irresponsible, of not 'taking responsibility' for being clumsy, reckless, or not 'careful enough.' But let me tell you something: two of the hardest moments of my life were a miscarriage and an at-home early medical abortion. Nothing about either was easy.
Living through both of these experiences hammered home the reality of our current abortion law and its real-world impact.
One was my choice. The other was completely out of my control. But both were painful, lonely, and traumatising. Something that will stay with me for the rest of my life. Along with knowing that, in the eyes of the law, I could be treated not as a patient, but as a suspected criminal.
My miscarriage was sudden and brutal. I hadn't yet made any decision about the pregnancy, but my body made it for me. I was alone at home, in agony, bleeding and terrified. I called for help because I feared for my life. I didn't want to be on my own. But the idea that someone might suspect I had done something to cause my miscarriage never crossed my mind... until I found out they could. Because under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, women who have suffered miscarriages or stillbirths have found themselves being investigated by police, under suspicion for illegal abortions. Those found guilty can be jailed for life.
This included a 15-year-old girl, who suffered an unexplained early still birth. Police were called by hospital staff who believed she had taken a substance bought online to end her pregnancy.
She had her phone and laptop seized, with police performing an invasive digital strip search, including reading text messages she had exchanged with her boyfriend expressing worry about her pregnancy. The case was dropped after postmortem tests found the baby had probably been stillborn because of natural causes.
During my abortion, I bled so heavily that I passed out and had to be taken to hospital by ambulance [Editor's note: abortion is a safe and common medical procedure, but like any, complications can occur albeit rarely]. Despite taking the pills legally and as prescribed, the bleeding was so severe that I had to have an additional procedure to remove remaining tissue from my uterus. My legs were in stirrups. Exposed. Shaking. Humiliated. I felt guilty. I felt ashamed. And on top of that, I was scared, scared that even though I was well within the legal limit, my experience could still raise questions.
I wasn't just vulnerable physically or emotionally. I felt vulnerable to being investigated. The pills I had taken were prescribed to me after a phone consultation. I wasn't anywhere near the 24-week limit. But the pain was so intense, the bleeding so severe, I started to question myself. What if I'd miscalculated the dates? What if someone thought I'd lied? It was terrifying. I couldn't think straight. It might sound paranoid, but this very thing happened. Nicola Packer, who was found not guilty of having an illegal abortion this month, and who was prescribed abortion pills over the phone.
She was 26 weeks pregnant but believed, at the time, she was six weeks pregnant. It took five years to clear her name.
You might not feel sorry for me. Maybe you think, well, it was 'my choice.' Fine. But think about this. That law that is still in place today, in England, in Wales, it's older than women's right to vote. Older than the NHS. Older than almost every right we've fought to gain. And it's being used more and more frequently.
When Roe v Wade happened in the US, it caused people at home to be outraged, and rightly so. But we also thought we were safe. 'That would never happen in the UK,' they said. 'We're more progressive.' But that outrage is built on a false sense of security. The very drugs that saved my life, in different ways, in both of those experiences, are being banned across parts of the US. And here, in the UK, our laws are hanging by a thread.
A change in government could change everything. Because our reproductive rights are still built on a 19th century law that treats pregnancy as a crime waiting to happen.
When I had my abortion, yes, I had access to medical care. Yes, I had the dignity of being at home. But I also had fear. If the pills had arrived too late. If something had gone wrong. If someone had reported me. I could have been investigated, interrogated, even charged. All while going through something that was already unbearable.
And here's what matters: in both of those moments, I wasn't doing anything wrong. I was putting my life first. My wants. My needs. My health. I wasn't committing a crime. I was trying to survive. That's what 'pro-life' should mean.
This isn't a distant threat. Between 2012 and 2022, at least 17 women in England and Wales were investigated for ending their pregnancies. In the last three years alone, six have been prosecuted. BPAS has received almost 100 police requests for patients' confidential records — including for teenage girls, survivors of domestic abuse, and women who miscarried unexpectedly at home.
This is happening. Right now. Here. In the UK.
Abortion is still criminalised under the 1861 Act. The 1967 Abortion Act introduced a legal defence of two doctors who approved the procedure, but it didn't take abortion out of the criminal code. In England and Wales, it's still legally punishable by life imprisonment.
That's why I'm backing the End 1861 campaign. This month, MPs have the chance to vote for an amendment that will finally decriminalise abortion. Reports suggest this reform is expected to pass through Parliament this week, but it is not guaranteed until it happens.
That's why every single one of us needs to put pressure on our MP. We need them to vote to pass this reform. Not later. Not next year. Now.
It won't change how services are delivered. It won't change time limits. It will just recognise that abortion is what it's always been: healthcare.
Every day this law remains in place, women remain at risk. The fear. The silence. The shame. The threat of being treated like a criminal just for surviving something horrific. Whether you've had an abortion or a miscarriage, that legal shadow hangs over you.
Abortion is common. Miscarriage is even more so. What's not common, and what should never be acceptable, is a law that punishes women for surviving the hardest, most vulnerable moments of their lives.
This campaign matters. I stand behind it.
Because no one should grieve a pregnancy loss with a police officer watching.
Because no one should be scared to go to hospital.
Because no one should ever be punished for putting their life first.
It's time to trust women.
It's time to decriminalise pregnancy.
It's time to drag this law out of the 19th century and into the reality we live in.
Join the campaign to End 1861 and email your MP using this template, urging them to vote in favour of the NC1 amendment to the Crime and Policing bill this week
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sharon Gaffka: "I had an abortion and a miscarriage – and our current laws left me terrified during both"
Sharon Gaffka: "I had an abortion and a miscarriage – and our current laws left me terrified during both"

Cosmopolitan

time16-06-2025

  • Cosmopolitan

Sharon Gaffka: "I had an abortion and a miscarriage – and our current laws left me terrified during both"

Little-known fact: abortion is technically a criminal offence in England and Wales, governed by a law from 1861, before women got the right to vote. As powerful anti-choice groups seek to roll back reproductive rights in the UK - as we've seen in the US and Europe - Cosmopolitan has joined forces with BPAS, the UK's leading abortion care service, on a new campaign: End 1861. It hopes to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales. Head here to take action to raise your voice for choice and fight for bodily up, I saw people on the internet call abortion 'the easy way out.' Women were accused of being irresponsible, of not 'taking responsibility' for being clumsy, reckless, or not 'careful enough.' But let me tell you something: two of the hardest moments of my life were a miscarriage and an at-home early medical abortion. Nothing about either was easy. Living through both of these experiences hammered home the reality of our current abortion law and its real-world impact. One was my choice. The other was completely out of my control. But both were painful, lonely, and traumatising. Something that will stay with me for the rest of my life. Along with knowing that, in the eyes of the law, I could be treated not as a patient, but as a suspected criminal. My miscarriage was sudden and brutal. I hadn't yet made any decision about the pregnancy, but my body made it for me. I was alone at home, in agony, bleeding and terrified. I called for help because I feared for my life. I didn't want to be on my own. But the idea that someone might suspect I had done something to cause my miscarriage never crossed my mind... until I found out they could. Because under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, women who have suffered miscarriages or stillbirths have found themselves being investigated by police, under suspicion for illegal abortions. Those found guilty can be jailed for life. This included a 15-year-old girl, who suffered an unexplained early still birth. Police were called by hospital staff who believed she had taken a substance bought online to end her pregnancy. She had her phone and laptop seized, with police performing an invasive digital strip search, including reading text messages she had exchanged with her boyfriend expressing worry about her pregnancy. The case was dropped after postmortem tests found the baby had probably been stillborn because of natural causes. During my abortion, I bled so heavily that I passed out and had to be taken to hospital by ambulance [Editor's note: abortion is a safe and common medical procedure, but like any, complications can occur albeit rarely]. Despite taking the pills legally and as prescribed, the bleeding was so severe that I had to have an additional procedure to remove remaining tissue from my uterus. My legs were in stirrups. Exposed. Shaking. Humiliated. I felt guilty. I felt ashamed. And on top of that, I was scared, scared that even though I was well within the legal limit, my experience could still raise questions. I wasn't just vulnerable physically or emotionally. I felt vulnerable to being investigated. The pills I had taken were prescribed to me after a phone consultation. I wasn't anywhere near the 24-week limit. But the pain was so intense, the bleeding so severe, I started to question myself. What if I'd miscalculated the dates? What if someone thought I'd lied? It was terrifying. I couldn't think straight. It might sound paranoid, but this very thing happened. Nicola Packer, who was found not guilty of having an illegal abortion this month, and who was prescribed abortion pills over the phone. She was 26 weeks pregnant but believed, at the time, she was six weeks pregnant. It took five years to clear her name. You might not feel sorry for me. Maybe you think, well, it was 'my choice.' Fine. But think about this. That law that is still in place today, in England, in Wales, it's older than women's right to vote. Older than the NHS. Older than almost every right we've fought to gain. And it's being used more and more frequently. When Roe v Wade happened in the US, it caused people at home to be outraged, and rightly so. But we also thought we were safe. 'That would never happen in the UK,' they said. 'We're more progressive.' But that outrage is built on a false sense of security. The very drugs that saved my life, in different ways, in both of those experiences, are being banned across parts of the US. And here, in the UK, our laws are hanging by a thread. A change in government could change everything. Because our reproductive rights are still built on a 19th century law that treats pregnancy as a crime waiting to happen. When I had my abortion, yes, I had access to medical care. Yes, I had the dignity of being at home. But I also had fear. If the pills had arrived too late. If something had gone wrong. If someone had reported me. I could have been investigated, interrogated, even charged. All while going through something that was already unbearable. And here's what matters: in both of those moments, I wasn't doing anything wrong. I was putting my life first. My wants. My needs. My health. I wasn't committing a crime. I was trying to survive. That's what 'pro-life' should mean. This isn't a distant threat. Between 2012 and 2022, at least 17 women in England and Wales were investigated for ending their pregnancies. In the last three years alone, six have been prosecuted. BPAS has received almost 100 police requests for patients' confidential records — including for teenage girls, survivors of domestic abuse, and women who miscarried unexpectedly at home. This is happening. Right now. Here. In the UK. Abortion is still criminalised under the 1861 Act. The 1967 Abortion Act introduced a legal defence of two doctors who approved the procedure, but it didn't take abortion out of the criminal code. In England and Wales, it's still legally punishable by life imprisonment. That's why I'm backing the End 1861 campaign. This month, MPs have the chance to vote for an amendment that will finally decriminalise abortion. Reports suggest this reform is expected to pass through Parliament this week, but it is not guaranteed until it happens. That's why every single one of us needs to put pressure on our MP. We need them to vote to pass this reform. Not later. Not next year. Now. It won't change how services are delivered. It won't change time limits. It will just recognise that abortion is what it's always been: healthcare. Every day this law remains in place, women remain at risk. The fear. The silence. The shame. The threat of being treated like a criminal just for surviving something horrific. Whether you've had an abortion or a miscarriage, that legal shadow hangs over you. Abortion is common. Miscarriage is even more so. What's not common, and what should never be acceptable, is a law that punishes women for surviving the hardest, most vulnerable moments of their lives. This campaign matters. I stand behind it. Because no one should grieve a pregnancy loss with a police officer watching. Because no one should be scared to go to hospital. Because no one should ever be punished for putting their life first. It's time to trust women. It's time to decriminalise pregnancy. It's time to drag this law out of the 19th century and into the reality we live in. Join the campaign to End 1861 and email your MP using this template, urging them to vote in favour of the NC1 amendment to the Crime and Policing bill this week

Abortion clinic staff feel 'abandoned', says charity
Abortion clinic staff feel 'abandoned', says charity

Yahoo

time14-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Abortion clinic staff feel 'abandoned', says charity

Staff at an abortion clinic feel "abandoned" by police because no-one has been prosecuted following more than 40 reports of alleged criminal damage to their vehicles, a charity has said. The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) runs the clinic in Ophir Road, Bournemouth, which anti-abortion protesters had stationed themselves outside of before a council order was implemented in 2022. The clinic was brought to international attention when US Vice President JD Vance raised concerns over the prosecution of a man who breached a protection zone around it. A Dorset Police spokesperson said the force has met with BPAS staff regularly and that it was "actively pursuing" lines of enquiry. Rachael Clarke, BPAS's head of advocacy, said the lack of police action against people who allegedly left nails and screws on roads to be driven over was "incredibly upsetting". "We have been reporting this to the police. We work with the council. There's now CCTV up outside the clinic but still nobody has been identified, nobody has been caught," she said. "It often feels to our staff, who often are nurses and midwifes, who are going into help women access essential legal medical care, that they have been abandoned by local police and that's incredibly upsetting," Ms Clarke added. Before the council order was introduced, she said one protester would leave baby clothes in a bush close to the clinic "to try to make women feel guilty". Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council introduced the Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) for an area around the clinic in October 2022 in an effort to stop anti-social behaviour. In April, Livia Tossici-Bolt, from Bournemouth, was ordered to pay £20,000 for breaching the PSPO twice in March 2023. Vance voiced concern about the prosecution of Adam Smith-Connor, who was told to pay £9,000 after he prayed outside the clinic. He said it represented the UK's "backslide away from conscience rights" at the Munich Security Council in February. The government introduced buffer zones around abortion clinics in England and Wales in October, which prevent protesters gathering in a 492ft (150m) radius around them. A Dorset Police spokesperson said the force's neighbourhood policing team has worked "extensively" with BPAS staff "to tackle the issues they face when going to work". The said: "We have seen a reduction in the number of criminal damage offences reported to us this year and have met with clinic management to ensure we are being made aware of all incidents that have taken place. "Subsequently we have not seen any additional reports. "The crime series remains under investigation and we actively pursue any potential lines of enquiry, however, no arrests have been made to date." You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram. JD Vance attacks Europe over free speech and migration Praying man breached abortion clinic safe zone Buffer zones set to come in around abortion clinics Abortion clinic protesters lose prayer case

Fact check: Amendment would stop prosecutions of women for getting abortions
Fact check: Amendment would stop prosecutions of women for getting abortions

Yahoo

time05-06-2025

  • Yahoo

Fact check: Amendment would stop prosecutions of women for getting abortions

A widely shared post on social media claimed MPs 'are voting to legalise abortion up to BIRTH. No limits. No safeguards.' The poster also said: 'On 4 July, Parliament will vote on a law that would: Remove ALL criminal penalties for abortion.' They added: 'Under MP Diana Johnson's amendment: No time limits. No gestational protections. No punishment for abortions at 7, 8, even 9 months.' The proposal being discussed was not tabled by Diana Johnson, nor is there any evidence Parliament will be voting on it on July 4. It also does not remove all criminal penalties for abortion and maintains most of the limits that are currently in place. If the amendment is made into law it will still be illegal for a woman to terminate her pregnancy outside of the current rules – which among other things limit abortions after 24 weeks into a pregnancy – but her actions would be decriminalised, meaning she would not be punished. However doctors who perform abortions which are not permissible under current laws could still be punished. Who has tabled the amendment? The poster initially said that the changes could come under an amendment from Diana Johnson MP. Ms Johnson did table an amendment to the last Government's criminal justice bill, however that bill – and therefore the amendment – was abandoned when the election was called. In a reply to another user, the original poster instead said they were referring to an amendment which 'has been tabled by Tonia Antoniazzi to the government's Crime & Policing Bill.' Ms Antoniazzi has indeed filed an amendment to the current crime and policing bill which is making its way through Parliament. The two amendments are very similar in their wording, although not identical. What does the amendment say? Ms Antoniazzi's amendment is called NC1 and reads: 'Removal of women from the criminal law related to abortion. For the purposes of the law related to abortion, including sections 58 and 59 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 and the Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929, no offence is committed by a woman acting in relation to her own pregnancy.' Ms Antoniazzi's explanatory note which accompanies the amendment states that the change would 'disapply existing criminal law' on abortion from 'women acting in relation to her own pregnancy.' This is at any point in the pregnancy, the note states. It adds: 'It would not change any law regarding the provision of abortion services within a healthcare setting, including but not limited to the time limit, telemedicine, the grounds for abortion, or the requirement for two doctors' approval.' What does the current law on abortion say? The 1967 Abortion Act made abortion legal in some circumstances. In its current form the act allows an abortion if the pregnancy is terminated by a registered medical practitioner, and as long as the woman is not more than 24 weeks pregnant. The act also sets other restrictions on when an abortion can be legally carried out, including the need for sign-off by two registered medical practitioners. Outside of the parameters in which the 1967 act made abortion legal in certain circumstances, the practice is still governed by acts passed in 1929 and 1861 which can punish abortion with life imprisonment. When will the amendment be voted on? The Crime and Policing Bill, which this amendment has been attached to, has passed its first and second reading in the House of Commons. It is currently in the so-called report stage and a third reading in the Commons is due to happen 'on a date to be confirmed'. In a first reading the bill is presented to the Commons and not debated. The bill's general principles are debated at the second reading, then amendments come at committee and report stage. At the third reading MPs decide on whether to pass the bill. If they do it then goes onto the House of Lords. At the time of writing there was no sign of the crime and policing bill on the House of Commons schedule for July 4. In fact that day is a Friday and the House of Commons normally only sits on Mondays to Thursdays, sometimes sitting on Fridays to consider private member's bills. The crime and policing bill is not a private member's bill. Would this legalise abortion up to birth? No, the bill would decriminalise abortion up to birth for the pregnant woman, not legalise it. Decriminalising something means that while it is still illegal, breaking that law does not carry any penalty. The suggested amendment would only deal with 'a woman acting in relation to her own pregnancy'. Therefore the amendment does not change the current law on whether doctors can provide an abortion after 24 weeks. Other safeguards around legally provided abortions remain unchanged. Doctors and others who provided an abortion outside of the legally defined parameters could still be punished. It is just the pregnant woman who would escape punishment in such a scenario. Thread of posts on X (archived) UK Parliament – Dame Diana Johnson's amendment (archived) UK Parliament – Criminal Justice Bill, news (archived) Post referring to amendment (archived post and thread) House of Commons – Crime and Policing Bill, Amendment Paper (archived) Criminal Justice Bill – Cross-party amendment briefing (archived) – Abortion Act 1967 (archived) – Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929 (archived) – Offences against the Person Act 1861, section 58 (archived) – Offences against the Person Act 1861, section 59 (archived) UK Parliament – Crime and Policing Bill, details (archived) UK Parliament – Crime and Policing Bill, news (archived) UK Parliament – Bill stages (archived) UK Parliament – What's on: Friday 4 July 2025 (archived) – Guide to Parliamentary Work (archived)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store