New cheapest EV in Britain revealed as Tesla rival knocks £1,500 off price of compact city car
DRIVE DOWN COSTS New cheapest EV in Britain revealed as Tesla rival knocks £1,500 off price of compact city car
A NEW Chinese electric vehicle has grabbed the crown as Britain's cheapest EV – knocking its rival off the top spot with a surprise price cut.
The Leapmotor T03 city car is now on sale for just £14,495 after the manufacturer slashed £1,500 from the original list price.
5
The Leapmotor T03 city car is now on sale for just £14,495
5
That makes it £500 cheaper than the Dacia Spring
Credit: Newspress
That makes it £500 cheaper than the Dacia Spring, which had held the budget EV title for the past year at £14,995.
The price drop applies immediately across the UK as Leapmotor looks to get ahead of the Government's new Electric Car Grant, which is set to come into force next month.
The firm, which now sells its models through Vauxhall and Peugeot showrooms as part of a deal with European giant Stellantis, says it is offering customers an instant saving while the official subsidy remains weeks away.
Based in China, Leapmotor is also cutting the cost of its larger C10 SUV by £3,750.
The new price tag of £32,750 puts it well under the Government's £37,000 grant threshold.
Both cars qualify for 0 per cent finance deals and come with long warranties — four years on the car and eight years on the battery.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander confirmed the Government's new scheme on Monday.
The Electric Car Grant will offer between £1,500 and £3,750 off qualifying electric vehicles, depending on how sustainably they are made.
However, it's not available yet, as carmakers must apply for approval — a process that could take weeks.
That's left firms like Leapmotor in limbo.
The brand says its 'Leap-Grant' is a proactive move to give drivers savings now, before the Government scheme kicks in.
Managing director Damien Dally said the company wants to give drivers clarity, confidence and immediate savings.
But questions hang over whether Leapmotor — and other Chinese EV makers — will qualify at all.
To get the full Government grant, manufacturers must meet green targets under the Science-Based Targets initiative, a framework that rates the environmental impact of vehicle production, including energy use at factories.
Transport Minister Lilian Greenwood has warned that vehicles made in China may not be eligible.
Speaking on the BBC's Today programme, she said factories powered by coal are unlikely to meet the Government's strict criteria.
She added that only brands reaching minimum environmental standards will be approved for taxpayer support.
This has sparked tension with the Chinese government.
A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in London said the UK must follow World Trade Organisation rules and avoid discriminatory policies.
They warned they are monitoring the situation closely and would defend the rights of Chinese companies.
'It swallows up the potholes and the bumps' cries car dealership owner over popular motor brand ideal for the countryside
Even BYD — China's biggest EV manufacturer — has confirmed it is applying for the grant but, like Leapmotor, has yet to hear back.
There's also doubt over the Dacia Spring's eligibility.
Although Dacia is a Renault-owned brand, the Spring is built in Wuhan, China, at a joint venture facility shared with Dongfeng Motor Group.
Seven low-cost electric cars expected to benefit from the grant — including the Dacia Spring, MG4, Peugeot e-208, Fiat 500e and Volkswagen ID.3 — though most will only get the lower £1,500 discount unless they can prove greener production credentials.
But with the Government now focusing on sustainability standards, many of those could also miss out on the full grant unless their makers can prove they meet the green benchmarks.
Tax payers are, however, footing the bill for the £650million subsidy scheme, including for EVs leased through Motability, prompting criticism from some quarters.
Commentators have questioned whether public funds should be used to make new cars cheaper for wealthier drivers at a time when many families are struggling to afford food.
The Government is also promising £63million to improve the UK's public charging infrastructure and £25million to help people without off-street parking charge their EVs at home.
But even Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander admitted she doesn't currently drive an electric vehicle herself, citing the cost.
For now, Leapmotor is pressing ahead with its own incentive.
The T03 is being offered on a four-year personal contract purchase plan at just £169 per month with a £169 deposit.
The larger C10 SUV comes in at £319 per month, also with a matching deposit and 0 per cent APR.
Both offers run until 30 September.
Whether the brand qualifies for official Government support or not, Leapmotor has made its move — and, for now at least, it means Britain's cheapest electric car is Chinese, costs just under £14.5k.
5
The new price tag of £32,750 puts it well under the Government's £37,000 grant threshold
Credit: Leapmotor
5
But even Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander admitted she doesn't currently drive an electric vehicle herself, citing the cost
Credit: Leapmotor
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Car
10 minutes ago
- Auto Car
New Tesla Model Y squares up to Skoda Enyaq in family EV showdown!
Open gallery Model Y or Enyaq - which takes the family EV crown? Quick steering and a more rear-biased drive set-up make the Tesla seem agile Minimalist Tesla interior feels solidly built overall and provides good space Skoda's front end will tend to run wide of the apex if you push hard Skoda's cabin creates a slightly more upmarket ambience and is roomy Close Tesla's in a spot of bother. Its sales across Europe have dropped and profits have taken an even more vertiginous slump. Adding to its woes was the recent news that it was forced to issue its eighth (yes, you read that right) recall of its cubist Cybertruck, this time to remedy its propensity for shedding stainless steel bodywork. So what's going on? If you look at many of the headlines, the finger points directly at the company's controversialist CEO, Elon Musk. His appetite for attracting attention of the wrong kind certainly hasn't helped lure customers into showrooms – although it has created a cottage industry in 'not in my name' bumper stickers – but as ever the answer is, well, more complicated than that. For starters, there's the current tariff situation. Then there's the fact that Tesla is actually more of a tech company than a car firm, which brings its own challenges. Like a smartphone manufacturer, it's all about the software, and in this respect it's one of the best in the business, streets ahead of the legacy brands (and that also includes its understanding of battery chemistry). Yet this means it doesn't follow some of the tried and tested methods of the established practitioners, such as model cycles that include visually appealing mid-life refreshes designed to persuade people to part with their cash for cars that might otherwise be getting close to their sell-by date. By contrast, Tesla's line-up comes across visually as a bit old hat, as if the company has been peddling the same, unchanged product from day one. The recent Model 3 'Highland' is a case in point. It's a thoroughly overhauled car, but to the casual observer it could just as easily be the 2017 original. The same can be said of the Model S and Model X, which have both benefited from top to bottom technical titivation but are indistinguishable from their decade-old progenitors. However, the stakes are higher for the Model Y, which is the brand's best-seller and until very recently topped the sales charts across Europe. As a result, Tesla has taken a leaf out of rivals' books and delivered a facelift that will leave buyers in no doubt this is a box-fresh proposition. Speaking of which, the Tesla isn't the only family-sized all-electric EV to have gone under the knife. The Skoda Enyaq Coupé (and its more sensible SUV sibling) has always been one of our favourite protagonists in this corner of the market, and five years on from its debut the Czech machine has been treated to the industry-standard nip and tuck. Looks are clearly subjective but, to our eyes, Tesla's tweaks are more eye-catching. You can see the DNA of the original car between the A- and C-pillars, but at the front there's a Cybertruck-inspired nose complete with a pencil-thin LED light bar, while the rear features a neat-looking, indirectly lit, full-width tail-light. By contrast, Skoda has grafted its bold new 'Tech-Deck' nose onto the Enyaq, but the rest of the car's appearance has been left largely untouched. It's a similar story inside, where the Skoda looks and feels very much the same as the old car. There's a revised 13in infotainment screen that looks slicker and responds more swiftly but otherwise it's business as usual. This means that, unlike in the Model Y, you do get some handy physical shortcut keys and a separate display ahead of the driver for speed and range information. As ever, the Tesla's dashboard is dominated by its centrally mounted infotainment screen, which literally controls all of the car's major functions (although, unlike in the Model 3, there is an actual column stalk for the indicators. Hallelujah!). Still, the set-up is one of the best around, proving a doddle to navigate and always responding crisply to your demands. It's sufficiently good that you almost don't miss the odd button or two. With its greater mix of rich materials and more complex dashboard and door mouldings, the Skoda's cabin looks a little more upmarket than the Model Y's, but in terms of touchy-feely perceived quality, there's little to separate the two. In fact, it's the uplift in solidity that you notice most in the starkly minimalist cabin of the Tesla. There are still some areas of the car that look a little hand-finished – the cheap LED spotlight in the boot and the thin fabric covering the A-pillar-mounted tweeters – but overall the Model Y is full of appealing materials and exhibits a tight fit and finish. The Tesla also scores strongly for space and versatility, which is surely one of the biggest considerations with cars like these. There's a large load area with plenty of underfloor storage compartments, plus the trademark 117-litre frunk. (The Skoda's bonnet lifts to reveal various EV ancillaries but no space for luggage overspill from its 570-litre boot.)Rear occupants in the Model Y also have plenty of head and leg room, while a powered reclining backrest and completely flat floor add to the feeling of comfort. What's more, the addition of a small touchscreen now allows occupants to adjust the temperature and switch on their heated seats without having to issue orders to the driver. Up front, the sense of space is enhanced by the low scuttle and large windscreen, which helps deliver a more panoramic view of the road than in the Skoda. However, this Sportline-trim Enyaq hits back with heavily bolstered front seats that offer greater support. Grab the tape measure and you'll find the Enyaq pretty much matches the Model Y for accommodation. Where the Skoda edges ahead is in those thoughtful details that have become a calling card for the Czech brand, such as the umbrellas secreted in the front doors and the multitude of handy boot dividers, hooks and nets. That said, you're unlikely to run out of room for odds and ends in the Model Y, with its large, carpeted door bins, cupholders galore and a lidded cubby between the front seats that's so deep you'll need to send Lassie for help if you ever fall in. So it's even-stevens for practicality, but what about performance and poise? Once again, our two dual-motor contenders are separated by the width of a Tesla key card, but they go about their business in slightly different ways. If outright urge is your thing, though, the Model Y is a slam-dunk choice. With 375bhp and a lower, 1997kg kerb weight, the Tesla is seriously rapid and feels especially so in Sport mode, when its throttle response is even sharper. The 282bhp Enyaq, with a claimed 0-62mph of 6.7sec, is no slouch but it's left gasping in its rival's wake on a straight road. Throw some corners into the mix and there's less clear air between the two. With its quick, albeit lifeless, steering, the Tesla feels more agile – an impression exaggerated by a rear-biased power delivery that allows you to tighten your cornering line with a dose of throttle. Special mention also has to go to the new brake-by-wire set-up, which offers a firm pedal and plenty of progression. With its slower but better-weighted steering, the Skoda feels a little lazier in its reactions, its narrower-section front tyres gently squealing into safe understeer at the limit. Yet despite its heftier kerb weight, the Enyaq feels better tied down over bumpier stretches of Tarmac, containing body movements more effectively than the Tesla, which can hop and corkscrew a little when pressing on. Traction isn't a problem for either all-wheel-drive vehicle. The Skoda maintains a narrow advantage when it comes to cruising comfort. Both have firm low-speed rides – although the newly softened Tesla is much better here than its predecessor – that calm down at speed, and while each delivers decent refinement, the Enyaq does a marginally better job of isolating you from road and wind noise. You can also tailor the regen brake assistance in each – a first for Tesla – although the Model Y has a more effective one-pedal calibration. As you would expect, both cars have driver aids galore – and you'll be either fine or frustrated with that depending on your point of view. On the plus side, turning off the lane keeping assistance is a doddle in either car and the other systems are as unobtrusive as they get these days. Mind you, because the Model Y uses plenty of cameras (the Enyaq favours radar), its various warnings become increasingly inconsistent as each lens becomes coated with road grime. So we have established that each of these cars is practical, delivers all the performance you're ever likely to need and, while you're unlikely to pick either for a dawn raid on your favourite roads, they both steer and stop with admirable accuracy and agility. Tesla Model Y vs Skoda Enyaq Coupe: Verdict Ultimately, then, it comes down to the numbers – and again the margins are tight, although the more cost-effective contender probably isn't the one you would expect. When it comes to claimed range, the Model Y totes a figure of 364 miles as standard, reduced to 353 miles with the optional wheels of our test car, while the Skoda stretches to 334 miles. Thanks to Tesla's mastery of battery chemistry, motor efficiency and (relatively) lightweight construction methods, the Model Y gets closer to its WLTP numbers in real-world use. Over the course of our test, it delivered an impressive efficiency return of 3.8mpkWh, whereas the Enyaq could manage only 3.4mpkWh. Then there's the thorny issue of cash. In Long Range AWD form, the Tesla's sticker price is £51,990, a scant £1330 more than the Enyaq. Yet nobody turns up to a dealer with a suitcase full of banknotes for cars like these: they plonk down a deposit and finance the rest. Put your pen to a PCP deal and over four years you'll shell out £499 a month for the Model Y and £527 for the Skoda. Again, not that much in it, but there's something significant about Tesla getting one over on a brand famed for delivering value for money. Are these cost savings enough to swing the result in favour of the Model Y? By the tightest of margins, we would say yes. Sure, Tesla has some PR issues bubbling away in the background, but as a spacious, sensible and swift family wagon that packs genuinely innovative engineering, the new Model Y makes a compelling choice. Maybe that will give Elon something to smile about. 1st. Tesla Model Y The revised Tesla Model Y fixes most of its predecessor's flaws yet retains its efficiency, performance and impressive practicality. 2nd. Skoda Enyaq Coupe It's a close-run thing for the Skoda Enyaq, which in facelifted form remains a refined, thoughtfully designed and thoroughly likeable car. Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you'll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here. Next Prev In partnership with
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Resurrect HS2 northern leg to boost rail freight capacity, say UK manufacturers
Manufacturers will press ministers today to resurrect plans for a high-speed rail line reaching Leeds and Manchester as part of a large strategic investment to get lorries off Britain's roads and cut emissions. Business lobby group Make UK and Barclays Corporate Bank said research showed companies believe the move would significantly increase passenger numbers and free up capacity for rail freight on existing lines. A survey of 200 manufacturers showed that nine in 10 believe the original high-speed rail line HS2 should still go ahead, while a similar number said there should be greater investment in faster connections between Liverpool, Manchester, Sheffield, Hull and Newcastle. HS2 has suffered huge cost overruns and is being overhauled under new management. The transport minister, Heidi Alexander, said this year that problems with the line would delay its opening beyond 2033. Many of Labour's regional mayors support moves to extend the line to Manchester to boost economic growth across the north of England. However, Keir Starmer, the prime minister, has indicated there is little cash available to extend HS2, even under 'HS2-lite' plans that would have allowed for more capacity north of Birmingham. Verity Davidge, the director of policy at Make UK, said: 'It's clear that the current levels of rail capacity aren't suitable for the levels of freight traffic the government is predicting in the future. 'As a result, if industry is to make greater use of rail then we need the extra capacity which a high-speed link for passenger traffic would free up. 'This would provide a valuable opportunity to invest in multi-mode hubs which would improve connectivity between our major ports and better integrate road and rail routes through the spine of the country.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion The survey found that road is overwhelmingly the main mode of transport for nine in 10 manufacturers, with six in 10 regarding road investment as critical for their just-in-time operations. This compares with just under half (46%) for investment in ports and just under four in 10 for rail. Lee Collinson, the head of manufacturing, transport and logistics at Barclays UK Corporate Bank, said: 'Upgrading and integrating our road, rail and port systems is crucial for boosting productivity, decarbonising transport and supporting long-term competitiveness.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Two days less holiday? France is up in arms but my sympathy is limited
France is skint, but the French are in denial. To judge by the howls of outrage from the left and the hard right of the French political spectrum, you would think the prime minister, François Bayrou, had just taken a Javier Milei-style chainsaw to public services, announced Doge-style mass layoffs or imposed swingeing pay cuts. But it was Bayrou's suggestion that the French should give up two of their 11 cherished public holidays – Easter Monday and 8 May, the anniversary of the end of the second world war in Europe – and work instead to increase economic output and hence government revenue that provoked the anger. Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the leader of the hard-left France Unbowed (LFI) party, accused the centrist prime minister of leading a 'race towards an economic, financial and social abyss for the greater suffering of all'. The Socialist party leader, Olivier Faure, described the proposals as 'a demolition plan for our French model', and Jordan Bardella, president of the hard-right National Rally (RN), said the the proposal to cancel the two holidays was 'a direct attack on our history'. The hard left and the populist right threatened to bring down the government with no confidence motions in the autumn, when the budget will be put to a hung parliament, as they did with Bayrou's short-lived predecessor, Michel Barnier, last year. As is so often the case, the sound and fury in the echo chamber of French political rhetoric is out of all proportion to reality. Bayrou proposes a standstill in public sector pay, pensions, welfare benefits and tax thresholds in 2026, which, with inflation forecast to increase slightly to about 1.4% next year, means a modest erosion of living standards for most people and a slightly increased tax take. Better-off pensioners will pay more tax, poorer ones will pay less. The measures are supposed to reduce the deficit by €43.8bn to 4.6% of economic output next year. Only defence spending will be increased, in line with France's commitment to Nato, given Europe's deteriorating security situation. This is hardly a draconian austerity purge for a country that had a deficit of 5.8% of GDP last year – the highest in the euro area – and which by most rational measurements is living beyond its means. National debt has risen to 113% of GDP, higher than any EU country except Greece and Italy. But while their debt piles are falling, France's keeps on growing. Public spending accounts for 56.5% of GDP in France, the second highest level in the EU after Finland. Despite the centrist president Emmanuel Macron's intention to reduce the tax burden and get more French people into work when he took office in 2017, a series of crises – the revolt of the gilets jaunes against a carbon tax, the Covid-19 pandemic and the effects of Russia's war in Ukraine – triggered more state expenditure. In 2023, France's tax-to-GDP ratio was 43.8%, significantly higher than the average of 33.9% in advanced economies. The country has too many layers of public administration, which together employ 5.8 million people – 20% of the total workforce. Bayrou proposed that one in three retiring civil servants should not be replaced, drawing immediate protests from trade unions representing teachers, health workers and the police. Perhaps the most telling criticism came from Édouard Philippe, Macron's first prime minister and a likely centrist presidential candidate, who said Bayrou's package contained no structural reforms of failing public policies and was just an emergency plan to limit the damage without solving the problem. Sign up to This is Europe The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment after newsletter promotion Axing a couple of public holidays would go some way towards narrowing the gap between the number of hours worked per inhabitant in France compared with competitors such as Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK – not to mention the United States or South Korea. But the French are militantly resistant to any attempt to remove acquired social rights, regardless of the economic situation, changing demography or dire public finances, as they showed with sustained social unrest over Macron's raising of the retirement age to 64. It's not that French workers actually work much less than their European counterparts. But France has less of its population in employment because of a combination of earlier retirement, later entry into the labour market, higher unemployment and welfare dependency. 'The markets and the EU are watching us,' Pierre Moscovici, the president of the French court of accounts and a former finance minister and European commissioner, said after presenting an annual report that warned that the country's debt was approaching a tipping point. 'As demanding and difficult as it may be, getting our public finances under control from 2026 is imperative for debt sustainability,' he added. France has long enjoyed the indulgence of bond market vigilantes because of its ability to raise revenue and a presumption that its debt was implicitly backed by Germany, since a French financial crisis would trigger severe turbulence in the eurozone. But several credit ratings agencies have recently lowered France's sovereign rating because of a concern that the government will be unable to enact serious deficit-cutting measures without a parliamentary majority. French people need to get real about their fiscal predicament before it descends into an acute crisis. So far there is little sign of that reality dawning on either the political class or the population. The left just keeps repeating that the government should soak the rich and reimpose a wealth tax, even though that would make little more than a symbolic dent in the deficit. The populist right argues that the state could save all the money it needs if only it stopped paying benefits to immigrants. Those numbers don't add up either. With so many politicians encouraging voters to go on believing that 'public money' grows on trees or can be borrowed in unlimited amounts – Mélenchon has argued in the past that France should default on its debt – it is hard to have a rational debate on the budget. The stage is set for another battle of wills in parliament, and probably in the street. If the uneasy grouping of centrist and conservative parties supporting Bayrou cannot get something resembling his proposed savings through the National Assembly this autumn, France may be plunged into a real financial crisis that could play into the hands of Marine Le Pen's National Rally ahead of the next presidential election, due in 2027. Paul Taylor is a senior visiting fellow at the European Policy Centre
