
Congo, M23 rebels pledge to reach peace deal next month
Representatives for both sides were at a ceremony in Doha on Saturday. They signed a declaration of principles laying out the new timeline, a copy of which was obtained by Reuters.
The ceremony followed months of Qatari mediation after talks began in April.
The United States, which has hosted separate talks between the governments of Congo and Rwanda, has exerted pressure to finalize a durable peace deal in Congo. President Donald Trump has made clear he hopes that would spur Western investment into a country rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper, lithium and other minerals.
Last month, the Rwandan and Congolese foreign ministers signed a peace deal and met with Trump at the White House.
Trump at the time invited Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi and Rwandan President Paul Kagame to Washington to sign a package of agreements potentially including economic deals.
M23, in the latest of a series of uprisings, has controlled Goma, eastern Congo's largest city, since late January, and has also made gains across North Kivu and South Kivu provinces.
Rwanda has long denied allegations it has helped M23, which has seized more territory in Congo than it has ever previously held. The fighting has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands more this year, while escalating the risk of a full-scale regional war. Several of Congo's neighbours had troops deployed in eastern Congo when the advance began.
'New phase of partnership'
Qatar's Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Al-Khulaifi said at a news conference that Saturday's declaration "lays the groundwork for a new phase of partnership among the various components of society in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — including armed movements that have chosen to prioritize the greater national interest."
It was brought about by talks that followed a surprise meeting between Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi and his Rwandan counterpar,t Paul Kagame, brokered by Qatar in March, during which they called for an "immediate and unconditional" ceasefire.
Congo previously rejected the idea of holding talks with M23, branding it a terrorist group.
While denying it has supported M23, Rwanda has said its forces have acted in self-defence against Congo's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
Points of contention
Sources in both delegations have expressed frustration with the pace of negotiations in Doha and the lack of progress on confidence-building measures, including the release of M23 members held by Congo and the reopening of banks in rebel-held territory.
The declaration of principles does not resolve those issues, instead committing the parties to "creating the necessary conditions" to eventually do so.
It also does not address bigger questions concerning the possible Rwandan and M23 withdrawals from eastern Congo. It says Congo and M23 agree state authority should be restored "on all national territories" as part of an eventual peace agreement, but does not give details.
Congo government spokesperson Patrick Muyaya nevertheless said on X on Saturday that the declaration "takes into account the red lines we have always defended, including the non-negotiable withdrawal" of M23.
Negotiations for a peace agreement are to start no later than Aug. 8, according to the declaration, which would give the parties less than two weeks to finalize a deal if they stick to their new Aug. 18 deadline.
"We are confident and we are hopeful," Massad Boulos, Trump's senior adviser for Africa, told Reuters after Saturday's ceremony in Doha, adding that Tshiskedi and Kagame "have both committed to resolving this."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
29 minutes ago
- CBC
Trump threatens to hold up stadium deal if Washington Commanders don't revert to old name deemed offensive
President also voices desire for MLB's Cleveland Guardians to revert to old moniker Image | 1255944811 Caption: A hand-painted concrete barrier stands in the parking lot of Northwest Stadium — home of the NFL's Washington Commanders — in Landover, Maryland, in 2020, prior to the franchise's name and logo rebrand. () President Donald Trump is threatening to hold up a new stadium deal for Washington's NFL team if it does not restore its old name of the Redskins, which was considered offensive to Native Americans. Trump also said Sunday that he wants Cleveland's baseball team to revert to its former name, the Indians, saying there was a "big clamoring for this" as well. The Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians have had their current names since the 2022 seasons and both have said they have no plans to change them back. Trump said the Washington football team would be "much more valuable" if it restored its old name. "I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original `Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, `Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington," Trump said on his social media site. His latest interest in changing the name reflects his broader effort to roll back changes that followed a national debate on cultural sensitivity and racial justice. The team announced it would drop the Redskins name and the Indian head logo in 2020 during a broader reckoning with systemic racism and police brutality. The Commanders and the District of Columbia government announced a deal earlier this year to build a new home for the football team at the site the old RFK Stadium, the place the franchise called home for more than three decades. Trump's ability to hold up the deal remains to be seen. President Joe Biden signed a bill in January that transferred the land from the federal government to the District of Columbia. The provision was part of a short-term spending bill passed by Congress in December. While D.C. residents elect a mayor, a city council and commissioners to run day-to-day operations, Congress maintains control of the city's budget. Teams have quashed speculation of reverting Josh Harris, whose group bought the Commanders from former owner Dan Snyder in 2023, said earlier this year the name was here to stay. Not long after taking over, Harris quieted speculation about going back to Redskins, saying that would not happen. The team did not immediately respond to a request for comment following Trump's statement. The Washington team started in Boston as the Redskins in 1933 before moving to the nation's capital four years later. The Cleveland Guardians' president of baseball operations, Chris Antonetti, indicated before Sunday's game against the Athletics that there weren't any plans to revisit the name change. "We understand there are different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago, but obviously it's a decision we made. We've got the opportunity to build a brand as the Guardians over the last four years and are excited about the future that's in front of us," he said. Cleveland announced in December 2020 it would drop Indians. It announced the switch to Guardians in July 2021. In 2018, the team phased out "Chief Wahoo" as its primary logo. The name changes had their share of supporters and critics as part of the national discussions about logos and names considered racist. Cleveland baseball team's name change sparks hopes other teams follow suit Trump posted Sunday afternoon that "The Owner of the Cleveland Baseball Team, Matt Dolan, who is very political, has lost three Elections in a row because of that ridiculous name change. What he doesn't understand is that if he changed the name back to the Cleveland Indians, he might actually win an Election. Indians are being treated very unfairly. MAKE INDIANS GREAT AGAIN (MIGA)!" Matt Dolan, the son of the late Larry Dolan, no longer has a role with the Guardians. He ran the team's charity endeavours until 2016. Matt Dolan was a candidate in the Ohio U.S. Senate elections in 2022 and '24, but lost. Washington and Cleveland share another thing in common. David Blitzer is a member of Harris' ownership group with the Commanders and holds a minority stake in the Guardians.


Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Why Solana Is Surging Today
Key Points There's no obvious reason behind Solana's weekend move. The U.S. House of Representatives voted in favor of several important crypto bills last week. Institutional interest around Solana appears to be growing. 10 stocks we like better than Solana › Since Friday afternoon at 4 p.m., the price of Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) had surged nearly 10%, as of 11:09 a.m. ET today. While there's not an exact reason for the move, a few events could be driving it. Institutional interest picking up Last week, the U.S. House of Representatives voted in favor of three crypto bills that investors view as bullish for the entire sector, two of which would create a framework for stablecoins and digital assets. President Donald Trump recently signed the Genius Act (the one for stablecoins) into law because both the House and Senate approved the bill. But it's also become clear that institutional interest in Solana is picking up. According to CoinShares' digital fund flows data, more than $39 million flowed into Solana-linked financial products last week. CoinShares also estimates that year-to-date inflows total $245 million. Furthermore, there have now reportedly been seven applications for a Solana spot exchange-traded fund (ETF). Crypto spot ETFs increase liquidity for tokens and have previously proven to be bullish. There are already extremely high odds that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will eventually approve a spot-Solana ETF before the year ends. A token to watch Solana is one of the few cryptocurrencies with immense potential. The technical strength of its network allows it to, in theory, process tens of thousands of transactions per second. But it's still hard to translate this capability into a price target. For this reason, I'd recommend keeping positions smaller and more speculative right now. Should you invest $1,000 in Solana right now? Before you buy stock in Solana, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Solana wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025


Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Stellantis warns of more tariff impacts as it reports US$2.7B loss
Stellantis expects more impact from U.S. tariffs on vehicles and auto part imports in the second half of 2025, the company said on Monday as it reported a preliminary 2.3 billion euro (US$2.7 billion) net loss for the first six months of the year. The carmaker, which owns a sprawling portfolio of brands including Jeep, Ram, Peugeot and Fiat, said President Donald Trump's tariffs had cost it 300 million euros so far as the company reduced vehicle shipments and cut some production to adjust manufacturing levels. But Chief Financial Officer Doug Ostermann told analysts that the 300 million euro impact was not representative of what the group expects for the second half, as tariffs only came into effect part way through the first half. 'We'll see significantly more in the second half unless things change … given the current outlook, I would expect to see that figure probably double in the second half or more,' he said, adding that Stellantis was seeing a total full-year impact of between 1 and 1.5 billion euros. Story continues below advertisement 2:01 Some small auto businesses suffering under U.S. Tariff threats Stellantis, which under new CEO Antonio Filosa faces the challenge of revamping its product ranges in Europe and the United States, said it also booked 3.3 billion euros in pre-tax charges for the first half. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy These were due to program cancellations, including a hydrogen fuel cell project and money set aside for fines linked to U.S. pre-Trump carbon emission regulation. It was also investing more in popular hybrid cars in Europe and large gasoline-powered models in the U.S. market. Last year, more than 40 per cent of the 1.2 million vehicles Stellantis sold in the United States were imports, mostly from Mexico and Canada where Trump has imposed tariffs of 25 per cent. Imports from the EU face levies of 30 per cent, though these have been deferred to Aug. 1. Earnings miss In April this year, the company said it had reduced vehicle imports in response to tariffs and would calibrate 'production and employment to reduce impacts on profitability.' Story continues below advertisement The automaker's first-half results were below consensus, according to analysts at Jefferies, Bernstein and Citi. But despite the earnings miss, restructuring steps taken by Stellantis 'suggest decisive actions,' Bernstein analysts said. Milan-listed shares in the automaker closed up 1.5 per cent after falling as much as 3.9 per cent in morning trade. They are down 35 per cent since the start of the year. In April, Stellantis suspended its profit forecasts for 2025 due to uncertainty about tariffs, but said on Monday it was publishing its unaudited preliminary financial data to align analyst forecasts with the group's actual performance. Asked whether Stellantis' situation was similar to that of rival Renault's, whose shares fell as much as 18 per cent last week when it issued a profit warning on the back of softening demand for cars and vans in Europe, Ostermann said Europe was a 'very competitive environment.' 8:50 Automotive parts manufacturers association doesn't want countertariffs 'I won't disagree with our counterparts at Renault,' he said. Story continues below advertisement Stellantis' first-half loss, versus a 5.6 billion euro net profit a year earlier, underscores the tough challenges for Filosa, who was appointed in May after a disastrous performance in the company's crucial U.S. market in 2024 forced the ousting of former boss Carlos Tavares. In a letter to employees seen by Reuters the new CEO on Monday promised that 2025 would be 'a year of gradual and sustainable improvement' after a 'tough first half, with increasing external headwinds.' Stellantis, which will publish its final results for the first half on July 29, said it burnt through 2.3 billion euros of cash in the January-June period. –Additional reporting by Enrico Sciacovelli; Writing by Giulio Piovaccari and Nick Carey; Editing by Louise Heavens and David Holmes