Cardinals notebook: What we know about Iván Herrera's hamstring, Michael McGreevy's next start
ST. LOUIS — The St. Louis Cardinals hoped Friday would bring optimistic news regarding Iván Herrera and his sore left hamstring.
Instead, they were greeted with a grim prognosis. Herrera, the team's most impactful hitter, could miss up to six weeks with a Grade 2 hamstring strain. The Cardinals were made aware of the injury a few hours before Friday's game, a 6-1 win over the Cincinnati Reds spurred by six scoreless innings from Andre Pallante. Still, the ramifications of losing Herrera for an extended period could be severe for St. Louis.
Advertisement
Herrera sustained the injury in the top of the sixth inning during Game 1 of Thursday's doubleheader against the Chicago White Sox, rounding first base after singling to right. Herrera, the starting catcher in Game 1, did not initially think the injury was serious and remained in the game for two more innings. When he continued to feel a twinge, the Cardinals removed him.
'I tried to go for two bases and I felt a pull in my hamstring, a small spot,' Herrera said. 'I didn't think it was bad. … I didn't feel uncomfortable, but they did take me out of the game.'
'I thought I could keep playing,' he added. 'I was hoping that I could play today. But (the team) said if I keep playing with it, I risk missing all year.'
Herrera underwent imaging Friday morning at Busch Stadium, which revealed a significant strain will keep him out a minimum of two weeks, but likely much more. The Cardinals' initial recovery timeline ranged anywhere from two to six weeks. Herrera was placed on the 10-day injured list Friday afternoon, and the team recalled Thomas Saggese as the corresponding move.
INF Thomas Saggese has been recalled from Memphis (AAA).
C/DH Iván Herrera has been placed on the 10-day IL (left hamstring strain). pic.twitter.com/tR4KQIdgq6
— St. Louis Cardinals (@Cardinals) June 20, 2025
Being without Herrera for any length of time is not ideal for St. Louis. Despite his defense continuing to be a work in progress, Herrera cemented himself in the starting lineup because of his bat. His .320/.392/.533 line is the most productive of any Cardinal, and his eight homers are the fourth-most on the team. The 25-year-old already missed a month of the season after sustaining a bone bruise on his left knee in early April, yet he still leads most of the roster in OPS (.925) and RBIs (36).
'It's unfortunate, he's been doing a really nice job,' manager Oli Marmol said of Herrera. 'Swinging a really hot bat, just a real threat offensively. We're going to miss that, but it's an opportunity for someone else to step in.'
Advertisement
The Cardinals will have to get creative in Herrera's absence. They'll also need multiple players to step up during the next two weeks. St. Louis (41-35, 4 1/2 games back in the National League Central) is entering a pivotal stretch of schedule where it will face division opponents in 12 of its next 15 games. The Cardinals also do not have a scheduled team off day until July 3. Here's what to watch as the Cardinals navigate a serious blow to their everyday lineup — during a time where they could hardly afford it.
For the last several weeks, Marmol's lineup configuration resembled solving a Rubik's Cube. Keeping Herrera as the starting designated hitter kept the best bat in the lineup, but made it impossible for Marmol to play Gorman, Jordan Walker, Burleson, Lars Nootbaar and Victor Scott II in the lineup at the same time.
Gorman and Burleson were the players who saw their playing time cut the most, despite both hitters swinging much better bats lately. Gorman entered play Friday hitting .286 with three homers and a .946 OPS in June, while Burleson is slugging a whopping .400/431/.600 and also has three home runs this month. What's been most encouraging about both Gorman and Burleson's performance is that it has come regardless of opposing handedness. The two lefties are having no problem hitting lefty pitching lately, and Marmol is eager to play both hitters more.
'Gorman has shown over time that he can handle lefties, it's more so if his swing is right,' Marmol explained. 'When he's feeling good, I don't think it's a matter of handedness, where Burleson is showing us that he can stay in there really well (against lefties) right now.'
Three-run Burly Bomb! 🌮 pic.twitter.com/DLzb5Orgj1
— St. Louis Cardinals (@Cardinals) June 19, 2025
The Cardinals believe they can increase playing time for Gorman and Burleson by utilizing the designated hitter role and also working in consistent rest days for Walker. Asked if there was some hesitancy about carrying a lefty-heavy lineup (Brendan Donovan, Nootbaar and Scott II will continue in their usual roles), Marmol acknowledged that could be a concern but said: 'It is what it is. You take your shot with what you have, and we can give guys a blow with Saggese from the right side.'
Advertisement
Expect St. Louis to use the designated hitter role as a carousel, similar to how it operated during Herrera's first IL stint. Gorman and Burleson can trade off in that role, with Burleson also available to give Willson Contreras time off at first base or Walker in right field. The Cardinals could also elect to start Donovan in left field and Gorman at second base on days Nootbaar needs off, but that will raise questions about how much they are willing to sacrifice defensively to prioritize offense.
It's not an ideal situation, but if the team is looking for a silver lining, it's that Burleson and Gorman look ready to pick up in Herrera's place.
'This will give more opportunity to Gorman (and Burleson) to step in there and show what they're capable of, which will be fun to watch as well,' Marmol said.
Saggese was the logical call-up, with Yohel Pozo available to back up Pedro Pagés behind the plate. While there will be a clamor to play Saggese every day, Marmol made it clear the infielder's role is to provide depth.
The 23-year-old appeared in 15 games in April for St. Louis before he was optioned back to Memphis to see more consistent playing time. He's hitting .317 with an .847 OPS over 42 Triple-A games, but his ability to play around the infield is where he brings the Cardinals the most value. Marmol wants to prioritize Gorman's and Burleson's playing time, though there will still be opportunities for Saggese to play.
Thomas Saggese is red hot for the @MemphisRedbirds 🔥
The @Cardinals' No. 5 prospect is 20-for-45 (.444) in June after belting his fifth homer of the season at Triple-A. pic.twitter.com/umyONcXLcZ
— MLB Pipeline (@MLBPipeline) June 18, 2025
'The priority is the guys that have been here, more so than the guy who's getting here,' Marmol explained. 'An opportunity — in an undesirable way — has presented itself, but I think the guys that have been waiting for their opportunity should get it.'
Saggese was the designated hitter in Friday's starting lineup, as both Contreras and Nolan Arenado were scheduled for days off after Thursday's doubleheader. Saggese could start against opposing left-handers, but his primary obligation will be bench depth for now.
Advertisement
A rainout Wednesday allowed St. Louis to bring up McGreevy for a spot start Thursday as its 27th man — before his eligibility date of June 24. The result? Five innings of one-run ball against the White Sox, where the right-hander scattered three hits and a walk with five strikeouts. The Cardinals had to send him back to Memphis after Thursday (McGreevy was sent down on June 10 and, by rule, must wait 15 days before he's eligible to be called back up, with the exception of injury and doubleheaders).
Expect to see him back with the big-league club as soon as it's permitted.
The Cardinals will likely spot start McGreevy against the Cubs on Tuesday, his third start of the year for St. Louis and his fourth overall appearance. Sonny Gray, who was supposed to start Wednesday's postponed game, was pushed back to Saturday. Miles Mikolas will take Sunday's series finale against the Reds, and Matthew Liberatore is scheduled to start Monday's game — the first of four against Chicago, whom St. Louis is facing for the first time this season.
St. Louis has aimed to keep its starters on a six-day schedule for most of the season. By starting McGreevy on his eligibility date, the Cardinals will be able to enforce that schedule. They plan to finish the series with Erick Fedde on Wednesday and Pallante on Thursday, both of whom would be on a five-day schedule if not for a spot start Tuesday.
It's fair to question why McGreevy, who has allowed five earned runs over 16 2/3 major-league innings this season, isn't a fixture in the rotation. The Cardinals certainly would like him to be but remain concerned about their lack of starting pitching depth in the minor leagues. St. Louis is one of few MLB teams that has not suffered a significant starting pitching injury, which has kept McGreevy in Triple A. The club could re-evaluate McGreevy's usage ahead of the trade deadline. Until then, St. Louis will continue utilizing McGreevy for spot starts when the schedule allows and look to find a clear avenue for him to remain in the big leagues for good later in the year.
(Photo of Ivan Herrera: Jeff Hanisch / Imagn Images)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
How do Michigan fans grade Sherrone Moore and what's next? Our Wolverines fan survey
ANN ARBOR, Mich. — In an email to fans last week, athletic director Warde Manuel said Michigan is continuing to evaluate ways to pay for 82 new scholarships and $20.5 million in revenue-sharing funds that will be distributed to athletes in football, basketball, volleyball and ice hockey. If Manuel needs more input, The Athletic's Michigan fan survey is here to help. More than 1,000 fans shared their thoughts last week on scheduling more events at Michigan Stadium (yes, please), higher ticket prices (no way!) and permanent advertising inside the Big House (a definite maybe), along with numerous topics related to the upcoming football season. The overall picture reveals a fan base that, despite some short-term uncertainty, feels confident in the long-term trajectory of Michigan athletics in the revenue-sharing era. Advertisement 'I think UM is generally in a good place,' wrote Chris P. 'Football needs to take a step forward after a natty hangover year in 2024, but I like that the team finished strong last season, and I think Sherrone Moore's approaches to recruiting, the transfer portal and building his coaching staff make sense.' 'I don't think this is THE year for Michigan football,' added Noah K. 'We should be good, not great. The next two years are going to be the hot zone for Bryce (Underwood) and the elite recruiting class we just pulled in to develop.' Here's the full breakdown of the survey results. In last year's fan survey, the vast majority of Michigan fans said they were on board with promoting Moore to replace Jim Harbaugh. Moore's first season was far from flawless, but the combination of beating Ohio State and Alabama and landing the No. 1 recruit in the nation earned Moore solid marks in this year's survey. 'Sherrone Moore had me very nervous at first,' wrote Michael L. 'I think he underestimated how bad his QB was and killed the season because of it. I do think he has bounced back in a major way.' Despite the optimism, there's a sense that Moore needs to show something in 2025. Most fans seem willing to give him some runway as Underwood develops, but they'd also like to see Michigan back in the CFP conversation. 'This season is time for Sherrone to prove he can win outside of the shadow of the national championship,' wrote Bruce B. The takeaway here is that a majority of fans would accept a season similar to 2024 as long as Michigan wins its two rivalry games. There's a clear expectation that Michigan should be back in the CFP by 2026, but fans can deal with some growing pains as long as Michigan is moving in the right direction. Advertisement 'To think this team is ready to compete for a national title with a true freshman QB (though I believe he is talented) and a patchwork offensive line is probably unrealistic,' wrote Sam K. 'My hope is that we can see this team start to jell in the back half of the season, keep the core in place, and 2026 could set up for a special year.' With a freshman quarterback and two excellent running backs, Michigan's new offensive coordinator would be smart to rely on the ground game as much as possible. That's what fans expect, though many find it hard to contain their expectations for Underwood. 'I don't think I have ever been this excited for a quarterback,' wrote Adam S. 'I can't wait to see Underwood play.' The split vote reflects a defense that will rely on depth rather than star power. It will be a great sign for Michigan if Rod Moore is in the conversation given the severity of his knee injury and his lengthy path to recovery. The top choice is no surprise, but I thought Michigan's first Big Ten game in L.A. might rate a bit higher. Fans are right to be excited about the Week 2 trip to Oklahoma, a great intersectional matchup that will set the tone for the rest of Michigan's season. Aside from quarterback, wide receiver is the position that seems most ripe for a breakout season from a freshman. Even so, I might cast my vote for Earls, who has a great shot to be Michigan's third cornerback and might even work his way into the starting lineup. Fans seem confident that Michigan's defensive line won't miss a beat despite losing Josaiah Stewart, Mason Graham and Kenneth Grant. I expected the vote to be closer between the D-line and the running backs, though it's tough to go wrong either way. No surprises here. Michigan had one of the least productive wide receiver units in college football last season and returns many of the same players after swapping Tyler Morris for Indiana transfer Donaven McCulley. The long-term picture looks brighter thanks to a strong 2025 class and Zion Robinson's commitment for 2026, but it remains to be seen if any of the young players are ready to emerge. Advertisement My other takeaway: Michigan fans aren't sure what to make of this offensive line. I'd like to get the 7 percent who graded the O-line as the strongest position group in the same room with the 12 percent who think it's the weak link and let them hash it out. We're going on 18 months of opposing fans claiming the sign-stealing scandal is a capital offense while Michigan fans claim it's much ado about nothing. We can all agree on one thing: It will be nice to have closure. 'I feel the Connor Stalions story, while an entertaining distraction, is just that: a distraction,' wrote Nick M. 'Most people will swiftly forget it in a few years, and it will be little more than an embarrassing blip on our reputation.' I do wonder if Michigan fans are setting themselves up for disappointment if the NCAA ruling is harsher than they expect. The case wouldn't have gone all the way to an infractions hearing if the NCAA's enforcement staff was content to let Michigan off with a wrist-slap. That doesn't mean the Committee on Infractions will see it the same way, but Michigan definitely is not in the clear. The perception a few years ago was that Michigan lagged behind its peers in the NIL space. That's no longer the case. Michigan has modernized its personnel department and committed to doing what's necessary to land elite players like Underwood. Give credit to general manager Sean Magee, who has proven to be a smart hire for Moore. The vibes continue to be immaculate for May and his program. Replacing Vlad Goldin and Danny Wolf is no small task, but fans are confident Michigan can build on last year's success with the additions of Yaxel Lendeborg, Morez Johnson Jr. and Elliot Cadeau. Manuel didn't provide the exact percentages, but Michigan's strategy seems roughly in line with fan preferences. Football is the bell cow and is going to get a majority of the revenue-sharing funds. The next biggest chunk will go to basketball, with volleyball and ice hockey also receiving some funding. The distribution model may evolve over time, Manuel said, and could include payouts for top performers in sports that aren't on the initial list. Advertisement Football is king, but fans want to ensure sports like swimming, gymnastics and track and field have the resources they need to survive. Those fans will be happy to hear that, according to Manuel, cutting any of Michigan's 29 varsity sports programs is not a consideration. 'I really hope Michigan avoids cutting sports such as track, rowing, field hockey, etc.,' wrote Baker C. 'I feel having those sports plays a part in the overall athletic culture of the university and have each had moments of individual excitement and success that I would be sad to see leave.' Keeping last year's format was the most popular choice, though fans are ambivalent overall about the expanded playoff. It's notable that an option the Big Ten has pushed for — four guaranteed bids for the Big Ten and SEC, two apiece for the Big 12 and ACC, one for the Group of 5 and three at-large — was the last-place option. 'The powers that be are going to ruin college football with expanding the Playoff, doing nothing about transfers/tampering and moving away from regional conferences,' wrote Ben K. 'The regular season used to be special. Now an Ohio State team can win the national title without beating Michigan. We probably don't need more than six playoff spots.' These two questions were designed to test the hypothesis that changes in college football have affected fans' attitudes more than their habits. The results bear that out: 47.6 percent of fans feel less interested, but only 22.8 percent are consuming less college football. While interest in college football remains strong, fans are expressing fatigue with the endless tinkering with Playoff formats, conference realignment, player movement and legal wrangling. 'The transfer portal, revenue sharing and NIL do not bother me in the least,' wrote Andrew R. 'However, expanding the playoff field to an absurd 12 teams has ruined the sport and greatly reduced my interest. Conference expansion at the same time has not helped, either. The regular season no longer matters, officially, so why should we care about it? It's a real shame.' Advertisement Michigan fans are divided on the Gus Johnson/Joel Klatt combo, but the Big Noon window is their clear favorite. It's interesting to me that while Ohio State fans clamor for fewer noon kickoffs, Michigan fans would gladly take more if it meant fewer night games. Perhaps that's because night games are a relatively recent phenomenon at the Big House. Hosting events at Michigan Stadium seems like a no-brainer, and I'd expect more of those in the coming years. Michigan hasn't made a decision on permanent advertising at the Big House, but the wording of Manuel's email made me think it's only a matter of time. 'Permanent advertising in Michigan Stadium has been a topic of discussion for many years, predating my tenure at Michigan,' Manuel wrote. 'It's essential for us to assess all potential advertising opportunities to generate new revenue while respecting our traditions. Every decision we make will take into account Michigan's traditions and values while also understanding the decisions we need to make to continue to support the success of our teams.' As someone who didn't grow up attending games at the Big House, my first reaction was, 'Wait, Michigan doesn't have advertising at the stadium?' I can't say that I notice the difference when I travel to other venues, but I understand that some longtime fans have strong feelings about it. 'Never, ever have advertising in or around Michigan Stadium or the uniforms!!' wrote a fan named Jim. Fans may not like it, but if the alternative is cutting sports or raising ticket prices, they'll take the ads. For a fan base that's more tradition-minded than most, Michigan fans expressed a surprising openness to private equity funding, too. 'College football is trending toward the structure of the English Premier League,' wrote Dana B. 'As such, Michigan should get ahead of the game and bring in private equity investors ASAP. Without a doubt this is the direction the sport is headed.' That's not quite the last resort, but it's fairly low on the list of options. Fans can think of much better ways to pay for those new revenue-sharing deals. 'Eminem at the Big House, anyone?' wrote Sen A.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Texas' Arch Manning shares advice from Matthew McConaughey as popularity grows
Print Close By Ryan Gaydos Published June 30, 2025 All eyes will be on Texas Longhorns quarterback Arch Manning in 2025 as he embarks on his first season as the starter. Manning committed to Texas before the start of the 2023 season. He appeared in two games as a freshman and 10 games as a sophomore as he sat as a backup to Quinn Ewers. However, with Ewers in the NFL, the keys are handed to Manning to lead Texas to the promised land. CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON The fame attached to Manning because of his football status, as well as his last name, certainly creates a celebrity atmosphere around him in Austin. However, he told reporters at the Manning Passing Academy he received some advice from Matthew McConaughey about how to handle the attention. "A few. It depends on the night, but I stay pretty low key. … I had to get used to it a little bit," he said about receiving picture requests, via The Athletic. "I've actually talked to Matthew McConaughey about that. He's given me some advice. BYU'S JAKE RETZLAFF INTENDS TO TRANSFER AS QB EXPECTS HONOR CODE SUSPENSION AFTER ASSAULT ALLEGATIONS: REPORT "He's been great to have in my corner. … He just told me different ways on how to handle things in different situations. He's way more known than I am, so it's good anytime you get advice from him. … He kind of told me you still have to live your life. He says he goes to the grocery store, walks down every aisle and he lives his life. You can't let you taking a picture or signing an autograph affect your life." Manning has already gotten NFL hype thrown around him, but he says he doesn't pay attention too much to the noise around him. "I really don't pay much attention to anyone, what they think besides my coaches, my parents and some close friends that will tell me the truth. But I'm not worried about what other people think. I'm just going to go out there and have fun and play my game," he said. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Manning had 939 passing yards and nine touchdown passes for the Longhorns last year. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter . Print Close URL
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
"Felt Bad For Him": Kiyan Anthony Sympathizes With Bronny James Over Comparisons To Fathers
"Felt Bad For Him": Kiyan Anthony Sympathizes With Bronny James Over Comparisons To Fathers originally appeared on Fadeaway World. LeBron James and his son Bronny became the first father-son duo to play together in NBA history. One would think such a historic personal achievement for James, a testament to the longevity of his career, would be widely celebrated. However, it has also ended up subjecting Bronny to unrealistic comparisons with his father. Advertisement Carmelo Anthony's son Kiyan, who is also a highly rated basketball talent going to Syracuse in the coming NCAA season, went on his father's podcast with Dylan Harper, the No. 2 pick in the 2025 NBA Draft, who is also the son of NBA legend Ron Harper, i.e, another second-generation basketball player, and they discussed this about Bronny. 'Yeah, I feel like as soon as whoever's talking tries to connect like both, that's when it gets messed up. Cause like it's a new generation, two totally different people, even though that might be your kid, y'all both going through different things. So like Bronny, I kind of felt bad for him cause that's my guy." "So just seeing, he doesn't speak a lot, he doesn't. He's not going to go on the internet and say what he has to say. But like deep down, like behind closed doors, he probably was going through it. Like you seeing this every day, you're on social media, you can't even scroll twice without seeing a post with your name on it." 'He probably talked to his pops about it, but at the end of the day he's nice at ball, he not like people trying to say he not good or he just there for his pops, I think he's really nice and I think he really has a chance to you know prosper in the NBA." Advertisement "But they trying to get it to him, for him to get his first year like no it could take a couple years like D was saying it take a couple years before you could even you know start getting situated, start getting settled, and even play your own game so that's how I feel about it man.' Assessing Bronny James' First Year As A Lakers Player Bronny James only played 27 regular-season games for the Lakers and spent most of the season getting his reps in during the G League. More often than not, he was struggling in the games he played and was thus subject to a lot of criticism due to the standards his father had set. He averaged 2.3 points in 6.7 minutes played in each of those 27 games. But as the 55th overall pick, any other player who would be getting similar minutes would also have a similar performance. Moreover, Bronny has shown sparks of what he can do with multiple stellar games in the G-League. He averaged 21.9 points, 5.3 rebounds, and 5.3 assists in the 11 regular-season games he played in the G-League. If he gets more minutes for the Lakers, he may actually be useful for the Lakers in the long run. Related: NBA Insider: LeBron James May Request Trade After Picking Up $52.6 Million Player Option This story was originally reported by Fadeaway World on Jun 30, 2025, where it first appeared.
