logo
Corporate Mentions Of ‘DEI' Dropped 72% In 2025, Analysis Finds

Corporate Mentions Of ‘DEI' Dropped 72% In 2025, Analysis Finds

Forbes29-05-2025
References to diversity, equity and inclusion in Fortune 100 company reports dropped 72% between 2024 and 2025, according to an analysis by Gravity Research, as pressure from the Trump administration has led corporations to gut their diversity initiatives.
Corporations have faced anti-DEI pressure from the government and conservative activists. (AP ... More Photo/John Hanna, File)
Usage of the acronym 'DEI' in Fortune 100 company reports had the steepest decline between 2024 and 2025, decreasing by 98%, while each individual term also declined significantly: Mentions of 'diversity' dropped 62%, 'equity' decreased 48% and 'inclusion' declined 43%.
Gravity Research, a firm that studies how companies manage their reputations and respond to social pressures, analyzed more than 1,300 financial filings, proxy statements, earnings calls and other documents filed between 2023 and 2025.
References to DEI also decreased between 2023 and 2024, though to a lesser degree: 'DEI' declined 26% between those years, while mentions of 'diversity' dropped 30%.
Words explicitly referring to diversity, including 'DEI' and 'racial diversity,' declined 72% overall between 2024 and 2025, while words Gravity Research considered to be more neutral, like 'inclusion' and 'belonging,' declined 34% overall.
Gravity Research found companies adopted more 'neutral' language in 2024 as a potentially less controversial alternative to DEI, but had largely abandoned these terms by 2025 amid pressure from the federal government.
Use of the word 'belonging' increased 87% between 2023 and 2024 as a 'safer' alternative to DEI, but mentions of 'belonging' decreased 47% between 2024 and 2025.
Mentions of employee resource groups, which are often centered around racial or gender groups and were a frequent casualty of the corporate push away from DEI, dropped between 2024 and 2025, and many of these references mention these groups are open to all.
Earnings calls were the only place where mentions of 'DEI' increased, rising 390% between 2024 and 2025, as heightened scrutiny over DEI programs led to an increase in media and shareholder inquiries about these initiatives.
Joanna Piacenza, vice president of thought leadership at Gravity Research, said the report 'speaks volumes to the current political environment. It's become so charged, it's become so risky for corporations to speak publicly about their DEI commitments, stating companies are 'trying to keep up not only with how polarized things have become, but what they think consumers and other stakeholders want from them.'
Many companies have dropped their diversity programs or reframed them to focus more on general 'inclusion' or employee well-being amid pressure from conservative activists and the federal government. Among the first executive orders of President Donald Trump's second term were multiple directives targeting DEI programs across the federal government, which included threats to 'combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences.' Companies like Meta, Amazon and Walmart began dismantling diversity programs before Trump took office, and many more backed off after his inauguration. Many of these companies have abandoned diversity hiring goals, which Trump has framed as illegal discrimination, and some of these companies have cut DEI officer roles or transformed them to focus on general employee development. Anti-DEI activist Robby Starbuck, who has more than 800,000 followers on X, has claimed credit for several of the companies that have watered down their diversity initiatives, including Pepsi, Walmart and McDonald's, by threatening to expose their 'woke' policies on his social media.
A Gravity Research survey published last month found two in five companies plan to decrease LGBTQ Pride Month engagement this year, while another two-fifths said their engagement would stay the same and the rest said they had not decided. The survey elicited responses from 49 corporate executives from Fortune 1000 companies, some of whom cited pressure from the Trump administration and conservative activists. Of the companies who said they would pull back support for Pride, 43% of those said they would reduce external-facing engagement, including social media posts and presences at Pride marches. Gravity Research president Luke Hartig told Forbes the survey 'reveals just how dramatically the cultural and political tides have turned,' stating two-fifths of companies scaling back Pride Month engagement 'would've been unthinkable just five years ago.' Several of the nation's largest Pride organizations told Forbes earlier this year some longtime corporate sponsors pulled back funding this year, leaving the organizations in a bind to replace the lost money. San Francisco Pride told Forbes it lost $200,000 in funds after previous sponsors including Comcast and Diageo pulled out, while NYC Pride said a quarter of its sponsors either withheld or reduced funding this year, representing $750,000 in lost funds.
2 In 5 Corporations Scaling Back LGBTQ Pride Engagement Amid Trump Administration Pressure, Survey Finds (Forbes)
IBM Reportedly Walks Back Diversity Policies, Citing 'Inherent Tensions': Here Are All The Companies Rolling Back DEI Programs (Forbes)
St. Louis Pride Says Anheuser-Busch Ended Sponsorship—As Corporate Support For LGBTQ Pride Celebrations Dwindles (Forbes)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A MAGA Voter's Reddit Post Breaking Down 5 Reasons They'll Be Voting "All Blue" In The Midterms Is Going Viral
A MAGA Voter's Reddit Post Breaking Down 5 Reasons They'll Be Voting "All Blue" In The Midterms Is Going Viral

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A MAGA Voter's Reddit Post Breaking Down 5 Reasons They'll Be Voting "All Blue" In The Midterms Is Going Viral

As of late, Donald Trump's MAGA base has NOT been happy with him. From his mishandling of the Epstein files to bombing Iran, Trump seems to be backtracking on many of his campaign promises, and his support, even from high-profile names, is slipping. A Reddit post by a MAGA voter has recently gone viral for breaking down five reasons why they are abandoning Trump and planning to vote blue in the 2026 midterms. Related: At the start of the post, the MAGA voter explained their last-minute decision to vote for Trump on Election Day... They described feeling that Trump "got his ass beat" by Kamala Harris in the presidential debate, but did not like that the DNC was "open to big corporations and corporate donors." Their decision to vote for Trump also was inspired by Trump joining forces with RFK Jr., which they felt could improve nutrition policies. "Nutrition is a huge thing for me..." Related: The MAGA voter also assumed that Trump could end the Ukraine/Russia war due to his close relationship with Vladimir Putin. "I felt Trump would calm down the Ukraine/Russia basically say 'stop this shit' and create a calmer world for us." But, according to the MAGA voter, everything went south with the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files. "Guy thinks we're stupid. He campaigns on the Epstein files, realizes he's on there and now is telling us to stop worrying about it." The White House has called the Wall Street Journal's claim that Trump was notified by the Attorney General that his name was in the Epstein files a "fake news story." Related: The MAGA voter also called out Trump's attempts to get rid of the Department of Education. "I know he brought this up during his campaign, but I thought he'd be sensible enough to work across the aisle with Democrats on this matter, but this is insane." They also called out Trump's "Big, Beautiful, Bill" that they described as "abhorrently terrible." As well as Trump's tariffs increasing costs for young people. "Wtf is this guy thinking other countries will pay more. We're the ones having to foot the cost." They took issue with Trump's immigration and deportation policies call them "messed up," because Trump has given ICE "free will to do whatever." Related: And finally, the post ended with a promise to abandon Trump in the midterms. "I will absolutely be voting all blue come the midterms and will be voting for a sensible democrat next election." After reading the post, most people in the comments were not exactly applauding the MAGA voter for their switch-up. "Wow, this is someone who even seems to have paid more attention than most, but also somehow discounted 99% of things Trump said he'd do. I just can't with that level of cognitive dissonance," one user said. "'She didn't have any ideas that I considered fresh and new, so I figured I may as well vote for the guy who babbled utter nonsense instead,'" another user wrote sarcastically, referencing the voter's comments on the presidential debate. "This sounds like a lot of people in my family's rationale for voting Trump, who should have had enough common sense to think things through. They'll never admit they're wrong and vote democrat though. At least this person realized they were wrong, albeit way too late," this user wrote. "They really give him too much credit thinking these pie in the sky thoughts that'd he abolish everything he said he would, and replace it all with something way better, which he never had a plan to do." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:

U.S. slaps 20.56% anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber
U.S. slaps 20.56% anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

U.S. slaps 20.56% anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood lumber

The U.S. Commerce Department has decided to hike anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood to 20.56 per cent, with B.C. lumber organizations calling them unjustified, punitive and protectionist. The hiked softwood lumber duties come amid the growing trade war between Canada and the U.S., and represent the latest blow to B.C.'s beleaguered forestry industry. B.C. Forests Minister Ravi Parmar described the long-awaited rate hike as a "gut punch" for B.C.'s forestry industry which has seen thousands of workers laid off over the last few years. "U.S. President Donald Trump has made it his mission to destroy Canada's economy, and there is no sector that has faced more of that than the forestry sector," he told CBC News. "This is a big deal for our workers. This is going to have a significant impact. It will lead to curtailments," he added. The B.C. government has been urging the federal government to prioritize the softwood lumber industry in trade discussions with the U.S., and Parmar said the hiked duties would also impact U.S. homeowners needing lumber to rebuild or renovate their homes. "This is going to mean that Americans, in particular middle-class Americans, are going to be paying more to the tune of $15,000 to $20,000 more USD to purchase or to build a home." The B.C. Lumber Trade Council says in a statement that if the U.S. department's pending review on countervailing duties is in line with its preliminary results, the combined rate against Canadian softwood shipped to the United States will be well over 30 per cent. In April, the preliminary combined rate on Canadian softwood lumber was reported to be 34.45 per cent, up from the previous 14.54 per cent. Friday's decision is a final determination, with Parmar saying it would go into effect in the U.S. Federal Register shortly.U.S. lumber producers have long maintained that Canadian stumpage fees, for harvesting on Crown land, are an unfair government subsidy. B.C.'s Independent Wood Processors Association says in a statement that the U.S. Commerce Department's decision this week to raise duties also includes a requirement for Canadian companies to retroactively remit duties for products shipped to the United States since Jan.1, 2023. WATCH | B.C. premier urges feds to prioritze lumber deal: Association chair Andy Rielly says in a statement that the requirement to pay duties on products shipped in the last 31 months could not only force small B.C. producers to shut down, but may also threaten operators' personal assets as they may have to risk using their homes as collateral to secure bonds to pay. Prime Minister Mark Carney said earlier this month that a future trade agreement with the United States could include quotas on softwood lumber, an area that has caused friction between the two countries for years before the latest trade war. Producer urges province to change conditions The United States has long been the single largest market for B.C. lumber exports, representing over half the market for the approximately $10-billion industry. But amid a series of challenges for the province's forestry industry — including a mountain pine beetle infestation that has killed hundreds of thousands of trees — mills have been closing around the province in recent years, and major forestry companies are opening up new mills in the United States. In 2023, numbers from Statistics Canada showed B.C. had lost more than 40,000 forest-sector jobs since the early 1990s. Kim Haakstad, the CEO of the B.C. Council of Forest Industries, said the B.C. government should work to improve the production environment in the province to prevent future mill closures. In a statement, the council said that by activating timber sales, fast-tracking permits and cutting through regulatory gridlock, the province could send a signal that it is serious about rebuilding a sustainable forest argued that if the industry could get production levels back to historic levels, it could help keep forestry-dependent communities vibrant into the future. "That will bring more than $300 million to the provincial government, as well, to help address the deficit situation we're in," Haakstad said. Kurt Niquidet, the president of the B.C. Lumber Trade Council, highlighted that Trump also has initiated a federal investigation into the U.S. imports of lumber and timber citing "national security," which could further impact B.C.'s forestry industry when combined with the tariffs. "Softwood lumber is quite important for the United States. They can only supply about 70 per cent of their softwood lumber demand, and they're importing 30 per cent from elsewhere," he told CBC News. "25 per cent of that's really coming from Canada, and British Columbia is the largest softwood lumber producer within Canada."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store