PCJCCI president expresses satisfaction over Economic Survey, federal budget
LAHORE: Nazir Hussain, President Pakistan China Joint Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCJCCI), appreciated the government's launch of the Pakistan Economic Survey 2024–25 and Budget 2026, calling them strong indicators of Pakistan's commitment to economic stability, investment, and regional connectivity through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).
He emphasized that CPEC was playing a transformative role in building infrastructure, boosting trade, and creating job opportunities, especially through key projects in road, port, energy, and urban development.
He added that the completion of several major infrastructure projects under CPEC, including the Multan-Sukkur and Hakla-D I Khan motorways, and the operationalization of the New Gwadar International Airport was already improving logistics, reducing travel time, and opening new trade corridors.
Brig Mansoor Saeed Sheikh (retd), Senior Vice President PCJCCI particularly praised the progress in Gwadar, where the Gwadar Port and Free Zone have seen over $250 million in investment from the China Overseas Ports Holding Company Limited (COPHCL), enabling operations in logistics, manufacturing, fisheries, and finance.
With generous incentives like a 23-year tax holiday, full foreign ownership, and one-window facilitation, Gwadar is rapidly becoming a strategic commercial hub for the region.
Zafar Iqbal, Vice President PCJCCI said that Budget 2026 had also allocated significant funding under the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) for ongoing and new CPEC projects, including infrastructure development in Gwadar, land acquisition, and the second phase of the East Bay Expressway.
He also highlighted achievements in social infrastructure, such as the completion of a 1.2 million-gallon-per-day desalination plant to address water scarcity in Gwadar, and progress in digital connectivity, including the completion of a cross-border optical fibre cable.
Salahuddin Hanif, Secretary General further welcomed signs of macroeconomic stabilization, with inflation recorded at 4.6 percent and GDP growth at 2.7 percent in the outgoing fiscal year. These are positive signs for investor confidence. Chinese businesses are already showing renewed interest, and CPEC's next phase will focus on job creation, industrial development, and local empowerment.
The PCJCCI reaffirmed its commitment to promoting bilateral trade, facilitating business partnerships, and supporting the government's development goals under CPEC and Budget 2026. 'CPEC is not just an economic corridor it's a symbol of long-term cooperation and shared prosperity. The foundation has been laid. Now it's time to build on it, together.'
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Recent regional crisis: Senate body praises FO for outstanding performance
ISLAMABAD: The Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, chaired by Senator Irfan Siddiqui, praised the Foreign Office for its outstanding performance during recent regional crisis, asserting that Pakistan's strong diplomatic narrative has prevailed globally, particularly in wake of Pakistan-India war and attacks on Iran. In a high-level in-camera session held in Parliament House on Friday, Senator Siddiqui stated, 'The Foreign Office has played a brilliant role in representing Pakistan's position in the context of two consecutive wars and presenting a steady narrative to the world.' Senator Siddiqui also acknowledged the contributions of committee members Senator Sherry Rehman and Senator Musadik Malik, who, as part of a parliamentary delegation led by former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, effectively communicated Pakistan's position to the international community during a critical diplomatic juncture. The committee was given a comprehensive briefing by Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch and senior Foreign Office officials regarding Pakistan's stance following attacks on Iran. The officials outlined Pakistan's diplomatic efforts and shared insights into future regional dynamics. Addressing questions raised by committee members, Foreign Secretary Baloch emphasised Pakistan's commitment to regional peace, stating, 'All our efforts are focused on establishing lasting peace in the region, for which, Pakistan is playing a very effective role in collaboration with different countries.' Siddiqui further remarked, 'India's isolation at various international forums is a defeat in itself and our narrative is a victory.' He credited Pakistan's principled stance and proactive diplomacy for the shift in global perceptions. The meeting was attended by senators, Sherry Rehman, Anwarul Haq Kakar, Musadik Malik, Barrister Syed Ali Zafar, and Zeeshan Khanzada. The Foreign Office was represented by Foreign Secretary Baloch and other senior officials. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
SBP injects Rs12.38 trillion
Listen to article The State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) injected Rs12.38 trillion into the financial system through two separate Open Market Operations (OMOs) on June 27, 2025, to manage the liquidity vacuum caused by Eid-related cash demand and fiscal needs of the government constrained by International Monetary Fund (IMF) conditions. The larger of the two was a conventional reverse repo OMO, in which SBP accepted Rs12.20 trillion out of Rs12.42 trillion offered by banks at a rate of 11.07% for a seven-day tenor. A total of 34 bids were accepted out of 36 received, with rates ranging between 11.20% and 11.04%. Additionally, a Shariah-compliant Mudarabah-based OMO saw the SBP accept Rs178 billion out of Rs326 billion offered at a slightly higher rate of 11.13% for the same tenor. Only two bids were received and accepted, showing limited participation from Islamic financial institutions. Analysts attributed the rise in OMO stock to higher currency in circulation during Eid (a temporary effect) and a lag between debt repayments and incoming inflows. They expect OMO levels to ease as inflows materialise in the coming weeks. In the currency market, the Pakistani rupee slightly weakened against the US dollar on Friday, falling by 0.02% in the interbank market. By day's end, the rupee closed at 283.72, down five paisas from Thursday's close of 283.67. Meanwhile, gold prices in Pakistan also saw a steep decline, mirroring a global drop of nearly 2% after confirmation of a US-China trade agreement boosted investor risk appetite and reduced demand for safe-haven assets. According to the All-Pakistan Gems and Jewellers Sarafa Association, the per tola gold price dropped by Rs5,000 to Rs351,000, while the 10-gram price fell Rs4,287 to Rs300,925. This came after gold gained Rs1,335 per tola the previous day, reaching Rs356,000. Adnan Agar, Director at Interactive Commodities, said gold hit a new intra-day low on Friday. "Gold touched a low of $3,255 and is now trading around $3,276 after opening at $3,320," he said, adding that, "The trend remains bearish, with potential downside targets near $3,213 before any short-term rebound." He added that confirmation of a US-China trade deal has dampened gold's momentum, and if similar agreements emerge with other major economies like the European Union, gold could revisit levels between $3,000 and $2,800 in the medium term. "Sentiment is currently tilted towards the downside, and the market may continue to face pressure into next week," Agar said.
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
New realities of power in global politics
Recent geopolitical flashpoints — the four-day military engagement between India and Pakistan and the 12-day war between Iran and Israel—have unveiled two compelling realities. First, despite the shifting tides of multi-polarity, the United States remains the most consequential actor in global power politics. Second, the long-standing regional myths of invincibility and dominance by India's in South Asia and Israel's in the Middle East have been irreversibly challenged. In both crises, the US emerged not only as a mediator but as the ultimate arbiter of dispute resolution and end of hostilities between the said warring nations. President Donald Trump's assertive and decisive phone calls, whether by official design or calculated spectacle, succeeded in arresting escalations that could have spiraled into regional wars - a feat that a world body like the UN could not have achieved so decisively and in so short a time. Washington's capacity to stop two simultaneous conflicts in volatile regions underscores its unmatched diplomatic leverage and military deterrence even in an era of a waning uni-polarity. Equally significant, however, is what these conflicts revealed about the internal dynamics of their respective regions. In South Asia, the India-Pakistan skirmish exposed the limits of New Delhi's regional hegemony. The conflict demonstrated not only Pakistan's strategic resilience but also the geopolitical reality that India is not unilaterally dominant in the subcontinent. Both nations, despite their historical asymmetries in size and economy, were treated as equals by global powers in diplomatic terms. This is a notable departure from narratives of Indian supremacy and highlights the strategic agency of smaller states in the region. Meanwhile, in the Middle East, the twelve-day Israel-Iran conflict similarly unsettled long-held perceptions. While Israel has historically enjoyed technological and military edge, Iran's retaliatory capacity, endurance, and regional alliances gave it a credible deterrent posture. The myth of Israel's absolute military superiority took a hit—not necessarily in battlefield metrics, but in the psychological and diplomatic perceptions that govern modern deterrence theory. Iran showed it could absorb strikes, retaliate meaningfully, and force negotiations—all while maintaining a regional influence structure through proxies. In the wake of the recent India-Pakistan military standoff and the 12-day Israel-Iran war, the global spotlight focused not only on the crisis resolution but also on the visible absence of direct intervention from China and Russia—two major global powers often seen as the principal challengers to US influence. Despite their strategic relationships with Pakistan and Iran respectively, Beijing and Moscow exercised strategic restraint. The absence of direct Chinese and Russian intervention in support of Pakistan and Iran is perhaps not a sign of weakness—it is a calculated strategic posture consistent with their long-term vision of a multi-polar world. Their restraint reflects an understanding that global influence in the 21st century is shaped as much by stability, economic entrenchment, and ideological appeal as by military might. China and Russia prioritize strategic stability over tactical opportunism, particularly in regions where overt engagement could spiral into uncontrollable escalation. Both powers prefer the doctrine of strategic patience and to leverage the US burden to preserve their influence through non-military tools such as diplomacy, infrastructure investment, arms sales, and cyber presence. Also, China's risk calculus avoids getting embroiled in wars that could endanger its global economic interests or supply chains. This strategy has paid off in China's rise as the second biggest economy of the world. It is important to note that China backed Pakistan by providing it with the means of air force and missile superiority over India and Iran with missile superiority over Israel — which proved to be a turning point in both the said conflicts. Additionally, Russia, heavily engaged in Ukraine and under severe Western sanctions, seeks to avoid opening a second front or worsening its diplomatic isolation. In an era where multi-polarity is often taken as a given, recent history just offered a blunt reality check: the United States still sits at the top of the global power pyramid. China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the growing BRICS bloc may be reshaping economic partnerships, but when conflict erupts, it's still Washington—not Beijing or Moscow—that the world turns to. While critics will debate whether Trump's methods are sustainable, the facts on the ground are clear: the global order may be evolving, but America's authority—particularly in moments of crisis—remains unchallenged. China is just not yet ready to overtly exercise its authority into the internal affairs of other countries nor into their wars or conflicts. Much of the same holds true for Russia. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
