Methanex price target lowered to $55 from $63 at CIBC
Discover the latest stocks recommended by top Wall Street analysts, all in one place with Analyst Top Stocks.
Make smarter investments with weekly expert stock picks from the Smart Investor Newsletter.
Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>>
See Insiders' Hot Stocks on TipRanks >>
Read More on MEOH:
Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue
Methanex price target lowered to $41 from $57 at Barclays
Methanex Announces 2025 Annual General Meeting Details
Barclays sees potential operational questions for Methanex
Methanex price target lowered to $64 from $68 at Jefferies
Methanex: Undervalued with Strong Long-Term Prospects Despite Short-Term Challenges
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Barclays exits Net-Zero Banking Alliance, follows HSBC
This story was originally published on ESG Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily ESG Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: Barclays is withdrawing from the United Nations-backed Net-Zero Banking Alliance, a sector coalition whose members have committed to aligning their financial activities with the aim of reaching net-zero emissions by 2050. The British bank announced its exit Friday and pointed to the financial sector's retreat from the climate group in its statement. 'With the departure of most of the global banks, the organization no longer has the membership to support our transition,' Barclays said. Barclays is the latest financial institution to quit NZBA, following in the footsteps of rival bank HSBC, which departed the group last month. The departures trail behind U.S.-based banks' exodus from NZBA and other climate-focused alliances, spurred in part by new federal leadership and ongoing scrutiny from the Republican party. Dive Insight: Barclays said it would remain committed to its sustainability goals, including a target to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. The bank reiterated that its commitment to allocating $1 trillion in sustainable and transition financing by 2030 remains 'unchanged.' 'We continue to work with our clients on their transition, finance the transition and scale climate tech, while helping to ensure energy security for our customers and clients,' Barclays said. The departure from NZBA comes just a few days after the bank shared it had generated 500 million pounds (over $663 million) in revenue in 2024 from sustainable and low-carbon transition related activities. Earlier in June, Barclays announced that its climate investment arm had enabled 508 million pounds (nearly $687 million) in investments focused on climate technology and innovation since 2020. However, a recent report from a coalition of climate organizations found that Barclays was the biggest financier of fossil fuels in Europe last year, boosting its funding for related operations by over 55% to $35.4 billion. The report backed by the Rainforest Alliance Network, Sierra Club and Reclaim Finance also counted Barclays as one of four banks — alongside JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup — that increased its fossil fuel financing by over $12 billion from 2023 to 2024. The U.K.-based responsible investment NGO ShareAction called Barclay's decision to depart NZBA 'incredibly disappointing,' in an emailed statement sent to ESG Dive. The organization's Co-Director of Corporate Engagement Jeanne Martin said the bank took a 'step in the wrong direction at a time when the dangers of climate change are rapidly mounting.' 'The announcement comes just three days after Barclays published a transition update reiterating its commitment to be a net zero bank by 2050, sending mixed signals to governments and companies around the world,' Martin added. Recommended Reading HSBC departs Net-Zero Banking Alliance, following US banks Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
The £44bn car finance ruling that threatens calamity for Reeves
Follow the latest on the Supreme Court car finance ruling Most Friday afternoons in the City of London are spent tying up loose ends, sending last minute emails and – if you're lucky – grabbing a swift drink before the weekend kicks in. But not this week. That's because this Friday, Britain's highest court will hand down a judgment with profound implications for banks in the Square Mile – as well as Rachel Reeves's push to shake Britain out of its anti-growth torpor. Judges at the Supreme Court are effectively set to decide if millions of car finance agreements dating back more than a decade were mis-sold to customers. The judgment could not only unleash a PPI-style compensation scheme worth billions, but also create a fresh headache for Reeves, who fears a ruling against the banks would reflect badly on Britain as a place to do business. 'An enormous redress scheme could negatively impact the reputation of our financial services industry, damage UK plc's investability and stifle growth,' says Mike Walters, a former compliance chief for Barclays who now advises banks at FTI Consulting. 'There's a lot to play for.' The ruling will decide whether it was lawful for banks to pay 'secret' commissions to car dealers who promoted loans to help people buy a car. Specifically, judges must decide whether car buyers in two cases – Close Brothers vs Hopcraft and FirstRand Bank vs Wrench –were treated unfairly by not having commission payments between the lenders and dealers disclosed to them. It threatens to spark a wave of compensation claims worth an estimated £44bn that could shake the City to its core. In a sign of the possible impacts on the banks, the Supreme Court has made the highly unusual decision to publish its verdict after stock markets close, at 4.35pm, to protect share prices. The magnitude of the ruling had already led to interventions from the very top of Government, with speculation Reeves could simply overrule the judges by changing the law if they arrive at a decision that is bad for the Square Mile. The Chancellor's concerns are also mirrored in the City, where bosses have warned that a ruling against the banks risks deterring investors from putting their money into UK companies. While the case revolves around car loans, the decision could have larger ramifications for all kinds of credit brokered by middle men. A broader interpretation of the law could see the Supreme Court rule against secret commission payments more generally, in a move that would expose banks to significantly higher costs. Such a ruling could expose lenders to a wave of claims from consumers who bought products ranging from laptops to washing machines – anything purchased on credit. 'It isn't just the auto industry that's looking at this judgment,' says Kevin Ingram, a partner at law firm Clifford Chance. Even if it takes a more narrow interpretation of the law, the Supreme Court could still rule that only the secret commissions paid to car dealers were unlawful. Ingram says costs for banks could vary significantly depending on the scope of the ruling and the setup of the compensation claims process. 'It's not a binary decision,' he says. Broader pain Friday's judgment also has huge political significance. Reeves has already voiced concerns that the Supreme Court's ruling could go too far. Addressing a roomful of bankers at Davos earlier this year, the Chancellor said: 'We've got to get the balance right, and sometimes the balance has not been right in recent years ... having a vibrant car industry and motor finance industry in the UK is important. 'There is nothing pro-consumer about making it harder for people to buy an affordable car for their family. That would be bad for working families.' The Chancellor also attempted to intervene in the case, though this was blocked by the Supreme Court itself. Reeves's concerns could be well-founded. 'If big banks pull away from the market, that's not going to be cost-free,' Walters says, warning that the Supreme Court's ruling could ultimately result in higher costs for borrowers. Higher legal and compliance costs on the back of the case are likely to also push up the price of loans, as lenders seek to avoid a repeat of the current situation. Hyder Jumabhoy, a partner at law firm White & Case, believes that the ruling could prompt banks to step away from vehicle finance and force car manufacturers to step in instead. 'The car manufacturers are watching the market very carefully. If there's a lack of financing in the market, they're going to be worried about whether there's buyers for their cars ... A lot of the large vehicle manufacturers actually have the balance sheet to support this,' Jumabhoy says. And what of the banks themselves? The upcoming ruling threatens to deliver a serious financial hit that has already weighed significantly on their share prices. Some of Britain's biggest banks are in the firing line, including Lloyds, Barclays and Santander, who all extended millions of pounds worth of motor finance loans to car buyers. Meanwhile, Jumabhoy says that smaller motor finance providers 'could really struggle' from an adverse decision. Lloyds has set aside the most of any bank so far, provisioning £1.2bn to cover the costs of compensation. Santander has earmarked £295m and Barclays has set aside £90m. Close Brothers, a smaller specialist lender deeply embedded in the market, has provisioned £165m and Investec has set aside £30m. 'Any redress scheme that does result from the Supreme Court's decision will be quite absorbable for the largest banks because of their significant profitability and capital buffers, so that's the likes of Lloyds, Barclays and Santander,' Huseyin Sevinc, from Fitch Ratings, says. 'But some small and medium-sized motor finance lenders are slightly more vulnerable, given that for some of them, the motor finance business has been a much larger part of their business.' Car finance loans account for around 20pc of Close Brothers' entire loan book, compared to just 2pc to 3pc for much bigger banks like Lloyds and Santander. Jumabhoy says an adverse ruling could leave smaller lenders vulnerable to potential takeover and may 'hasten the flurry of M&A activity' in the UK's financial industry, as the winners use their clout to snap up any losers. Whatever the court rules, it is likely to have a major impact – not least for Reeves's push to boost the City. 'There's obviously a big concern about the investability of the UK economy but it's going to be interesting to see how concerns play out on the other side of the coin.' says Walters. 'If people have been ripped off, it's only right that they're compensated.' A HMT spokesman said: 'We want to see a balanced judgment that delivers compensation proportionate to losses that consumers have suffered and allows the motor finance sector to continue supporting millions of motorists to own vehicles. It is now appropriate to let the appeals process run its course.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
9 hours ago
- Business Insider
Barclays Keeps Their Buy Rating on Schroders (SDR)
In a report released on July 31, Michael Sanderson from Barclays maintained a Buy rating on Schroders, with a price target of £4.40. The company's shares closed yesterday at p380.20. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Sanderson covers the Financial sector, focusing on stocks such as 3i Group plc, Intermediate Capital, and Partners Group Holding AG. According to TipRanks, Sanderson has an average return of 2.2% and a 54.67% success rate on recommended stocks. In addition to Barclays, Schroders also received a Buy from UBS's Michael Werner in a report issued yesterday. However, on the same day, Deutsche Bank reiterated a Hold rating on Schroders (LSE: SDR). SDR market cap is currently £6.06B and has a P/E ratio of 17.07. Based on the recent corporate insider activity of 16 insiders, corporate insider sentiment is neutral on the stock.
