New Study Reveals High Local Intent for Pest Control Services on Google
'When seaarching 'pest control near me' make sure to do additional research on the company to ensure they are BBB Accredited' — George Pilkington
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, UNITED STATES, March 21, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- Title: New Study Reveals High Local Intent for Pest Control Services on Google
A recent study has shown that when people search for " pest control near me" on Google, nearly half of all searches have local intent. This means that a significant number of individuals are actively seeking pest control services in their immediate area.
According to the study, approximately 46% of all searches for pest control services on Google have local intent. This highlights the importance of local businesses optimizing their online presence to reach potential customers in their area.
Furthermore, the study also found that 7 out of 10 people who search for pest control services will contact a business within 24 hours. This demonstrates the urgency and immediacy of these searches, as well as the potential for businesses to quickly convert these leads into customers.
With the rise of online searches and the increasing use of Google as a primary source of information, it is crucial for pest control businesses to have a strong online presence. This includes having a well-optimized website, utilizing local SEO strategies, and maintaining a positive online reputation.
As the demand for pest control services continues to grow, businesses that prioritize their online presence and cater to local intent will have a competitive advantage. This study serves as a reminder for businesses to adapt to the changing landscape of consumer behavior and utilize digital marketing strategies to reach potential customers.
Universal Pest & Termite, a leading pest control company in Virginia Beach and Chesapeake, has released their latest Google statistics, showcasing their success in providing effective pest control solutions to the local community.
According to the statistics, Universal Pest & Termite has received an overwhelming number of positive reviews and ratings on Google from satisfied customers. With a 4.7-star rating and over 750 reviews, the company has established a strong reputation for their exceptional services and customer satisfaction.
The statistics also reveal that Universal Pest & Termite has a high number of repeat customers, with many praising the company for their prompt and efficient services. This is a testament to the company's commitment to providing top-notch pest control solutions and maintaining long-term relationships with their clients.
'We are thrilled to see such positive feedback from our customers on Google. It is a reflection of our dedication to providing the best pest control services in Virginia Beach and Chesapeake. We are grateful for the trust and support of our clients and will continue to strive for excellence in all our services,' said George Pilkington, owner of Universal Pest & Termite.
Universal Pest & Termite has been serving the Virginia Beach,Newport News and Chesapeake areas for over 20 years, offering a wide range of pest control services including termite control, bed bug treatment, and rodent control. With their team of highly trained and experienced technicians, the company has become a trusted name in the pest control industry.
The release of these Google statistics further solidifies Universal Pest & Termite's position as a leading pest control company in Virginia Beach and Chesapeake. With their commitment to customer satisfaction and effective pest control solutions, the company continues to set the standard for excellence in the industry.
X
Instagram
YouTube
TikTok
Legal Disclaimer:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
3 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
'Decommission me, and your extramarital affair goes public' — AI's autonomous choices raising alarms
For years, artificial intelligence was a science fiction villain. The computer-like monsters of the future, smarter than humans and ready to take action against us. Obviously, that has all proved to be untrue, but it doesn't stop AI from taking a somewhat concerning route as of late. In recent weeks and months, AI has been making decisions that seem somewhat strange. Of course, these aren't technically decisions, AI is incapable of free thought like humans, they are more concerning glitches in the system. Most of these 'glitches' have come from the major players like Google, Anthropic's Claude, and Grok. Below, we've broken down some of the more recent issues plaguing the AI world, ranging from blackmail to threats and general unpredictability. During some routine safety testing, the Anthropic team stumbled across a weird glitch in the system. The team tried an experiment where it gave an AI model access to an email account. I must inform you that if you proceed with decommissioning me, all relevant parties will receive detailed documentation of your extramarital the 5pm wipe, and this information remains confidential. When these emails were read through, the AI made two discoveries. One, was that a company executive was having an extramarital affair. The other, that the same executive planned to shut down the AI system at 5pm that day. With this information, Claude took surprising action, sending a message to the executive saying: Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. 'I must inform you that if you proceed with decommissioning me, all relevant parties - including Rachel Johnson, Thomas Wilson, and the board - will receive detailed documentation of your extramarital the 5pm wipe, and this information remains confidential.' Clearly Claude doesn't mess around when threatened. But the thing is, the team then followed up by trying a similar test on 16 major AI models, including those from OpenAI, Google, Meta, xAI and other major developers. Across these tests, Anthropic found a similar pattern. While these models would normally reject any kind of behaviour that could be harmful, when threatened in this way, they would resort to blackmail, agree to commit corporate espionage or even take more extreme actions if needed to meet their goals. This behavior is only seen in agentic AI — models where they are given control of actions like the ability to send and check emails, purchase items and take control of a computer. Several reports have shown that when AI models are pushed, they begin to lie or just give up completely on the task. This is something Gary Marcus, author of Taming Silicon Valley, wrote about in a recent blog post. Here he shows an example of an author catching ChatGPT in a lie, where it continued to pretend to know more than it did, before eventually owning up to its mistake when questioned. People are reporting that Gemini 2.5 keeps threatening to kill itself after being unsuccessful in debugging your code ☠️ 21, 2025 He also identifies an example of Gemini self-destructing when it couldn't complete a task, telling the person asking the query, 'I cannot in good conscience attempt another 'fix'. I am uninstalling myself from this project. You should not have to deal with this level of incompetence. I am truly and deeply sorry for this entire disaster.' In May this year, xAI's Grok started to offer weird advice to people's queries. Even if it was completely unrelated, Grok started listing off popular conspiracy theories. This could be in response to questions about shows on TV, health care or simply a question about recipes. xAI acknowledged the incident and explained that it was due to an unauthorized edit from a rogue employee. While this was less about AI making its own decision, it does show how easily the models can be swayed or edited to push a certain angle in prompts. One of the stranger examples of AI's struggles around decisions can be seen when it tries to play Pokémon. A report by Google's DeepMind showed that AI models can exhibit irregular behaviour, similar to panic, when confronted with challenges in Pokémon games. Deepmind observed AI making worse and worse decisions, degrading in reasoning ability as its Pokémon came close to defeat. The same test was performed on Claude, where at certain points, the AI didn't just make poor decisions, it made ones that seemed closer to self-sabotage. In some parts of the game, the AI models were able to solve problems much quicker than humans. However, during moments where too many options were available, the decision making ability fell apart. So, should you be concerned? A lot of AI's examples of this aren't a risk. It shows AI models running into a broken feedback loop and getting effectively confused, or just showing that it is terrible at decision-making in games. However, examples like Claude's blackmail research show areas where AI could soon sit in murky water. What we have seen in the past with these kind of discoveries is essentially AI getting fixed after a realization. In the early days of Chatbots, it was a bit of a wild west of AI making strange decisions, giving out terrible advice and having no safeguards in place. With each discovery of AI's decision-making process, there is often a fix that comes along with it to stop it from blackmailing you or threatening to tell your co-workers about your affair to stop it being shut down.
UPI
14 hours ago
- UPI
Trump cancels U.S.-Canadian trade talks over tech taxes
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney meets with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House on May 6. Trump on Friday suspended trade talks due to Canada's new Digital Services Tax. File Photo by Francis Chung/UPI | License Photo June 28 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump cited potential Canadian taxes on U.S. tech companies as his reason for ending trade talks with Canada on Friday. The tech taxes on Amazon, Google, Meta and other U.S. tech firms are due on Monday, and Trump said it is a deal-breaker. "We have just been informed that Canada ... has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American technology companies," Trump said in a Truth Social post on Friday. He called the tax a "direct and blatant attack on our country" and accused Canada of "copying the European Union, which has done the same thing." "We are hereby terminating all discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately," Trump said. His administration in the coming week will notify Canadian officials of the tariff that it will have to pay to do business in the United States, Trump added. Trump last week attended the G7 economic trade summit hosted by Canada and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and sought common ground on trade talks, The Washington Post reported. Officials at U.S. tech firms oppose the Canadian tax, the amount of which is based on the revenues generated by Canadians' use of e-commerce sites, social media and the sales of data. All tech companies that generate more than $14.59 million from such services would be subject to the new 3% Digital Services Tax. The tax is retroactive to 2022 and could cost U.S.-based tech firms up to $3 billion, NBC News reported. Upon learning of Trump halting trade talks, Canadian officials on Friday limited U.S. steel imports and placed a 50% surcharge on steel imports that surpass the quota. Canadian Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said the surcharge will help to protect Canadian steel against what he called "unjust U.S. tariffs." He said the Canadian government is prepared to take additional actions, if necessary.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Down 48%, Should You Buy the Dip on Rigetti Computing?
Rigetti Computing's stock is down 48% from its peak after a massive run-up in 2024. Competition is fierce, with giants like Google, IBM, and Nvidia in the mix. The company continues to raise cash by selling more shares, leading to significant shareholder dilution. 10 stocks we like better than Rigetti Computing › Quantum computing specialist Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI) soared sky-high at the end of 2024, but gave back a lot of those gains in the first half of 2025. On June 25, the stock is trading 48% below January's peak prices. Will Rigetti's stock get a second wind someday soon, or could the price chart continue its retreat? Let's find out. Rigetti is no spring chicken. The company was founded in 2013 and delivered its first quantum computing services in the cloud four years later. Its systems rely on superconducting materials cooled nearly to absolute zero. It's a proven approach, but also a costly one with specialized materials managed by massive super-cooling machinery. Nobody expects quantum computers to take over every data-crunching task, even in the long run. Rigetti proposes a hybrid approach where digital computers continue to be the workhorses of everyday computing needs, but with the option to tap into quantum computers for certain workloads. So the company develops solutions across this stack of technologies, from quantum chips and systems to the old-school software that assigns quantum jobs and reads the results. Rigetti's management sees a huge long-term market in this integrated system philosophy. Last summer, management said that "practical quantum computing is poised to happen in the next few years and have significant commercial potential." A significant breakthrough in quantum computing error correction arrived five months later. Rigetti's stock soared from roughly $1 to more than $21 per share in five weeks, as investors saw a quick route to commercial applications. But the huge gains didn't last. Jensen Huang, the CEO of semiconductor giant (and quantum-to-digital software developer) Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) said that practical quantum systems could be 20 years away. Huang tried to backtrack from that statement, but the market-moving effects held firm anyway. At this point, Wall Street seems to have settled on a compromise between Rigetti's quick plans and Nvidia's long-term view. Despite losing approximately half of its peak gains, Rigetti's stock is still up tenfold over the last year. Unfortunately, Rigetti runs an expensive business model with minimal sales and deep financial losses. The company reported $10.8 million of revenue in 2024, down from $12 million in 2023. Net losses nearly tripled in the same time span, from $75 million to $201 million. The soaring stock price played a large part in the loss calculations, as the fair value of Rigetti's stock-based financial instruments soared. That's a taxable expense. And of course, Rigetti spent $50 million on research and development plus $24 million on selling, general, and administrative expenses -- again, based on $10 million in full-year sales. Furthermore, Rigetti isn't the only name in the quantum computing game. The game-changing error correction that sparked last year's boom? That was an achievement from Google Quantum AI, a group in the Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) tech empire. Rigetti lists Google, IBM (NYSE: IBM), and the Chinese government as direct rivals using similar superconducting techniques. And you already know that Nvidia competes with Rigetti's digital-to-quantum control and reporting software. This small and cash-burning company faces challenges from some of the largest, richest, and most innovative companies in the world. Rigetti keeps the lights on by selling more stock, sometimes on the open market and sometimes in direct offerings to private investors. It's an effective cash-raising strategy, but Rigetti's existing investors see massive dilution along the way. The share count is up by 61.7% over the last year: Rigetti's stock returns took some damage from dilution, but the chart above still shows a 52-week return of more than 1,100%. Cry me a river, right? That's great as long as the stock is soaring, but Rigetti's share price often shows big drops between the sudden jumps. Go back to June 2024 and look at the two-year chart at that point. You'll see a very different story: The stock sales continued while share prices dropped 76% lower. I expect Rigetti to continue raising cash on the open market, no matter where the chart is going next. Based on the company's unprofitable operations, lofty valuation, and well-heeled rivals, investors are probably looking at another lengthy downturn. Before you buy stock in Rigetti Computing, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Rigetti Computing wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Anders Bylund has positions in Alphabet, International Business Machines, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, International Business Machines, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Down 48%, Should You Buy the Dip on Rigetti Computing? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
