Another commercial startup just flubbed a moon landing
Similar to its first attempt two years ago when it attempted to become the first commercial company to achieve a fully successful soft landing on the moon, the Tokyo-based mission team lost contact with its Resilience lander in the final stages before touchdown on the lunar surface.
Recommended Videos
In a statement on the Hakuto-R Mission 2 delivered on Friday Tokyo time, ispace explained that following the initiation of Resilience's landing sequence, mission controllers were unable to establish communications with the vehicle.
It said that as of 8 a.m. local time on June 6, the team had determined that it is 'unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored' and 'therefore it has been decided to conclude the mission.'
Elaborating on the lander's final moments, ispace said that commands to execute the landing sequence were transmitted at 3:13 a.m. Tokyo time.
'The Resilience lander then began the descent phase. The lander descended from an altitude of approximately 100 km to approximately 20 km, and then successfully fired its main engine as planned to begin deceleration. While the lander's attitude was confirmed to be nearly vertical, telemetry was lost thereafter, and no data indicating a successful landing was received, even after the scheduled landing time had passed.'
It added that the laser rangefinder used to measure the distance to the lunar surface experienced delays in obtaining valid measurement values. 'As a result, the lander was unable to decelerate sufficiently to reach the required speed for the planned lunar landing. Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface.'
It said that after communication was lost with Resilience, a command was sent to reboot the it, but a connection could not be established.
'Given that there is currently no prospect of a successful lunar landing, our top priority is to swiftly analyze the telemetry data we have obtained thus far and work diligently to identify the cause,' said Takeshi Hakamada, founder and CEO of ispace.
The company said it's now seeking to convince its backers that it can work through the issue and go again.
The failure of ispace's second lunar landing attempt is yet another reminder of the challenges faced by commercial lunar missions, many of which have failed to make a successful soft landing on the moon.
A breakthrough came earlier this year, however, when Texas-based Firefly Aerospace became the first commercial firm to achieve a fully successful soft landing, with its Blue Ghost Mission 1 lander. Blue Ghost operated for a couple of weeks, supporting various science experiments before finally losing power.
With space technology advancing and launch costs reducing, private firms are increasingly interested in reaching the moon, primarily to explore opportunities for mining resources.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street Circles Starbucks as China Deal Heats Up--Tech Giants and PE Titans in Bidding War
Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX) is quietly making moves in Chinaand Wall Street's watching. The coffee giant has invited a dozen heavyweight investors, including Carlyle, KKR (NYSE:KKR), EQT, and tech majors (NASDAQ:JD) and Tencent (TCEHY), into the next phase of bidding for a stake in its China operations. According to people familiar with the matter, these shortlisted parties are now reviewing financials and preparing formal proposals. Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol emphasized this isn't about raising capital. What this is about, he told analysts, is how do we ensure that the Starbucks brand is in a much better place in the future. Starbucks plans to retain a meaningful stake and is not looking to fully exit. The stakes are high. China is Starbucks' second-biggest marketbut it's also one of the most competitive. Local rival Luckin Coffee has surged ahead with cheaper drinks, faster innovation, and aggressive expansion. To stay relevant, Starbucks has started adapting its menu with more affordable fruit teas and sugar-free options. And early signs suggest it's working: same-store sales in China turned positive last quarter for the first time since late 2023. A local partner with tech and consumer insight could help Starbucks move faster, optimize supply chains, and deepen its mobile platform strategy in a market that increasingly rewards speed and price. This process has drawn interest from over 20 potential backers, though only a dozen have made it to this second round. Starbucks isn't seeking a full salebut it is exploring how to tap deeper into China's fast-evolving consumer landscape. While no deal is guaranteed, more players could enter later stages as discussions evolve. With long-term ambitions to grow its China store count from roughly 7,800 to 20,000, the right strategic partner could be a pivotal lever for Starbucks' next act in Asia. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs Pump Cash, Reshoring Pitch Splits Opinion
The U.S. just started collecting another big haul now that the August 1 tariff hikes landed. Even countries that cut new deals with Washington didn't get a passJapan and the EU are still paying 15%. Markets dipped, but stocks barely blinked; they're still close to record highs. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. Importers are the ones writing the checks, and they're coping however they can: passing costs to customers, trimming margins, finding other suppliers, or cutting their own costs. The bottom line is simplethose tariffs are stuffing the Treasury. The White House isn't pretending this is only about money. Trump's pitch is that the pain will pull manufacturing back to U.S. soil, that higher import costs will nudge companies to build here again. That's a big assumption, and people are split. The cash is already showing up: June brought a rare $27 billion surplus, largely thanks to customs duties. Still, the bigger picture is soberingthe U.S. is running a $1.34 trillion deficit year to date, so unless spending gets reined in, the tariff windfall only goes so far. Tariffs are buying time and filling coffers, but whether this becomes a real reshoring story or just temporary noise depends on follow-through and whether Washington pairs revenue with discipline. Watch if the money keeps coming and if spending gets tightened. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US defense bill proposes examination of Apple display supplier
By Stephen Nellis SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -A measure added into a massive U.S. defense spending bill in recent weeks will, if passed, ask the Pentagon to determine whether one of Apple's display suppliers should be listed as a Chinese military company. Being on the list does not block companies from doing business in the U.S. but will in coming years block them from being part of the U.S. military's supply chain. The bill, known as the National Defense Authorization Act, was approved in July by key committees in both houses of the U.S. Congress. The final bill, considered a "must-pass" because it funds the U.S. military, is expected to become law later in the year. When the bill was approved by the U.S. House of Representatives Armed Services Committee, a newly added amendment for the first time asked the U.S. Defense Department to consider whether BOE Technology Group Co, listed on Apple's official suppliers list, should be added to a list of firms that allegedly aid China's military. BOE and Apple did not respond to requests for comment. Craig Singleton, a China expert at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington think-tank, said Beijing had offered billions of dollars in subsidies, tax breaks and loans to help firms such as BOE dominate global panel production. "This creates a single‑source vulnerability that could be easily exploited to disrupt or degrade U.S. military operations, not to mention undermine commercial supply chains, during a conflict or period of heightened bilateral tension with Beijing," Singleton added. A study published last month by New York-based NERA Economic Consulting and commissioned by BOE's U.S. subsidiary found that the display industry, which includes major Korean players such as Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics, remains highly competitive, with no single player capable of significantly affecting global prices. "There is no credible risk of a supply chain disruption by mainland China display manufacturers," the report said.
