&w=3840&q=100)
Why has Iran expelled half a million Afghans in 15 days?
Millions from Afghanistan had fled to neighbouring Iran after the Taliban returned to power in 2021. Reuters
Iran has expelled over half a million Afghans since the war with Israel ended.
The United Nations and other international organisations have called the development one of the biggest forced movement of population in decades.
Millions from Afghanistan had fled to neighbouring Iran after the Taliban returned to power in 2021.
Many of them work in low-wage jobs and as labourers and allege that they face discrimination on a daily basis.
But what do we know? And why has Tehran expelled nearly half a million Afghans?
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What do we know?
Iran initially announced the deportation program in March.
Tehran had set a July 6 deadline for Afghan migrants to leave.
Hundreds of thousands of Afghans have been deported from Iran over the past week alone.
The International Organisation for Migration (IOM) has estimated that 508,426 Afghans have left Iran via the border between June 24 and July 9 alone.
That figure was 33,956 last Wednesday, 30,635 last Tuesday, and 51,000 last Friday.
That figure in June was over 256,000.
Some reports say that even those with valid visas have been forcibly removed.
The Afghans have been making the crossing in searing weather.
Conditions have hit as high as 40 degrees Celsius.
Footage shows hundreds of migrants queuing up at the Islam Qala border in Western Afghanistan.
Mihyung Park, chief of mission for the UN's international organisation for migration, told CNN, 'There are thousands of people under the sun - and you know how hot Herat can be. It is quite dire. Last week was quite massive.'
Making things worse, many of these children are unaccompanied minors.
'Last week it was about 400 unaccompanied, separated children – that is a lot,' Park added.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Some say they were have been in Iran for years, and that they were treated badly by the authorities.
'First, they took $200 (Rs 17,150) from me. Then they sent me to the detention center where I was kept for two nights and they forced me to pay another $50 (Rs 4,200). In the detention center they wouldn't give us food or drinking water. There were around 200 people there, and they would beat us up, they would abuse us,' Bashir told CNN.
A young Afghan migrant who lives in Tehran told _RFE/RL h_is father was ill-treated by the police.
'My father was arrested and tortured on charges of espionage,' he said. 'His feet were tied with chains, and he was not given food or water. He was detained by the Iranian police for several days and later deported to Afghanistan. The situation here for Afghan refugees is very bad,' he added.
This individual said his visa has also expired. He is fearful of the same treatment at the hands of the authorities.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Refugees, most of whom are women and children, are being forced to return to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan under dire circumstances. Image courtesy: UN Women
'The situation of Afghan refugees has deteriorated further over the past week or two', another refugee told the outlet.
'Even those who have legal status and work live in fear. Most of our friends have been expelled. The situation is very worrying,' he told RFE/RL.
An Afghan woman who has lived in Iran for over a decade is now heading home with her five children.
'I didn't even get to pack their clothes. They came in the middle of the night. I begged them to give me just two days to collect my things. But they didn't listen. They threw us out like garbage', she told The Guardian.
'From Shiraz to Zahedan [close to the Afghan border], they took everything from us. My bank card had $149 (Rs 12,700). They charged $1 (Rs 85) for a bottle of water, $2 (Rs 170) for a cold sandwich. And if you didn't have it, your child went without,' she added.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The woman now says she has no prospects in Afghanistan – and has to support her children and elderly mother.
Things are even worse for women who are making the crossing. This is because under Afghan law, they are not allowed to venture out without male guardians. Anyone violating the law is subject to flogging.
Human rights groups have sounded the alarm at these developments, saying most migrants have 'nothing but the clothes on their back' and 'in urgent need of food, medical care, and support.'
The Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) said they have faced 'exhaustion, hunger, and uncertainty on their journey home' amid high temperatures.
Officials say several people have died during the crossings, though numbers remain uncertain.
Why has Tehran expelled half a million Afghans?
The development comes in the backdrop of spurious claims by Iranian media and some officials that Israel used Afghans to spy on the country during the conflict.
State media has aired footage of an Afghan 'spy' confessing his crimes.
The individual claimed he worked for someone in Germany.
'That person contacted me and said he needed information on certain locations,' the alleged spy said. 'He asked for some locations, and I provided them. I also received $2,000 from him.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Richard Bennett, the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in Afghanistan, wrote on X last week that 'hundreds' of Afghans have been 'accused of espionage.'
Bennett also voiced apprehension about Iran's media 'labeling Afghans [and] minority communities as traitors'.
Immigration has long been an issue in Iran, which has played host to the largest number of refugees anywhere in the world.
It appears that the authorities are using this as a pretext to carry out their long-awaited plans.
Experts say authorities in Iran are using such claims as a pretext to carry out their long-awaited plans. AFP
'The gloves are off,' Arafat Jamal, the UN refugee agency representative in Kabul, told The New York Times. 'There's a bit of a frenzy at the moment, no one is going to oppose deportations of Afghans right now so those who wish to deport them have been ramping it up.'
'We've always striven to be good hosts, but national security is a priority, and naturally illegal nationals must return,' Iran's government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani said on July 1.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The situation in Afghanistan bears watching too.
Hundreds of thousands of Afghans have returned from Pakistan, which is also planning a similar programme.
The UNHCR has claimed that at least 1.2 million Afghans have been forcibly sent back from Iran and Afghanistan.
The agency warns that this could cause a crisis in Afghanistan.
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
India–Maldives Ties: 8 key pacts inked in PM Modi-Muizzu meet; UPI, debt relief, fisheries, FTA on table
ANI photo India and the Maldives on Friday exchanged eight important agreements covering debt repayment, fisheries, digital payments, and a new Line of Credit worth Rs 4,850 crore, during PM Narendra Modi's visit to Malé. In the presence of PM Modi and Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu, both sides reaffirmed their commitment to a stronger economic and maritime partnership. India agreed to ease Maldives' loan repayment burden by 40%, and push digital ties through UPI, RuPay and local currency trade. PM Modi also handed over 3,300 social housing units, vehicles for security forces, and medical aid kits. He and President Muizzu jointly inaugurated infrastructure projects and pledged cooperation on climate, disaster risk, and renewable energy. The visit also marked 60 years of Maldives' independence and India-Maldives diplomatic ties. PM Modi called the agreements a reflection of India's 'Neighbourhood First' approach and long-standing friendship with the island nation.


Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Rahul, Pradhan spar over ‘vacant' reserved varsity teaching posts
After LS Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi flagged vacancies in teaching positions for SC, ST, and OBC categories in central universities Friday and referred to it as a 'planned conspiracy', Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan hit out saying the Centre has increased the number of teaching positions in the past 10 years. Citing data presented in response to a question in the RS Wednesday, Gandhi said on X: 'Data presented by the Modi government in Parliament is evidence of the deprivation of Bahujans and institutionalized Manuvad.' Stating that these posts 'are deliberately kept vacant', Gandhi said: 'This is not mere negligence but a well-planned conspiracy—to keep Bahujans out of education, research, and policymaking.' 'In the name of NFS (Not Found Suitable), thousands of qualified SC, ST, OBC candidates are being declared unfit under a Manuvadi mindset, and the government is unwilling to take any accountability. This is completely unacceptable,' he said. Around 80% of posts sanctioned in central universities for professors under the OBC category, 83% in the ST category, and 64% in the SC category remain vacant, the RS was informed. In response, Pradhan said Friday: 'Rahul Gandhi has raised the matter of 'not found suitable.' In 2019, the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Teachers' Cadre) Act was passed. For the first time in independent India, reservation for SC/ST/OBC categories in the posts of assistant prof, associate prof, and prof was ensured through an Act. The Act also says that if a suitable person is not found, the post won't cease to exist or lapse.' 'I would like to ask Rahul Gandhi… in their (Congress) tenure how many posts were converted into 'general' category where candidates were 'not found suitable.' And in Modi's tenure… not even one has been converted,' he said.


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Opposition motion in RS to oust Justice Varma was submitted, not admitted
NEW DELHI: The Lok Sabha will take up an all-party motion to remove Justice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad HC over the cash-in-house controversy. The opposition-sponsored notice for a similar motion in the Rajya Sabha hasn't been admitted. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now RS secretariat, after a mandatory scrutiny, didn't find it to be in "complete compliance with the procedure", sources said. Former Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar's move to allow the notice is believed to have caused unhappiness within the government. Now that it has been clarified that it was not admitted, it clears the way for LS Speaker Om Birla to choose three members of the probe panel, comprising CJI or an SC judge, an HC chief justice and a jurist, to probe the allegations of corruption against Varma. The RS chairperson would've had an equal say in the matter if RS secretariat ruled otherwise. All parties agree Varma ouster should be a joint call, says Rijiju The decision about Lok Sabha taking up the matter, announced by parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju, was followed by 152 members drawn from all political parties signing the motion. The issue is said to be at the core of former RS chairman and ex-Veep Jagdeep Dhankhar's abrupt resignation on Monday. Dhankhar had accepted the motion signed by 63 opposition members against Justice Yashwant Varma despite the decision at all-party meeting on Sunday that process for the removal of the judge should begin in the LS. Dhankhar's action of accepting opposition's notice is said to have set in motion a chain of events, murmurs of a "secret deal" and, crucially, a move by BJP-led coalition to signal their loss of trust in the Chairman, leading to his surprise exist on "health grounds". Rijiju reiterated Friday that there was a unanimous decision of all political parties to move for the removal of Varma, asserting that the Lok Sabha will take up the motion. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The minister said all political parties had agreed that the removal of Justice Varma should be a joint call, adding that the proceedings will be taken up in the Lok Sabha and then moved to the Rajya Sabha, in line with the Judges (Inquiry) Act. "We shouldn't remain in any doubt; proceedings will begin in the Lok Sabha," he said. Section 3, sub-section (2) of the Act says, "If notices of motions for removal of a Judge are given on the same day in both Houses of Parliament, no committee shall be constituted unless the motion has been admitted in both Houses, and where such motion has been admitted in both Houses, the committee shall be constituted jointly by the speaker and the chairman."