logo
Republicans and Democrats visited ‘Alligator Alcatraz' for the first time. Here's what they saw.

Republicans and Democrats visited ‘Alligator Alcatraz' for the first time. Here's what they saw.

Yahoo19 hours ago
MIAMI — Democrats on Saturday called for the closure of 'Alligator Alcatraz' after touring the controversial pop-up tent immigration detention center that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis quickly assembled in the Everglades.
DeSantis has looked to match President Donald Trump's hard line on immigration, painting his state as an eager partner in the president's plan to detain and deport potentially millions of immigrants.
At least five members of Congress and roughly 20 state legislators toured the detention center over the weekend, the first inspection by elected officials of the area since it opened about a week ago. Trump visited the site ahead of detainees arriving earlier this month, accompanied by DeSantis and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and since then news accounts of dire living conditions have emerged.
While Republicans insisted that the facility was appropriate and clean, and staffed similar to any detention facility, Democratic lawmakers raised concerns about food quantity, drinking water and high temperatures, with Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz calling the facility an 'internment camp.'
'They are essentially packed into cages, wall to wall humans, 32 detainees per cage,' she said in a news conference following the tour.
Democrats also said they thought they got a 'sanitized' version of the center, and complained they were not allowed to talk to detainees or enter the tents where people were living so that they could get a better look and understanding of the conditions.
Members were shown areas where food was being prepared and a tent where medical care was being provided.
GOP state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia, a DeSantis ally, defended the conditions as 'clean, air conditioned and well-kept,' and said he lay down on one of the beds and thought it was comfortable. He countered that lawmakers would be allowed to talk to detainees if they requested a specific person by name, at least 48 hours in advance, under ICE rules.
'The rhetoric does not match the reality,' Ingoglia said. 'It's basically all political theater coming from the [Democrats]. What they're saying is pure bullshit.'
The visiting lawmakers were not allowed to bring phones, cameras or any other electronic devices with them, and while members of Congress were permitted to bring staff, state lawmakers were not. Kevin Guthrie — Florida's executive director of emergency management who was at one point considered to lead FEMA under the Trump administration — led the tour, members told POLITICO.
Republican state Sen. Jay Collins, who's on the short list to be the next lieutenant governor of Florida and runs a nonprofit that does disaster relief, said it was similar to the facilities he has seen in emergency situations and when he was in the military. He noted there were backup generators and praised the setup as going 'above and beyond.'
'This is one of several stops along the way for people who are detained by ICE as they go back to their country of origin,' he said.
But Democrats, including Rep. Maxwell Frost, accused the state of obscuring potentially dangerous and unsanitary conditions.
In the future, Frost said he plans to show up unannounced — an ability members of Congress have for federal facilities — to speak with family members of those detained. He also criticized the arrangement between Florida and federal officials on who is actually running the facility.
'There was so much ambiguity on under what authority people are being held here, and whether this is a state facility or federal facility,' he said. 'What we heard was very clear: ICE is giving them the directions from A to Z.'
Democratic members of Congress said they'd already planned on showing up at the facility unannounced on Saturday before the DeSantis administration announced official tours. State Democratic lawmakers showed up uninvited on July 3, but were turned away because of security concerns. They sued in response.
Many of those lawmakers returned for Saturday's tour, including state Sens. Shevrin Jones of Miami Gardens and Carlos Guillermo Smith and state Rep. Anna Eskamani, both of Orlando.
'Alligator Alcatraz' has drawn backlash among environmentalists — who have sued to try to stop it — as well as Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans who privately conceded they're worried about the area's fragile ecosystem and effects on tribal lands. But lawmakers told POLITICO they didn't have time to ask questions about the environment.
Democratic state House leader Fentrice Driskell drew attention to how expensive she said the facility was to the state in an interview, which is estimated to cost $450 million a year. It's not clear how much of the expenses will ultimately be reimbursed by the federal government, and an email to the state's emergency division inquiring was not immediately returned.
'We are talking about tents, metal bedding with very thin mattresses and pillows,' Driskell said, adding that restrooms and showers were 'jail-like.'
Members did not get many questions answered, she said, and were instead encouraged to file public records requests when they asked about which contractors were hired to provide services and what kinds of crimes detainees had been accused of committing, other than illegal border entry.
Driskell said her tour was abruptly cut short due to a security issue that they didn't get any additional information about. Her group had a dozen lawmakers present, and she accused the state of trying to 'put its best foot forward' and that the tour was 'pre-planned and staged.'
Asked why Republicans had such vastly different impressions, Driskell replied: 'If you only see what was shown and don't have a problem already with rounding up immigrants — even if some of them have not committed crimes — then you would be OK with what you saw.'
Kimberly Leonard reported from Miami.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

There's hope again for Pennsylvanians who want recreational marijuana legalized in the state. Maybe
There's hope again for Pennsylvanians who want recreational marijuana legalized in the state. Maybe

Miami Herald

time24 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

There's hope again for Pennsylvanians who want recreational marijuana legalized in the state. Maybe

HARRISBURG - Recreational marijuana is back on the table for state lawmakers. But it's still a long way away from being legally sold in Pennsylvania. Adult-use cannabis came the closest it's ever gotten to being legalized in Pennsylvania in May, after the state House passed a proposal to allow state-owned stores to run a burgeoning legal marijuana market that nearby states have said has brought in tens of millions of dollars in additional revenue each year. But a state Senate committee quickly killed the bill, citing opposition from both Democrats and Republicans to the state-store model. Now, lawmakers are trying a different approach. State Sens. Dan Laughlin, R-Erie, and Sharif Street, D-Philadelphia, introduced their own proposal Thursday to legalize recreational marijuana by relying on current medical marijuana retailers to kick off the expansion of the market, while setting aside 15 licenses for small businesses to try to get a piece. The two lawmakers have worked on adult-use cannabis legislation in the past, the culmination of which came together in the bill introduced this week that Laughlin said was "years in the making." Under their bill, anyone in Pennsylvania who is 21 or older would be allowed to possess, consume, purchase, or transport adult-use cannabis. Senate Republicans have broadly opposed legalizing recreational marijuana, though Laughlin has remained a supporter for years. And support appears to be growing, Street said, noting that the bill has bipartisan support in the House and Senate. A similar bill will be introduced in the state House in the coming weeks, said Street, who last week launched his campaign for Congress. "There is legitimate representation and input from all four caucuses in the construction of this bill, and I think that's important to ultimately getting a bill that can get to the governor's desk," Street said. Under the bill, legalization of recreational marijuana would be monitored by a new, seven-member oversight panel of political appointees, titled the Cannabis Control Board, to be led by an executive director and chief medical officer. It would also move the Department of Health's current purview of the state's medical marijuana program to the new board. Senate Bill 120 also would allow nonviolent marijuana offenses to be expunged from a person's record, as well as try to target the benefits of the new industry to "disproportionately impacted areas" by the criminalization of marijuana. Among the other proposals in the 181-page bill introduced Thursday: -Edible forms of marijuana would be allowed to be sold in retail stores, which are currently unregulated in Pennsylvania. -Residents could have two mature marijuana plants at their homes. -Marijuana usage would be banned from all public places, including sidewalks and alleys. -Possession would be limited to 30 grams of cannabis flower, 1,000 milligrams of edible THC, or 5 grams of cannabis concentrate. -The proposal also suggests additional fixes to the state's medical marijuana law, including how employers should handle medical marijuana users in the workplace. Under the legislation, employers cannot fire or refuse to hire someone because they have a medical marijuana card, but can fire them if they are not doing their job properly due to their marijuana usage. They can also drug test if it is seen as necessary for "safety-sensitive positions." Laughlin said in an email that there is "no timetable" on when he will call up the bill for a vote. As the chair of the Law and Justice Committee, he previously fast-tracked the House recreational marijuana bill for a vote, where it ultimately failed to pass the committee and will not be reconsidered. Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman, R-Indiana, threw cold water on any hopes that recreational marijuana could be legalized as part of this year's budget, which Gov. Josh Shapiro has repeatedly proposed as a new source of state revenue. Pennsylvania's state budget was due by the start of this fiscal year, and is now nearly two weeks late, with no budget deal in sight. In a statement, Pittman said he does not "see a prevailing view for legalization of recreational marijuana within our caucus as part of the current budget." Still, Street said he remains optimistic it could be part of this year's budget, or next year's. He pointed out that the state would receive approximately 25% of the funds generated by the licensing and sale of marijuana, which he said could help fund Pennsylvania's mass transit systems, as SEPTA and other agencies face a fiscal crisis. "Realistically, we need more revenue, and this is a good alternative," Street added, in reference to the state's $5.5 billion budget gap. Even boxing champion Mike Tyson, who in April was named CEO of a Las Vegas-based cannabis company, chimed in to voice his support of the bipartisan effort to legalize recreational marijuana. "Encouraging to see the PA GOP introduce a rec bill today," Tyson wrote on X Thursday. "This bill would ensure that PA residents have access to safe, tested cannabis as opposed to the unsafe, untaxed pesticide laden stuff the illicit cartel operators are selling." The Laughlin-Street proposal would also allow the behemoth multistate operators that control much of Pennsylvania's medical marijuana market to continue to do so, though the legislation would limit the number of storefronts a single company can have to 24. The medical marijuana industry broadly praised the bill on Thursday as one "poised to create thousands of jobs" that "ensures equitable access," according to a news release from the Pennsylvania Cannabis Coalition. Meanwhile, opponents of adult-use cannabis quickly rejected it. "Lawmakers should prioritize the public health and safety of Pennsylvania families, not hand over our children and neighborhoods to the marijuana lobby," said Dan Bartkowiak, chief strategy officer at the ultraconservative Pennsylvania Family Council, in a news release. Laughlin can call up the bill for a vote in his committee at any time, though sweeping policy changes or new revenue generators are usually negotiated as part of a final budget deal, Street said. _____ Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

NFLPA denies tension in its camp, says executive director Lloyd Howell wasn't asked to resign
NFLPA denies tension in its camp, says executive director Lloyd Howell wasn't asked to resign

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NFLPA denies tension in its camp, says executive director Lloyd Howell wasn't asked to resign

The NFLPA's executive committee sent a memo to players on Sunday, denying that executive director Lloyd Howell was asked to step down. Howell has come under scrutiny since ESPN reported he has maintained a part-time consulting job with the Carlyle Group, a private equity firm that holds league approval to seek minority ownership in NFL franchises. Advertisement That followed the revelation that the NFL Players Association and the league had a confidentiality agreement to keep quiet an arbitrator's ruling about possible collusion by owners over quarterback salaries. In January, arbitrator Christopher Droney ruled there wasn't sufficient evidence of collusion by owners in contract negotiations with quarterbacks after the Cleveland Browns gave QB Deshaun Watson a record $230 million fully guaranteed contract. But Droney did conclude that 'by a clear preponderance of the evidence,' Commissioner Roger Goodell and the league's general counsel encouraged owners to restrict players' guaranteed money in their contracts. The union plans to appeal the ruling, a person with knowledge of that decision told The Associated Press on Wednesday. The letter sent to players on Sunday and obtained by the AP said: 'As members of the NFLPA Executive Committee, we categorically reject false reports insinuating doubts within this committee or suggestions that we have asked our Executive Director to step down. We further reject attempts to mischaracterize the committee's views or divide our membership. We have established a deliberate process to carefully assess the issues that have been raised and will not engage in a rush to judgment. Advertisement "We believe in and remain committed to working with our Executive Director and other members of NFLPA staff and player leadership who have a shared mission to advance the best interests of players. As we approach the 2025 season, we look forward to continuing our important work together and ensuring the strength and unity of our association.' ___ AP NFL:

Democrat Ro Khanna Demands Vote To Release Full Jeffrey Epstein Files
Democrat Ro Khanna Demands Vote To Release Full Jeffrey Epstein Files

Miami Herald

time27 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Democrat Ro Khanna Demands Vote To Release Full Jeffrey Epstein Files

Representative Ro Khanna (D‑CA) has announced plans to force a vote in the House of Representatives demanding the full, unredacted release of all documents related to disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Khanna said he will introduce an amendment this week that would require the House Speaker to bring the measure to a roll-call vote, putting every member of Congress on the record. Newsweek contacted Khanna's team via email and House Speaker Mike Johnson via online form for comment outside of usual working hours on Sunday. As reported by Newsweek, Epstein, who died in prison six years ago while facing sex trafficking charges, had maintained close ties with numerous high-profile figures around the world. Though his death was officially ruled a suicide, speculation has persisted for years that he may have been murdered to prevent the release of a so-called "client list," a roster some believe could implicate prominent political figures, including President Donald Trump, former President Bill Clinton, and the U.K.'s Prince Andrew. After being accused of sexual abuse connected to the Epstein scandal, Prince Andrew denied all accusations against him and resigned from royal duties in 2020. Clinton maintains that he did not have any contact with Epstein after the financier was accused of sex crimes, and never visited his now-infamous private island of Little St. James in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The controversy was reignited last month when billionaire Elon Musk alleged, in a since-deleted social media post, that the government had withheld Epstein-related records because "Trump is in the Epstein files." The president dismissed the claim, saying he "had nothing to do with it," but it sparked further interest in the government's records. Trump has denied any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, although they were known to have interacted in social and professional circles in the early 2000s. The former president distanced himself from Epstein after the financier admitted soliciting prostitution from a minor in Florida and was sentenced to 18 months in prison in June, 2008. During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump pledged to make Epstein-related files public. A partial release occurred in February, overseen by Attorney General Pam Bondi. But earlier this week, both Trump and Bondi announced that their investigation had turned up "no incriminating 'client list,'" prompting sharp criticism from Democrats, and even backlash from some of Trump's own MAGA supporters who had anticipated deeper revelations. A memo, first reported by Axios, said investigators found "no incriminating 'client list'" and "no credible evidence ... that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals." It also said video footage from the Manhattan jail where Epstein was being held when he died supported a medical examiner's finding that he had died by suicide. In a TruthSocial post on Saturday, Trump urged others to "not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about." Late Saturday, Khanna posted to his X account: "Why are the Epstein files still hidden? Who are the rich & powerful being protected? On Tuesday, I'm introducing an amendment to force a vote demanding the FULL Epstein files be released to the public. The Speaker must call a vote & put every Congress member on record." The post has since had over 432k views. Khanna's initiative is seen as a way to hold both Congress and the Justice Department accountable, especially as the Department of Justice (DOJ), led by Trump-appointed officials, including Bondi, recently reversed its previous commitment to release more documents. The move is also politically strategic. If Khanna's proposal is accepted, it would force a House vote on releasing the full Epstein files, allowing the public to see how each representative stands on the matter, with many praising it as a savvy political move that puts pressure on those trying to avoid scrutiny. This comes after months of mounting bipartisan frustration. Though Democrats have led the charge, some Republican voices have also joined the call for full transparency. However, the Justice Department's decision to halt further disclosures has renewed criticism that the agency is protecting politically sensitive figures. Earlier this month, congressional Democrats, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin, called for the release of any documents mentioning Trump. In response to criticism of his proposal on X, Khanna said: "This is about transparency and restoring trust, not partisan politics. The public outcry is apparent. The files should be fully released and can be done so consistent with DOJ principles of protecting victims and the innocent." Even if the measure fails, Khanna's supporters argue it will create a clear public record—either the files will be released, or voters will know exactly who stood in the way. With trust in government transparency at stake, the coming vote could mark a pivotal moment in the long-running Epstein saga. Related Articles Republican Backs Push to Repeal Part of Trump Bill Days After Voting For ItExclusive: Ro Khanna on War Powers and Avoiding Another 'Endless' ConflictSenator Says War Powers Resolution Against Trump Will Have GOP SupportWar Powers Act Explained as Thomas Massie, Ro Khanna Push House Resolution 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store