
Rachel Reeves' uncle reveals why she was crying at PMQs as he blasts Keir Starmer and Labour for 'joke' first year in power
Terry Smith, 72, the brother of the Chancellor's mother Sally Reeves, also advised his niece to 'stop spending money on the migrants and focus on fixing the country instead'.
But the retired construction company owner and vintage car enthusiast, who hails from north Kent, is clear that the Prime Minister, in his view, was responsible for Ms Reeves' sobbing.
'I think Rachel was upset because she wasn't getting the backing she deserved, Keir Starmer immediately backtracked and backed her', he told MailOnline today.
And he does not think she should be blamed for some of the 'farcical' policies and decisions Labour has made - pointing the finger at the PM, Angela Rayner, Ed Miliband 'and the rest'.
The pound and bond markets plunged as tears tumbled down her face while the Chancellor looked directly at the Labour leader. But she later insisted she had been dealing with a 'personal issue' - not a row with her boss or colleagues.
But her uncle Terry told MailOnline: 'For Rachel to be taking all the responsibility just doesn't seem right'.
He added: 'I don't agree with Rachel's politics, but I don't think she deserves all the blame. Keir Starmer needs to take some responsibility, as do Angela Rayner, Ed Miliband and the rest - they are all begging for money from her for their departments'.
Terry, who has said he is proud of his niece but opposes her political views, has admitted he is upset about the way Labour Government has targeted pensioners.
'I'm a pensioner, I have paid my dues all my life. I think pensioners have been wrongly treated and should not be involved in this issue and should be left alone', he said.
'I never thought the winter fuel payments should be going to rich people - but now it seems like they're going to everyone again. They should be means tested.
'The benefits policy, obviously we need to get the costs lower, but I don't understand where this new black hole has come from.
'When she started Rachel said there was a black hole, she filled that, and now there's another one.
'They seem to have spent all the money on the NHS and now there's nothing left for anything else - that and the people coming across on small boats.
'They should just stop spending money on the migrants and focus on fixing the country instead'.
He added: 'It has just been farcical - the whole thing is a joke.'
Uncle Terry spoke out after Keir Starmer 's claim that he did not know Rachel Reeves was in tears was branded 'nonsense' after the Tories insisted they gave Labour 'early warning' of her distress.
Tory MPs revealed they alerted Labour whips to the fact that the Chancellor was weeping in the Commons to ensure she got help.
They say that was at 11.43am – 17 minutes before Prime Minister's Questions when Ms Reeves had tears rolling down her cheeks as she sat next to an apparently oblivious Sir Keir.
One Tory MP said: 'It simply beggars belief that with that much warning, the PM wasn't told.
'Nearly 20 minutes before PMQs began, we could see Reeves was already tearful sitting on the front bench and we alerted Labour whips to the problem.
'It's nonsense to say Starmer wouldn't have been aware.'
Last night Downing Street was still insisting Sir Keir spent the entire half-hour session of questions unaware of her trauma.
But amid continued confusion, party sources claimed last night that Labour whips were so worried at Ms Reeves' state of mind, they tried to stop her appearing alongside Sir Keir.
The Treasury insisted her distress was caused by a personal matter, while Ms Reeves sought to bounce back next day with an unexpected appearance at the launch of the Government's ten-year health plan
They said whips pleaded with Ms Reeves – who had briefly come out of the Chamber – not to go back inside.
But sources close to the Chancellor said there was 'no truth' in that claim.
Ms Reeves said yesterday she regretted going into PMQs in tears 'after a tough day in the office'.
She told The Guardian: 'It was a personal matter but it was in the glare of the camera.
'And that's unfortunate, but I think people have seen that I'm back in business and back out there.'
The events – which sparked turmoil on financial markets – began after Ms Reeves was rebuked by Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle as she entered the Commons over taking too long to answer Treasury questions the previous day.
She was overheard replying that she was 'under so much pressure' before briefly taking her seat but then leaving afterwards in what appeared to be distress.
To the surprise of some Labour MPs, Ms Reeves then reappeared to take her place at Sir Keir's side when he arrived for PMQs.
But to the horror of colleagues, the self-styled Iron Chancellor then wept beside the PM.
MPs were surprised that Sir Keir was seemingly oblivious to how upset she was, even after Tory leader Kemi Badenoch pointed out how 'absolutely miserable' she looked.
Sir Keir also forgot to guarantee that his Chancellor's position was safe after her role in last week's humiliating U-turn on saving almost £5 billion from controversial welfare cutbacks.
The Government was forced to deny reports that Sir Keir and his deputy Angela Rayner had rows with Ms Reeves over the benefits fiasco which had upset her.
The Treasury insisted her distress was caused by a personal matter, while Ms Reeves sought to bounce back next day with an unexpected appearance at the launch of the Government's ten-year health plan.
But questions have remained over how Sir Keir could not have been aware of her state of mind – especially as his parliamentary aide Chris Ward tapped her on the shoulder to check she was OK.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rayner backs down in Islamophobia free speech row
Angela Rayner has backed down on 'secretive' plans for a new definition of Islamophobia after free speech campaigners threatened legal action. The Deputy Prime Minister has expanded and extended a public consultation over the proposals, which critics fear will rubber-stamp a controversial definition. The consultation will now run for an extra week and a link for responses to the plans has been made public. The move followed complaints by the Free Speech Union (FSU), which said the new definition was being drawn up behind closed doors. The FSU wrote to Ms Rayner expressing concern that the process would enshrine a definition which treats Islamophobia as a type of racism. The definition has been criticised for being so expansive that it could threaten free speech, act as a de facto blasphemy law and stifle legitimate criticism of Islam as a religion. In his letter, Lord Young, the general secretary of the FSU, said the consultation questions appeared to be 'heavily weighted' in favour of a 'predetermined outcome', endorsing a definition 'closely aligned' with that put forward by the all party parliamentary group (APPG) on British Muslims. The APPG definition was adopted by Labour and stated that 'Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness'. Lord Young said key groups that might challenge the definition over its impact on free speech and provide alternative views had not been invited to submit evidence. He listed Christian Concern, the Christian Institute, the Adam Smith Institute, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Ms Rayner's department has extended the deadline to July 20 and widened the consultees. Lord Young said it needed to give sufficient time to take on board all the responses to the plan. Lord Young said: 'I'm glad the working group has abandoned its plans to confine its consultation to a small group of hand-picked activists in response to my letter. 'But given that the group will now be carrying out a proper consultation and extending the deadline, I trust it will delay coming up with a definition of Islamophobia until it has had a proper chance to consider all the responses. 'Hoping to complete its work within a couple of months is now completely unrealistic.' A spokesman for Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'The independent working group is listening to a broad range of views and perspectives. 'The call for evidence will enable them to build on the extensive consultation already undertaken, ensuring the advice provided to Government reflects diverse experiences and opinions, while also safeguarding our vital and unwavering right to freedom of speech.'


Sky News
35 minutes ago
- Sky News
Ex-Tory chairman Sir Jake Berry defects to Reform
Former Tory chairman Sir Jake Berry has defected to Reform, in the latest blow to the Conservatives. The former MP for Rossendale and Darwen, who served as Northern Powerhouse minister under Boris Johnson, said he had defected to Nigel Farage's party because the Tories had "lost their way".


The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
BMW secretly followed, filmed and then sacked worker over injury claim
A disabled BMW worker was discriminated against and unfairly dismissed after managers authorised covert surveillance, believing he was exaggerating his back pain, a tribunal has found. Mohamed Kerita, who worked in the firm's manufacturing factory, had suffered with back pain from 2017, the Reading tribunal heard. In March 2023, a physiotherapist emailed absence manager Richard Darvill to say Mr Kerita had been signed off work by his GP for two months. The physiotherapist stated he could not explain the level of pain Mr Kerita was experiencing and why he remained unfit for work. Following this, Mr Darvill and HR manager Akhil Patel instructed security firm G4S to carry out surveillance of Mr Kerita, a move Employment Judge Hawksworth described as a "highly unusual step". A G4S operative filmed Mr Kerita from behind, walking around three miles in about an hour and a half, despite the claimant never having stated he could not walk. In a report, they said that there was 'no indication whatsoever that the claimant had lower back, leg or shoulder pain or was experiencing sickness or dizziness', despite not filming Mr Kerita's face. Mr Darvill later approached a senior manager to get more funding for further surveillance to ensure a 'robust outcome', the tribunal heard. In May 2023, Mr Kerita was dismissed for gross misconduct, including a fraudulent claim of company sick pay and unacceptable levels of absence. During a disciplinary meeting, he had said that he was in the wrong area and needed light duties but his managers told him there were none and sent him home, the tribunal heard. The tribunal found that Mr Kerita's back pain met the definition of a disability under the Equality Act 2010. Judge Hawksworth said it could be inferred that managers 'had a level of distrust or hostility towards associates with back conditions, and were unwilling to take their word for it that they had a back problem, or were quick to conclude that a person with a back condition was not being honest about their symptoms'. The judge added: 'We have found that the respondent made assumptions about what the claimant had told them about his ability to walk and about the G4S surveillance film.' Mr Kerita's claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments, disability discrimination and unfair dismissal succeeded.