SC refuses to intervene in Tiruchendur Temple Kumbhabhishekam schedule dispute
However, the apex court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the High Court with a review petition.
A vacation bench comprising Justice P.K. Mishra and Justice A.G. Masih was hearing the plea filed by R. Sivarama Subramaniya Sasthrigal, the Vidhayahar of the Tiruchendur temple.
The petitioner contended that the High Court's decision to form a five-member committee was arbitrary, biased, and violative of the temple's traditional religious autonomy.
According to the petitioner, three out of the five committee members had already expressed opinions on the muhurat (auspicious time) for the ceremony prior to the constitution of the committee at the instance of the state authorities, making the process 'prejudicial and futile.'
"The prescription of a muhurat is purely a religious function; it has nothing to do with regulation by the state," argued Senior Advocate K. Parameshwar for the petitioner.
"This amounts to a complete state takeover of our essential religious functions. The committee's constitution is itself flawed."
The petitioner also argued that of the five committee members, three have no traditional or historical connection to the Tiruchendur temple and belong to different sampradayas (religious denominations). He submitted that this composition disregards temple-specific traditions and Agamic customs.
The petitioner approached the Madras High Court earlier, challenging the state government's unilateral decision to fix the Kumbhabhishekam timing as July 7, 2025, between 6:00 AM – 7:00 AM, allegedly without consulting the temple's Vidhayahar.
The petitioner claimed the astrologically appropriate timing was the Abhijit Muhurtham (12:05 PM – 12:45 PM) based on ancient scriptures such as Kala Prahasiha and Sarva Muhurtha Chintamani.
Instead of adjudicating on the muhurat directly, the High Court constituted a five-member committee including the Vidhayahar (petitioner), Sivasri K. Pitchai Gurukkal (Chief Priest, Sri Karpaga Vinayagar Temple, Pillaiyarpatti), K. Subramaniaru (Thanthri, Sree Subramaniaswamy Temple, Tiruchendur, Sivasri S.K. Raja Pattar @ Chandrasekar Pattar (Sthanikar, Arulmigu Subramaniyaswamy Thirukoil, Thiruparankundram) and Melsanthi, Iyyappan Temple, Sabarimala, Kerala.
The petitioner approached the Supreme Court, arguing that the constitution of this committee was devoid of neutrality and ignored the unique traditions of the Tiruchendur temple.
Senior Advocate K. Parameshwar argued, 'This is one of the largest temples of Lord Karthikeya. Deciding the muhurat is a religious act, not a state function. This committee was flawed from inception.'
Justice P.K. Mishra said, 'The committee says you consented. Then why did you agree? Perhaps form another committee?'
Parameshwar said, 'Three members are from different sampradayas. This is an essential religious practice and not subject to judicial review.'
The apex court said, 'We are not interfering. But when you agreed to the High Court's formation of a committee, how can you challenge it now?'
Parameshwar argued, 'The state has no role here. My family has been performing this function for generations.'
The bench declined to pass any direction interfering with the High Court's order, citing that the petitioner had already participated in the committee meetings and a report was prepared.
However, it granted liberty to the petitioner to file a review petition before the Madras High Court, noting that the petitioner can approach the Supreme Court again if necessary.
'Considering the petitioner's submission that the formation of the committee is itself flawed, we permit the petitioner to prefer a review petition. Respondents submit that the petitioner has already participated in the meetings of the committee and a report has been submitted. Be that as it may, the petitioner, if they so wish, may approach the High Court with a review petition, with liberty to approach this Court again,' the SC said. UNI SNG SSP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Darr chor ko lagta hai... We are not scared': 11/7 Mumbai train blast accused hopeful of Supreme Court acquittal
Mumbai train blasts case by the Bombay High Court, several accused expressed optimism about a favorable outcome in the Supreme Court MUMBAI: Most of the accused in the 11/7 Mumbai train bombings acquitted by Bombay high court said that they were hopeful that they would be acquitted by Supreme Court as well. A relative of Naved Hussain, who was given the death sentence by a trial court and was acquitted by the high court, said it was a process of law. "We would have been disappointed if the apex court had asked the men to return to jail. That is not the case. We will fight this case legally in Supreme Court and are sure to win it there too," said the relative. Dr Tanvir Ansari, who was termed a conspirator in the case and was acquitted, said, "Chor ko darr lagta hai (A thief feels scared). We are innocent. We are not scared. The high court judgment has covered all the angles. We will see it legally." Ansari had lost his mother while in jail. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai Shareeful Rehman, elder brother of acquitted accused Zameer Shaikh, said that there was uncertainty till SC issued an order Thursday. "Now we are relaxed. We are hopeful that we will win our case in Supreme Court," said Rehman. Shaikh had lost both his parents during his time in prison. During the last 19 years that the 12 accused were in jail, either the mother or father or both of a majority of the them passed away. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo The wife of Majid Shafi Shaikh died due to medical complications while he was incarcerated. Sohail Shaikh said, "This stay is not the victory of lies of the ATS. This is a procedure. The ATS should not think it has won. The lies have been going on for the last 19 years." Another acquitted accused said the trial court ignored the torture they had suffered and the fake confessions prepared by the police. He said the high court looked into all aspects, examined all angles and acquitted them. Sajid Ansari, another acquitted accused, said he had faith in Allah and the judiciary. "The lawyers and Jamiat-ul-Ulema are fighting our case. We are sure of winning it at SC," Sajid said. While in prison, he completed seven certificate courses including those on human rights, Arabic language, tourism studies, AIDS and family education, teaching of English, and BA, MA in political science; he has also completed two years of LLB. His mother and two sisters passed away while he was in jail. Another acquitted accused, Muzammil Shaikh, who worked as a database administrator in Bengaluru, said that he lost both parents during his time in jail.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Transport & environment depts studying ban on overage vehicles, to submit report
Delhi govt asked its transport and environment departments to study the current guidelines on end-of-life vehicles, enforcement against overaged vehicles and the reaction of the public and stakeholders to the action. Govt will also assess the removal of vehicles so far and the impact of this on air quality levels, officials said on Thursday. One official added, "Govt may then file a review petition on the policy in the Supreme Court based on the findings and reports submitted by the two departments." Environment minister Manjinder Singh Sirsa said, "The environment and transport departments are studying, separately, the guidelines, their impact on the public and the benefits and consequences on ground and air quality levels. Once they complete their studies and submit the report, govt will take further decisions on filing a petition in the court." The departments will also mention the other measures they took in the last five months to curb air pollution in the city and their results, said a govt official. A 2014 order of the National Green Tribunal also prohibits the parking of vehicles aged over 15 years in public places. Following the NGT and Supreme Court's order, in 2021-22, the transport department began de-registering petrol and diesel vehicles that had completed, respectively, 15 years and 10 years of life. Then in 2023, the transport department launched an enforcement drive against these overaged vehicles found parked in public places or running on the roads. However, several vehicle owners moved court, following which govt was asked to come up with proper guidelines to handle ELVs in Delhi. The current govt relaunched the enforcement drive in July and banned provision of fuel to ELVs, both cars, trucks and bikes. However, after facing public heat the drive was halted on grounds of "critical operational and infrastructural challenges". Sirsa also wrote to pollution watchdog Commission for Air Quality Management pleading the city authorities could not accommodate the panel's imposition of the anti-ELV measure. After this, lieutenant governor VK Saxena wrote to CM Rekha Gupta, asking Delhi govt to seek a review petition before the apex court against its 2018 order restricting petrol vehicles beyond 15 years and diesel vehicles beyond 10 years from plying in Delhi-NCR. "How can a vehicle banned as unfit in Delhi run lawfully in other cities? This is against equal treatment," LG queried in the letter. Citing equality and socio-economic reasons, Saxena underlined that such rules should be proportionate, non-arbitrary and not solely based on a rigid age-based classification. He also said that the ban should be put on hold unless it was implemented across NCR. He sought a comprehensive air pollution mitigation plan within three months. Talking on similar lines, Gupta said, "Just as we requested CAQM to review its decision on overage vehicles, we will approach the Supreme Court to give us a detailed overview of our preparation in the fight against pollution, and we will let the court know of public grievances. We will fight for the rights of people.">
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Karnataka High Court Halts Deportation Of Russian Woman's Children Found In Cave
Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has intervened to temporarily halt the deportation of a Russian woman's children, emphasising the need to consider their best interests as mandated by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). The decision of Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav came during the hearing of a writ petition that was filed to challenge a sudden deportation order issued against the children. The petitioner, represented by advocate Beena Pillai, argued that the deportation process disregarded the children's welfare and violated UNCRC principles. The assistant solicitor general (ASG), appearing in the matter for the Union of India, informed the court that the children currently lack valid travel or identity documents. Based on this submission, the court observed that immediate deportation was not reasonable at this stage. However, the court stressed the importance of a detailed hearing to thoroughly examine the case. It directed the respondents to submit a written affidavit, confirming the absence of valid documents, and file their objections within two weeks. Additionally, the court issued a clear directive that no deportation plan can be executed without prior intimation to it, effectively stalling any unilateral deportation effort until the next hearing scheduled for August 18. Nina Kutina (40), along with her two daughters Preya (6) and Ama (4), was rescued by police from the Ramatirtha cave at Gokarna in Uttara Kannada district on July 11. Kutina was staying here even though her visa had expired.
