logo
As Musk's feud with Trump reignites, his business with the government is back in the crosshairs

As Musk's feud with Trump reignites, his business with the government is back in the crosshairs

NBC News19 hours ago
Elon Musk and President Donald Trump are fighting again. Now Musk's business interests — and the billions in government contracts they enjoy — are once again in the crosshairs.
Investors were already punishing Tesla Tuesday, sending shares in the electric vehicle maker more than 4% lower in afternoon trading. The stock has experienced a late-spring rally alongside the broader market but remains down some 20% so far this year. The shares have been pummeled by a global backlash to Musk's alliance with Trump on the campaign trail and in the White House, where the multibillionaire led a sweeping program of government cuts
Musk acknowledged there had been 'some blowback' to the actions taken by his Department of Government Efficiency project that may have affected Tesla sales. Yet investors remain largely bullish on the company and its efforts to pivot away from mass-market EVs and toward self-driving taxis and robotics, pushing its market valuation back toward $1 trillion.
Tesla remains Musk's best-known business, but its fortunes are less directly tied to the government than SpaceX, his rocket-building company. SpaceX's $350 billion valuation largely rests on the many government contracts that fuel it. SpaceX's work for NASA has ramped up in recent years in support of the Artemis mission to return to the moon.
Meanwhile, SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft is currently the only active vessel capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station. SpaceX has also become essential to the Department of Defense's missions taking satellites into orbit and today is responsible for the majority of such missions, according to Ars Technica.
SpaceX is privately held, meaning its shares don't trade on the open market. It is thus difficult to get a real-time gauge on how worsening relations could affect the company's fortunes. But the impact could be substantial. Since fiscal year 2000, total revenue for SpaceX and Tesla from federal unclassified contracts sits at $22.5 billion, according to Bloomberg Government data — with most of those going to the former. The Washington Post has put the figure for SpaceX alone at close to $38 billion, with $6.3 billion alone coming in 2024 — the highest annual total to date.
The dispute with Trump has also taken a chunk out of Musk's personal net worth. After soaring to an all-time high of nearly half a trillion dollars after Trump's election win, Musk's publicly available wealth tally now sits at $400 billion, though that still makes him the world's wealthiest individual by nearly $150 billion ahead of Oracle founder Larry Ellison, another Trump ally.
The Musk-Trump tiff first exploded into public view last month, shortly after Musk formally stepped down from his special government employee role, criticizing the massive spending and tax cut bill that Republican senators passed Tuesday. Trump responded at the time by threatening to 'terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. '
Musk, in turn, said he would begin 'decommissioning' the Dragon, only to reverse course hours later after an X user advised him and Trump to 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days.'
That initial flare-up subsided for a time as Musk announced he would be reining in his political spending, especially after a candidate he had backed lost a key Wisconsin Supreme Court race. Some analysts believe the current relapse in tensions between the two men will be short-lived given Musk's reliance on the government, and vice-versa.
Still, Musk is now discussing launching his own political party to address the U.S.'s fiscal imbalances, which he believes Trump's bill will exacerbate — a contention supported by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. While the South Africa-born executive is ineligible to run for office, any candidate he backed for national office would likely face immediate conflict-of-interest questions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Paramount to pay £11m in settlement with Trump over Kamala Harris interview
Paramount to pay £11m in settlement with Trump over Kamala Harris interview

Rhyl Journal

time18 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Paramount to pay £11m in settlement with Trump over Kamala Harris interview

Paramount said the money will go to Mr Trump's future presidential library, not to the president himself, and added that the settlement did not involve an apology. Mr Trump's lawyer said the president had suffered 'mental anguish' over the editing of the interview which was broadcast in October on the CBS News show 60 Minutes. In a case seen as a challenge to free speech, Paramount and CBS rejected Mr Trump's contention that the interview was edited to enhance how Ms Harris sounded and had sought to get the president's lawsuit dismissed. Under the settlement, reached with help of a mediator, Paramount agreed that 60 Minutes will release transcripts of future interviews with presidential candidates, 'subject to redactions as required for legal and national security concerns', CBS News said. Mr Trump, who did not agree to be interviewed by 60 Minutes during the presidential campaign, protested over editing which showed Ms Harris giving two different answers to a question from interviewer Bill Whitaker in separate clips aired on 60 Minutes and Face The Nation earlier in the day. CBS said both replies came as part of Ms Harris's long answer to Whitaker, but the clip was edited to be more succinct. The president's lawyer, Edward Andrew Paltzik, said that caused confusion and 'mental anguish', misleading voters and causing them to pay less attention to Mr Trump and his Truth Social platform. Paramount and controlling shareholder Shari Redstone were seeking the settlement with Mr Trump, whose administration must approve the company's proposed merger with Skydance Media. CBS News president and chief executive Wendy McMahon and 60 Minutes executive producer Bill Owens, who both opposed a settlement, have resigned in recent weeks. The case has been closely watched by advocates for press freedom and journalists at CBS, whose lawyers called the lawsuit 'completely without merit' and pledged to fight it after it was filed. The Freedom of the Press Foundation, a media advocacy group that says it is a Paramount shareholder, said it would file a lawsuit in protest if a settlement was reached. In December, ABC News settled a defamation lawsuit by the president over statements made by anchor George Stephanopoulos, agreeing to pay 15 million dollars (£11 million) towards Mr Trump's presidential library rather than engage in a public dispute. Meta reportedly paid 25 million dollars (£18 million) to settle another Trump lawsuit over the tech firm's decision to suspend his social media accounts after the riot at the US Capitol on January 6 2021.

Hamas ‘ready for a ceasefire' but only if a deal ends the war in Gaza
Hamas ‘ready for a ceasefire' but only if a deal ends the war in Gaza

Rhyl Journal

time18 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Hamas ‘ready for a ceasefire' but only if a deal ends the war in Gaza

The militant group stopped short of accepting a US-backed proposal announced by Donald Trump hours earlier. The US president said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire and urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. He has been increasing pressure on the Israeli government and Hamas to broker a ceasefire and hostage agreement and bring about an end to the war. Mr Trump said the 60-day period would be used to work towards ending the war — something Israel says it will not accept until Hamas is defeated. He said a deal might come together as soon as next week. Hamas's response raised questions about whether the latest offer could lead to an actual pause in fighting. Hamas official Taher al-Nunu said the militant group was 'ready and serious regarding reaching an agreement', adding that the group is 'ready to accept any initiative that clearly leads to the complete end to the war'. A Hamas delegation is expected to meet Egyptian and Qatari mediators in Cairo on Wednesday to discuss the proposal, according to an Egyptian official. Throughout the nearly 21-month war, ceasefire talks have repeatedly faltered over whether the war should end as part of a deal. Hamas has said it is willing to free the remaining 50 hostages, less then half of whom are said to be alive, in exchange for a complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and an end to the war. Israel says it will only agree to end the war if Hamas surrenders, disarms and exiles itself, something the group refuses to do. An Israeli official said the latest proposal calls for a 60-day deal that would include a partial Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a surge in humanitarian aid to the territory. The mediators and the US would provide assurances about talks on an end to the war, but Israel is not committing to that as part of the latest proposal, the official said. It was not clear how many hostages would be freed as part of the agreement, but previous proposals have called for the release of about 10. Israel has yet to publicly comment on Mr Trump's announcement. On Monday, he is set to host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for talks at the White House, days after Ron Dermer, a senior Netanyahu adviser, held discussions with senior US officials about Gaza, Iran and other matters. On Tuesday, Trump wrote on social media that Israel had 'agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War'. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE.'

Maersk estimates effective US tariffs average 21% currently
Maersk estimates effective US tariffs average 21% currently

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Maersk estimates effective US tariffs average 21% currently

COPENHAGEN, July 2 (Reuters) - Maersk ( opens new tab estimates companies pay effective U.S. import tariffs of on average 21% relative to container load, the Danish shipping group said on Wednesday, less than half the rate before Washington paused its sweeping tariffs in April. Maersk said in a regular global market update that at its peak, shortly after April 2 when President Donald Trump unveiled tariffs against nearly all U.S. trading partners, the average effective rate was 54%. Its estimate was based on the group's container-weighted effective average tariff rate metric. More than a dozen major U.S. trading partners are rushing to reach agreements with the Trump administration by a July 9 deadline to avoid import tariffs jumping to higher levels. In April, Trump put a 90-day pause on the stiff levies he had announced just a week earlier that sent global financial markets into a tailspin. "The whole world is on tariff watch in July and August where various deadlines for potential trade deals with the U.S. expire," Maersk said. "The outcome of these negotiations will of course colour global trade and consumer sentiment in the months to come," it added. The company said it had seen robust container demand growth in the first half of the year. "What played out was not completely unexpected, and we did see customers advance orders ahead of the tariff announcements," it said. Maersk has seen many of its large U.S. customers reduce import dependency on China in recent years. "Many apparel and fashion customers have now reached single-digit China dependency," it said. "Other commodities like home improvements have a significantly higher level of Chinese manufacturing due to the nature of the goods," it added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store