Will Trump ease tariffs based on market sentiment? Kevin Hassett clears the air on future plans
Hassett hails tariff deals
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Days after US President Donald Trump signed an executive order that modified tariff rates for dozens of countries, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said on Sunday (August 3, 2025) that a market reaction to tariff policies will not deter the US President from proceeding with his plans to levy fees on imports.In an interview on NBC News, Kevin Hassett responded to a question on whether Trump could change the tariff rates again if the market reacted as it did in April, when the tariff announcement sent stocks tumbling. Responding to a question on the future tariff rate change, Hassett said, 'The markets have seen what we're doing and celebrated them, so I don't see how that would happen.'Host of NBC News's 'Meet the Press' Kristen Welker pressed Hassett: 'OK, but not ruling it out?' 'No, I would rule it out,' Hassett responded. 'Because these are the final deals,' he saidThe US president signed an executive order that changed tariff rates for dozens of countries after twice postponing plans to implement 'reciprocal' tariffs on other nations. Tariff rates now range from as high as 41 percent on goods from Syria to as low as 10 percent. According to the executive order signed by Trump, all imports will face a 10 percent tariff, effective August 7.Some countries have separately negotiated trade deals to set their tariff rates, including Indonesia and Thailand, which agreed to a 19 percent tariff. Meanwhile, South Korea and Japan secured 15 percent rates, and the United Kingdom finalized a 10 percent tariff. Other nations that did not negotiate deals are set to face higher tariffs.Hailing the tariff deals struck by Trump, Hassett said that those rates are 'more or less locked in' as other countries are expected to continue to press for negotiations, even after the tariffs kick in.'We have eight deals that cover about 55 percent of world GDP with our biggest trading partners, the EU, Japan, Korea, and so on,' Hassett said. 'I expect that those matters are more or less locked in, although there will have to be some dancing around the edges about exactly what we mean when we do this or that,' he added.'For the deals that aren't ready yet, they're going to get the reciprocal rates soon, and then we would expect that there might continue to be negotiations with those countries,' he continued.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Trump ends Musk's ‘five things' rule for federal workers — why did the White House finally snap and pull the plug?
Synopsis Elon Musk's 'Five Things' email program has been officially scrapped by the Trump administration, ending months of confusion and pushback from federal workers. Introduced earlier in 2025 to boost accountability, the rule forced government employees to email weekly work summaries. But after growing backlash and internal agency resistance, the Office of Personnel Management finally shut it down. This marks a clear shift in President Trump's federal reform approach and signals the administration's distancing from Musk's influence in Washington. The move reaffirms trust in traditional oversight while rejecting unnecessary tech-driven mandates that created more chaos than clarity. Elon Musk's bold attempt to reshape federal productivity has come to an end. The Trump administration has officially scrapped Musk's controversial 'Five Things' weekly email directive, a rule that had required federal employees to report five accomplishments every week. Initially launched as part of Musk's aggressive government reform strategy, the program faced mounting criticism, internal pushback, and logistical chaos. Elon Musk's 'Five Things' email program officially scrapped by Trump administration amid backlash and confusion- In a major move that reflects growing tension between President Donald Trump and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, the Trump administration has officially ended Musk's controversial 'Five Things' email directive that had stirred widespread confusion and discontent across federal agencies. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued a formal notice on August 5, 2025, revoking the program, marking a definitive shift away from Musk's once-celebrated push for government efficiency. The 'Five Things' initiative, introduced earlier this year under Elon Musk's short-lived leadership at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), required all federal employees to send weekly emails listing five key accomplishments from their work. Originally promoted as a tool for enhancing productivity and accountability, the policy quickly became a source of confusion, frustration, and resistance across multiple government departments. In the official memo released this week, OPM Director Scott Kupor stated that federal supervisors already have the 'tools and flexibility needed' to evaluate employee performance, rendering Musk's email summaries redundant and ineffective. This announcement comes just months after Musk's high-profile departure from the federal government and a public falling-out with President Trump, who had initially championed the program but later distanced himself as implementation faltered. In January 2025, President Trump tapped Elon Musk to lead the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—a bold experiment aimed at reducing bureaucracy, slashing government costs, and streamlining federal operations. Musk, known for his disruptive business style at Tesla and SpaceX, wasted no time in pushing aggressive reforms. One of his first and most visible directives was the weekly 'Five Things' email rule. According to internal sources, Musk believed the practice would enhance workplace discipline, improve visibility into government functions, and cut down on inefficiencies. But what seemed like a simple accountability tool on the surface turned into a logistical headache for many government workers. As early as February 2025, signs of internal pushback began to surface. Agencies such as the Department of Defense, NASA, State Department, and Health and Human Services began advising employees to pause or disregard the directive entirely. Internal memos cited concerns about legal risks, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and conflicting chains of command. Some supervisors complained that the requirement added administrative burdens without delivering meaningful insights. Others argued that the centralized summaries violated existing agency reporting protocols. In fact, by April, many departments had already unofficially stopped enforcing the rule—even before Musk left his post. Initially, President Trump praised Musk's approach, calling it 'ingenious' and a 'wake-up call for lazy bureaucracy.' But as criticism mounted and implementation faltered, the administration began quietly stepping back. By June, tensions between the two had boiled over. Trump publicly criticized Musk's handling of internal reforms and later revoked federal appointments aligned with Musk's DOGE team. Additionally, federal contracts involving Musk-owned companies like SpaceX, Neuralink, and The Boring Company came under review—further escalating the rift. The formal termination of the 'Five Things' policy now cements that rift, signaling the Trump administration's broader rejection of Musk-style micromanagement and automation-driven government models. In the memo issued August 5, the Office of Personnel Management stated that agencies would now 'return to existing oversight mechanisms' that include performance reviews, project evaluations, and internal accountability metrics. 'This directive is no longer in effect,' the OPM memo read. 'We believe agency leadership is fully equipped with the tools necessary to assess team performance without weekly reporting mandates.' The Trump administration's move underscores its confidence in traditional supervisory structures—and a desire to minimize administrative chaos stirred up by Musk's reforms. Musk's exit from government in late May followed a wave of resignations and infighting within DOGE. Critics called the agency 'chaotic' and 'visionless,' while supporters defended Musk's attempts to modernize Washington's outdated systems. Even after his departure, Musk remained vocal on social media, slamming what he called 'deep state resistance' to accountability and claiming that Trump 'betrayed the vision for real change.' Since then, he has focused on expanding his ventures in AI and space exploration, while DOGE has been largely sidelined within the administration. For the more than 2 million federal employees affected by the weekly email directive, the repeal comes as a major relief. The program had added extra hours of unpaid administrative work and opened employees to new levels of scrutiny, according to union leaders. The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) had been advocating for the policy to be scrapped, citing unfair labor practices and stress-related issues among staff. With this formal announcement, agencies can now focus on core mission work without the added burden of weekly summary submissions. The unraveling of Elon Musk's influence in Washington politics is now evident. From once being hailed as the face of 'Silicon Valley meets Capitol Hill,' Musk now finds himself on the outside looking in. His bold but divisive ideas—like algorithmic personnel tracking and AI-assisted departmental decision-making—failed to gain lasting traction. What's clear is that President Trump is reasserting control over his administration's direction, refocusing on efficiency through conventional oversight, and stepping back from experiments that stir more dysfunction than results. While innovation remains a key part of Trump's agenda for his second term, the administration has now drawn a clear line between meaningful reform and disruptive overreach. The end of Musk's 'Five Things' email rule symbolizes that shift. By formally terminating the program, the White House is sending a message: government reform must be functional, clear, and supported by institutional leadership—not just dictated by tech billionaires with grand visions. As 2025 moves forward, it's expected that the Trump administration will continue pushing for government modernization, but with greater respect for the realities of federal operations and agency autonomy. Q1: Why did the Trump administration end Elon Musk's 'Five Things' email rule? Because it caused confusion, added workload, and was no longer seen as useful. Q2: What was Elon Musk's government email directive all about? It required federal workers to send weekly emails listing five things they accomplished.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
US Should Not Burn Relationship With "Strong Ally Like India": Nikki Haley
New York: The US should not burn its relationship with a "strong ally like India" and give a pass to China, Indian-American Republican leader Nikki Haley said on Tuesday, amid President Donald Trump's attacks against New Delhi over tariffs and purchases of Russian oil. "India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause," Nikki Haley said in a post on X. "Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India," she said. Haley, the former Governor of South Carolina, was the US Ambassador to the United Nations under Trump's first presidential term, becoming the first Indian-American to be appointed to a cabinet-level post in the US administration. In 2013, she officially announced her candidacy for the 2024 presidential election and withdrew from the race in March last year. Her comments came hours after Trump said India has not been a "good trading partner" and announced he will raise tariffs on India "very substantially over the next 24 hours" because New Delhi is buying Russian oil and "fueling" the "war machine". India on Monday mounted an unusually sharp counterattack on the US and the European Union for their "unjustified and unreasonable" targeting of New Delhi for its procurement of Russian crude oil. New Delhi's response came after Trump asserted that Washington will substantially raise tariffs on goods from India over its energy ties with Russia. Meanwhile, Trump, in an interview with CNBC responded to a question on China and its leader, Xi Jinping, and said, "We have a very good relationship". Trump added that he might have a meeting with the Chinese President "before the end of the year, most likely, if we make a deal." He said he won't have a meeting if a deal doesn't materialise. "But we're getting very close to a deal. We're getting along with China very well." Trump added that China is "very reliant" on the US. "My relationship with them is very good. I think we'll make a good deal. It's not imperative, but I think we're going to make a good deal." He added that he has had a "great relationship" with President Xi. "We respect him a lot. They respect us a lot." (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Trump Says Tariffs On Pharma, Chips Coming By "Next Week Or So"
US President Donald Trump signaled Tuesday that fresh tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals and semiconductors could be unveiled as soon as the coming week, as he presses on in efforts to reshape global trade. Trump's latest comments, in an interview on CNBC, come days before a separate set of tariff hikes takes effect on dozens of economies later this week. The sweeping tariff plans have sparked a flurry of activity as governments seek to avert the worst of his threats -- with Switzerland's leaders heading to Washington on Tuesday in a last-minute push to avoid punitive duties. But he appears set to widen his trade wars further. The US president told CNBC that upcoming tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals could reach 250 percent, while adding that he plans for new duties on foreign semiconductors soon. "We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year, one-and-a-half years, maximum, it's going to go to 150 percent," Trump said. "And then it's going to go to 250 percent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country." Trump also said that Washington will be announcing tariffs "within the next week or so." He added: "We're going to be announcing on semiconductors and chips." Concern For US Economy Trump has taken aim at products from different countries with varying tariff rates after imposing a 10-percent levy on almost all trading partners in April -- with excluded products targeted by sector. While Swiss leaders are seeking to stave off a US tariff hike to 39 percent come Thursday -- which excludes sectors like pharma -- Trump's plans for a steep pharma levy will likely be a point of contention in any talks. Pharmaceuticals represented 60 percent of Swiss goods exports to the United States last year. Besides probing pharmaceuticals and chips imports, Trump has already imposed steep duties of 50 percent on imports of steel and aluminum, alongside lower levels on autos and parts. In the same CNBC interview, Trump said he expects to raise the US tariff on Indian imports "very substantially over the next 24 hours" due to the country's purchases of Russian oil. This is a key revenue source for Moscow's military offensive on Ukraine. His pressure on India comes after signaling fresh sanctions on Moscow if it did not make progress by Friday towards a peace deal with Kyiv, more than three years since Russia's invasion. Moscow is anticipating talks this week with the US leader's special envoy Steve Witkoff, and the Kremlin has criticised Trump's threat of raising tariffs on Indian goods. Weak employment data last week pointed to challenges for the US economy as companies take a cautious approach in hiring and investment while grappling with Trump's radical -- and rapidly changing -- tariffs policy. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees as putting US exporters in a stronger position while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy.
