Encrypted message advicing 'lay low': How Pakistani Muhammad Shahzeb Khan was hiding in Canada
Pakistani national Muhammad Shahzeb Khan was extradited to the US for planning a mass shooting of Jews on the first anniversary of the October 7 Hamas attack in New York City. Khan was hiding in Canada and claimed that if his plan succeeded, it would have been the "largest attack on US soil since 9/11".
Canadian media reported that Khan was traced through an encrypted message that he sent someone who thought an ally but was an undercover American agent.
The arrest of a father and son over an alleged terrorist plot in Ontario spooked Khan and he sent a message that there was a need to "lay low" on his plans of killing "as many Jewish people as possible in New York",
Khan was arrested on his way from Canada to New York to carry out his plans and has now been extradited to the US.
The RCMP said it conducted an investigation into Khan in partnership with the FBI and 'as his actions escalated, at no point in time was Khan an immediate threat prior to his arrest.'
FBI special agent Khajae Hester said Khan used encrypted messaging apps to communicate with undercover agents posing as willing participants in the plot, asking them to buy 'automatic and semi-automatic weapons.'
Here's what Khan planned sitting in Canada
United States Attorney General Merrick Garland said Khan was alleged to have had the goal of 'slaughtering, in the name of ISIS, as many Jewish people as possible.'
The complaint filed when Khan was arrested said that since last November, Khan 'repeatedly and explicitly expressed his support for ISIS and his desire to carry out terrorist attacks in support of ISIS.' The complaint said Khan boasted the mass shooting would be 'the largest attack on US soil since 9/11.
'
According to the complaint filed in Canada, Khan faced three charges in Canada: attempting to leave Canada to commit an offence for a terrorist group, participating in activities of a terrorist group and conspiracy to commit an offence by violating US immigration law or attempting to enter the US unlawfully.
How Khan was arrested
On July 31, 2024, the RCMP arrested two terrorists -- father and son Ahmed Eldidi and Mostafa Eldidi. Khan got alerted and warned his associates to stay off social media. But the associates, who were undercover agents, told Khan that they had the weapons ready and he should go ahead with the plan. On September 4, 2024, Khan got in a vehicle in Toronto and set off for Napanee to pick up others who were supposed to accompany him on the mission.
In Nepanee, they switched to a second car and drove to Montreal where Khan and an 'unidentified female' changed vehicles again, with another person at the wheel
When they were about 19 kilometers from the US border, the vehicle was stopped and Khan was arrested.
Khan entered Canada in 2023
Khan arrived in Toronto on June 24, 2023 on a student visa. It was not known which university he was enrolled to.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
35 minutes ago
- News18
Who Is Vaibhav Taneja, Indian-Origin Tesla CFO Handling Finances For Musk's America Party?
Last Updated: Taneja's official role in Musk's political outfit was confirmed through paperwork submitted to the US Federal Election Commission Indian-American Vaibhav Taneja, currently the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) at Tesla, has been named as the Treasurer and Custodian of Records for Elon Musk's newly launched political venture, the America Party. On Saturday, Musk announced the formation of the America Party through a post on his social media platform, X, saying it aimed to 'give Americans their freedom back" and challenge what he called the country's 'one-party system". 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom," Musk wrote. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy," added the billionaire, who heads Tesla and SpaceX. Taneja's official role in Musk's political outfit was confirmed through paperwork submitted to the US Federal Election Commission (FEC), which lists him as both Treasurer and Custodian of Records of the party. 🚨 BREAKING: It's FEC filing under Elon Musk's name just confirmed the creation of a brand new political vehicle, the AMERICA PARTY. The paperwork lists Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja as both Treasurer and Custodian of Records. You don't file FEC paperwork unless you're… — Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) July 6, 2025 Who Is Vaibhav Taneja? Vaibhav Taneja is a seasoned financial executive and the current CFO at Tesla. He holds a commerce degree from Delhi University and is a qualified Chartered Accountant from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). He began his professional career at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) in India before moving to the United States in 1999. In March 2016, Taneja joined SolarCity Corporation, a solar energy company, as part of its finance and accounting team. Following Tesla's acquisition of SolarCity in the same year, he transitioned to Tesla in 2017 as Corporate Controller. Taneja rapidly moved up the ranks, becoming Tesla's Chief Accounting Officer in 2019 and eventually taking over as Chief Financial Officer in 2023. With over 17 years of experience across sectors such as technology, retail, and telecom, Taneja is well-versed in US GAAP, SEC filings, and financial audits. He has worked closely with senior executives and board members, helping companies streamline operations, ensure compliance, and reduce revenue leakage. First Published:
Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
Deal or No Deal: Trump's 2018 tariffs on Indian steel and aluminium set to stay
Next Story Dhirendra Kumar Focus has shifted to textiles and pharmaceuticals in negotiations, with contentious metal issues postponed. India and the US have been racing to close a deal before US president Donald Trump's 9 July deadline to offer lower tariffs on US goods ends. Gift this article New Delhi: The proposed India-US bilateral agreement (BTA) is not likely to resolve the fraught issue of American tariffs on Indian steel and aluminium, two people directly involved in the process said, with days to go before the deadline for the first phase of the deal. New Delhi: The proposed India-US bilateral agreement (BTA) is not likely to resolve the fraught issue of American tariffs on Indian steel and aluminium, two people directly involved in the process said, with days to go before the deadline for the first phase of the deal. The two sides have been racing against time to dust off the deal before president Donald Trump's 9-July deadline for countries to offer lower tariffs on US goods. 'As a formal political green signal is awaited from Donald Trump following the approval of the deal's terms by the US Trade Representative, the long-standing duties on Indian metal exports—50% on steel and 50% on aluminium—will not be rolled back in this round of negotiations," said the first person cited above. Focused on incremental progress The Indian negotiating team, led by commerce ministry secretary-designate Rajesh Agrawal, returned to New Delhi on Friday after a series of intense discussions in Washington. The team focused on achieving incremental progress in priority areas such as market access for Indian textiles, pharmaceuticals and services, while setting aside contentious issues like metals and autos for future rounds. According to the second person, the tariffs are part of a broader global regime. 'Every country is facing similar duties that have been levied on steel and aluminium. India has also imposed safeguard duties. These issues were discussed, but there is no interim relief for India on this front," this person said. As per this person, both sides may revisit these tariffs in a future round of negotiations. Also read | Why India's No. 2 aluminium producer is unfazed by Trump's tariffs The Trump administration had originally imposed tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminium in 2018, citing national security concerns under Section 232 of US trade law. On 12 March 2025, Trump removed all country-specific exemptions and raised the aluminium tariff to 25%. Less than three months later, the US further doubled these tariffs to 50% for both metals, with the revised rates taking effect from 4 June. Mint reported on 3 June that India would seek the removal of US steel tariffs through trade talks rather than opting for immediate retaliation. It also reported on 5 July that the first tranche of the India-US BTA is now on Trump's desk for final approval, after being greenlit by US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Part of broader hike These measures are part of a broader reciprocal tariff hike by the US under Trump's second term, including a 25% tariff on imported automobiles that came into effect on 3 April. The White House order stated that the aim is to "more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminium in the US". Trade analysts point out that while India has a limited export exposure to the US in steel and aluminium compared to other sectors, the continuation of high duties reflects Washington's protectionist stance and leaves little room for near-term relief. 'This signals that the US is prioritizing domestic industrial revival and employment over trade concessions, especially in politically sensitive sectors like metals," said Abhash Kumar, a trade export and assistant professor of economics at Delhi University. Also read | US news: Trump to announce 25% steel and aluminium tariffs in trade escalation The no-change in tariffs on Indian metals stands in contrast to the deal the Trump administration has struck with the UK. Under their existing bilateral trade framework, metal imports from the UK continue to face a 25% tariff, while both sides work towards a resolution involving quotas and adjusted duties. Indian industry groups had been hoping that the BTA would offer at least partial relief on these duties, especially since high tariffs erode the price competitiveness of Indian exporters in the US market. 'While metals are not among India's top exports to the US, the principle of reciprocity and fair treatment matters. Our manufacturers are competing against suppliers from countries with more favourable terms," said Arun Kumar Garodia, former chairman of the Engineering Export Promotion Council (EEPC) and director of Corona Steel, manufacturers of light engineering goods and trading. Legitimacy challenged Meanwhile, India has challenged the legitimacy of these tariffs at the World Trade Organization (WTO), arguing that they constitute safeguard measures—temporary restrictions allowed under WTO rules to protect domestic industries from import surges. In a notification to the WTO in May, India conveyed its intention to suspend concessions under the Safeguards Agreement in response to the US action. However, Washington rejected India's position. In a communication circulated to WTO members on 23 May, Washington reiterated that the tariffs were imposed under Section 232 for national security reasons and not as safeguard measures under WTO provisions. Also read | These two metal stocks may withstand Donald Trump's steel, aluminium tariffs Experts believe that WTO proceedings may not yield quick results. 'India's legal pushback at the WTO is important to maintain multilateral discipline, but realistically, dispute resolution takes time and won't immediately help exporters," said Ajay Srivastava, a former Indian Trade Service official and co-founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI). Queries sent to the commerce ministry remained unanswered at press time. As per the GTRI report, in FY2025, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US. This included $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related articles. These products now face sharply higher tariffs, that could make it difficult for Indian exporters to remain competitive. Topics You May Be Interested In Stay updated with the latest Trending, India , World and United States news. Follow all the latest updates on Israel Iran Conflict here on Livemint.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Bilawal Bhutto says ready to extradite Hafiz Saeed to India, draws his son's ire
Former Pakistani Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has asserted that his country had no objection to extraditing terrorists like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar to India as a "confidence-building measure". However, Bilawal's remark did not go down well with Hafiz Saeed's son, Talha Saeed, who claimed that his comments brought disgrace to Pakistan an interview to Qatar-based Al Jazeera on Friday, Bilawal said Pakistan was ready to extradite "individuals of concern" to India provided New Delhi showed what he called "willingness" to cooperate in the process. He made the remarks while responding to a question about extraditing Hafiz Saeed, the chief of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) chief Masood Azhar as possible concessions and good-faith gestures to part of a comprehensive dialogue with Pakistan, where terrorism is one of the issues that we discuss, I am sure Pakistan would not be opposed to any of these things," Bilawal, the chairman of the Pakistan People's Party, said. Both LeT and JeM have been banned by Pakistan, according to the National Counter Terrorism Authority (Nacta). While Hafiz Saeed, the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack mastermind, is currently serving a 33-year sentence for terror financing, Masood Azhar, a UN-designated global terrorist, has been proscribed by Azhar, one of India's most-wanted terrorists, has been linked to several major attacks in India, including the 2001 Parliament attack, the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, the 2016 Pathankot airbase assault, and the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing. He was released from Indian custody in 1999 as part of the Indian Airlines Flight 814 Kandahar hijacking hostage despite Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar being proscribed, such terrorists continue to roam freely within Pakistan and operate their outfits with impunity, and with the backing of the Pakistani military that note, Bilawal said that the cases prosecuted against these "individuals" were those related to Pakistan, such as terrorist financing. He asserted that prosecuting Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar for cross-border terrorism was difficult due to what he claimed was "noncompliance" from India."India is refusing to comply with certain basic elements that require that conviction to take place. It's important to present evidence within these courts, for people to come over from India to testify, to put up with whatever the counter-accusations will be," he claimed."If India is willing to be cooperative in that process, I am sure there will be no hurdle in extraditing any individual of concern," he to whine about India, Bilawal said that New Delhi's vow to pursue terrorists was a "new abnormal". "This does not serve the interests of Pakistan and it does not serve the interests of India," he on the whereabouts of Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar, Bilawal stated that the LeT chief was incarcerated, while Islamabad believes the JeM chief is in is factually not correct that Hafiz Saeed is a free man. He is in the custody of the Pakistani state," he claimed, while adding that Pakistan had been unable to arrest Masood Azhar."It is our belief that he is in Afghanistan. If and when the Indian government shares information that he is on Pakistani soil, we will be more than happy to arrest him," Bilawal SAEED HITS BACKResponding angrily to Bilawal's remark, Talha Saeed, the son of Hafiz Saeed, said the PPP leader shouldn't have given such a statement. He claimed that his remarks on extraditing Hafiz Saeed to India brought disgrace to Pakistan in the Saeed, who is also a designated global terrorist, said his family and others had vehemently opposed extraditing Hafiz Saeed to India.- Ends(with inputs from PTI)
