Senate body reviews reforms to boost agricultural exports
The Senate Standing Committee on National Food Security and Research, led by Senator Syed Masroor Ahsan, visited the Department of Plant Protection (DPP) head office to review key interventions made for improving sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) compliance and curbing maximum residue limit (MRL) violations in agricultural exports, particularly rice.
The visit comes as recent reforms, spurred by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, have already led to a marked decline in export interceptions and noticeable improvements in compliance standards.
The committee was briefed in detail by senior DPP officials, including Tahir Abbas (Director General), Muhammad Ishfaque (Deputy Director Quarantine) and Muhammad Basit (Director Quarantine), on the measures taken to align Pakistan's export framework with international food safety and plant protection standards.
The committee noted the significant strides made in improving compliance, especially in light of the prime minister's directives issued in December 2024, which called for legal action against negligent officers and the immediate establishment of pesticide residue testing laboratories.
These directives have shown concrete results. In 2023, Pakistan faced 61 interceptions of rice consignments by the European Union due to higher MRL and aflatoxins. The number rose to 106 in 2024, with 73 linked directly to pesticide residues. However, following reforms, the year 2025 has seen a notable decline, with only 30 interceptions recorded so far – just 13 related to MRL and 15 to aflatoxins.
This decline is attributed to intensified monitoring, awareness campaigns for exporters and closer coordination between the DPP, provincial departments and industry stakeholders. Notably, pesticides such as Acetamiprid, Chlorpyrifos, Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam were identified as primary contributors to MRL breaches.
The committee also discussed progress in the maize sector. Maize is Pakistan's third major food grain, with annual production of 10.634 million tonnes over 1.72 million hectares. In 2023-24, exports peaked at 1.837 million tonnes but declined sharply in 2024-25 to just over 786,000 tonnes.
While high domestic prices contributed to this drop, phytosanitary interceptions by Vietnam due to Khapra Beetle infestation also played a role. Following Vietnam's third warning and 72 reported interceptions, the DPP imposed a temporary two-week export ban and suspended responsible fumigators.
Corrective actions such as the registration of 63 compliant storage godowns, traceability protocols and pest-specific fumigation SOPs were implemented. Additional efforts included stakeholder meetings, strict inspection regimes and firm control over the use of jute bags — a major source of infestation.
The committee turned its attention to mango exports, with special emphasis on high-end markets such as Japan, Korea and the US, which have strict protocols including hot water treatment (HWT) and vapour heat treatment, among others. While the DPP has developed SOPs and installed CCTV surveillance systems for monitoring HWT facilities, the chairman raised concerns over operational irregularities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
11 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PM Shehbaz lauds World Bank's support on Indus Waters Treaty dispute
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Thursday lauded the World Bank's principled support for Pakistan's stance on the Indus Waters Treaty, reiterating Islamabad's commitment to upholding international law and resolving regional issues through dialogue. PM Shehbaz remarks came during a meeting with Ousmane Dione, World Bank Regional Vice President for the Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (MENAAP), in Islamabad, where both sides discussed bilateral cooperation and reaffirmed their commitment to Pakistan's long-term development goals, read a statement released by the Prime Minister's Office (PMO). 'PM Shehbaz appreciated the World Bank's principled support for Pakistan's legitimate position in light of India's unilateral and illegal actions to undermine important international agreements like the Indus Waters Treaty,' read the statement. The prime minister expressed his sincere gratitude to the World Bank for its long-standing partnership with Pakistan. World Bank urges Pakistan to expedite $55mn power efficiency project 'He particularly thanked World Bank's President, Ajay Banga and former World Bank Country Director for Pakistan, Najy Benhassine, for their key role in advancing the new Country Partnership Framework (CPF) for Pakistan,' read the statement. The prime minister appreciated the strategic role of the CPF in Pakistan's development priorities, especially in the areas of energy, human resources, climate change and governance reforms. The Prime Minister thanked the World Bank for its assistance during the devastating floods of 2022, which helped Pakistan to launch immediate relief activities and initiate reconstruction and rehabilitation measures. Meanwhile, Ousmane Dione thanked PM Shehbaz Sharif for the warm hospitality extended to him during his visit to Pakistan. He reiterated the World Bank's commitment to further deepen and broaden Pakistan's long-standing partnership and cooperation in key sectors of the economy. As per the PMO's statement, Dion commended Pakistan's ongoing macroeconomic recovery and commended the government for leading the country towards fiscal stability and sustainable growth. The World Bank official particularly praised the reform agenda of the current administration, describing the strong leadership of PM Shehbaz as crucial in advancing institutional reforms, restoring investor confidence, and promoting inclusive economic growth.
Business Recorder
16 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Development 2.0: the case for PPPs in Pakistan
Over the past few years, policymakers and academics have shown renewed interest in Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) as a way of addressing fiscal limitations and speeding up infrastructure construction and the provision of increased yet sustainable public services. Similar to other developing nations, according to Dr Shamshad Akhtar, who was former finance minister of Pakistan, Pakistan will be facing an estimated USD 124 billion infrastructure financing gap by 2040, along with public debt nearing 66.3% of GDP and is projected to rise to 71.4 percent in FY2025, making traditional government-led-financed development increasingly unsustainable. These gaps have forced government to explore other forms of financing vehicles like PPPs to facilitate funding of desirable public infrastructure development using money raised from the private sector. However, PPPs have largely been promoted only as an alternative mode of financing whereas they might actually be an enabling tool to deliver greater efficiencies, innovation and value for money-normally referred in Pakistan as a game changer. The prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, has recognised the successful implementation of PSDP under the leadership and oversight of the federal minister for planning, development and special initiatives, Professor Ahsan Iqbal. He gave this credit due to the fact that PSDP is being strategically used for ensuring development of much-needed infrastructure but also serving to provide a clear vision of development priorities and growth path of the country. It is commendable, however this should be supplemented or complemented in the PSDP with addition of new models of financing for PPP that will extend the frontiers of fiscal efficiency even more, crowd in additional private funding and lead to institutional reform. A detailed report of 2023 published by the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), Reforming the Federal Public Sector Development Programme, presented a strong case of an urgent reform was established. The report promoted a portfolio cleaning strategy, which advised a reduction of the size of PSDP by 20 to 25 percent and the removal of almost half of all projects underway in this regard. The study indicated that many of such projects are either not backed by institutions or have become low-priority schemes that involve subjecting of the national funds on them without receiving a corresponding reward. PSDP resources are often spread thin over too many unviable projects, thus limiting impact and leading to cost and time overruns. Now this lack of efficiency has crippled the argument in favor of seeking alternative forms of developmental financing only. Beyond financing, frame-work has to be energized and implemented quickly. The greatest of them is the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model that provides a practical and performance-oriented system of project delivery. PPPs, by utilising the privately raised funds, technical excellence, and creativity can aid Pakistan to make important infrastructure, enhance social amenities, even bring in Foreign Direct Investment as a complement and decrease the pressure on the exchequer. The federal government, to its credit, has achieved certain success in institutionalizing the PPP model with the setting up of the Public-Private Partnership Authority (P3A) across provinces and federal government. Since its inception, P3A has developed a project pipeline of PKR 2.5 trillion. Its priorities however are limited to federal infrastructure projects such as roads, bridges and transportation corridors. To make PPPs a real pillar of the national development, the model has to develop both vertically and horizontally, expanding to provinces and sectors like education, health, and housing as well. Sindh's PPP-based Education Node where private firms operate public schools has shown success in underserved areas. The mixed model has produced the following positive results such as better administration, provision, and education achievement, especially in underdeveloped and remote regions. The Sindh experience shows that when well-designed PPPs are implemented with transparency and accountability they result in marked improvement in the quality of public service delivery. Similarly, even in Pakistan, thought leaders have been promoting a paradigm shift for public investment. One of the notable economists and Vice Chancellor of PIDE Dr Nadeem Javaid has stressed on how Pakistan should no longer focus at using public money as a crutch, but should instead reinvent PPPs as a means of managing risks, corporate efficiency, and innovation. He suggested radical reforms: such as the use of inflation-linked bonds, blended finance, and revenue-sharing arrangements so that PPPs could be scaled up and made more marketable. More importantly, he pointed out to the necessity of institutional reforms and better governance in order to have sustainable ecosystem of the collaboration of the private sector. This is what is also embedded in the URAAN Pakistan transformation plan. Around the world, countries like the UK, India, Brazil, and Chile have used PPPs to bridge public service gaps most effectively. The Private Finance Initiative in the UK has been quite revolutionary in the modernisation of hospitals and transport schemes, whereas in Chile there has been a larger access to clean water due to the water and sanitation PPPs. These success stories emphasize that PPPs are not mere financial tools, they are development tools that can transform service delivery and governance. In addition to infrastructure, the scope of PPPs to revolutionize service delivery in the sectors of human development is huge. As it has been reported in Housing Finance Pakistan Report, 2024, Pakistan requires developing 2 million housing units annually to accommodate its growth requirements, which is a situation that cannot be achieved without the involvement of the private sector. PPPs can also help expand healthcare access, digital platforms, and affordable housing. Whether these projects can succeed or not will however be based on the capacity of the government to design transparent contracts, establish accountability and earn the confidence of the people. It is also a change that needs the redefinition of the role of the state. The government should stop acting as the only financier and project implementer but an enabler-designing the rules, tracking the performance, and achieving the results. It has to develop the capacity of PPP design and management, simplify the procedures of procurement, and integrate transparency throughout the project cycle. Procurement procedures need to be sanitized and made corruption free. This matter is most important, particularly after Pakistan has been ranked 135th out of 180 countries by the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index One of the priorities, in this case, should be to decentralize the PPP system into the provinces and local governments. Local governments are in a position to determine contextual demands and have a project that deals with shortages of public services at the community level. The establishment of facilitating legal and regulatory framework of subnational PPPs, coupled with technical assistance and even financial de-risking, will do a lot to stimulating development at the grassroots. The government of Pakistan needs to wade through its development problems with insufficient resources and a huge scope of the problem. Although the PSDP is important, it cannot be used as the single point through which infrastructure and service delivery aspiration is realized in the country. A gap, where vision and performance split, can be narrowed with the help of Public-Private Partnerships provided that they were well thought of and clearly performed. The time to institutionalize PPPs is now — anything less risks repeating past inefficiencies. (Dr Ahmad Fraz is Assistant Professor and Dr Mahmood Khalid is Senior Research Economist at the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE)) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
17 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Dismantling DPP: a risky gamble with Pakistan's food security
The recent restructuring of Pakistan's agricultural regulatory framework under the National Agri-Trade and Food Safety Authority (NAFSA) Ordinance 2025 has created widespread confusion, institutional uncertainty, and serious operational disruptions. Intended as a reform to modernize and streamline food safety and agri-trade functions, the implementation of this ordinance — particularly the dissolution of core functions of the Department of Plant Protection (DPP) — has proven technically inconsistent and strategically misaligned. For decades, the DPP functioned as Pakistan's National Plant Protection Organisation (NPPO) under the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) and FAO. It was not merely a plant quarantine body — it managed pesticide regulation, led the country's desert locust control program, conducted aerial pest control operations, and maintained critical international partnerships with bodies like the FAO and regional surveillance networks, including neighbor countries. However, the new NAFSA framework has thrown the future of these vital functions into uncertainty. The situation worsened on July 3, 2025, when the Federal Secretary of the Ministry of National Food Security and Research (MNFS&R) approved the transfer of 282 - technical and supporting regular staff members (BPS 01 to 19)—key to desert locust operations—to the federal government's Establishment Division's surplus pool. This move effectively dismantles nearly half of DPP's core team and put the last nail in its coffin. Alarmingly, there's no clarity on whether more staff will be added to this list in subsequent phases or not. Adding to the contradiction, the same ministry/department has reportedly hired 50–100 contract entomologists under the guise of a desert locust project—only to reassign them to plant quarantine functions. These bureaucratic inconsistencies raise serious concerns about decision-making within the ministry. Such actions appear to prioritize administrative face-saving over food security, ignoring the looming threat of desert locust infestations, which could lead to devastating consequences for crops and national food supplies. In response to the earlier article, the Federal Secretary for MNFS&R, Waseem Ajmal Chaudhry, clarified that the DPP would retain its desert locust control mandate. He said, 'The new authority will not do the locust control function. That is why it is not part of the new law… DPP is not being completely disbanded. In fact, it would be a dedicated organization for locust control at the federal level.' While this statement provided partial relief, it also exposed the structural disorder at play. If DPP will continue to function for locust control, then what happens to its other mandates and no official notification has addressed these core responsibilities. Contradictions continue to emerge. In a recent meeting with the Russian Ambassador, Federal Minister Rana Tanveer Hussain acknowledged DPP's ongoing role in fruit fly surveillance to support export standards. Meanwhile, industry bodies like the Pakistan Crop Protection Association (PCPA) continue to engage with DPP on matters like pesticide registration — indicating that DPP's functions remain active despite the formal creation of NAFSA. This hybrid status—where DPP is simultaneously being phased out and still actively functioning — raises major compliance concerns under international agreements like the IPPC. According to IPPC standards, an NPPO must be a recognised government body, not a semi-autonomous or undefined entity. Countries like India, Kenya, and Australia retain their NPPOs directly under agricultural ministries to ensure policy alignment and international credibility. Pakistan's ambiguous model threatens its compliance status and could undermine agricultural exports. The core issue stems from how the restructuring was executed: with minimal input from domain experts and heavy reliance on bureaucratic decisions. This exclusion of technical professionals has led to flawed policies, unclear jurisdictional boundaries, and a total lack of transition planning—leaving exporters, provincial departments, and global partners unsure of whom to approach for certifications, risk assessments, and phytosanitary assurances. A more effective approach would have been a phased transition plan, involving stakeholders and domain professionals from the outset. Instead, what exists now is a disjointed system marked by overlapping mandates, legal ambiguity, and operational paralysis. Despite reassurances from officials like Mr. Chaudhry, key questions remain unanswered: Who will now serve as Pakistan's legally designated NPPO under the IPPC and desert locust coordination and control organisation? Will NAFSA be recognized in that role internationally—and under what legal framework? How will essential services like pesticide registration, pest surveillance including cross boundary insects, and export certifications continue without disruption? Until these questions are resolved through formal legal instruments, transparent policy declarations, and the appointment of competent technical professionals, the restructuring cannot be considered complete or credible. As Pakistan moves through the critical kharif season, these unresolved issues carry significant economic and diplomatic risks. Immediate action is needed to restore institutional continuity, define clear mandates, and ensure that experienced professionals are empowered to safeguard the country's agricultural and phytosanitary systems. The DPP has historically acted as Pakistan's first line of defence against invasive insect pests and crop diseases. It was structured like a paramilitary organisation, designed to address pest threats across three seasonal breeding zones: summer, winter, and spring. Its headquarters in Karachi — once a full-fledged base—along with regional hubs in all four provinces, included aerial control infrastructure, landing strips, operational vehicles, and field outposts in key locations like Mirpur Khas, Sukkur, Bhitshah and Qambar Bakrani in Sindh, while Quetta, Khuzdar, Uthal, Panjgur, Pasni, Chaman, Taftan, Turbatetc in Balochistan, similarly Rahimyar Khan, Bahawalpur, Lahore, Rawalpindi in Punjab and Peshawar and Mardanin KP with two hangars Karachi and Walton Lahore. Hence, it was once a huge organization with no comparison in the region. However, the head office's land is allocated and given to different 'orphan' departments like FSC&RD, PARC and Animal Quarantine. It also housed technical workshops, maintenance facilities, spare parts depots, and fleets of pest control vehicles. The department was capable of mounting rapid locust surveillance and aerial spray operations, backed by trained engineers and entomologists. Now, this robust infrastructure is being broken up — its land repurposed, its teams disbanded, and its mandate diluted. Without strategic foresight, Pakistan risks losing a vital institution that has protected its crops, supported its exports, and fulfilled international commitments for decades. The path forward must prioritize clarity, expertise, and legal coherence. Otherwise, this reform may ultimately prove to be a self-inflicted wound to Pakistan's agricultural/food security and global credibility. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
